Next Article in Journal
The Effect of the Preoperative Fasting Regimen on the Incidence of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux in 90 Dogs
Next Article in Special Issue
Biosecurity Levels and Farm Characteristics of African Swine Fever Outbreak and Unaffected Farms in Estonia—What Can Be Learned from Them?
Previous Article in Journal
Occurrence of Chicken Infectious Anemia Virus in Industrial and Backyard Tunisian Broilers: Preliminary Results
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Commentary

Biosecurity Concept: Origins, Evolution and Perspectives

by
Véronique Renault
1,
Marie-France Humblet
2 and
Claude Saegerman
1,*
1
Research Unit in Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULiege), Fundamental and Applied Research for Animal Health (FARAH) Centre, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium
2
Biosafety and Biosecurity Unit, Department of Occupational Safety and Health, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(1), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010063
Submission received: 10 December 2021 / Revised: 27 December 2021 / Accepted: 28 December 2021 / Published: 28 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Livestock Biosecurity in a One Health Perspective)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The term biosecurity first referred to biological weapons and bio-terrorism. It is now used in diverse sectors including biological laboratory risks and infectious disease prevention in both animal and public health. Therefore, several definitions and understandings of the term biosecurity co-exist. This commentary aims to describe the evolution of the biosecurity concept over the years and discuss its possible future.

Abstract

Originally used in reference to the management of biological weapons and bio-terrorism, the term biosecurity was first used in the agricultural sector in the 1980s as “the sum of risk management practices in the defence against biological threats”. This term was then taken up in different strategic documents of different organisations, so multiple definitions and understandings co-exist. This short communication reviews the origins and evolution of the biosecurity concept and discusses the future perspectives of biosecurity in regard to the One Health Approach and the changing environment.

1. Introduction

Over the years, infectious diseases have had a huge impact on both animal and public health. The 19th century saw the foundation of epidemiology as a scientific discipline with the studies of John Snow during the 1845 cholera outbreak in London [1]. Those studies identified contaminated water as the source of the disease, the main contamination pathways and deduced the hygienic measures to be taken in order to control it. The 19th century also witnessed the development of the first vaccines. The discovery of antibiotics in the 20th century was a major step towards the control and eradication of some major infectious diseases. Since then, the era of modern medicine has led to the development of major public health improvements and epidemiological knowledge. The incidence of infectious diseases was largely reduced and several diseases were regionally eradicated. In the 1960s, medical and public health professionals were convinced that infectious diseases “were gradually going to disappear under the combined influence of hygiene, antibiotics, and vaccines” [2]. Indeed, the development of the biomedical sciences in the 20th and 21st centuries led to major successes in disease control and prevention such as the eradication of small pox and rinderpest, as well as the regional eradication and control of other infectious diseases. Nevertheless, the last decades saw the (re) emergence of infectious diseases, 61% of which were zoonotic, and 75% of new human pathogens originating from animals [3,4]. The drivers of the(re)emergence and spread of infectious diseases include globalization and demographic changes, and new agricultural production and food processing technologies have increased international movements of goods, animals and persons.
Therefore, a shift from curative to preventive medicine has been observed over the years. If the first practitioners in both medical and animal health were mainly asked to treat diseases, the necessity and benefit of preventing them would not be a modern concept [5,6]. Preventive medicine implies a proper knowledge of the aetiology and epidemiology of infectious diseases. Nevertheless, several examples of preventive measures have been found that date to 2000 bc [5], long before microorganisms such as moulds and bacteria were discovered in 1676 [7]. Over time, different protective measures against infectious diseases were identified and proven effective based on observation and trial and error. We could mention, as key examples, the measures developed in the 14th century in Italy and southern France against the plague (e.g., sanitary cordon, observation and isolation facilities, and disinfection procedures) [6], and the smallpox variolation practice that was reported as early as 1670 [8]. Due to the progress in sciences and epidemiology, many measures to prevent and control these diseases were identified and promoted; the biosecurity concept emerging as preventive medicine became a key element of both public and animal health.

2. Biosecurity: The Initial Concept and Existing Definitions

Originally, “biosecurity” was mainly used in defence regarding the control of biological weapons. This first definition of biosecurity still appears on some official documents and websites. As an example, the Belgian biosafety server defines biosecurity as “the prevention of misuse through loss, theft, diversion or intentional release of pathogens, toxins and any other biological materials” (https://www.biosafety.be/content/biosecurity, accessed on 15 December 2021). Nevertheless, in the 1980s ‘’biosecurity” started to be used regarding animal health and production systems; it was defined by the U.S. Association of State Departments of Agriculture as “the vital work of strategy, efforts and planning to protect human, animal and environmental health against biological threats”. The first citation of “biosecurity” in PubMed was recorded in 1987. Its general uptake increased slowly with an average of five publications including the term “biosecurity” per year in the 1990s, 127 from 2000 to 2010 and 680 from 2011 to 2020 (Figure 1) [9].
The primary goal of biosecurity is to protect against risks posed by diseases and organisms. The primary tools of biosecurity are exclusion, eradication and control, supported by expert system management, practical protocols, and the rapid and efficient securing and sharing of vital information. Although frequently used in the scientific literature as being similar to biosafety [10], biosecurity is different. Biosafety is complementary to biosecurity and refers to “the implementation of laboratory practices and procedures, specific construction features of laboratory facilities, safety equipment, and appropriate occupational health programs when working with potentially infectious microorganisms and other biological hazards” [11]. For example, biosafety is defined in Belgium as “the safety for human health and the environment, including the protection of biodiversity, during the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or micro-organisms (GMMs), and during the contained use of pathogenic organisms for humans” (https://www.biosafety.be/content/belgian-regulatory-framework-biosafety, accessed on 15 December 2021).
Over the years, the concept of biosecurity has been largely adopted by a number of countries and incorporated in several strategic documents of different sectors. In the animal health and production sector, biosecurity is defined as “a set of management and physical measures designed to reduce the risk of introduction, establishment and spread of animal diseases, infections or infestations to, from and within an animal population” (https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahc/2018/en_glossaire.htm, accessed on 15 December 2021). This definition is referred to in the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) 2016/429). Different definitions of biosecurity, therefore, co-exist as attempts are made to propose a unified definition as “the strategies to assess and manage the risk of infectious diseases, quarantine pests, invasive alien species, living modified organisms, and biological weapons” [12].

3. The Current Understanding and Definition of Biosecurity

For the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO), “biosecurity is a strategic and integrated concept that encompasses the policy and regulatory frameworks (including instruments and activities) that analyse and manage risk in food safety, public health, animal life and health, and plant life and health, including associated environmental risk” [13]. Since 2007, biosecurity has been included as a key element in the European Union Animal Health Strategy [14] and in the country preparedness plan of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) [15]. Earlier, it was enclosed in the International Health Regulation adopted by the WHO in 2005 [16].
Biosecurity includes all measures to prevent the introduction of pathogens (bio-exclusion) and reduce the spread of pathogens (bio-containment) [17]. As part of the One Health concept, biosecurity is particularly important as it includes the prevention of the spread to humans, animals, plants and the environment. It is therefore a holistic and integrated approach, which considers the interactions among different stakeholders and sectors, as presented in Figure 2. A stringent biosecurity level, therefore, minimises the impact of infectious diseases on public, animal and plant health, as well as the economy, the environment and society in general. The FAO and WHO definition of biosecurity, which includes these aspects, is therefore appropriate and should be considered by the other actors as a reference to emphasise the importance of biosecurity, not only for animal health but also for public and environmental health.
The different kinds of hazards that biosecurity targets relate to different sectors (e.g., food safety and human, animal and plant health) with special attention paid to zoonoses, biological weapons and invasive alien species. Therefore, based on the sector, the risk-and-hazard definitions to be addressed are multiple (see examples in Table 1).

4. Perspectives and Conclusions

The OIE definition mentions the risk of “infections or infestations to, from and within an animal population”. This definition does not explicitly mention links with public and environmental health, which can then be forgotten or undermined. The FAO and WHO definition already clarifies these aspects, ensuring links with farm biosecurity and the proper consideration of public and environmental health. Due to the international context, the risks of infectious diseases to animals, humans, plants and the environment, as illustrated in Figure 3, are increasing. Therefore, the importance of biosecurity as a key element of the One Health concept will have to be developed further and addressed properly.
In the future, the importance of biosecurity in mitigating the risks for animal and public health and environmental contamination will have to be further developed and taken into account. The concept of “One biosecurity” was already introduced in a recent publication [19] as “a unified concept to integrate human, animal, plant, and environmental health”. The implementation of this broader concept of biosecurity will need a strengthened collaboration and interaction among the different sectors at all levels, which represents a major challenge. The success will greatly depend on the political, legislative and collaborative structures that will prevail and their capacity to integrate the necessary elements for an effective intersectoral collaboration In all official communications or programmes mentioning biosecurity, special attention is required to ensure that its definition is comprehensive and not limited to animal or public health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.R.; resources, V.R.; writing—original draft preparation, V.R.; writing—review and editing, M.-F.H. and C.S.; visualization, V.R.; supervision, M.-F.H. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable as the study did not involve humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analysed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tulchinsky, T.H. John Snow, Cholera, the Broad Street Pump; Chapter 5, In: Waterborne Diseases Then and Now. Case Stud. Public Health 2018, 77–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Echaubard, P.; Rudge, J.W.; Lefevre, T. Evolutionary perspectives on human infectious diseases: Challenges, advances, and promises. Evol. Appl. 2018, 11, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Saegerman, C.; Dal Pozzo, F.; Humblet, M.F. Reducing hazards for humans from animals: Emerging and re-emerging zoonoses. Ital. J. Public Health 2012, 9, 13–24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Birhan, G.; Alebie, A.; Admassu, B.; Shite, A.; Mohamed, S.; Dagnaw, B. A Review on Emerging and re Emerging Viral Zoonotic Diseases. Int. J. Basic Appl. Virol. 2015, 4, 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker, D.M. History of Preventive Medicine. In Prevention in Clinical Practice; Becker, D.M., Gardner, L.B., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1988; Chapter 2; pp. 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rosen, G. Historical evolution of primary prevention. Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 1975, 51, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Porter, J.R. Antony van Leeuwenhoekl: Tercentenary of His Discovery of Bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 1976, 40, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Riedel, S. Edward Jenner and the History of Smallpox and Vaccination. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. Proc. 2005, 18, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pubmed. (n.d.). Timeline of the Term Biosecurity. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=biosecurity&timeline=expanded (accessed on 17 March 2021).
  10. Peng, H.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Improved biosafety and biosecurity measures and/or strategies to tackle laboratory-acquired infections and related risks. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Bakanidze, L.; Imnadze, P.; Perkins, D. Biosafety and biosecurity as essential pillars of international health security and cross-cutting elements of biological nonproliferation. BMC Public Health 2010, 10 (Suppl. 1), S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Meyerson, L.A.; Reaser, J.K. A Unified Definition of Biosecurity. Science 2002, 295, 44a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. FAO. Biosecurity Principles and Components. Part. 1. In FAO Biosecurity Toolkit; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2007; pp. 1–20. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/a1140e/a1140e.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  14. European Commission. A New Animal Health Strategy for the European Union (2007–2013) Where “Prevention Is Better than Cure”; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, 2007; p. 26. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2016-10/ah_policy_strategy_2007-13_en.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  15. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; Tsolova, S. ECDC Country Preparedness Activities: 2013–2017, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2018. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2900/115381 (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  16. WHO. International Health Regulations, 2nd ed. 2005. Available online: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241580410_eng.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  17. OIE-FAO Guide to Good Farming Practices for Animal Production Food Safety; FAO-OIE: Rome, Italy, 2009; Available online: https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Food_Safety/docs/pdf/GGFP.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  18. FAO. FAO Biosecurity Toolkit. 2007. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1140e/a1140e00.htm (accessed on 15 December 2021).
  19. Hulme, P.E. One Biosecurity: A unified concept to integrate human, animal, plant, and environmental health. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 2020, 4, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Number of occurrences of “biosecurity” in PubMed.gov.
Figure 1. Number of occurrences of “biosecurity” in PubMed.gov.
Animals 12 00063 g001
Figure 2. Sector interests that are important to a holistic approach of biosecurity (Adapted from the FAO, 2007 [18]).
Figure 2. Sector interests that are important to a holistic approach of biosecurity (Adapted from the FAO, 2007 [18]).
Animals 12 00063 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the links among human, animal, plant, and environmental health (adapted from Hulme, 2020 [19]).
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the links among human, animal, plant, and environmental health (adapted from Hulme, 2020 [19]).
Animals 12 00063 g003
Table 1. Examples of different types of hazards applicable to different biosecurity sectors (Adapted from FAO, 2007 [18]).
Table 1. Examples of different types of hazards applicable to different biosecurity sectors (Adapted from FAO, 2007 [18]).
Biosecurity SectorHazard Definition
Food safetyA biological, chemical or physical agent in, or condition of, food with the potential to cause an adverse health effect
ZoonosesA biological agent that can be transmitted naturally between wild or domestic animals and humans
Animal healthAny pathogenic agent that could produce adverse consequences on animal health
Plant health
(or pest)
Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products
“Biosafety” in
relation to plants
and animals
A living modified organism (LMO) that possesses a novel combination of genetic material obtained through the use of modern biotechnology that is likely to have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health (Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety).
“Biosafety” in
relation to food
A recombinant DNA organism directly affecting or remaining in a food that could have an adverse effect on human health
Invasive alien
species
An invasive alien species outside its natural past or present distribution whose introduction and/or spread threatens biodiversity
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Renault, V.; Humblet, M.-F.; Saegerman, C. Biosecurity Concept: Origins, Evolution and Perspectives. Animals 2022, 12, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010063

AMA Style

Renault V, Humblet M-F, Saegerman C. Biosecurity Concept: Origins, Evolution and Perspectives. Animals. 2022; 12(1):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Renault, Véronique, Marie-France Humblet, and Claude Saegerman. 2022. "Biosecurity Concept: Origins, Evolution and Perspectives" Animals 12, no. 1: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop