You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
by
  • Muhammad Wasim Iqbal*,
  • Ina Draganova and
  • Patrick C. H. Morel
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

You included the reviewers' suggestions in your manuscript. Nice, I have no further comments. 

Kind regards

Author Response

  1. You included the reviewers' suggestions in your manuscript. Nice, I have no further comments.
    RE: No changes made

Thank you very much for taking the time to review this article and for the kind suggestions to improve it.

Regards

Reviewer 2 Report

The text needs improvement. Sentences should be clear in their messages. Some notes are on the manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for taking your time to review this article and for the kind suggestions to improve it. The comments have been addressed below. 

Regards

  1. The text needs improvement. Sentences should be clear in their messages. Some notes are on the manuscript.
    RE: Introduction was improved, and new references were added, see lines 59-60, 62. Overall text was also improved see lines 66, 71, 90, 119-122, 129-130. Changes were also made to clarify the sentences, see the lines 154, 172-174, 137, 193-195, 198-199, 220-228, 230-232, 241-244, 304-306, 361-365, 371-75, 382-384, Conclusion was revised, see lines 458-474.
  2. Line 68: add various at the start of the sentence
    RE: Added as suggested, see line 78
  3. Line 76: add “respective algorithms exist”
    RE: added as suggested, see lines 88
  4. Line 76: Add “them into”
    RE: Added as suggested, see line 88
  5. Line 77: Use record instead of measure
    RE: Revised as suggested, see line 90
  6. Line 91: Use the instead of therefore
    RE: revised as suggested, see line 106
  7. Lin 93: use but instead of therefore
    RE: revised as suggested, see line 109
  8. Line 115: is this the daily yield ? is this the milking period average ?
    RE: This is mil, revised as suggested, see line 137
  9. Line 124: use had instead of provided with
    RE: revised as suggested see line 146
  10. Line 164: use fitted with instead of wearing
    RE: revised as suggested see line 133
  11. Line 194: Add “suggested by Laurance and Kei”
    RE: revised as suggested, see lines 244-245
  12. Line 216: add that
    RE: added, see line 267
  13. Line 267: add earlier
    RE: revised as suggested see line 338
  14. Line 270: remove grazing
    RE: removed as suggested, see line 342
  15. Line 276: use between
    RE: revised as suggested see line 351.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf