Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Risk Assessment for the Introduction of Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cattle Using a Cattle Movement Network Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Diagnosis, Prevalence and Importance of Zoonotic Vector-Borne Pathogens in Cuban Shelter Dogs—A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Characterization of G Protein α Subunits in Aspergillus fumigatus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Heterotrimeric G-Protein Signalers and RGSs in Aspergillus fumigatus

1
School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
2
Department of Integrative Biology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
3
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
4
Department of Systems Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
5
Department of Microbiology, Graduate School, Daejeon University, Daejeon 34520, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(11), 902; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110902
Submission received: 25 September 2020 / Revised: 27 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 28 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Signal Transduction in Pathogenic Fungi)

Abstract

:
The heterotrimeric G-protein (G-protein) signaling pathway is one of the most important signaling pathways that transmit external signals into the inside of the cell, triggering appropriate biological responses. The external signals are sensed by various G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and transmitted into G-proteins consisting of the α, β, and γ subunits. Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGSs) are the key controllers of G-protein signaling pathways. GPCRs, G-proteins, and RGSs are the primary upstream components of the G-protein signaling pathway, and they are highly conserved in most filamentous fungi, playing diverse roles in biological processes. Recent studies characterized the G-protein signaling components in the opportunistic pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. In this review, we have summarized the characteristics and functions of GPCRs, G-proteins, and RGSs, and their regulatory roles in governing fungal growth, asexual development, germination, stress tolerance, and virulence in A. fumigatus.

1. Introduction

Aspergillus fumigatus, a saprophytic fungus, is found in various ecological niches [1,2,3]. This fungus is also a key opportunistic human pathogenic fungus that causes invasive aspergillosis primarily in immunocompromised patients and other human diseases, including allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, fungal asthma, and chronic pulmonary disease [4,5,6,7]. Recently, there have been reports of increased risks and mortality due to the coinfection of COVID-19 and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, which is also called COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis [8,9]. To survive in the host system or harsh environmental conditions, this fungus senses different signals and transmits them into the cell [10,11]. For this, various signal transduction pathways are involved in appropriate biological processes [10]. In addition, the signal transduction pathways regulate the production of virulence factors, including gliotoxin and melanin, thereby affecting the pathogenesis of A. fumigatus [4,12]. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the signal transduction pathways in A. fumigatus.
The heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein) signaling pathway is an important signal transduction pathway that has multiple functions in most eukaryotic systems [13,14]. G-proteins are composed of three subunits, α (Gα), β (Gβ), and γ (Gγ), which are activated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and transmit signals into the cell for an appropriate biological response [15,16]. In the presence of a ligand, GPCRs can function as guanine nucleotide exchange factors, accelerating the exchange from Gα-guanosine diphosphate (GDP) to Gα-Guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and the dissociation of the Gα subunit from the heterotrimeric G-protein Gαβγ complex [17,18]. Gα-GTP and Gβγ heterocomplexes can transmit signals leading to downstream effectors. The activated G-protein signaling is turned off when Gα-GTP is hydrolyzed to Gα-GDP by GTPase-accelerating proteins (GAPs) [19]. Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are one of the GAPs that induce the intrinsic GTPase activity of Gα-GTP, thereby attenuating G-protein signaling [20,21].
GPCRs, heterotrimeric G-proteins, and RGS proteins are the key components of G-protein signaling and highly conserved in most filamentous fungi [22,23]. In particular, these G-protein signaling components have multiple functions in fungal growth, asexual development, secondary metabolism, and stress responses in filamentous fungi [22]. In the opportunistic fungal pathogen A. fumigatus, 15 classical GPCRs, 3 Gα subunits, 1 Gβ subunit, 1 Gγ subunit, and 6 RGS proteins have been identified [23,24,25]. For decades, researchers have studied the functions of G-protein signaling components and revealed that the G-protein signaling pathway has diverse roles in the growth, development, stress response, and virulence in A. fumigatus. This review provides knowledge about the functions of G-protein subunits and RGS proteins in A. fumigatus.

2. GPCRs

GPCRs sense various environmental signals and transmit them for appropriate biological responses via the heterotrimeric G-protein complex [26]. In the A. fumigatus genome, 15 genes encode putative classical GPCRs [23]. Among them, only five GPCRs have been characterized. GprC and GprD are similar to Gpr1, the carbon-sensing receptor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that activates the cyclic AMP (cAMP)–protein kinase A (PKA) pathway [27,28]. Gehrke et al. characterized the roles of GprC and GprD and demonstrated that GprC and GprD are required for hyphal growth, germination, and stress response against thermal stress and reactive oxygen species [29]. The ΔgprC or ΔgprD mutant strains are attenuated for virulence in the murine low-dose model for invasive aspergillosis. Transcriptomic analyses found that GprC and GprD are involved in the mRNA expression of genes associated with primary and secondary metabolism. GprK contains seven transmembrane domains with an RGS domain [30]. The detailed functions of GprK are described below. Recently, two GPCRs, GprM and GprJ, have been characterized. GprM and GprJ are essential for normal melanin production, cell wall integrity, and virulence. RNA-sequencing and mass spectrometry analyses demonstrated that the two GPCRs regulate the mRNA expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters, thereby affecting the production of various secondary metabolites [31]. The functions of the five GPCRs have been studied, but further studies on the other GPCRs are still needed.

3. Heterotrimeric G-Protein Complex

The heterotrimeric G-protein complex consists of three subunits, Gα, Gβ, and Gγ [22]. In A. fumigatus, three Gα subunits, one Gβ subunit, and one Gγ subunit have been identified, which is similar to other filamentous fungi. Their functions have been characterized [32,33] (Figure 1).
GpaA is the A. nidulans FadA homolog. The absence of gpaA causes increased conidiation and reduced gliotoxin production [33]. The conidiation reduction in the ΔgpaA mutation is similar to the dominant-interfering (GpaAG203R) mutation, a G-protein signaling-blocking mutation, but it is the opposite of the dominant active mutation (GpaAQ204L), reducing the intrinsic GTPase activity of GpaA and resulting in uncontrolled GpaA activity [24,33]. In addition, the dominant-activating mutation of GpaA results in increased hyphal growth [24]. Genetic analysis demonstrates that the reduction of conidiation in the dominant-interfering GpaA mutation is suppressed by the loss-of-function flbA, suggesting that GpaA is the primary target of FlbA, which is an RGS protein (see below) [24]. These results indicate that GpaA-mediated signaling induces hyphal growth but inhibits conidiation in A. fumigatus.
GpaB belongs to Group II Gα proteins involved in different biological processes in fungi. Liebmann et al. found that the ΔgpaB mutant strain is attenuated or almost avirulent in the murine inhalation model [34]. In addition, the ΔgpaB strain produces fewer conidia, suggesting that GpaB is required for proper conidiation. A mechanistic study found that GpaB regulates growth and asexual development via the cAMP–PKA signal transduction pathway [34]. Further phenotypic analyses have found that gpaB deletion results in decreased gliotoxin production and conidial germination [33]. According to a recent study on the third Gα protein, GanA is involved in germination and gliotoxin production [33].
In the eukaryotic system, Gβ and Gγ subunits are highly conserved. They form the Gβγ heterodimeric complex, acting as one functional unit. SfaD and GpgA are the Gβ and Gγ subunits, respectively, in A. fumigatus. The phenotypes of the ΔsfaD and ΔgpgA strains are almost same, and these two mutations have more severe phenotypes than any Gα mutant strain [32]. Functional studies have found that the ΔsfaD and ΔgpgA strains exhibit delayed trehalose hydrolysis, conidial germination, hyphal growth, and gliotoxin biosynthesis but induce conidiophore formation and the expression of brlA, which is a key activator for conidiation in A. fumigatus [32]. Importantly, the functions of Gβγ subunits in germination and vegetative growth are highly conserved in other Aspergillus species.

4. RGS

RGS proteins are the key factors that interact with active Gα subunits to accelerate the rate of GTP hydrolysis [21]. In fungi, RGS proteins have multiple functions in different biological processes [35,36]. In the pathogenic fungus A. fumigatus, six proteins, including FlbA, RgsA, RgsB (Rax1), RgsC, RgsD, and GprK, contain RGS domains. Their functions have been identified (Figure 2). These six RGS proteins have diverse functions in fundamental biological processes (Table 1).

4.1. FlbA

FlbA was the first characterized RGS protein in the model fungus A. nidulans [44]. The flbA gene is one of the fluffy genes (fluG, flbA-E) that encode a protein containing two DEP (Dishevelled, Egl-10, and Pleckstrin) domains in the middle region and one RGS domain in the C-terminal region. The loss-of-function flbA mutants exhibited the fluffy phenotype with cotton-like colonies, which are characterized by undifferentiated masses of vegetative hyphae [45], and a reduction in the mRNA level of brlA, which is a key initiator for conidiation in A. nidulans [44]. In addition, flbA overexpression causes the induction of brlA expression and premature asexual development under normally repressive conditions, i.e., submerged culture [46]. Results of genetic analyses found that FadA (Gα) is a target Gα subunit for FlbA. FlbA controls vegetative growth, development, and secondary metabolism via the FadA-mediated signaling pathway in A. nidulans [35,44,46]. The function of FlbA and Gα-RGS signaling components is conserved in A. nidulans and A. fumigatus. Mah and Yu found that the ΔflbA mutants exhibit decreased conidiation in A. fumigatus [24]. In addition, decreased conidiation of the GpaA (homologue of A. nidulans FadA) dominant-interfering mutation is restored by loss-of-function flbA, suggesting that FlbA attenuates vegetative growth via the inactivation of GpaA in A. fumigatus. In addition to its function in vegetative growth, other functions of FlbA have been studied via comparative proteomic analyses. flbA deletion affects the secretion of GliT and intracellular superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, implying that FlbA is involved in the detoxification of exogenous gliotoxin and reactive oxygen species in A. fumigatus [37]. FlbA is also involved in detoxification by regulating catalase expression and activity [37]. Overall, FlbA has crucial functions in vegetative growth, asexual development, and detoxification in A. fumigatus.

4.2. RgsA

The rgsA gene encodes a protein that contains a typical RGS domain. RgsA has diverse roles in A. fumigatus [37]. First, rgsA deletion causes induced conidiophore production and increased mRNA levels of the asexual developmental regulatory genes brlA, abaA, and wetA, suggesting that RgsA attenuates asexual development. Second, ΔrgsA mutants exhibit increased germination rates and hyphal growth. Third, the absence of rgsA leads to increased tolerance against oxidative stress-inducing compounds and induced levels of genes related to stress response. These phenotypes of the ΔrgsA strain in A. fumigatus are quite similar to those of the ΔrgsA strain in A. nidulans [47], indicating that the function of RgsA can be conserved in Aspergillus species. The target Gα protein (GanB) of RgsA has been identified in A. nidulans. RgsA attenuates fungal growth, germination, conidiation, and oxidative stress response via the GanB-mediated signaling pathway. However, it has not been identified in A. fumigatus. One possible target Gα protein for RgsA might be GpaB, because of various phenotypes, including gliotoxin production, growth, and conidiation, of the ΔgpaB strain exhibit the opposite phenotypes of the ΔrgsA strain [33,39]. However, this should be verified through further experiments, such as protein–protein interaction or genetic analysis. The downstream pathway of RgsA-mediated regulation is not clear. However, it has been proposed that RgsA negatively regulates the PKA signaling pathway and oxidative stress response pathway, thereby regulating fungal growth, oxidative stress tolerance, and conidiation [39]. In addition, RgsA is required for gliotoxin production, virulence, and carbohydrate metabolism in A. fumigatus. The amount of gliotoxin and mRNA levels of genes in the gliotoxin gene cluster increases in the ΔrgsA strain. In the immunocompromised mouse model, rgsA deletion causes an increased mortality rate and pulmonary fungal burden. The transcriptomic analysis found that the absence of rgsA affects the mRNA expression of genes encoding carbohydrate metabolism-related proteins and cellulolytic enzymes, including cellobiohydrolase, endo-1,4-β-glucanase, and β-glucosidase. In addition, deletion of rgsA results in decreased intracellular and extracellular endoglucanase activities, suggesting that RgsA plays a crucial role in endoglucanase activity.

4.3. RgsB (Rax1)

RgsB (or Rax1) is an ortholog of S. cerevisiae Rax1, which is required for the bipolar budding pattern [48]. RgsB has multiple functions in growth, development, and conidial tolerance. rgsB deletion resulted in restricted radial growth and reduced conidial production, suggesting that RgsB is a positive regulator for vegetative growth and conidiation [40]. RgsB is also required for conidial tolerance against oxidative stress. ΔrgsB conidia have more trehalose contents than wild-type (WT) conidia. They contain a thicker electron-dense melanized layer compared to WT, which appear to have a vital role in conidial tolerance against H2O2 [40]. RgsB is also essential for endoplasmic reticulum stress and exogenous gliotoxin response. However, RgsB does not affect virulence in the murine model [41].

4.4. RgsC

RgsC is the longest protein among the RGS proteins and has PhoX-associated (PXA), RGS, PhoX homology (PX), and nexin domains. PX domain acts as a phosphoinositides-binding motif, and PXA, PX, and nexin domains are involved in protein sorting and membrane traffic in the endosomal system [49]. Transcriptomic and phenotypic analyses of the ΔrgsC mutant indicate that RgsC is associated with conidiation, germination, stress response, and toxin production [42]. rgsC deletion results in an accelerated conidial germination rate, decreased conidia production, and increased oxidative stress sensitivity. In the Galleria mellonella infection model, the ΔrgsC strain is attenuated for virulence. Gliotoxin production and the mRNA expression of genes in gliotoxin gene clusters are decreased in the ΔrgsC strain compared to WT. Collectively, these indicate that the RgsC-mediated signaling pathway regulates proper asexual development, gliotoxin biosynthesis, fungal virulence, and stress response in A. fumigatus.

4.5. RgsD

Similar to RgsA, RgsD contains one RGS domain in the N-terminal region. A protein interaction study using a yeast two-hybrid assay indicated that RgsD mainly interacted with GpaB, suggesting that RgsD might regulate the GpaB-mediated signaling pathway [43]. In the downstream signaling pathway, RgsD negatively regulates the cAMP-dependent PKA signaling pathway. Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses demonstrated that RgsD negatively regulates conidiation, stress response, melanin biosynthesis, and gliotoxin production. In the G. mellonella infection model, rgsD deletion results in enhanced virulence. These results may be due to the loss-of-function rgsD that causes the enhanced production of two virulence factors, such as melanin and gliotoxin. These results propose that RgsD attenuates the GpaB signaling pathway, which then affects cAMP–PKA signal transduction. RgsD modulates asexual development, melanin biosynthesis, stress response, and virulence in A. fumigatus.

4.6. GprK

GprK is a hybrid protein that contains both seven-transmembrane and regulator of RGS domains. GprK is a unique protein. GprK orthologs can be found in Ascomycetes but not in Basidiomycetes [22]. Functional study results for A. fumigatus demonstrated that GprK acts as a multifunctional regulator for development, oxidative stress response, gliotoxin production, and germination [30]. The absence of gprK results in impaired conidia production and reduced transcript expression of conidiation-related genes, such as brlA, abaA, and wetA. The ΔgprK strain is more sensitive to oxidative stress than WT. In addition, the mRNA expression of sakA and atfA and the activities of CatA, SOD1, and SOD2 are reduced in the ΔgprK strain, proposing that GprK governs the oxidative stress response through the AtfA-mediated signaling pathway [30].

5. Other Components

RicA is an ortholog of Ric-8 in animals or yeasts, which stimulates the dissociation of monomeric Gα-GDP but not the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of the Gα subunit [50,51]. The functions of RicA are conserved in Aspergillus species and crucial for growth and development in A. fumigatus [52]. The phenotypes of ΔricA exhibit delayed and/or reduced conidial germination, vegetative proliferation, conidiophore formation, and proper hyphal cell death in liquid submerged culture. The transcript expression of key asexual developmental regulators, such as brlA, abaA, and wetA, is decreased in A. fumigatus ΔricA mutants. These results suggest that RicA has a vital function in asexual development and growth. Although the mechanistic research was not conducted in A. fumigatus, the molecular mechanism of RicA was carried out in the model organism, A. nidulans. This study found that RicA can interact with GanB, which is a Gα subunit. The RicA-mediated signaling is primarily through the GanB–PkaA pathway in A. nidulans.
CpcB (cross-pathway control B) is a Gβ-like protein, which is the ortholog of Cryptococcus neoformans Gib2 and mammalian RACK1 ortholog. cpcB deletion affects hyphal growth, conidiophore morphology, and gliotoxin production in A. fumigatus [53,54]. In addition, the deletion of cpcB attenuates fungal virulence in an immunosuppressed mice model. The results of complementary experiments indicate that the function of CpcB is conserved in Aspergillus, but the function of CpcB is partially restored by the yeast CpcB ortholog [54]. Genetic analysis also indicates that CpcB has a distinct role compared to the subunits of the G-protein complex. Structurally, CpcB contains the seven WD-40 repeat motif required for the normal function of CpcB [55]. The phenotypes of several truncated cpcB mutant strains exhibit abnormal hyphal growth, conidiation, antifungal drug susceptibility, and virulence in A. fumigatus. Overall, these results support the idea that CpcB has a crucial function in the normal fungal growth, development, and pathogenesis in A. fumigatus.

6. Conclusions

In filamentous fungi, the G-protein signaling pathway is crucial for regulating different biological processes. The pathway senses external environmental signals and coordinates fungal metabolism, development, and stress responses. In addition, the components of the G-protein signaling pathway are involved in the pathogenesis or production of virulence factors, such as melanin and gliotoxin, suggesting that these components are targets for antifungal development. Although the function of each component was characterized, the detailed signaling cascades of the G-protein signaling still need further research. In addition, further research is also needed on the possibility of RGS as a target for antifungal agents. Therefore, future studies should provide insights into the detailed molecular mechanism underlying cell growth, morphogenesis, metabolism, and pathogenesis in human pathogenic fungi.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, H.-S.P., and M.-J.K.; writing—review and editing, J.-H.Y. and K.-S.S.; funding acquisition, H.-S.P. and K.-S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

H.-S.P. was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant NRF-2020R1C1C1004473 funded by the Korean Government. K.-S.S. was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the NRF grant NRF-2019S1A5C2A03082827. The work at UW was supported by Food Research Institute and the University of Wisconsin-Madison Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education (OVCRGE) with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation to J.-H.Y.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Latgé, J.P. Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 310–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Tekaia, F.; Latgé, J.-P. Aspergillus fumigatus: Saprophyte or pathogen? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005, 8, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Sugui, J.A. Aspergillus fumigatus—What makes the species a ubiquitous human fungal pathogen? PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dagenais, T.R.T.; Keller, N.P. Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus in invasive aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 447–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Chaudhary, N.; Marr, K.A. Impact of Aspergillus fumigatus in allergic airway diseases. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2011, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Latgé, J.P.; Chamilos, G. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis in 2019. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shah, A.; Panjabi, C. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: A perplexing clinical entity. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2016, 8, 282–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Koehler, P.; Cornely, O.A.; Böttiger, B.W.; Dusse, F.; Eichenauer, D.A.; Fuchs, F.; Hallek, M.; Jung, N.; Klein, F.; Persigehl, T.; et al. COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses 2020, 63, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van Arkel, A.L.E.; Rijpstra, T.A.; Belderbos, H.N.A.; Van Wijngaarden, P.; Verweij, P.E.; Bentvelsen, R.G. COVID-19–associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 202, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lengeler, K.B.; Davidson, R.C.; D’Souza, C.; Harashima, T.; Shen, W.C.; Wang, P.; Pan, X.; Waugh, M.; Heitman, J. Signal Transduction cascades regulating fungal development and virulence. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 746–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Grice, C.M.B.; Bertuzzi, M.P.; Bignell, E. Receptor-mediated signaling in Aspergillus fumigatus. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sugui, J.A.; Pardo, J.; Chang, Y.C.; Zarember, K.A.; Nardone, G.; Galvez, E.M.; Müllbacher, A.; Gallin, J.I.; Simon, M.M.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Gliotoxin is a virulence factor of Aspergillus fumigatus: GliP deletion attenuates virulence in mice immunosuppressed with hydrocortisone. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1562–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Neves, S.R.; Ram, P.T.; Iyengar, R. G Protein pathways. Science 2002, 296, 1636–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McCudden, C.R.; Hains, M.D.; Kimple, R.J.; Siderovski, D.P.; Willard, F.S. G-protein signaling: Back to the future. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 551–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Stewart, A.; Fisher, R.A. Introduction: G protein-coupled receptors and RGS proteins. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2015, 133, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Syrovatkina, V.; Alegre, K.O.; Dey, R.; Huang, X.Y. Regulation, signaling, and physiological functions of G-proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3850–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kobilka, B.K. G protein coupled receptor structure and activation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1768, 794–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rosenbaum, D.M.; Rasmussen, S.G.F.; Kobilka, B.K. The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 459, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Siderovski, D.P.; Willard, F.S. The GAPs, GEFs, and GDIs of heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunits. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2005, 1, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kimple, A.J.; Bosch, D.E.; Giguère, P.M.; Siderovski, D.P. Regulators of G-protein signaling and their Gα substrates: Promises and challenges in their use as drug discovery targets. Pharmacol. Rev. 2011, 63, 728–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Woodard, G.E.; Jardin, I.; Berna-Erro, A.; Salido, G.M.; Rosado, J.A. Regulators of G-protein-signaling proteins: Negative modulators of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015, 317, 97–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, L.; Wright, S.J.; Krystofova, S.; Park, G.; Borkovich, K.A. Heterotrimeric G protein signaling in filamentous fungi. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 61, 423–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lafon, A.; Han, K.H.; Seo, J.A.; Yu, J.H.; D’Enfert, C. G-protein and cAMP-mediated signaling in aspergilli: A genomic perspective. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2006, 43, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mah, J.H.; Yu, J.H. Upstream and downstream regulation of asexual development in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 1585–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. De Vries, R.P.; Riley, R.; Wiebenga, A.; Aguilar-Osorio, G.; Amillis, S.; Uchima, C.A.; Anderluh, G.; Asadollahi, M.; Askin, M.; Barry, K.; et al. Comparative genomics reveals high biological diversity and specific adaptations in the industrially and medically important fungal genus Aspergillus. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Brown, N.A.; Schrevens, S.; Van Dijck, P.; Goldman, M.H.S. Fungal G-protein-coupled receptors: Mediators of pathogenesis and targets for disease control. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kraakman, L.; Lemaire, K.; Ma, P.; Teunissen, A.W.; Donaton, M.C.; Van Dijck, P.; Winderickx, J.; De Winde, J.H.; Thevelein, J.M. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae G-protein coupled receptor, Gpr1, is specifically required for glucose activation of the cAMP pathway during the transition to growth on glucose. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 32, 1002–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pan, X.; Heitman, J. Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase regulates pseudohyphal differentiation in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 4874–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gehrke, A.; Eheinekamp, T.; Jacobsen, I.D.; Brakhage, A.A. Heptahelical receptors GprC and GprD of Aspergillus fumigatus are essential regulators of colony growth, hyphal morphogenesis, and virulence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3989–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Jung, M.G.; Kim, S.S.; Yu, J.-H.; Shin, K.S. Characterization of gprK encoding a putative hybrid G-protein-coupled receptor in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Filho, A.P.D.C.; Brancini, G.T.P.; De Castro, P.A.; Valero, C.; Filho, J.A.F.; Silva, L.P.; Rocha, M.C.; Malavazi, I.; Pontes, J.G.D.M.; Fill, T.; et al. Aspergillus fumigatus G-protein coupled receptors GprM and GprJ are important for the regulation of the cell wall integrity pathway, secondary metabolite production, and virulence. mBio 2020, 11, e02458-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shin, K.S.; Kwon, N.J.; Yu, J.H. Gβγ-mediated growth and developmental control in Aspergillus fumigatus. Curr. Genet. 2009, 55, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Choi, Y.H.; Lee, N.Y.; Kim, S.S.; Park, H.S.; Shin, K.S. Comparative characterization of G protein α subunits in Aspergillus fumigatus. Pathogens 2020, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Liebmann, B.; Müller, M.; Braun, A.; Brakhage, A.A. The Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase a network regulates development and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 5193–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yu, J.H. Heterotrimeric G protein signaling and RGSs in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 145–154. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, Y.; Geng, Z.; Jiang, D.; Long, F.; Zhao, Y.; Su, H.; Zhang, K.Q.; Yang, J. Characterizations and functions of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) in fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 7977–7987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shin, K.S.; Park, H.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Yu, J.H. Comparative proteomic analyses reveal that FlbA down-regulates gliT expression and SOD activity in Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Proteom. 2013, 87, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shin, K.S.; Yu, J.H. Expression and activity of catalases is differentially affected by GpaA (Ga) and FlbA (regulator of G protein signaling) in Aspergillus fumigatus. Mycobiology 2013, 41, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Lwin, H.P.; Choi, Y.H.; Lee, M.W.; Yu, J.H.; Shin, K.S. RgsA attenuates the PKA signaling, stress response, and virulence in the human opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Igbalajobi, O.A.; Yu, J.H.; Shin, K.S. Characterization of the rax1 gene encoding a putative regulator of G protein signaling in Aspergillus fumigatus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 487, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Choi, Y.H.; Lee, M.W.; Igbalajobi, O.A.; Yu, J.H.; Shin, K.S. Transcriptomic and functional studies of the RGS protein Rax1 in Aspergillus fumigatus. Pathogens 2019, 9, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Kim, Y.; Heo, I.B.; Yu, J.H.; Shin, K.S. Characteristics of a regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) rgsC in Aspergillus fumigatus. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kim, Y.; Lee, M.W.; Jun, S.C.; Choi, Y.H.; Yu, J.H.; Shin, K.S. RgsD negatively controls development, toxigenesis, stress response, and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yu, J.H.; Wieser, J.; Adams, T.H. The Aspergillus FlbA RGS domain protein antagonizes G protein signaling to block proliferation and allow development. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 5184–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tamame, M.; Antequera, F.; Villanueva, J.R.; Santos, T. High-frequency conversion to a "fluffy" developmental phenotype in Aspergillus spp. by 5-azacytidine treatment: Evidence for involvement of a single nuclear gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1983, 3, 2287–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Na Lee, B.; Adams, T.H. Overexpression of fIbA, an early regulator of Aspergillus asexual sporulation, leads to activation of brIA and premature initiation of development. Mol. Microbiol. 1994, 14, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Han, K.H.; Seo, J.A.; Yu, J.H. Regulators of G-protein signalling in Aspergillus nidulans: RgsA downregulates stress response and stimulates asexual sporulation through attenuation of GanB (Gα) signalling. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 53, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fujita, A.; Lord, M.; Hiroko, T.; Hiroko, F.; Chen, T.; Oka, C.; Misumi, Y.; Chant, J. Rax1, a protein required for the establishment of the bipolar budding pattern in yeast. Gene 2004, 327, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zheng, B.; Ma, Y.C.; Ostrom, R.S.; Lavoie, C.; Gill, G.N.; Insel, P.A.; Huang, X.Y.; Farquhar, M.G. RGS-PX1, a GAP for galpha s and sorting nexin in vesicular trafficking. Science 2001, 294, 1939–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hinrichs, M.; Torrejón, M.; Montecino, M.; Olate, J. Ric-8: Different cellular roles for a heterotrimeric G-protein GEF. J. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 113, 2797–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tall, G.G.; Krumins, A.M.; Gilman, A.G. Mammalian Ric-8A (Synembryn) is a heterotrimeric Gα protein guanine nucleotide exchange factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 8356–8362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Kwon, N.J.; Park, H.S.; Jung, S.; Kim, S.C.; Yu, J.H. The putative guanine nucleotide exchange factor RicA mediates upstream signaling for growth and development in aspergillus. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 1399–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kong, Q.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Kwon, N.J.; Kim, S.C.; Yu, J.H. Gβ-Like CpcB plays a crucial role for growth and development of aspergillus nidulans and Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Cai, Z.D.; Chai, Y.F.; Zhang, C.Y.; Qiao, W.-R.; Sang, H.; Lu, L. The Gβ-like protein CpcB is required for hyphal growth, conidiophore morphology and pathogenicity in Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 81, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cai, Z.; Chai, Y.; Zhang, C.; Feng, R.; Sang, H.; Lu, L. Molecular characterization of Gβ-like protein CpcB involved in antifungal drug susceptibility and virulence in A. fumigatus. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Functions of G-protein subunits in A. fumigatus. Gα; G alpha subunit, Gβ, G beta subunit, Gγ; G gamma subunit. GpaA, GpaB, and GanA are Gα subunits. SfaD is a Gβ subunit. GpgA is a Gγ subunit Upwards arrow(↑) indicates activation/induction. Downwards arrow(↑) indicates repression/inhibition.
Figure 1. Functions of G-protein subunits in A. fumigatus. Gα; G alpha subunit, Gβ, G beta subunit, Gγ; G gamma subunit. GpaA, GpaB, and GanA are Gα subunits. SfaD is a Gβ subunit. GpgA is a Gγ subunit Upwards arrow(↑) indicates activation/induction. Downwards arrow(↑) indicates repression/inhibition.
Pathogens 09 00902 g001
Figure 2. Domain architecture of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins in A. fumigatus. Abbreviations are regulators of G-protein signaling domain, RGS domain; Dishevelled, Egl-10, and Pleckstrin domain, DEP domain; PhoX domain, PX domain; transmembrane domain, TM domain; PhoX-associated superfamily, PXA superfamily.
Figure 2. Domain architecture of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins in A. fumigatus. Abbreviations are regulators of G-protein signaling domain, RGS domain; Dishevelled, Egl-10, and Pleckstrin domain, DEP domain; PhoX domain, PX domain; transmembrane domain, TM domain; PhoX-associated superfamily, PXA superfamily.
Pathogens 09 00902 g002
Table 1. Functions of RGS proteins in A. fumigatus.
Table 1. Functions of RGS proteins in A. fumigatus.
NamePotential Gα TargetPotential Downstream PathwayFunctionReferences
FlbAGpaAPKA-mediated pathwayHyphal growth, conidiation, detoxification[24,37,38]
RgsAPKA-mediated pathway
AtfA-mediated pathway
Hyphal growth, conidiation, conidial germination, oxidative stress response, gliotoxin production, virulence, carbohydrate metabolism[39]
RgsB aHyphal growth, conidiation, melanin production, stress response[40,41]
RgsCPKA-mediated pathwayConidiation, conidial germination, stress response, gliotoxin production[42]
RgsDGpaBPKA-mediated pathwayConidiation, stress response, melanin production, gliotoxin production, virulence[43]
GprKPKA-mediated pathway
AtfA-mediated pathway
Conidiation, oxidative stress response, gliotoxin production, conidial germination[30]
a RgsB is also called Rax1.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, H.-S.; Kim, M.-J.; Yu, J.-H.; Shin, K.-S. Heterotrimeric G-Protein Signalers and RGSs in Aspergillus fumigatus. Pathogens 2020, 9, 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110902

AMA Style

Park H-S, Kim M-J, Yu J-H, Shin K-S. Heterotrimeric G-Protein Signalers and RGSs in Aspergillus fumigatus. Pathogens. 2020; 9(11):902. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110902

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Hee-Soo, Min-Ju Kim, Jae-Hyuk Yu, and Kwang-Soo Shin. 2020. "Heterotrimeric G-Protein Signalers and RGSs in Aspergillus fumigatus" Pathogens 9, no. 11: 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110902

APA Style

Park, H. -S., Kim, M. -J., Yu, J. -H., & Shin, K. -S. (2020). Heterotrimeric G-Protein Signalers and RGSs in Aspergillus fumigatus. Pathogens, 9(11), 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110902

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop