Customizing Fair Use Transplants
School of Law and Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, Fort Worth, TX 76102, USA
Laws 2018, 7(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7010009
Received: 27 October 2017 / Revised: 11 February 2018 / Accepted: 13 February 2018 / Published: 26 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intellectual Property Law in the New Technological Age: Rising to the Challenge of Change?)
In the past decade, policymakers and commentators across the world have called for the introduction of copyright reform based on the fair use model in the United States. Thus far, Israel, Liberia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka and Taiwan have adopted the fair use regime or its close variants. Other jurisdictions such as Australia, Hong Kong and Ireland have also advanced proposals to facilitate such adoption. This article examines the increasing efforts to transplant fair use into the copyright system based on the U.S. model. It begins by briefly recapturing the strengths and weaknesses of legal transplants. The article then scrutinizes the ongoing effort to transplant fair use from the United States. Specifically, it identifies eight modalities of transplantation. This article concludes with five lessons that can be drawn from studying the ongoing transplant efforts. View Full-Text
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Yu, P.K. Customizing Fair Use Transplants. Laws 2018, 7, 9.
AMA StyleShow more citation formats Show less citations formats
Yu PK. Customizing Fair Use Transplants. Laws. 2018; 7(1):9.Chicago/Turabian Style
Yu, Peter K. 2018. "Customizing Fair Use Transplants." Laws 7, no. 1: 9.
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Article Access Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.