Next Article in Journal
The Microstructures of TiC–Ti5Si3-Reinforced Cu Matrix Composites Prepared by Ti–SiC Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of the Bridge’s Angle during Porthole Die Extrusion of Aluminum AA6082
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Effect of RE (La, Er, Y, Ce) and Al-5Ti-B on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 6111Aluminum Alloy

1
State Key Laboratory of Featured Metal Materials and Life-Cycle Safety for Composite Structures, School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
2
Key Laboratory of High-Performance Structural Materials and Thermo-Surface Processing, Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
4
Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2023, 13(3), 606; https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030606
Submission received: 30 December 2022 / Revised: 7 March 2023 / Accepted: 9 March 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Computation and Simulation on Metals)

Abstract

:
For aluminum alloys, grain refinement is one of the effective methods for improving both strength and ductility. However, the refining effect of Al-Ti-B master alloy refiners deteriorates due to the agglomeration and sinking of the second phase particles. In this paper, the effects of rare earth type, rare earth content, and holding time on the microstructure and properties of Al-5Ti-B + RE/6111 were investigated by orthogonal experiment. It was shown that the addition of rare earth promoted the transformation of the β-Al5FeSi phase to anα-Al15(Mn,Fe)3Si2 phase, while the segregation of rare earth made it difficult for TiB2 to aggregate and inhibited the growth of TiAl3, resulting in more particles becoming effective nucleation substrates. The Al-5Ti-B + Ce master alloy developed based on orthogonal experiment improved the refinement recession problem well and improved the comprehensive mechanical properties of 6111 aluminum alloy. It was found that the addition of Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce, which had an ultimate tensile strength of 240.4 ± 2.2 MPa, successfully reduced the grain size by 73.8% and improved elongation by 37.8% compared to the base alloy. There search is of great significance for the preparation and application of high-performance rare earth 6111 aluminum alloy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aluminum alloys are widely used in the transport industry, medical equipment, and construction materials due to their abundant resources, lightweight, good mechanical properties, good corrosion resistance, and good electrical conductivity [1]. With carbon neutrality becoming a global consensus, the light-weighting of machinery and equipment, especially automobiles, has become an important direction for future development [2]. Aluminum alloy, which is the main material for the light-weighting of cars, is prone to forming coarse grain, which is not conducive to its strength and plasticity, limiting its application in key components [3]. Over the past few decades, various techniques have been used to improve the strength and elasticity of aluminum alloys. Grain refinement is an effective method for simultaneously enhancing the strength and plasticity of aluminum alloys. The addition of master alloys containing refiners to control the nucleation and growth of α-Al grains during solidification has become a standard practice in the aluminum casting industry [4]. At the same time, the increase of grains not only reduces defects, such as segregation and porosity in castings, but it also eliminates columnar structure, thus improving the quality of wrought aluminum alloys by improving formability [5,6]. The most widely used master alloy refiner has been the Al-Ti-B grain refiner [7]. However, the Al-Ti-B master alloy refiner has easy recession [8], silicon poisoning [9], zirconium poisoning [10], and other problems, and has not been able to meet the needs of high-performance aluminum alloy production. Therefore, in recent years, many researchers have continued to explore its recession [11] and poisoning mechanism [12] and have tried to develop new anti-recession [8] anti-poisoning [13,14,15] master alloy refiners.
In the industrial production of aluminum alloys, if the melt is not cast directly but left to stand for a long time after the addition of master alloys, a coarse grain is obtained instead of fine equiaxed crystals, which is a phenomenon known as refinement “recession”. This is very common in the production of aluminum alloys, making the refinement effect of the master alloy significantly weaker and getting a columnar crystal or feather crystal, which is attributed to the aggregation, precipitation, or decomposition of particles in the master alloy [16] Research on the master alloy refiner of aluminum alloy started late in China and was initially to block Al-Ti-B into the aluminum melt, although it also played a role in the refining effect of aluminum alloy grain; however, this method of addition makes the second phase particle high density, and easy to gather precipitation when at rest, and thus, the phenomenon of refinement declined. Later, a technology developed in the USA was introduced to continuously add filamentary Al-Ti-B to the flow bath melt using automated equipment, which effectively alleviated the aggregation and precipitation of the second phase particles. But more was needed to fundamentally solve the problem of refinement recession. The recession of the aluminum melt after adding Al-Ti-B was mainly due to the aggregation of TiAl3 and TiB2 particles. Mohanty et al. [17] studied the aggregation of particles after standing using a metal purity analyzer. They added Al-5Ti-B to the aluminum melt, treated it for 5 min, and then stirred it uniformly. 0.063 wt.% Ti and 0.012 wt.% B were analyzed at the bottom, and 0.306% Ti and 0.114% B were analyzed at the bottom after one day of standing.
The grain size and morphology of TiAl3 and TiB2 phases have an important effect on the grain refining efficiency of Al-Ti-B master alloys [18]. Attempts have been made to grind grains by mechanical agitation, magnetohydrodynamic mixing, or ultrasonic grinding [19]. These methods have achieved some results, but they cannot completely replace Al-Ti-B. Al-Ti-B-RE is considered to be a very promising anti-recession refiner. The Beijing Institute of Technology [20], the Lanzhou University of Technology [21], and some other institution shave studied the refining properties of rare earth Al-Ti-B master alloys and found that rare earth Al-Ti-B master alloys have a good effect on the microstructure and properties of the base. Ma et al. [22] found that the decomposition of TiAlEr compounds, which released Er, refrained the growth of TiAl3 and made TiB2 difficult to aggregate or deposit; therefore, this resulted in more particles being efficient nucleation substrates. Chen et al. [23] found that rare earth can reduce the size and surface energy of the TiB2phase by adsorption onto the surface of TiB2phase, thus reducing the possibility of agglomeration. However, due to the varieties of rare earth and their very active nature, the related research was not systematic enough and the products were not mature and stable enough; specifically, the anti-recession mechanism of Al-Ti-B-RE master alloys and the interaction between rare earth and Al-Ti-B have not been studied systematically.
In this study, the effects of varieties of rare earth, the content of rare earth, and holding time on the grain size and the mechanical properties of Al-5Ti-B + RE/6111 were investigated using orthogonal experiment. The effects of rare earth on the Al-5Ti-B master alloy and the microstructure and properties of 6111 base were investigated thermodynamically and experimentally, and the mechanisms were analyzed. This study provides some implications for the development of high-performance 6111 aluminum alloys.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

In this paper, the refinement effects of Al-5Ti-B, Al-5Ti-B + La, Al-5Ti-B + Er, Al-5Ti-B + Y, and Al-5Ti-B + Ce master alloy refiners were investigated in a 6111 casting process. Table 1 shows the details of the orthogonal experiment; combining rare earth types, rare earth content, and holding time were listed as the three factors in the orthogonal experiment, with four levels of each factor. The base was named No. 1, and No. 2 was supplemented with 0.6% Al-5Ti-B. No.’s 3 to 6 were supplemented with Al-5Ti-B + La, No.’s 7 to 10 with Al-5Ti-B + Er, No.’s 11 to 14 with Al-5Ti-B + Y, and No.’s 15 to 18 withAl-5Ti-B + Ce.
Before each casting, 100 g of raw material was prepared, mechanically polished, and cleaned in an alcohol-filled ultrasonic shaking bath to remove surface impurities and oxides. After treating the surfaces, all samples and melting tools, such as graphite rods and molds, were preheated in an oven at 250 °C for 20 min to ensure the experiment’s safety and reduce the introduction of hydrogen into the melt. Firstly, 6111 was melted in a high-temperature melting furnace at 750 °C, stirred with 0.5% refining agent (NaCl:KCl = 1:1) and 0.3% degassing agent (C2Cl6), and held for 10 min before slagging. The melt was then cleaned and the corresponding master alloy was added according to the orthogonal experiment table and stirred and held for the corresponding time, as shown in Table 2. Finally, the No.1 sample was poured into the steel mold, and the other sample alloys were poured into the copper mold to cool and solidify. After casting into ingots, the specimens were cut into 15 mm × 15 mm × 5 mm metallographic samples and tensile samples with a maximum length of 82 mm. The experimental procedure is shown in Figure 1. The master alloys were prepared similarly. After Al-5Ti-B was refined and de-gassed, Al-10RE was added to obtain the corresponding Al-5Ti-B + RE master alloy.

2.2. Specimen Characterizations

The samples were examined for elemental content using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF-S8 TIGER from BRUKER, Karlsruhe, Germany), and the elemental content of base 6111 is listed in Table 3. The microstructure was observed using an optical microscope with polarization. The samples were first polished by grinding in water with coarse to fine sandpaper, then polished and ultrasonically cleaned in alcohol before the grain size was observed by anodic cladding. The anodic coating etchant was a 1.8% mass fraction fluoroboric acid solution at a controlled voltage of 20 V for 80 s. The grain size was measured by the transversal method (GB/T 6394-2017) in Image-Pro Plus 6.0 imaging software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). The samples of Al-5Ti-B and Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce master alloys (block of 15 mm × 15 mm × 5 mm) were polished with sandpaper, cleaned, and dried before being subjected to XRD (Rigaku D/MAX 2500V from Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The X-ray tube was a copper target with a scanning angle of 20–90°, a scanning speed of 5°/min, a tube voltage of 45 kV, and a tube current of 40 μA.
The samples were first polished by sanding in water with coarse to fine sandpaper, then polished, ultrasonically cleaned in alcohol, and etched with Keller’s reagent for 20 s. The tensile fracture specimens were ultrasonically cleaned and glued to the sample table with conductive adhesive. The specimens were ultrasonically cleaned and glued to the sample table with conductive adhesive. Three tensile samples were cut in the middle of each specimen and the results were averaged. According to GB/T228.1, the samples were processed into a national standard tensile sample, and the size of the tensile sample is shown in Figure 2. The specimens were subjected to the necessary tensile tests using a universal material testing machine (AGS-X 100KN) manufactured by Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan, with a tensile speed of 1 mm/min, to investigate the effect of different rare earth master alloy refiners on the mechanical properties of the base alloy and determine the microstructure influence on mechanical properties.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure of Al-5Ti-B-RE Refiner

It is generally accepted that stable α-Al crystals result from heterogeneous nuclei and their growth. The theory suggests that the transfer of atoms from the melt to the α-Al phase is facilitated by substrates with high potency [24,25]. As shown in Figure 3, in this model [26], the nucleus α forms on the type-wall plane W , and α is a sphere crowned by the W plane. If the change in surface energy of the system during nucleation is Δ G s , then:
Δ G s = A α L × σ α L + A α W × σ α W A α W × σ L W ,
where A α L and A α W are the interface areas between nucleus α and liquid phase L and type wall W , respectively; σ α L , σ α W , σ L W are the specific surface energy (expressed as surface tension) at the α - L , α - W , L - W interfaces, respectively. At the intersection of the three phases, the surface tension should reach equilibrium, and the collation can be obtained as follows:
Δ G s = ( A α L π r 2 sin 2 θ cos θ ) σ α L ,
The total free energy change of the system when the nucleus is nucleated:
Δ G = Δ G t + Δ G s = ( 4 3 π r 3 Δ G v + 4 π r 2 σ α L ) f ( θ ) ,
where Δ G t is the change in nucleation caused by volume:
f ( θ ) = ( 2 3 cos θ + cos 3 θ ) / 4 ,
Since θ is in the range of 0–180°, f ( θ ) must be less than 1. The work required for heterogeneous nucleation is less than that for uniform nucleation, so the subcooling is smaller and easier to nucleate. The nucleation rate increases as the work needed to form stable crystals decreases. Therefore, the more nucleation sites and the better the lattice match, the better the grain refinement [27].
Effective grain refinement by the Al-5Ti-1B grain refiner was directly attributed to the enhanced potency of TiB2 particles with the Al3Ti [28]. In Figure 4, the morphology and distribution of the nucleated phases of the master alloy can be clearly seen after corrosion with Keller’s reagent, and the Al-5Ti-B refiner showed obvious large particles and clusters. The addition of rare earth not only reduced the particle size, it also made the particles more dispersed. When combining the energy spectra in Figure 5 and the XRD patterns in Figure 6, it can be seen that the Al3Ti phase of Al-5Ti-B had long strips, and the long strips of Al3Ti and clusters limited its refinement effect. The Al3Ti phase of Al-5Ti-B was finer and more uniformly dispersed with the addition of rare earth, and the clustering phenomenon was improved.
Figure 6 shows the XRD results for the Al-5Ti-B and Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce refiners. The results showed that the α-Al, Al3Ti, and TiB2 phases were present in both refiners, while the Ti2Al20Ce phase was also present in the Al-5Ti-B-RE refiner. The corresponding rare earth phases were present in all four refiners with rare earth additions. So, more particles could become effective nucleation substrates.
The addition of rare earth Ce to the master alloy added a rare earth phase to the melt. The decomposition of the rare earth phase released Ce, which spontaneously deviated on the TiAl3 surface. On the one hand, it inhibited the growth of TiAl3, thus allowing more particles to become effective nucleation substrates. On the other hand, it reduced the surface energy of TiAl3 and promoted the nucleation of α-Al on the TiAl3 surface.

3.2. Evaluation of the Refinement Effect of Different Master Alloys on 6111 Aluminum Alloy

In order to better control the efficiency of grain refinement, Easton [29] and John [30] developed a new analytical model for grain refinement in which the grain size, d [31,32], can be expressed as:
d = 1 f ρ v 3 + D Δ T n v Q ,
where ρ v refers to the volume number density of nucleated particles; f refers to the fraction of activated particles; D is the diffusion coefficient; and v is the growth rate. Δ T n is the subcooling required for nucleation; Q is the growth limiting factor, Q = m k 1 C 0 , m is the slope of the liquid phase line, and k is the distribution system number, C 0 is the concentration of solute [33]. Equation (5) can be simplified to d = a + b Q where α is related to the number of activated nuclei. The potency of the nucleate particles is related to b and the solute segregation is related to Q [34].
The Al-Ti-B refiner has been used extensively since its introduction. It produces two important refining phases in the melt (Al3Ti, TiB2), which play a key role in refining the grain of aluminum alloys. The addition of rare earth elements results in the homogeneous dispersion of these two important refining phases in the melt, leading to an increased number of activation nuclei. At the same time, the rare earth elements segregate at the grain boundaries, producing a greater growth restriction factor [35]. However, the addition of rare earth elements is not always effective. Too many or too long holding times can lead to coarsening of the grains [36]. In this research, the addition of 0.3% Ce under a longer holding time of 15 min led to the degradation of performance. The microstructure of specimens refined with different refiners is illustrated in Figure 7. The results showed that the 6111 poured into the steel mold had a significant coarse grain and obvious dendrites. But the 6111 poured into the copper mold tended to form equiaxed grains due to the large supercooling, and the grain refinement effect was more limited. With the right amount of addition and the right holding time, all four different additions of rare earth produced a significant grain refinement effect, forming fine isometric crystals, which played a key role in the performance improvement.
In order to study the primary and secondary effects of different factors on grain size, range analysis was used to analyze the impact of the results, and the statistical results obtained are shown in Table 4. From Table 4, the extreme difference values of the three factors on the grain size in descending order were earth content > rare earth type > holding time. It can be seen that the addition of rare earth to the Al-5Ti-B refiner does not need to be a lot to achieve good grain refinement, and it is worth noting that the rare earth Ce was the best in terms of grain refinement. Whether the holding time was 5 min or 20 min, the refinement effect of Al-5Ti-B + Ce was relatively stable, showing good resistance to recession and greatly improving the microstructure of the cast 6111 aluminum alloy.
Based on the grain size analysis by orthogonal experiment, the optimum rare earth and optimum rare earth content were taken and single-factor experiments were carried out on the holding time in order to investigate the anti-recession effect of Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce refined 6111.The Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111 specimens with different holding times were polished and then etched with a mixture of acids (45 mL HCl, 15 mL HNO3, 15 mL HF, 25 mL H2O) to observe the macrostructure in order to compare the refinement effect. The results are shown in Figure 8. The results showed that the grain size of the Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111 specimens did not become significantly coarser from a holding time of 5 min to a holding time of 20 min, indicating that the Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce refinement of the 6111 aluminum had a good effect on anti-recession.

3.3. Impact of the Second Phase

In order to investigate the synergistic effect of Al-5Ti-B and rare earth on the as-cast structure and properties of 6111 aluminum alloy, the effect of the addition of Al-5Ti-B and rare earth on their physical phases was first investigated by thermodynamic calculation. The equilibrium phase diagrams of the Al-5Ti-B/6111 and Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111 systems are shown in Figure 9. The Al-5Ti-B/6111 system consisted mainly of α-Al, Al5Cu2Mg8Si6, Mg2Si, α-Fe(AlFeMnSi), β-Fe(AlFeSi) phases, a small number of classical nucleation phases Al3Ti, TiB2, and trace amounts of Al13Cr4Si4. In the early stages of compound formation, first came the formation of the stable high-temperature TiB2 phase, which played a key role in heterogeneous nucleation, while the basis for refining the grain was laid with the cooperation of Al3Ti. The α-Al15(Mn,Fe)3Si2 phase and β-Al5FeSi phase formation was also critical, as the form of the Fe element present tends to have a great influence on the matrix, with the α-Al15(Mn,Fe)3Si2 phase having less influence on the mechanical properties of the matrix, while the β-Al5FeSi phase, in a plate-like form, severely cuts into the matrix and significantly reduces the mechanical properties of the aluminum alloys. As the temperature decreased, the Mg2Si phase was gradually formed, which was considered to be a good reinforcing phase and gave the matrix better mechanical properties. The Ce-rich phase decomposed the Ce elements at high temperatures, and the Ce elements at the grain boundaries restricted the growth of α-Al, resulting in the formation of fine grains.
To further investigate the effect of Al-5Ti-B and Ce on the phase composition of 6111, thermodynamic simulations were performed for the Al-5Ti-B/6111 and Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce/6111 systems [37]. Figure 10 shows the solid phase fraction versus temperature in the Scheil solidification path and the effect of the addition of rare earth on the nucleation temperature. The Scheil solidification model is based on the assumption that the solute does not diffuse in the solid phase and is perfectly homogeneous in the liquid phase [38]. It has been widely used to model the as-cast microstructure of non-equilibrium solidifying alloys. Firstly, for the nucleation temperature of α-Al, there was a small increase in the nucleation temperature of α-Al with the addition of the rare earth element Ce, which further confirmed that the decomposition of the Ce-rich phase released the element Ce, which biased the Al3Ti before it solidified and inhibited the growth of Al3Ti. As a result, this led to more particles becoming effective nucleation substrates, reducing the subcooling required for α-Al nucleation and making it easier to nucleate. In addition, the nucleation temperature of the α-Al15(Mn,Fe)3Si2 phase increased while that of the β-Al5FeSi phase decreased. This was because the addition of Ce promoted the nucleation of the α-Al15(Mn,Fe)3Si2 phase and inhibited the nucleation of the β-Al5FeSi phase, which promoted the transformation of the β-Al5FeSi phase to the α-Al15(Mn,Fe)3Si2 phase and reduced the harm to the mechanical properties of the matrix.

3.4. Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of the Cast State

In terms of tensile properties, the base strength was 144.9 MPa and the plasticity was 11.5% when poured into the steel mold. Still, its strength was 199.9 MPa and the plasticity was 23.2% when poured into the copper mold, indicating that the cooling rate had a profound effect on the properties of the alloy. Therefore, subsequent tests were carried out using copper molds as casting molds. The addition of Al-5Ti-B resulted in an almost constant strength and a slight increase in elongation, indicating that grain refinement contributed significantly to the elongation, which reduced the density of dislocations dispersed within each grain, thus allowing the material to resist greater plastic deformation.
Figure 11 shows the stress–strain curves for the cast alloys. It can be seen from the graph, that the mechanical properties of the alloys were improved by the addition of rare earth, with the best elongation being 35.2% for Al-5Ti-B-0.3Ce/6111, and the highest tensile strength being 252.6 MPa for Al-5Ti-B-0.2Ce/6111.The best comprehensive mechanical property was achieved by Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111, with a tensile strength of 240.4 MPa and an elongation of 32.0%.
In order to study the major and minor influences of different factors on mechanical properties, range analysis was used to analyze the influence of the results, and the statistical results obtained are shown in Table 5 and Table 6. The order of the extreme differences in the effects of the three factors on elongation from largest to smallest was rare earth type > holding time > rare earth content. At the same time, the extreme difference between the three factors on the tensile strength was also the largest for the rare earth type, indicating that the rare earth type had a greater influence on the mechanical properties, which may have been related to the rare earth phase formed and its solid solution degree. It is worth noting that the best solution for elongation was 0.1%, while the best solution for tensile strength was 0.4%. The main reason for this was that fewer rare earth tended to disperse and lead to finer grains, while too much agglomeration led to coarser grains, but more rare earth increased tensile strength.

3.5. Cast Fracture Analysis

Figure 12 shows the fracture morphology of the six alloys. The 6111 base had obvious holes and ridge-like fractures, with hard-to-observe tough nests, but obvious tearing ridges. With the addition of Al-5Ti-B, the porosity and fracture surface was reduced, while small amounts of tough nests and deconstruction surfaces were present, which is a mixed fracture. After the addition of rare earth, a large number of tough nests appear in the fractures, especially in the Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111 alloy, where large and deep tough nests were evident in the fractures and no facets were observed, but the Al-5Ti-B-0.1Er/6111 alloy still had more cleavage plane in the fractures, which corresponded to their mechanical properties.

4. Conclusions

(1)
Among the four rare earths, Al-5Ti-B + Ce had the best effect on the grain refinement and mechanical properties of the 6111 aluminum, and had the best fracture morphology.
(2)
The addition of rare earth to the Al-5Ti-B added a rare earth-rich phase to the TiAl3 phase and the TiB2 phase, and the decomposition of the rare earth phase released rare earth elements, which made TiB2 difficult to aggregate or deposit and inhibited the growth of TiAl3, thus resulting in more particles becoming an effective nucleation substrate.
(3)
The influence of the α-Al15(Mn,Fe)3Si2 phase on the mechanical properties of the base was small. In contrast, the plate-like β-Al5FeSi phase severely cut into the base and significantly reduced the mechanical properties of the aluminum alloy. Compared to the base 6111, the addition of rare earth facilitated the transformation of the β-Al5FeSi phase into the α-Al15(Mn,Fe)3Si2 phase.
(4)
In the as-cast state, Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce/6111 had the best comprehensive mechanical properties. It was found that the addition of Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce, which had an ultimate tensile strength of 240.4 ± 2.2 MPa, successfully reduced the grain size by 73.8% and improved elongation by 37.8% compared to the base alloy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M. and H.T.; methodology, Z.L. and C.M.; validation, C.M., C.S. and Y.L.; investigation, C.S. and D.L.; resources, C.M.; data curation, H.T.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M. and Z.L.; writing—review and editing, C.M. and D.L.; visualization, C.S.; supervision, X.R. and J.W.; project administration, H.T.; funding acquisition, H.T. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Guangxi Joint Fund (U20A20276), and the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students in Guangxi (202210593049).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, K.; Jiang, H.Y.; Jia, Y.W.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Q.D.; Ye, B.; Ding, W.J. Nanoparticle-inhibited growth of primary aluminum in Al-10Si alloys. Acta Mater. 2016, 103, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deepati, A.K.; Alhazmi, W.; Benjeer, I. Mechanical characterization of AA5083 aluminum alloy welded using resistance spot welding for the lightweight automobile body fabrication. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 5139–5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bolzoni, L.; Nowak, M.; Babu, N.H. Grain refinement of Al-Si alloys by Nb-B inoculation. Part II: Application to commercial alloys. Mater. Design 2015, 66, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abdizadeh, H.; Ashuri, M.; Moghadam, P.T.; Nouribahadory, A.; Baharvandi, H.R. Improvement in physical and mechanical properties of aluminum/zircon composites fabricated by powder metallurgy method. Mater. Design 2011, 32, 4417–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Murty, B.S.; Kori, S.A.; Chakraborty, M. Grain refinement of aluminum and its alloys by heterogeneous nucleation and alloying. Int. Mater. Rev. 2002, 47, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Birol, Y. A novel Al-Ti-B alloy for grain refining Al-Si foundry alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 486, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Birol, Y. Performance of AlTi5B1, AlTi3B3 and AlB3 master alloys in refining grain structure of aluminum foundry alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2012, 28, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.J.; Si, N.C. Synthesis and Refinement Performance of the Novel Al-Ti-B-RE Master Alloy Grain Refiner. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2015, 44, 2970–2975. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, Y.; Hu, B.; Liu, B.; Nie, A.; Gu, Q.; Wang, J.; Li, Q. Insight into Si poisoning on grain refinement of Al-Si/Al-5Ti-B system. Acta Mater. 2020, 187, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mao, G.; Tong, G.; Gao, W.; Liu, S.; Zhong, L. The poisoning effect of Sc or Zr in grain refinement of Al-Si-Mg alloy with Al-Ti-B. Mater. Lett. 2021, 302, 130428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.; Horsfield, A.; Schwingenschlögl, U.; Lee, P.D. Heterogeneous nucleation of solid Al from the melt by TiB 2 and Al 3 Ti: An ab initio molecular dynamics study. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 184203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wu, J.; Ruan, Q.; Chen, S.; Meng, C.; Xu, Z.; Wei, C.; Wang, J. Insights into Poisoning Mechanism of Zr by First Principle Calculation on Adhesion Work and Adsorption Energy between TiB2, Al3Ti, and Al3Zr. Metals 2022, 12, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nie, J.; Ma, X.; Ding, H.; Liu, X. Microstructure and grain refining performance of a new Al-Ti-C-B master alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 486, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Ma, K.; Fu, Y.; Guo, E.; Chen, Z.; Li, Q. In-situ observation of grain refinement dynamics of hypoeutectic Al-Si alloy inoculated by Al-Ti-Nb-B alloy. Scr. Mater. 2020, 187, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Y.H.; Ye, C.Y.; Shen, Y.P.; Chang, W.; StJohn, D.H.; Wang, G.; Zhai, Q.J. Grain refinement of hypoeutectic Al-7wt.% Si alloy induced by an Al-V-B master alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 812, 152022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vicario, I.; Poulon, Q.A.; Lagos, M.A.; Silvain, J.F. Effect of material and process atmosphere in the preparation of Al-Ti-B grain refiner by SHS. Metals 2015, 5, 1387–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mohanty, P.S.; Guthrie, R.I.L.; Gruzleski, J.E. Studies on the fading behaviour of Al-Ti-B master alloys and grain refinement mechanism using LiMCA. Light Metals: Proceedings of Sessions, TMS Annual Meeting, Warrendale, PA, USA. 1995; pp. 859–868. [Google Scholar]
  18. Qian, P.P.; Tang, Z.H.; Yuan, M.W.; Xiang, Y.L.; Wang, L. Microstructure and refinement mechanism of TiB2/TiAl3 in remelted Al-5Ti-1B system. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 1563–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, Y.L.; He, W.X.; Song, D.F.; Shen, F.H.; Li, X.X.; Sun, Z.Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.H.; Du, Y.; Fernández, R. Effect of ultrasonic melt processing and Al-Ti-B on the microstructural refinement of recycled Al alloys. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2022, 89, 106139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.; Wang, B.; Li, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Xue, C.; Tang, H. Quantifying the Effects of Grain Refiners Al-Ti-B and La on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of W319 Alloy. Metals 2022, 12, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ding, W.; Zhao, X.; Chen, T.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Y.; Lei, D. Effect of rare earth Y and Al-Ti-B master alloy on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 6063 aluminum alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 830, 154685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, T.F.; Chen, Z.Y.; Nie, Z.R.; Huang, H. Microstructure of Al-Ti-B-Er refiner and its grain refining performance. J. Rare Earths 2013, 31, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Z.Q.; Hu, W.X.; Shi, L.; Wang, W. Effect of rare earth on morphology and dispersion of TiB2 phase in Al-Ti-B alloy refiner. China Foundry 2023, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Du, Q.; Li, Y.J. An extension of the Kampmann–Wagner numerical model towards as-cast grain size prediction of multicomponent aluminum alloys. Acta Mater. 2014, 71, 1359–6454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bolzoni, L.; Babu, N.H. Engineering the heterogeneous nuclei in Al-Si alloys for solidification control. Appl. Mater. Today 2016, 5, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gottstein, G. Physical Foundations of Materials Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ma, S.; Zong, N.; Dong, H.; Jing, T. Effect of Al-V-B grain refiner on refining aluminium alloys: Estimation from ab initio calculations. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 861, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, T.; Zhou, X.R.; Thompson, G.E.; Pennycook, T.; et al. Grain refining mechanism in the Al/Al-Ti-B system. Acta Mater. 2015, 84, 292–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Easton, M.; StJohn, D. An analysis of the relationship between grain size, solute content, and the potency and number density of nucleant particles. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2005, 36, 1911–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Easton, M.A.; StJohn, D.H. A model of grain refinement incorporating alloy constitution and potency of heterogeneous nucleant particles. Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 1867–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. StJohn, D.H.; Qian, M.; Easton, M.A.; Cao, P. The Interdependence Theory: The relationship between grain formation and nucleant selection. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 4907–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qian, M.; Cao, P.; Easton, M.A.; McDonald, S.D.; StJohn, D.H. An analytical model for constitutional supercooling-driven grain formation and grain size prediction. Acta Mater. 2010, 58, 3262–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Quested, T.E.; Dinsdale, A.T.; Greer, A.L. Thermodynamic modelling of growth-restriction effects in aluminium alloys. Acta Mater. 2005, 53, 1323–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. StJohn, D.H.; Cao, P.; Qian, M.; Easton, M.A. A new analytical approach to reveal the mechanisms of grain refinement. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2007, 9, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, X.; Cong, X.; Muhammad, A.; Hanada, S.; Yamagata, H.; Wang, W.H. Effects of Al-Ti-B-RE grain refiner on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-7.0 Si-0.55 Mg alloy. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 2244–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, X.; Wang, B.; Li, Q.; Wang, J.; Xue, C.; Yang, X.; Liu, X. Quantifying the effects of grain refiners (AlTiB and Y) on microstructure and properties in W319 alloys. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 33, 104671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhan, H.; Hu, B. Analyzing the microstructural evolution and hardening response of an Al-Si-Mg casting alloy with Cr addition. Mater. Charact. 2018, 142, 602–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Farkoosh, A.R.; Javidani, M.; Hoseini, M.; Larouche, D.; Pekguleryuz, M. Phase formation in as-solidified and heat-treated Al-Si-Cu-Mg-Ni alloys: Thermodynamic assessment and experimental investigation for alloy design. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 551, 596–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental flow chart.
Figure 1. Experimental flow chart.
Metals 13 00606 g001
Figure 2. Tensile specimen shape and size (mm).
Figure 2. Tensile specimen shape and size (mm).
Metals 13 00606 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of heterogeneous nucleation.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of heterogeneous nucleation.
Metals 13 00606 g003
Figure 4. Optical micrographs of the refiners (a) Al-5Ti-B refiner; (b) Al-5Ti-B + La refiner; (c) Al-5Ti-B + Er refiner; (d) Al-5Ti-B + Y refiner; (e) Al- 5Ti-B + Ce refiner.
Figure 4. Optical micrographs of the refiners (a) Al-5Ti-B refiner; (b) Al-5Ti-B + La refiner; (c) Al-5Ti-B + Er refiner; (d) Al-5Ti-B + Y refiner; (e) Al- 5Ti-B + Ce refiner.
Metals 13 00606 g004
Figure 5. SEM/EDS micrographs of the master alloys (a) Al-5Ti-B; (b) Al-5Ti-B-0.2Y.
Figure 5. SEM/EDS micrographs of the master alloys (a) Al-5Ti-B; (b) Al-5Ti-B-0.2Y.
Metals 13 00606 g005aMetals 13 00606 g005b
Figure 6. XRD patterns of Al-5Ti-B and Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce.
Figure 6. XRD patterns of Al-5Ti-B and Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce.
Metals 13 00606 g006
Figure 7. Microstructure of specimens refined with different refiners: (a) 6111 (copper mold); (b) Al-5Ti-B/6111; (c) Al-5Ti-B + 0.2% La/6111; (d) Al-5Ti-B + 0.2% Er/6111; (e) Al-5Ti-B + 0.2% Y/6111; (f) Al-5Ti-B + 0.2% Ce/6111.
Figure 7. Microstructure of specimens refined with different refiners: (a) 6111 (copper mold); (b) Al-5Ti-B/6111; (c) Al-5Ti-B + 0.2% La/6111; (d) Al-5Ti-B + 0.2% Er/6111; (e) Al-5Ti-B + 0.2% Y/6111; (f) Al-5Ti-B + 0.2% Ce/6111.
Metals 13 00606 g007aMetals 13 00606 g007b
Figure 8. Macrostructure of Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111: (a) Holding for 5 min; (b) Holding for10 min; (c) Holding for 15 min; (d) Holding for 20 min.
Figure 8. Macrostructure of Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111: (a) Holding for 5 min; (b) Holding for10 min; (c) Holding for 15 min; (d) Holding for 20 min.
Metals 13 00606 g008
Figure 9. Phase fraction as a function of temperature at equilibrium for: (a) Al-5Ti-B/6111; (b) Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111.
Figure 9. Phase fraction as a function of temperature at equilibrium for: (a) Al-5Ti-B/6111; (b) Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111.
Metals 13 00606 g009
Figure 10. Solidification path of the alloy: (a) Al-5Ti-B/6111; (b) Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce/6111.
Figure 10. Solidification path of the alloy: (a) Al-5Ti-B/6111; (b) Al-5Ti-B + 0.1Ce/6111.
Metals 13 00606 g010
Figure 11. Stress–strain curves for cast alloys: (a) base; (b) Al-5Ti-B + La/6111; (c) Al-5Ti-B + Er/6111; (d) Al-5Ti-B + Y/6111; (e) Al-5Ti-B + Ce/6111.
Figure 11. Stress–strain curves for cast alloys: (a) base; (b) Al-5Ti-B + La/6111; (c) Al-5Ti-B + Er/6111; (d) Al-5Ti-B + Y/6111; (e) Al-5Ti-B + Ce/6111.
Metals 13 00606 g011
Figure 12. Fracture features: (a) 6111; (b) Al-5Ti-B/6111; (c) Al-5Ti-B-0.1La/6111; (d) Al-5Ti-B-0.1Er/6111; (e) Al-5Ti-B-0.1Y/6111; (f) Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111.
Figure 12. Fracture features: (a) 6111; (b) Al-5Ti-B/6111; (c) Al-5Ti-B-0.1La/6111; (d) Al-5Ti-B-0.1Er/6111; (e) Al-5Ti-B-0.1Y/6111; (f) Al-5Ti-B-0.1Ce/6111.
Metals 13 00606 g012
Table 1. Details of the orthogonal experiment.
Table 1. Details of the orthogonal experiment.
LevelRare Earth TypesRare Earth Content (wt.%)Holding Time (min)
ABC
1La0.1%5 min
2Er0.2%10 min
3Y0.3%15 min
4Ce0.4%20 min
Table 2. Orthogonal experiment scheme and experimental results.
Table 2. Orthogonal experiment scheme and experimental results.
Alloy NumberRare Earth TypesRare Earth ContentHolding TimeGrain Size(µm)Elongation
(%)
UTS
(MPa)
1 (Base 1)---240 ± 3811.5 ± 0.4144.9 ± 1.5
(Base 2)---210 ± 3223.2 ± 0.5199.9 ± 2.9
2 (AlTiB)---195 ± 2726.0 ± 1.5201.7 ± 3.3
3La0.2%20 min50 ± 531.0 ± 0.6212.0 ± 2.1
4La0.4%15 min170 ± 2129.2 ± 1.3232.3 ± 2.7
5Er0.2%15 min130 ± 1928.2 ± 1.9207.9 ± 3.6
6Ce0.3%15 min80 ± 935.2 ± 0.9206.2 ± 1.9
7Ce0.4%10 min78 ± 729.8 ± 2.0244.9 ± 3.5
8Y0.2%10 min60 ± 629.7 ± 2.1225.4 ± 3.7
9Y0.3%20 min65 ± 828.3 ± 1.7223.3 ± 3.1
10Ce0.2%5 min75 ± 1128.6 ± 0.7252.6 ± 1.8
11Er0.4%20 min190 ± 2325.9 ± 1.6206.8 ± 2.8
12Y0.1%15 min65 ± 731.3 ± 2.2212.4 ± 3.4
13La0.1%5 min60 ± 527.9 ± 0.3211.6 ± 2.3
14Er0.3%5 min150 ± 2027.6 ± 1.1200.2 ± 2.6
15Ce0.1%20 min55 ± 432.0 ± 0.8240.4 ± 2.2
16Er0.1%10 min65 ± 929.2 ± 0.3215.0 ± 1.7
17Y0.4%5 min180 ± 2427.8 ± 2.1240.3 ± 3.9
18La0.3%10 min70 ± 1026.2 ± 0.2203.9 ± 1.6
Table 3. Chemical compositions of the 6111 bases (wt.%).
Table 3. Chemical compositions of the 6111 bases (wt.%).
ElementSiMgCuFeMnZnTiCrAl
Standard values0.6–1.10.5–1.10.5–0.9<0.40.1–0.45<0.15<0.1<0.1Bal.
Measured values1.090.570.590.210.180.040.020.0197.29
Table 4. Analysis of grain size in orthogonal experiment.
Table 4. Analysis of grain size in orthogonal experiment.
ParameterRare Earth TypesRare Earth ContentHolding Time
K187.50 μm61.25 μm116.25 μm
K2133.75 μm78.75 μm68.25 μm
K392.50 μm91.25 μm111.25 μm
K472.00 μm154.50 μm90.00 μm
Extreme difference values61.75 μm93.25 μm48.00 μm
Optimum solutionCe0.1%10 min
Order of importance Rare earth content > Rare earth type > Holding time.
Table 5. Analysis of elongation in orthogonal experiment.
Table 5. Analysis of elongation in orthogonal experiment.
ParameterRare Earth TypesRare Earth ContentHolding Time
K128.57%30.09%27.97%
K227.71%29.36%28.73%
K329.26%29.35%30.96%
K431.41%28.15%29.30%
Extreme difference values3.7%1.94%2.99%
Optimum solutionCe0.1%15 min
Order of influence: Rare Earth Types > Holding Time > Rare Earth Content.
Table 6. Analysis of ultimate tensile strength in orthogonal experiment.
Table 6. Analysis of ultimate tensile strength in orthogonal experiment.
ParameterRare Earth TypesRare Earth ContentHolding Time
K1214.96 MPa219.86 MPa226.18 MPa
K2207.49 MPa224.48 MPa222.31 MPa
K3225.38 MPa208.41 MPa214.71 MPa
K4236.02 MPa231.10 MPa220.65 MPa
Extreme difference values28.53 MPa22.69 MPa11.47 MPa
Optimum solutionCe0.4%5 min
Influence: Primary Rare Earth Type > Rare Earth Content > Holding Time.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, C.; Su, C.; Liu, Z.; Liao, D.; Rong, X.; Li, Y.; Tang, H.; Wang, J. Synergistic Effect of RE (La, Er, Y, Ce) and Al-5Ti-B on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 6111Aluminum Alloy. Metals 2023, 13, 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030606

AMA Style

Meng C, Su C, Liu Z, Liao D, Rong X, Li Y, Tang H, Wang J. Synergistic Effect of RE (La, Er, Y, Ce) and Al-5Ti-B on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 6111Aluminum Alloy. Metals. 2023; 13(3):606. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030606

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Chuanchao, Changchao Su, Zhenkuan Liu, Dongxing Liao, Xincheng Rong, Yuanzhuo Li, Hongqun Tang, and Junsheng Wang. 2023. "Synergistic Effect of RE (La, Er, Y, Ce) and Al-5Ti-B on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 6111Aluminum Alloy" Metals 13, no. 3: 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030606

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop