The Role of Networked Narratives in Amplifying or Mitigating Intergroup Prejudice: A YouTube Case Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- In Stage 1, automated emotion analysis using a Large Language Model (LLM) was employed to systematically assess the varying emotions expressed in the comments.
- In Stage 2, we conducted a qualitatively comparative case study by analyzing raw data from YouTube Studio. We examined types of videos suggested to the viewers, including suggestions appearing alongside or after the video, keywords searched, region of access, traffic, and viewing hours for each group. This analysis aimed to identify how the networked narratives affected users’ perceptions toward cultural outgroups.
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Intergroup Contact Theory
2.1.1. Forms of Intergroup Contact
2.1.2. Mediators of Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Reduction
- Knowledge
- Anxiety
- Empathy
2.2. Intergroup Contact on Digital Media
2.3. Networked Narrative
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Application of Intergroup Contact Model in Experimental Videos
The Three Key Mediators in Video Narrative
3.2. Two-Stage Research Approach
3.2.1. Stage 1: Emotion Analysis
“Identify which basic emotion—anger, fear, enjoyment, sadness, disgust, or surprise—is most prominently reflected in the following text. Explain your choice by discussing the specific words, phrases, and overall emotional tone that led to your decision.”
3.2.2. Stage 2: Comparative Case Studies
- User interactivity: we analyzed user comments to understand how viewers engaged with the content and each other.
- Algorithmic influence: to identify the algorithmic influence of YouTube, data spanning the videos’ lifetime (from the initial publishing date to May 2024) were analyzed. The following metrics were examined:
- Traffic sources: we analyzed how viewers discovered the content, whether through browse features like suggested videos or direct searches, and we examined viewing hours to understand engagement patterns.
- Geographic distribution: we looked at the geographic location of viewers to understand the reach within diasporic communities and local populations.
- Search trends: we examined the keywords viewers used to find content related to each cultural group, revealing insights into audience interests and information-seeking behavior.
4. Results
4.1. Stage 1: Emotion Analysis
That not fair, that the Chinese won’t let the Africans own there own restaurant in China but the Chinese can come to Africa and own all kinds of Businesses. China is very prejudice in that way!!!
“The text expresses frustration and anger towards the unfair treatment of Africans in China compared to the privileges given to Chinese in Africa. The use of words like ‘not fair’, ‘prejudice’, and multiple exclamation marks highlights the strong negative sentiment. The emotion of anger is evident from the tone and the feelings of injustice expressed in the text.”
I’m watching in garowe the capital city of puntland state of somalia One love both japanese and somali JPSO❤
Hehehe Somali people are pretty much everywhere. The entrepreneurship is imbedded in our DNA. Besides Somalis holding on tight to their religion this is my second main reason why i’m proud of my people.
I am from muqdishu somalia SO. Been living and studying Zhejiang province CN for the last 3 years:) China is such a great place and a very good experience. This video made me miss our ethnic food.
I loved this video. It’s really heartwarming and you’re a great person.
Ah, I think I am going to go eat laghman + somsa today. You guys really increased my appetite.
Greetings to all muslim brothers and sisters in Guangzhou. Uyghur—Turkish style of bread. We bake and eat similar style bread in Turkey.
Results of Emotion Analysis of Comments and Replies
Guys you can’t understand the different and every foreign youtuber comment section i see somalis bullying each other only based about their qabil or gobol…
- (1)
- Hatred or anger is exacerbated in replies over time, especially after people read a comment that fosters their anger, whether directed at ingroups or outgroups. This could potentially affect the anxiety of the audience in intergroup contact watching the content, as they are exposed to extreme conversations or fights among users [44], which also exacerbates the gap in empathy [50].
- (2)
- Our audience varies significantly across the three videos, attracting different people despite being on the same channel, possibly due to YouTube’s search engine-like features [70].
- (3)
- Although the emotions expressed in comments provide insight into the audience’s feelings, there are more complex dynamics at play that are difficult to identify through individual comments and emotions alone [20].
4.2. Stage 2: Comparative Case Studies
4.2.1. Uyghurs in Guangzhou
So glad to see you back in Guangzhou! Multiculturalism has always been flowing in the veins of the Guangzhou local people! Islam, in its imported and localised forms, has always been one of our cherished blossoms in this millennia-old yet lively garden that is Guangzhou!
Top Comment: This is probably one of my favourite episodes by far! Loved the diverse community in Guangzhou so much <3
Replies: I hope you reply to those speculations in the comments section that Uyghurs are followed by government agents to not say a thing about their situation. Tell them if you see sadness in those faces. Tell them if you see agents around them. (…)
4.2.2. Congolese in Guangzhou
African can not own a business in China but Chinese have a whole lot of businesses in Africa. What is wrong with Africa policy makers? Wake up Africa!!
That not fair, that the Chinese won’t let the Africans own there own restaurant in China but the Chinese can come to Africa and own all kinds of Businesses. China is very prejudice in that way!!!
These two are so kind and respectful! Love the way they were fearless to try new stuff
“How beautiful life is if we loved one another and coexisted worldwide.” Life would be so much fun
4.2.3. Somalis in Guangzhou
From somalia 2019 I was congo Is good country CDSO I am very like food of congales like that (fuufu)
Love and support from Somalia SO
Masha Allah Pakistanis brothers Allah/God bless you.❤ PK Pakistan and JP Japan. From Somalia SO. But now I’m in Turkey Istanbul for studying.❤ also TR Turkish brothers.
5. Discussion
5.1. Knowledge Acquisition
5.2. Anxiety Reduction
5.3. Empathy Development
Omg it was so cool to see the lady speak the Congolese native language. I love seeing all the different languages and cultures.
5.4. The Role of Storyteller in Networked Narratives
Funny how this video pops up after Africans/blacks have been mistreated in China and everywhere else in world, Africa has laid the foundation for humanity. I wish more people appreciated us like the reporter in the video! Oh and the food looks great!
Thank you for making these amazing videos! I have been watching since the Somali videos and I must say this is by far one of the best channels. Truly fascinating to watch.
5.5. Summary of Findings
- (1)
- Negative algorithmic influence leads to negative emotion. Despite storytelling designed with mediated intergroup contact theory, networked narratives impact overall user emotions toward the cultural outgroup. While this concept has been previously postulated, empirical evidence from action research in previous studies has been limited.
- (2)
- Audience engagement patterns vary, and the same channel attracts different audience types and engagement levels.
- (3)
- Emotion trends in user interactivity indicated that replies generally exhibited more negative emotions than initial comments across all videos.
- (4)
- Consistent viewership and positive interactions across different videos suggested the potential for building positive intergroup relations through the storyteller over time and that there is the possibility of positive engagements with the storyteller, fostering a supportive digital community and potentially mitigating some negative effects of networked narratives.
- (1)
- Our research extends intergroup contact theory by applying it to contemporary social media environments characterized by networked narratives. It contributes to the framework of networked narratives by encompassing the influences of algorithmic curation, user interactivity, and storytelling.
- (2)
- It expands the application of intergroup contact theory to an actual social media channel, thereby providing empirical evidence of its dynamics within networked narrative environments.
- (3)
- It offers empirical insights into how algorithmic influence, user interactivity, and storyteller engagement collectively shape intergroup attitudes within digital spaces, thus advancing our understanding of prejudice reduction mechanisms in online contexts.
6. Limitations and Future Research
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chapman, A.; Dilmperi, A. Luxury brand value co-creation with online brand communities in the service encounter. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 144, 902–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.V.; Ryu, E. “I’ll buy what she’s #wearing”: The roles of envy toward and parasocial interaction with influencers in Instagram celebrity-based brand endorsement and social commerce. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 55, 102121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lotun, S.; Lamarche, V.M.; Samothrakis, S.; Sandstrom, G.M.; Matran-Fernandez, A. Parasocial relationships on YouTube reduce prejudice towards mental health issues. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 16565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathje, S.; Van Bavel, J.J.; van der Linden, S. Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2024292118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odell, J. How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy; Melville House Publishing: Brooklyn, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Varennes, F.d. Tsunami of Hate and Xenophobia Targeting Minorities Must Be Tackled, Says UN Expert; United Nations Human Rights: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; Available online: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2021/03/tsunami-hate-and-xenophobia-targeting-minorities-must-be-tackled-says-un (accessed on 30 June 2024).
- Allport, G.W. The Nature of Prejudice; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Pettigrew, T.F.; Tropp, L.R. How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 38, 922–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, T.W.; Hsiao, C.H.; Sung, P.Y. Effects of YouTube advertising on intergroup contact: An experimental study. J. Advert. 2024, 53, 203–222. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, D.; Chen, T.; Pearce, J.; Mohammadi, Z.; Pearce, P.L. Reaching audiences through travel vlogs: The perspective of involvement. Tour. Manag. 2021, 86, 104326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sangeorzan, I.; Andriopoulou, P.; Livanou, M. Exploring the experiences of people vlogging about severe mental illness on YouTube: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 246, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Bernardo, G.A.; Vezzali, L.; Stathi, S.; McKeown, S.; Cocco, V.M.; Saguy, T.; Dixon, J. Fostering social change among advantaged and disadvantaged group members: Integrating intergroup contact and social identity perspectives on collective action. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 2021, 24, 26–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choe, H. Eating together multimodally: Collaborative eating in mukbang, a Korean livestream of eating. Lang. Soc. 2019, 48, 171–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Huang, W.-J.; Liu-Lastres, B. Impact of user-generated travel posts on travel decisions: A comparative study on Weibo and Xiaohongshu. Ann. Tour. Res. Empir. Insights 2022, 3, 100064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, N.C.H.; Massey, Z.B.; Barbati, J.L.; Bessarabova, E.; Banas, J.A. Theorizing prejudice reduction via mediated intergroup contact: Extending the intergroup contact theory to media contexts. J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl. 2022, 34, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, M.; Ottoni, R.; West, R.; Almeida, V.; Meira, W., Jr. Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTube. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1908.08313. [Google Scholar]
- Harris, B. South Koreans outraged as 500 Yemeni refugees flee to island. Financial Times, 30 June 2018. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/3388f37a-79ae-11e8-bc55-50daf11b720d (accessed on 5 May 2024).
- Aldamen, Y. Xenophobia and Hate Speech towards Refugees on Social Media: Reinforcing Causes, Negative Effects, Defense and Response Mechanisms against That Speech. Societies 2023, 13, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapiro, M.A.; Park, H.W. More than entertainment: YouTube and public responses to the science of global warming and climate change. Soc. Sci. Inf. 2015, 54, 115–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozinets, R.V.; De Valck, K.; Wojnicki, A.C.; Wilner, S.J.S. Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. J. Mark. 2010, 74, 71–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gran, A.-B.; Booth, P.; Bucher, T. To be or not to be algorithm aware: A question of a new digital divide? Inf. Commun. Soc. 2021, 24, 1779–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodomo, A. Africans in China; Cambria Press: Amherst, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Williamson, E.W.; Wang, V. African Americans and China’s coronavirus discrimination. The New York Times, 2 June 2020. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/us/politics/african-americans-china-coronavirus.html (accessed on 1 June 2024).
- Pettigrew, T.F. Intergroup Contact Theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1998, 49, 65–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paluck, E.L. Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 96, 574–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slovic, P. “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2007, 2, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vezzali, L.; Di Bernardo, G.A.; Birtel, M.D.; Stathi, S.; Brambilla, M. Outgroup morality perceptions mediate secondary transfer effects from direct and extended contact: Evidence from majority and minority group members. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 2020, 23, 1066–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Rayya, H.M.; Brown, R. Living together: An integrated acculturation–contact strategy to promote ethnic harmony between young British Muslims and Anglo-Britons. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 2023, 26, 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, L.; Rutland, A.; Brown, R.; Douch, R. Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Dev. 2006, 77, 1208–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Christ, O.; Hewstone, M.; Tausch, N.; Wagner, U.; Voci, A.; Hughes, J.; Cairns, E. Direct Contact as a Moderator of Extended Contact Effects: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Impact on Outgroup Attitudes, Behavioral Intentions, and Attitude Certainty. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 36, 1662–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, R.; Hewstone, M. An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005; Volume 37, pp. 255–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brewer, M.B.; Miller, N. Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984; p. 281. [Google Scholar]
- Tajfel, H. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, R.; Turner, J.C. Intergroup Behavior; B. Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Gaertner, S.L.; Dovidio, J.F. Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model; Psychology Press: London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez, R.; Brown, R. Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 33, 195–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wojcieszak, M.; Warner, B.R. Can interparty contact reduce affective polarization? A systematic test of different forms of intergroup contact. Political Commun. 2020, 37, 789–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettigrew, T.F.; Christ, O.; Wagner, U.; Stellmacher, J. Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2007, 31, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, F.A.; Borinca, I.; Vezzali, L.; Reynolds, K.J.; Blomster Lyshol, J.K.; Verrelli, S.; Falomir-Pichastor, J.M. Beyond direct contact: The theoretical and societal relevance of indirect contact for improving intergroup relations. J. Soc. Issues 2021, 77, 132–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerrato, S.; Forestell, C.A. Meet your meat: The effect of imagined intergroup contact on wanting and liking of meat. Appetite 2022, 168, 105656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crisp, R.J.; Turner, R.N. Can Imagined Interactions Produce Positive Perceptions?: Reducing Prejudice through Simulated Social Contact; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 231–240. [Google Scholar]
- Herman, D. Basic Elements of Narrative; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Dovidio, J.F.; Eller, A.; Hewstone, M. Improving intergroup relations through direct, extended and other forms of indirect contact. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 2011, 14, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephan, W.G.; Stephan, C.W. Improving Intergroup Relations; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- De Coninck, D.; Frissen, T.; Matthijs, K.; d’Haenens, L.; Lits, G.; Champagne-Poirier, O.; Carignan, M.-E.; David, M.D.; Pignard-Cheynel, N.; Salerno, S.; et al. Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation About COVID-19: Comparative Perspectives on the Role of Anxiety, Depression and Exposure to and Trust in Information Sources. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 646394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmad, A.R.; Murad, H.R. The Impact of Social Media on Panic During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: Online Questionnaire Study [Original Paper]. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e19556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory; Prentice-Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Reiss, S.; Peterson, R.A.; Gursky, D.M.; McNally, R.J. Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. Behav. Res. Ther. 1986, 24, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batson, C.D.; Ahmad, N.; Lishner, D.A.; Tsang, J.-A. Empathy and altruism. In Handbook of Positive Psychology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2002; pp. 485–498. [Google Scholar]
- Arceneaux, K. Anxiety reduces empathy toward outgroup members but not ingroup members. J. Exp. Political Sci. 2017, 4, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; Willis, H. Intergroup bias. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2002, 53, 575–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stein, J.C. Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior. Q. J. Econ. 1989, 104, 655–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldie, P. The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Stephan, W.G.; Finlay, K. The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. J. Soc. Issues 1999, 55, 729–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McPherson, M.; Smith-Lovin, L.; Cook, J.M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2001, 27, 415–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, J. Aesthetics of the internet-context as a medium. In Cyberarts—International Compendium Prix Ars Electronica; Prix Ars: Linz, Austria, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- McLuhan, M.; Gordon, W.T. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man; Gingko Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Diresta, R. The New Media Goliaths. Noema Magazine, 1 June 2023. Available online: https://www.noemamag.com/the-new-media-goliaths/ (accessed on 25 February 2024).
- Ifeanyi, F. Inside the Good, Bad, and Very Ugly of Social Media Algorithms. Fast Company, 24 June 2022. Available online: https://www.fastcompany.com/90761087/inside-the-good-bad-and-very-ugly-of-social-media-algorithms (accessed on 1 June 2024).
- Cinelli, M.; De Francisci Morales, G.; Galeazzi, A.; Quattrociocchi, W.; Starnini, M. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2023301118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Rascaroli, L. How the Essay Film Thinks; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Albarello, F.; Crisp, R.J.; Birtel, M.D. Reducing prejudice with imagined and virtual intergroup contact: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2023, 149, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettigrew, T.F.; Tropp, L.R.; Wagner, U.; Christ, O. Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2011, 35, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerbner, G.; Gross, L.; Morgan, M.; Signorielli, N. The “Mainstreaming” of America: Violence Profile No. 11. J. Commun. 1980, 30, 10–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekman, P.; Friesen, W.V. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1971, 17, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, L.F.; Adolphs, R.; Marsella, S.; Martinez, A.M.; Pollak, S.D. Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 2019, 20, 1–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, W.-L.; Liu, W.; Lu, Y.; Lu, B.-L.; Cichocki, A. Emotionmeter: A multimodal framework for recognizing human emotions. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2019, 49, 1110–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rathje, S.; Van Bavel, J.J.; van der Linden, S. The hidden tribulations of social media engagement. J. Soc. Psychol. 2024, 45, 177–198. [Google Scholar]
- Taecharungroj, V. Starbucks’ marketing communications strategy on Twitter. J. Mark. Commun. 2017, 23, 552–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashokkumar, A.; Pennebaker, J.W. Tracking group identity through natural language within groups. PNAS Nexus 2022, 1, pgac022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Betts, L.R.; Rotenberg, K.J.; Trueman, M.; Stiller, J. The role of parasocial relationships in adolescents’ social media use and social connectedness. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023, 140, 107575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grondahl, V.A.; Schachner, M.K.; Schwarzenthal, M. Fostering empathy through direct and indirect intergroup contact. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2018, 74, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muniz, A.M., Jr.; O’Guinn, T.C. Brand community. J. Consum. Res. 2001, 27, 412–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mediator | Definition | Designed Narrative Element | Function of Narrative Element | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge | Understanding and awareness of cultural outgroups and their perspectives | Introduction and Narration | Providing factual information (e.g., historical background, cultural traditions) about the ethnic enclave | [3,25,42] |
Immersive visual representation | Showcasing the physical environment and key locations within the community | |||
Interviews | Gathering firsthand perspectives and lived experiences | |||
Anxiety Reduction | Reducing fear, discomfort, and apprehension associated with intergroup interactions and unfamiliar cultures | Storytellers’ * Experience | Showcasing respectful encounters (e.g., sharing meals, participating in cultural activities) between storytellers and community members | [4,47,64] |
Storytellers’ Reflection | Sharing personal learning experiences and vulnerability to build trust with viewers | |||
Real-life snapshots | Showcasing routines and activities within the ethnic enclave | |||
Empathy | The ability to understand and share the feelings of others, fostering emotional connection and perspective-taking | Vlog-style presentation | Creating a sense of immediacy and shared experience with viewers | [28,30,39,40,65] |
Highlighting interconnectedness | Showcasing shared human experiences and values to foster empathy and understanding |
Uyghur | Congolese | Somali | |
---|---|---|---|
Happiness | 73.3% | 35.3% | 81.3% |
Anger | 13.3% | 47.1% | 6.3% |
Surprise | 6.7% | 5.9% | 6.3% |
Disgust | 6.7% | 5.9% | 0% |
Uyghur | Congolese | Somali | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emotion | Comments * | Replies ** | Difference *** | Comments | Replies | Difference | Comments | Replies | Difference |
Happiness | 67.4% | 31.3% | 36.1% | 53.2% | 24.3% | 28.9% | 71.7% | 39.3% | 32.4% |
Anger | 11.6% | 31.3% | −19.7% | 12.4% | 27.9% | −15.5% | 5.1% | 22.4% | −17.3% |
Surprise | 9.3% | 21.9% | −12.6% | 12.2% | 14.6% | −2.4% | 12.1% | 14.9% | −2.8% |
Disgust | 2.3% | 6.3% | −4.0% | 9.5% | 16.2% | −6.7% | 4.2% | 10.7% | −6.5% |
Fear | 2.3% | 3.1% | −0.8% | 2.4% | 4.5% | −2.1% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.0% |
Sadness | 4.7% | 6.3% | −1.6% | 3.8% | 4.8% | −1.0% | 2.0% | 3.9% | −1.9% |
Uyghurs | Congolese | Somalis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source Content | AVD * | Source Content | AVD | Source Content | AVD |
Food and cuisine of Muslims in China | 0:06:06 | African–Chinese couples on the rise in Guangzhou, China | 0:04:56 | ** Storyteller’s video on Somalis in Minneapolis | 0:03:51 |
Religious identity of Uyghurs | 0:04:43 | Cultural exchange between Africans and Chinese | 0:04:28 | ** Storyteller’s video on trying Somalis food in Minneapolis | 0:04:05 |
** Storyteller’s video on Congolese in Guangzhou | 0:05:49 | Life challenges faced by the Africans in China | 0:05:30 | Appreciation toward Somalis | 0:04:34 |
Political issues on Uyghurs | 0:03:41 | Racial and societal challenges faced by the Africans in China | 0:05:41 | ** Storyteller’s video on Congolese in Guangzhou | 0:03:32 |
** Storyteller’s video on Somalis in Guangzhou | 0:04:46 | Discrimination faced by the Africans in China | 0:05:55 | ** Storyteller’s video on Somali food party in Tokyo | 0:03:57 |
** Storyteller’s video on Shia Muslims in Japan | 0:03:27 | Cultural exchange between Africans and Chinese | 0:05:57 | Somali fashion | 0:04:31 |
Muslim religious practice in China | 0:03:45 | ** Storyteller’s video on Somalis in Guangzhou | 0:05:20 | Physical appearance of Somalis | 0:03:47 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, D.; Kokuryo, J. The Role of Networked Narratives in Amplifying or Mitigating Intergroup Prejudice: A YouTube Case Study. Societies 2024, 14, 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14090192
Kim D, Kokuryo J. The Role of Networked Narratives in Amplifying or Mitigating Intergroup Prejudice: A YouTube Case Study. Societies. 2024; 14(9):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14090192
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Daum, and Jiro Kokuryo. 2024. "The Role of Networked Narratives in Amplifying or Mitigating Intergroup Prejudice: A YouTube Case Study" Societies 14, no. 9: 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14090192
APA StyleKim, D., & Kokuryo, J. (2024). The Role of Networked Narratives in Amplifying or Mitigating Intergroup Prejudice: A YouTube Case Study. Societies, 14(9), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14090192