In Their Own Words: The Significance of Participant Perceptions in Assessing Entomology Citizen Science Learning Outcomes Using a Mixed Methods Approach

Lynch, Louise I.; Dauer, Jenny M.; Babchuk, Wayne A.; Heng-Moss, Tiffany; Golick, Doug

doi:10.3390/insects9010016

Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue

Article Menu

...

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

In Their Own Words: The Significance of Participant Perceptions in Assessing Entomology Citizen Science Learning Outcomes Using a Mixed Methods Approach

^1,*,

²,

³,

⁴ and

Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, ENTO 103B, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA

School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, HARH 502, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, TEAC 225, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA

⁴

College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, AGH 103, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Insects 2018, 9(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9010016

Received: 31 December 2017 / Revised: 18 January 2018 / Accepted: 30 January 2018 / Published: 6 February 2018

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Arthropod Education)

View Full-Text Download PDF

Browse Figure

Citation Export

Abstract

A mixed methods study was used to transcend the traditional pre-, post-test approach of citizen science evaluative research by integrating adults’ test scores with their perceptions. We assessed how contributory entomology citizen science affects participants’ science self-efficacy, self-efficacy for environmental action, nature relatedness and attitude towards insects. Pre- and post-test score analyses from citizen scientists (n = 28) and a control group (n = 72) were coupled with interviews (n = 11) about science experiences and entomological interactions during participation. Considering quantitative data alone, no statistically significant changes were evident in adults following participation in citizen science when compared to the control group. Citizen scientists’ pre-test scores were significantly higher than the control group for self-efficacy for environmental action, nature relatedness and attitude towards insects. Interview data reveal a notable discrepancy between measured and perceived changes. In general, citizen scientists had an existing, long-term affinity for the natural world and perceived increases in their science self-efficacy, self-efficacy for environmental action, nature relatedness and attitude towards insects. Perceived influences may act independently of test scores. Scale instruments may not show impacts with variances in individual’s prior knowledge and experiences. The value of mixed methods on citizen science program evaluation is discussed. View Full-Text

Keywords: citizen science; mixed methods; perceived influence; self-efficacy; attitude towards insects

▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lynch, L.I.; Dauer, J.M.; Babchuk, W.A.; Heng-Moss, T.; Golick, D. In Their Own Words: The Significance of Participant Perceptions in Assessing Entomology Citizen Science Learning Outcomes Using a Mixed Methods Approach. Insects 2018, 9, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9010016

AMA Style

Lynch LI, Dauer JM, Babchuk WA, Heng-Moss T, Golick D. In Their Own Words: The Significance of Participant Perceptions in Assessing Entomology Citizen Science Learning Outcomes Using a Mixed Methods Approach. Insects. 2018; 9(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9010016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lynch, Louise I., Jenny M. Dauer, Wayne A. Babchuk, Tiffany Heng-Moss, and Doug Golick. 2018. "In Their Own Words: The Significance of Participant Perceptions in Assessing Entomology Citizen Science Learning Outcomes Using a Mixed Methods Approach" Insects 9, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9010016

Find Other Styles

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Abstract views Pdf views Html views

Article Menu

In Their Own Words: The Significance of Participant Perceptions in Assessing Entomology Citizen Science Learning Outcomes Using a Mixed Methods Approach

Abstract

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI