1. Introduction
Adhesive capsulitis [
1,
2], commonly referred to as frozen shoulder, is a clinical syndrome marked by progressive shoulder pain and significant limitation in both active and passive ranges of motion. Its prevalence in the general population ranges between 2–5% [
3], while among individuals with diabetes mellitus, it increases markedly to 10–30% [
4]. The condition predominantly affects adults aged 40–60, with a higher incidence reported in women compared to men [
5]. Clinically, adhesive capsulitis progresses through three distinct phases: the painful “freezing” phase, the stiff “frozen” phase, and the recovery or “thawing” phase [
3,
6]. While spontaneous resolution occurs in some cases, long-term studies indicate that up to 50% of patients continue to experience persistent pain, stiffness, or functional impairment even several years post-onset [
7]. For instance, Shaffer et al. [
8] found that approximately half of the patients in their study exhibited ongoing symptoms at an average follow-up exceeding seven years (range: 2–11.75 years).
Imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and staging of adhesive capsulitis, as well as in the differentiation from other shoulder pathologies such as rotator cuff tears, calcific tendinopathy, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis [
9,
10]. Although magnetic resonance imaging remains the reference standard for assessing intra-articular structures, its clinical utility may be constrained by high cost, limited availability, and longer examination times [
11,
12,
13]. Musculoskeletal ultrasound has emerged as a valuable imaging modality due to its affordability, portability, absence of ionizing radiation, and capacity for dynamic, real-time assessment at the point of care [
14,
15]. Moleesaide et al. [
16] demonstrated that ultrasound enables detailed visualization of key structures involved in adhesive capsulitis, including the coracohumeral ligament, rotator interval, axillary pouch, and biceps tendon sheath, while also identifying concurrent soft tissue abnormalities such as subacromial bursitis or tenosynovitis.
Recent technological advancements have further expanded the utility of ultrasound. Dynamic imaging and sonoelastography now allow for functional and mechanical assessments of soft tissues. For instance, Kato et al. [
17] applied particle image velocimetry to ultrasound cine loops and identified reduced mobility of the coracohumeral ligament in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Similarly, Cheng et al. [
18] used contrast-enhanced ultrasound arthrography with SonoVue to show decreased axillary recess distensibility and increased contrast leakage, providing further diagnostic distinction from normal shoulders. Moreover, several studies have described characteristic sonographic findings such as thickening of the coracohumeral ligament and hypoechoic changes in the axillary capsule [
19,
20]. Emerging evidence from meta-analyses supports the diagnostic accuracy of these features [
21,
22].
In light of these developments, a comprehensive (pictorial) review of ultrasound applications—including static and dynamic imaging techniques as well as sonoelastography—in the evaluation of adhesive capsulitis is warranted. As such, this narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence and elucidate the expanding role of ultrasound as both a diagnostic and potentially therapeutic modality in the management of this challenging shoulder disorder.
2. Pathogenesis
Although the precise etiology of adhesive capsulitis remains unclear, its pathogenesis is characterized by an initial phase of chronic inflammation followed by fibrosis and capsular contracture, particularly affecting the rotator interval and axillary recess [
23]. Histopathological analyses have revealed dense fibroblastic proliferation, increased collagen deposition, and synovial hyperplasia within the affected capsule. In a pivotal study, tissue from the rotator interval exhibiting features akin to Dupuytren’s disease—i.e., active fibroblast proliferation, minimal inflammation, and disorganized collagen architecture—was observed [
24].
At the molecular level, dysregulated cytokine signaling is thought to drive the fibrotic process. Rodeo et al. [
25] identified elevated levels of transforming growth factor-beta, connective tissue growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor in the shoulder capsule, all of which promote myofibroblast activation and extracellular matrix accumulation, leading to capsular thickening and contracture. Additionally, increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators—such as interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and matrix metalloproteinases—have been detected in the synovial fluid and capsular tissue, suggesting an active inflammatory phase early in the disease course [
26]. Over time, this inflammation transitions into tissue remodeling and fibrosis.
A thorough understanding of these molecular and histological changes is crucial for interpreting sonographic findings in adhesive capsulitis (including ligamentous thickening, synovial effusion, and capsular stiffness), which are discussed in the following sections.
3. Literature Search Strategy
Although this article is a narrative review, a structured and systematic approach was adopted to ensure inclusion of the most relevant and high-quality literature on ultrasound imaging in adhesive capsulitis. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted for articles published up to June 2025. The strategy focused on identifying original research, as well as systematic reviews and meta-analyses, that evaluated the role of both static and dynamic ultrasound imaging, including sonoelastography, in the assessment of adhesive capsulitis. Where multiple original studies addressed a given topic, results from systematic reviews or meta-analyses were prioritized and will be summarized accordingly to provide a higher level of evidence.
The search incorporated the following terms and their combinations: “adhesive capsulitis,” “frozen shoulder,” “ultrasound,” “sonography,” “dynamic ultrasound,” “sonoelastography,” and “shoulder stiffness.” Boolean operators (AND, OR) were applied to optimize sensitivity and specificity. For instance, the combination (“adhesive capsulitis” OR “frozen shoulder”) AND (“ultrasound” OR “sonography” OR “sonoelastography”) was used to identify the relevant literature. A flow diagram showing the literature selection process (
Figure S1) is included in the
Supplemental Materials.
Eligible studies met at least one of the following inclusion criteria: (1) documentation of sonographic structural changes such as thickening of the coracohumeral ligament or axillary pouch; (2) evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy or clinical utility of ultrasound; (3) analysis of sonoelastographic findings in the capsule or surrounding tissues; or (4) assessment of dynamic sonographic signs of movement limitation. Studies were excluded if they lacked imaging data, were unrelated to adhesive capsulitis, or consisted of non-peer-reviewed content such as conference abstracts or commentaries or were deemed less representative of the corresponding categories. The probe placement angle, set frequency, and other relevant scanning parameters for the included studies are summarized in
Tables S1–S4 in the
Supplementary Materials.
4. Static B-Mode Examination
In the realm of static B-mode ultrasound for adhesive capsulitis, recent meta-analyses reinforce its diagnostic accuracy. A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis [
21] which included seven studies comprising 446 patients (490 shoulders), evaluated the accuracy of grey-scale ultrasonography against magnetic resonance imaging or arthroscopy as reference standards. The analysis reported an overall sensitivity of 88% (95% CI: 74–95%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI: 88–99%), with a positive likelihood ratio of 23.89 (95% CI: 6.31–90.51), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05–0.29), and an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96–0.98). These results underscore the high diagnostic performance of ultrasound in identifying adhesive capsulitis.
Four characteristic sonographic features were identified: coracohumeral ligament thickening (defined as a threshold of 3.0 mm) (
Figure 1), inferior capsule thickening (cutoff values ranging from 2.0 mm to 3.5 mm) (
Figure 2), rotator interval abnormalities (hypoechoic soft tissue thickening and/or increased vascularity) (
Figure 3), and restriction of the range of motion. Their respective sensitivities were 64.4% (95% CI: 48.8–78.1), 82.1% (95% CI: 73.8–88.7), 82.6% (95% CI: 74.1–89.2), and 94.3% (95% CI: 84.3–98.8), while specificities were 88.9% (95% CI: 76.0–96.3), 95.7% (95% CI: 90.3–98.6), 93.9% (95% CI: 89.8–96.7), and 90.9% (95% CI: 75.7–98.1), respectively. The restriction of the range of motion will be further elaborated in the section on Dynamic Examination. These findings support the incorporation of B-mode ultrasound into routine diagnostic workflows for adhesive capsulitis, particularly in settings where magnetic resonance imaging is less accessible or cost-prohibitive.
Although four sonographic features—thickening of the coracohumeral ligament, thickening of the inferior capsule, abnormalities at the rotator interval, and restriction of range of motion during dynamic ultrasound—were identified in the meta-analysis by Wu et al. [
21], their definitions and measurement criteria varied significantly across studies. For instance, thickening of the coracohumeral ligament was quantitatively defined in only one study [
27], and the criteria used to define abnormalities at the rotator interval were inconsistently applied. These variations represent a limitation of the meta-analysis and highlight the broader lack of standardization in the ultrasound evaluation of adhesive capsulitis. In the latter part of this section, several representative studies are discussed.
Homsi et al. [
19] included 17 arthrography-confirmed adhesive capsulitis cases among a cohort of 306 patients and found that mean coracohumeral ligament thickness measured by ultrasound was notably elevated at 3 mm in affected shoulders, compared to 1.34 mm in asymptomatic shoulders and 1.39 mm in other painful shoulders (all
p < 0.05). This early evidence underpins the use of coracohumeral ligament thickening as a sonographic hallmark of the condition.
In parallel, Michelin et al. [
28] conducted a retrospective ultrasound study evaluating inferior capsule thickness in 20 patients with unilateral capsular contracture confirmed either clinically or by magnetic resonance imaging. Using the axillary approach during maximal abduction, they measured the inferior glenohumeral capsule orthogonally to the inferior glenohumeral ligament. The average capsule thickness was significantly greater in affected shoulders (4.0 mm) than in asymptomatic contralateral shoulders (1.3 mm), with a
p-value < 0.0001. These results not only reinforce the diagnostic relevance of inferior capsule thickening but also emphasize the utility of standardized measurement techniques in improving the sonographic assessment of adhesive capsulitis. This study has several limitations. It only included patients with clinically evident stiff shoulders, limiting applicability to earlier disease stages, and did not assess the reliability or measurement error of the ultrasound technique. Additionally, the monocentric design and small sample size warrant confirmation through larger prospective studies.
Regarding abnormalities in the rotator cuff, Lee et al. [
29] exemplified those changes by prospectively investigating 30 individuals clinically diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis and comparing them with two control groups: 10 healthy volunteers and 100 patients with suspected rotator cuff tears. The diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis was based on clinical criteria, including shoulder pain and stiffness lasting more than 15 weeks, increasing severity at rest, and restricted motion greater than 30° in at least two planes. Using both grayscale and color Doppler ultrasound, the researchers assessed the rotator interval. Among the adhesive capsulitis group, 87% (26 patients) exhibited a hypoechoic pattern with increased vascularity in the rotator interval. Three patients showed hypoechoic changes without hypervascularity, while one had normal sonographic findings. Arthroscopic evaluation—performed in all cases—confirmed fibrovascular inflammatory soft-tissue changes in the rotator interval consistent with adhesive capsulitis. In contrast, such sonographic and arthroscopic features were absent in healthy individuals and those with suspected rotator cuff tears.
5. Contrast Enhanced Examination
This technique has emerged as a promising tool for evaluating adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Ahn et al. [
30] assessed the rotator interval in five patients with unilateral adhesive capsulitis and reported a significantly higher mean peak contrast intensity in the affected shoulders (5.45 dB) compared to the unaffected side (0.72 dB;
p < 0.05), paralleling contrast-enhanced MRI results. Cheng et al. [
18] demonstrated that ultrasound arthrography using the contrast agent SonoVue significantly improved diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional ultrasound. In their comparative study of 45 patients with adhesive capsulitis and 45 matched controls, the axillary recess volume was significantly reduced in the adhesive capsulitis group (mean 1.14 mL) compared to controls (mean 1.59 mL;
p < 0.05). Moreover, intra-articular filling defects were observed in 91% of affected shoulders, and synovitis-like abnormalities in 76%, whereas these features were absent in the control group. More recently, Cheng et al. [
27] utilized contrast-enhanced ultrasound during ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation in 40 patients and achieved a first-attempt joint access success rate of 87.5% with an average injection volume of 21 mL. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound allowed for real-time visualization of capsular expansion and identified extracapsular fluid leakage in approximately 80% of patients who showed limited clinical improvement. Collectively, these findings indicate that ultrasound contrast agents such as SonoVue not only improve visualization of adhesive capsulitis-related pathology but also enhance procedural accuracy and may help predict treatment response [
31].
However, it is important to note that neither of the cited studies directly compared the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with conventional grayscale or Doppler ultrasound. As such, the added diagnostic value of contrast enhancement remains uncertain. Additionally, the use of contrast agents introduces practical limitations, including higher cost, the need for intravenous or intra-articular administration, and limited applicability in routine outpatient clinical practice. These factors significantly constrain the generalizability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and should be acknowledged as major limitations in the current literature.
6. Dynamic Examination
Dynamic ultrasound has been widely explored for its diagnostic potential in evaluating adhesive capsulitis, particularly due to its ability to capture movement limitations in real time [
32]. Ryu and colleagues [
33] focused on identifying restricted sliding of the supraspinatus tendon beneath the acromion during shoulder elevation (
Figure 4). During the examination, the sonographer stabilized the patient’s elbow and used a longitudinal transducer placement over the supraspinatus tendon to visualize its motion as the arm was abducted. Two key sonographic findings were proposed as indicators of adhesive capsulitis: (1) persistent restriction of the tendon’s gliding motion and (2) uninterrupted visualization of the supraspinatus tendon throughout arm elevation (
Video S1, normal shoulder;
Video S2, adhesive capsulitis). The diagnostic performance of these ultrasound findings was validated against arthrography, which served as the reference standard. Among the 23 patients with arthrographically confirmed adhesive capsulitis, 21 demonstrated the sonographic criteria of adhesive capsulitis, resulting in a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 100%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 92%. These findings underscore the value of dynamic ultrasound in detecting functional limitations associated with adhesive capsulitis, particularly involving the supraspinatus tendon. However, it should be noted that the study did not include a dedicated control group. All enrolled subjects were clinically suspected of having frozen shoulders, and the specificity values were based only on those not meeting the arthrographic criteria. This limits the generalizability of the findings, as the proposed ultrasound features may not be entirely specific to adhesive capsulitis and could potentially be observed in other shoulder pathologies. This limitation should be taken into account when interpreting the diagnostic utility of dynamic ultrasound in clinical practice.
Tandon and colleagues [
34] evaluated 90 individuals—comprising 30 patients with adhesive capsulitis, 30 with nonspecific shoulder pain, and 30 healthy controls—to compare dynamic sonographic findings with clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging. Two experienced sonographers independently assessed the restriction of abduction and external rotation. Their results showed that restriction of external rotation (
Figure 5) was a highly specific indicator of adhesive capsulitis, with a sensitivity of 86.2% and a specificity of 92.8%. In contrast, restriction of abduction was found to be nonspecific, with a specificity of only 6.7%. These findings suggest that dynamic assessment of external rotation is more reliable than that of abduction for diagnosing adhesive capsulitis.
Recently, Chang et al. [
35] introduced the humerus-acromion angle model to assess adhesive capsulitis severity by quantifying scapulohumeral rhythm during shoulder abduction. Normally, it follows a 2:1 ratio—every 3° of elevation involves 2° at the glenohumeral joint and 1° from scapular rotation. During ultrasound, positioning the probe along the acromion, while the patient abducts the arm, reveals a progressive angle increase between the acromial cortex and the humerus, ranging from ~120° at rest to ~240° at full abduction. This change reflects both glenohumeral rotation and inferior humeral translation. In frozen shoulder, this angle plateaus prematurely despite passive elevation, indicating impaired glenohumeral motion. Further abduction then depends on limited scapular rotation (~60°). This model offers a more precise means to evaluate mechanical constraints in glenohumeral adhesive capsulitis (
Figure 6).
7. Sonoelastography
This is an advanced ultrasound technique that quantifies tissue stiffness and has emerged as a promising modality for evaluating adhesive capsulitis. By providing both qualitative and quantitative insights into the biomechanical properties of the shoulder capsule and surrounding soft tissues, it complements conventional B-mode ultrasound. Further, sonoelastography offers functional information that may aid in staging the disease and guiding treatment planning.
Wu and colleagues [
36] examined the elasticity of the coracohumeral ligament using shear wave elastography in 20 patients with clinically suspected adhesive capsulitis and 30 healthy individuals (
Figure 7). Measurements of ligament thickness and stiffness were taken from both shoulders in the neutral position and under maximal external rotation. Among the patients, the symptomatic shoulders showed significantly greater coracohumeral ligament thickness (
p < 0.001) and a higher elastic modulus in the neutral position (median 234.8 kilopascals, interquartile range 174.4 to 256.7) compared to the asymptomatic side (median 203.3 kilopascals, interquartile range 144.1 to 242.7;
p = 0.004). However, this difference was not statistically significant under maximal external rotation (
p = 0.123).
Yun and colleagues [
37] conducted a prospective case-control study involving 25 symptomatic shoulders from 20 patients with adhesive capsulitis and 24 asymptomatic shoulders from 18 individuals as controls. Both shear wave and strain elastography were performed on the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. In patients with adhesive capsulitis, the mean velocity and stiffness were significantly higher (
p < 0.001), while the strain ratio (defined as strain in the subcutaneous fat divided by strain in the target tendon) was significantly lower (
p < 0.001) than in the control group (
Figure 8). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed excellent diagnostic accuracy, with area under the curve values exceeding 0.970 for both tendons. Subsequently, Chang et al. [
38] raised concerns regarding the interpretation of the strain ratio whereby they pointed out that in normal physiology, tendons are stiffer than subcutaneous fat and therefore exhibit less strain, which should result in a strain ratio greater than 1. However, the reported median strain ratio of the supraspinatus tendon in the control group was 0.38, suggesting an inconsistency in either the calculation or interpretation of the strain values. This discrepancy underscores the need for standardized reporting conventions in elastography studies.
Chiu and colleagues [
39] published a systematic review and meta-analysis that included 11 cross-sectional studies. They found a trend toward increased stiffness in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons in patients with adhesive capsulitis, with standardized mean differences of 2.103 (95% confidence interval, –0.151 to 4.357;
p = 0.067) and 1.548 (95% confidence interval, –0.032 to 3.127;
p = 0.055), respectively.
Although sonoelastography is still a relatively new tool in musculoskeletal imaging, the aforementioned early findings suggest that it may allow for earlier detection of pathological stiffness, improve staging accuracy, and support more individualized treatment approaches in patients with adhesive capsulitis. However, its routine use in clinical practice will require further validation through studies with standardized acquisition protocols and normative reference data.
8. Clinical Utility and Limitations
In clinical settings, ultrasound serves as a valuable tool for evaluating structural changes associated with adhesive capsulitis. Key sonographic features include thickening of the coracohumeral ligament, fibrosis within the axillary pouch, and abnormal tendon motion patterns. The dynamic capabilities further enable real-time assessment during shoulder movement, which can aid in differentiating adhesive capsulitis from other conditions presenting with pain and stiffness, such as subacromial impingement or rotator cuff disorders.
In addition to its diagnostic utility, ultrasound increasingly supports therapeutic interventions for adhesive capsulitis. Image-guided techniques improve the precision of intra-articular corticosteroid injections and hydrodilatation procedures [
40,
41,
42,
43] intended to stretch the contracted joint capsule. Real-time targeting of specific regions, such as the rotator interval or axillary recess, may enhance the accuracy and comfort of these interventions. Emerging applications, including elastographic measurement of capsular stiffness, hold potential for tailoring treatment (based on disease severity or progression), though such uses remain largely investigational.
In our review of the sonoelastography section, Wu et al. [
36] reported that patients with adhesive capsulitis exhibited increased coracohumeral ligament thickness and stiffness, as measured by shear wave elastography, particularly in the neutral shoulder position. Similarly, Yun et al. [
37] employed both shear wave and strain elastography on the rotator cuff tendons and found significantly higher stiffness and lower strain ratios in affected shoulders, reflecting altered biomechanical properties. However, as highlighted by Chang et al. [
38], inconsistencies in the interpretation of strain ratios—such as the unexpectedly low values reported for control subjects—emphasize the need for standardized methodologies. Collectively, these findings support the clinical utility of sonoelastography while reinforcing the importance of consistent reporting protocols to enable reliable comparisons across studies.
Furthermore, ultrasound can help differentiate true adhesive capsulitis from other conditions with overlapping symptoms, such as subacromial impingement syndrome [
44,
45]. In cases of adhesive capsulitis, the glenohumeral capsule may demonstrate regionally uneven thickening. Ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation [
46,
47,
48,
49] can be tailored to specifically target these affected areas [
50]. For example, our review highlights that thickening of the coracohumeral ligament—which is connected to the anterior glenohumeral capsule—is a common finding in adhesive capsulitis and may warrant more focused intervention.
Despite its advantages, a major limitation in the current literature on ultrasound for adhesive capsulitis is the lack of standardized definitions for sonographic features. Studies frequently adopt varying diagnostic criteria and focus on different anatomical landmarks, leading to inconsistencies in interpretation and limited comparability. For example, while some reports highlight coracohumeral ligament thickening or axillary pouch fibrosis, the threshold values and measurement techniques vary considerably across investigations. This heterogeneity hampers the development of universally accepted protocols and undermines the reproducibility of ultrasound-based diagnoses.
Beyond definitional inconsistencies, several methodological limitations remain insufficiently addressed. These include the influence of individual patient anatomy, the high cost and potential adverse effects of contrast agents used in certain studies, and concerns regarding the overall cost-effectiveness of these imaging approaches. The operator-dependent nature of ultrasound—where diagnostic accuracy is strongly influenced by the physician’s skill and experience—further contributes to variability in findings. Additionally, many studies involve small sample sizes without adequate justification, limiting statistical power and generalizability. In some cases, the absence of a control group further weakens the strength of the conclusions, and the rationale for this omission should be explicitly stated to aid interpretation. Establishing consensus definitions and standardized imaging protocols—ideally through multicenter studies, expert panel recommendations, and rigorous methodological design—will be crucial for improving diagnostic reliability and promoting broader clinical adoption.
9. Conclusions
In addition to its ability to detect key structural abnormalities, recent advances in B-mode static imaging, dynamic assessment, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and sonoelastography have upscaled our insight into the biomechanical and pathological features of adhesive capsulitis. Although limitations such as operator dependency and limited visualization of intra-articular components persist, ultrasound remains a highly accessible and increasingly sophisticated modality. Ongoing efforts to standardize imaging protocols and validate novel techniques will be critical to fully realize its diagnostic and therapeutic potential in the management of this condition.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics15151924/s1, Figure S1: Flow Diagram of Literature Search; Table S1: Integrated Summary of Ultrasound Scanning Parameters in Adhesive Capsulitis: Static B-Mode Examination; Table S2: Integrated Summary of Ultrasound Scanning Parameters in Adhesive Capsulitis: Contrast Enhanced Examination; Table S3: Integrated Summary of Ultrasound Scanning Parameters in Adhesive Capsulitis: Dynamic Examination; Table S4: Integrated Summary of Ultrasound Scanning Parameters in Adhesive Capsulitis: Sonoelastography; Video S1: Dynamic ultrasound examination in a normal shoulder; Video S2: Dynamic ultrasound examination in a shoulder with adhesive capsulitis.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization W.-T.W. and K.-V.C.; methodology, K.-V.C.; software, W.-T.W.; validation, K.M., V.R. and C.B.G.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-T.W.; writing—review and editing, K.-V.C. and L.Ö.; funding acquisition, K.-V.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch; the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 106-2314-B-002-180-MY3 and MOST 109-2314-B-002-114-MY3); and National Science and Technology, Taiwan (NSTC 112-2314-B-002-134, NSTC 113-2314-B-002-208-MY2, NSTC 113-2314-B-002-209-MY2 and NSTC 114-2923-B-002-002-MY3).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Mullen, J.P.; Hauer, T.M.; Lau, E.N.; Lin, A. Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder. Arthroscopy 2025, 41, 2176–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, M.R. Adhesive capsulitis: Current concepts. Musculoskelet. Surg. 2025. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; St Angelo, J.M.; Taqi, M. Adhesive Capsulitis (Frozen Shoulder); StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, M.H.; Chen, W.S. A Narrative Review of Adhesive Capsulitis with Diabetes. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kingston, K.; Curry, E.J.; Galvin, J.W.; Li, X. Shoulder adhesive capsulitis: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2018, 27, 1437–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leafblad, N.; Mizels, J.; Tashjian, R.; Chalmers, P. Adhesive Capsulitis. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2023, 34, 453–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Le, H.V.; Lee, S.J.; Nazarian, A.; Rodriguez, E.K. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: Review of pathophysiology and current clinical treatments. Shoulder Elb. 2017, 9, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shaffer, B.; Tibone, J.E.; Kerlan, R.K. Frozen shoulder. A long-term follow-up. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1992, 74, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picasso, R.; Pistoia, F.; Zaottini, F.; Marcenaro, G.; Miguel-Pérez, M.; Tagliafico, A.S.; Martinoli, C. Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: Current Concepts on the Diagnostic Work-Up and Evidence-Based Protocol for Radiological Evaluation. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vita, F.; Pederiva, D.; Tedeschi, R.; Spinnato, P.; Origlio, F.; Faldini, C.; Miceli, M.; Stella, S.M.; Galletti, S.; Cavallo, M.; et al. Adhesive capsulitis: The importance of early diagnosis and treatment. J. Ultrasound 2024, 27, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murali, S.; Ding, H.; Adedeji, F.; Qin, C.; Obungoloch, J.; Asllani, I.; Anazodo, U.; Ntusi, N.A.B.; Mammen, R.; Niendorf, T.; et al. Bringing MRI to low- and middle-income countries: Directions, challenges and potential solutions. NMR Biomed. 2024, 37, e4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, J.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W.V.; Luo, M.; Gao, H.; Zhang, K. Magnetic resonance imaging features for diagnosing adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2025, 26, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitriou, D.; Winkler, E.; Zindel, C.; Grubhofer, F.; Wieser, K.; Bouaicha, S. Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder. JSES Int. 2022, 6, 855–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, M.; Xie, K. Advances in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Assistive Diagnosis in Pain Clinics. Pain Ther. 2025, 14, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adler, R.S. Musculoskeletal ultrasound: A technical and historical perspective. J. Ultrason. 2023, 23, e172–e187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moleesaide, A.; Saengsuwan, J.; Sirasaporn, P. Musculoskeletal ultrasound of the shoulder in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Biomed. Rep. 2024, 21, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kato, T.; Inui, A.; Mifune, Y.; Nishimoto, H.; Yoshikawa, T.; Shinohara, I.; Furukawa, T.; Tanaka, S.; Kusunose, M.; Kuroda, R. Dynamic Analysis of the Coracohumeral Ligament Using Ultra-Sonography in Shoulder Contracture. Sensors 2023, 23, 4015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xuanyan, G.; Li, T.; Li, J.; Yin, L.; Lu, M. Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: Evaluation With US-Arthrography Using a Sonographic Contrast Agent. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homsi, C.; Bordalo-Rodrigues, M.; da Silva, J.J.; Stump, X.M. Ultrasound in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: Is assessment of the coracohumeral ligament a valuable diagnostic tool? Skelet. Radiol. 2006, 35, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cho, H.R.; Cho, B.H.; Kang, K.N.; Kim, Y.U. Optimal Cut-Off Value of the Coracohumeral Ligament Area as a Morphological Parameter to Confirm Frozen Shoulder. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2020, 35, e99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Tian, H.; Dong, F.; Liang, W.; Song, D.; Zeng, J.; Ding, Z.; Shi, Y.; Luo, H.; Xu, J. The role of grey-scale ultrasound in the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med. Ultrason. 2020, 22, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrestha-Taylor, S.; Clarke, J.L.; Poulos, A.; Ginn, K. Ultrasound Features for the Diagnosis of Adhesive Capsulitis/Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2022, 48, 2379–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bunker, T.D. Frozen shoulder: Unravelling the enigma. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1997, 79, 210–213. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bunker, T.D.; Anthony, P.P. The pathology of frozen shoulder. A Dupuytren-like disease. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 1995, 77, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodeo, S.A.; Hannafin, J.A.; Tom, J.; Warren, R.F.; Wickiewicz, T.L. Immunolocalization of cytokines and their receptors in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J. Orthop. Res. 1997, 15, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lho, Y.M.; Ha, E.; Cho, C.H.; Song, K.S.; Min, B.W.; Bae, K.C.; Lee, K.J.; Hwang, I.; Park, H.B. Inflammatory cytokines are overexpressed in the subacromial bursa of frozen shoulder. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2013, 22, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, M.; Qiao, L.; Xu, J.; Lu, M. A preliminary study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound guided capsule-preserving hydrodilatation in shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2024, 14, 4804–4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michelin, P.; Delarue, Y.; Duparc, F.; Dacher, J.N. Thickening of the inferior glenohumeral capsule: An ultrasound sign for shoulder capsular contracture. Eur. Radiol. 2013, 23, 2802–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.C.; Sykes, C.; Saifuddin, A.; Connell, D. Adhesive capsulitis: Sonographic changes in the rotator cuff interval with arthroscopic correlation. Skelet. Radiol. 2005, 34, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahn, K.S.; Kang, C.H.; Jeong, W.K. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis: Preliminary Experience. Iran. J. Radiol. 2016, 14, e33069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezian, K.; Chang, K.V. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Frozen Shoulder. J. Med. Ultrasound 2019, 27, 146–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricci, V.; Chang, K.V.; Güvener, O.; Mezian, K.; Kara, M.; Leblebicioğlu, G.; Stecco, C.; Pirri, C.; Ata, A.M.; Dughbaj, M.; et al. EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM Dynamic Ultrasound Protocols for Shoulder. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2022, 101, e29–e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, K.N.; Lee, S.W.; Rhee, Y.G.; Lim, J.H. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: Usefulness of dynamic sonography. J. Ultrasound Med. 1993, 12, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tandon, A.; Dewan, S.; Bhatt, S.; Jain, A.K.; Kumari, R. Sonography in diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A case-control study. J. Ultrasound 2017, 20, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, K.V.; Wu, W.T.; Shu, Y.C.; Lin, C.Y.; Özçakar, L. Humerus-acromion angle model: A novel dynamic ultrasound technique for assessing shoulder mobility in adhesive capsulitis. Med. Ultrason. 2025, 27, 246–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.H.; Chen, W.S.; Wang, T.G. Elasticity of the Coracohumeral Ligament in Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder. Radiology 2016, 278, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, S.J.; Jin, W.; Cho, N.S.; Ryu, K.N.; Yoon, Y.C.; Cha, J.G.; Park, J.S.; Park, S.Y.; Choi, N.Y. Shear-Wave and Strain Ultrasound Elastography of the Supraspinatus and Infraspinatus Tendons in Patients with Idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Prospective Case-Control Study. Korean J. Radiol. 2019, 20, 1176–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, K.V.; Wu, W.T.; Chen, I.J.; Lin, C.Y. Strain Ratio of Ultrasound Elastography for the Evaluation of Tendon Elasticity. Korean J. Radiol. 2020, 21, 384–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiu, Y.H.; Chang, K.V.; Chen, I.J.; Wu, W.T.; Özçakar, L. Utility of sonoelastography for the evaluation of rotator cuff tendon and pertinent disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2020, 30, 6663–6672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.C.; Hsu, P.C.; Wang, K.A.; Wu, W.T.; Chang, K.V. Comparative Effectiveness of Corticosteroid Dosages for Ultrasound-Guided Glenohumeral Joint Hydrodilatation in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2023, 104, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.C.; Tsai, P.Y.; Hsu, P.C.; Huang, J.R.; Wang, K.A.; Chou, C.L.; Chang, K.V. Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodilatation With Triamcinolone Acetonide for Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Posterior Glenohumeral Recess and the Rotator Cuff Interval Approaches. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 686139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, W.T.; Chang, K.V.; Han, D.S.; Chang, C.H.; Yang, F.S.; Lin, C.P. Effectiveness of Glenohumeral Joint Dilatation for Treatment of Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guan, H.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Fan, X.; Zheng, K.; Si, T.; Zhao, J. A retrospective study of ultrasound-guided intervention for frozen shoulder in the frozen stage. Front. Surg. 2022, 9, 998590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dede, B.T.; Aytekin, E.; Bağcier, F. Measures of acromiohumeral distance with wireless ultrasound machine in subacromial impingement syndrome: An inter-machine reliability study. J. Ultrason. 2024, 24, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al Khayyat, S.G.; Stella, S.M.; Trentanni, C.; Falsetti, P.; Frediani, B.; Del Chiaro, A.; Galletti, S. Ultrasound definition of subacromial chronic “fibro-adhesive” bursitis and its treatment via ultrasound guided hydrodilation: A prospective pilot study. J. Ultrasound 2024, 27, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pimenta, M.; Vassalou, E.E.; Klontzas, M.E.; Dimitri-Pinheiro, S.; Ramos, I.; Karantanas, A.H. Ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation for adhesive capsulitis: Capsule-preserving versus capsule-rupturing technique. Skelet. Radiol. 2024, 53, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Zhu, J. A Retrospective Study of Ultrasound-guided Hydrodilatation of Glenohumeral Joint Combined with Corticosteroid Injection in Patients with Frozen Shoulder. Curr. Med. Imaging 2025, 21, e15734056338176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Xiong, M.; Kang, Y.; Liu, J.; Fang, M.; Chen, L. Short-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided capsule-preserving hydrodilatation for primary frozen shoulder using 5% dextrose water vs. corticosteroid: A randomized controlled trial. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dakkak, M.; Genin, J.; Wichman, L.; Zhang, C.; Patel, V. A team approach to adhesive capsulitis with ultrasound guided hydrodilatation: A retrospective study. Pain Manag. 2024, 14, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhim, H.C.; Schon, J.M.; Xu, R.; Schowalter, S.; Ha, J.; Hsu, C.; Andrew, M.; Robinson, D.M.; Tenforde, A.S.; Daneshvar, D.H. Targeting the Sweet Spot: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Anterior Versus Posterior Glenohumeral Joint Injections for Adhesive Capsulitis. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2025, 35, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).