You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Bianca Boca1,2,
  • Cosmin Caraiani2,* and
  • Teodora Telecan3,4,*
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Vladimir N. Bilim Reviewer 2: Se An Oh

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

This systematic review studied the potential of radiomics as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in bladder cancer (BCa). The authors searched Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and finally picked up 26 published papers which were analyzed in the present review.

The data are thoroughly analyzed and the results are clearly presented.

This manuscript is potentially interesting for radiologists, urologists, and other clinicians.

It seems that the references are not assigned correctly. Could you please check the references?

 

Author Response

Reviewer 1

This systematic review studied the potential of radiomics as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in bladder cancer (BCa). The authors searched Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and finally picked up 26 published papers which were analyzed in the present review.

The data are thoroughly analyzed and the results are clearly presented.

This manuscript is potentially interesting for radiologists, urologists, and other clinicians.

It seems that the references are not assigned correctly. Could you please check the references?

Answer: We thank the reviewer for his/her observation. We checked the references and changed them accordingly.

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript ID: diagnostics-2438183

Type of manuscript: Review

 

Title: MRI-based radiomics in bladder cancer: a systematic review and

Radiomics Quality Score Assessment

General comments

This paper performed 1)a systematic review of the use of MR imaging radiomics for BCa staging, grading and disease prognosis 2) to determine the quality of published papers using radiomics quality score.

 

Overall, the study is scientific and the purpose and conclusion of the study are thought to be clear.

However, given that this is a review paper, it would be helpful for the authors to understand more if radiomics were briefly added to the introduction.

Author Response

Reviewer 2

Title: MRI-based radiomics in bladder cancer: a systematic review and

Radiomics Quality Score Assessment

General comments

This paper performed 1)a systematic review of the use of MR imaging radiomics for BCa staging, grading and disease prognosis 2) to determine the quality of published papers using radiomics quality score.

 

Overall, the study is scientific and the purpose and conclusion of the study are thought to be clear.

However, given that this is a review paper, it would be helpful for the authors to understand more if radiomics were briefly added to the introduction.

Answer: We thank the reviewer for his/her suggestion. We added the requested information. Please refer to rows 66 – 79.