You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Diagnostics
  • Correction
  • Open Access

18 July 2022

Correction: Christensen et al. Impact of [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FLT-PET-Parameters in Patients with Suspected Relapse of Irradiated Lung Cancer. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 279

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
2
Cluster for Molecular Imaging, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
3
Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
4
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics

Error in Figure

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 6a. Figure 6a was replaced by Figure 6b, and thus Figure 6a,b appeared identical. The corrected Figure 6 appears below.
Figure 6. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the relapse diagnosis with FDG-SUVmax (a) and FLT-SUVmax (b).
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Christensen, T.N.; Langer, S.W.; Persson, G.; Larsen, K.R.; Amtoft, A.G.; Keller, S.H.; Kjaer, A.; Fischer, B.M. Impact of [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FLT-PET-Parameters in Patients with Suspected Relapse of Irradiated Lung Cancer. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.