Next Article in Journal
Numerical and Experimental Study of Hydraulic Performance and Wear Characteristics of a Slurry Pump
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimation and Mitigation of Unknown Airplane Installation Effects on GPA Diagnostics
Previous Article in Journal
Event-Triggered Intervention Framework for UAV-UGV Coordination Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aircraft Engine Performance Monitoring and Diagnostics Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Data-Driven Models for Gas Turbine Online Diagnosis

Machines 2021, 9(12), 372; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines9120372
by Iván González Castillo 1, Igor Loboda 2,* and Juan Luis Pérez Ruiz 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Machines 2021, 9(12), 372; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines9120372
Submission received: 25 October 2021 / Revised: 16 December 2021 / Accepted: 17 December 2021 / Published: 20 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostics and Optimization of Gas Turbine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors continue their interesting work on gas turbine diagnostics.

Although the work is interesting, the originality is not completely clear, since non-linear data driven models are used for control. Some relevant papers can be cited and a more elaborated discussion would be welcomed. Some parts of the introduction are text book and can be omitted.

The wording in some cases is not paper appropriate (e.g. "Let us now describe the second approach").

The methodology is consistent, in accordance with the state of the art of the discipline.

It is recommended that the authors support more the originality of their work and review the language after a second reading. 

Author Response

The response is in the file attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript (Title: Data-Driven Models for Gas Turbine Online Diagnosis; Manuscript ID: machines-1455486  ï¼‰studies the data-driven model of gas turbine.  Polynomials and neural networks are adopted. According to the content presented, the following aspects need to be improved.
1. The resolution of picture 1 needs to be enhanced.
2. The parameters and data in Table 2 are somewhat disordered.
3. Line 237, the expression of data range (the interval [0% - 5%],) is not standardized.  Check other range dimensions.
4. In Section 2, the description of the method lacks mathematical support.
5. In Figure 2, the text box used to distinguish lines should not obscure the data curve. More local detail windows can be added to the two comparison curves to observe the gap.
6. The references are somewhat old. Please refer to and quote the latest research.

Author Response

The response is in the file attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

1. For this manuscript (ID: machines-1455486 ), the author has completed the corresponding modification. The research content is substantial and detailed.
2. In Table 2, the display of the first column in PDF format is still garbled, please adjust it.

Back to TopTop