Review Reports
- Peter Ižol1,
- Jozef Brindza2 and
- Marek Vrabeľ2,*
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Dharmalingam Ganesan Reviewer 3: Márton Máté
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper has good work.
It will be ready for publication after revision.
Please, revise the manuscript based on the attached pdf.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
1. Abstract need to revise towards the problem definition, applications, methodology, results and conclusions of the study.
2. Introduction section is too lengthy and moreover, most of the literatures are not related to the problem definition. Authors need to revise the introduction section towards the existing issues , problem definition and specify the very concisely.
3. Conclusions to be modified as per the outcome of the results.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Congratulations!
A very nice work.See my comments in the attached file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Accept