Abstract
Consider G to be a finite group and p to be a prime divisor of the order in the group G. The main aim of this paper is to prove that the outcome in a recent paper of A. Laradji is true in the case of a p-constrained group. We observe that the generalization of the concept of Navarro’s vertex for an irreducible character in a p-constrained group G is generally undefined. We illustrate this with a suitable example. Let have a positive height, and let there be an anchor group . We prove that if the normalizer is p-constrained, then , where is the maximal normal subgroup of . We use character theoretic methods. In particular, Clifford theory is the main tool used to accomplish the results.
Keywords:
finite group; p-constrained groups; defect group; character; symmetric groups; automorphism of groups MSC:
20C15; 20C20
1. Introduction
Fix a prime number p, and consider G to be a finite group. Let be the set of all ordinary irreducible characters of Let B be a p block of G with defect group We write to denote the set of all ordinary irreducible characters of G with a height of zero which belong to the p block Let S be a normal subgroup of G and We write and for the set of all ordinary irreducible characters of G which lie over and For any term which is not defined here, the reader is referred to [1] and [2].
Throughout this paper, is a p-modular system [3,4,5]. The system is composed of a complete discrete valuation ring with a field of fractions k of a characteristic of zero. Let be a valuation of a field k such that . Then, we have , which is the residue field of the characteristic p, where refers to the Jacobson radical of the local ring .
In this introduction, we try to provide and give sufficient background for our subject. Consider G to be a finite group of the order such that , . Let . If is the greatest power of p which divides the positive integer , then , where refers to the p part of an integer r. The nonnegative integer m is termed as the defect of the irreducible character , and we denote it by If , then we say is of a full defect. The greatest defect of irreducible character which belongs to the p block B is termed the defect number of B and is denoted by The process of subtracting the defect number of from the defect number of B produces a height of . We write to indicate the height of . Let be the set of all conjugacy classes of G. Consider the center . This is a commutative group ring over with the basis such that is the class sum of the conjugacy class C of G. For every and , we have
as an algebra homomorphism , which is called a central character.
The most notable references that deal with block theory R are from Brauer [6,7], C. W. Curtis and I. Reiner, [8] and W. Feit [9]. The first description of a p block’s defect group was provided by R. Brauer [6] and J. A. Green [10].
Let . Then, can be extended to an algebra map in a unique way by the rule . We consider the group algebra element
where the unique primitive central idempotent in satisfies . The algebra is a primitive G-interior algebra [11] because the center contains the center as a subring.
In 1970, D. Wales [12] proved that if the normalizer of the nontrivial defect group D for a nonprincipal p block is p-constrained, then , where is the largest normal subgroup of . This result is essentially a restatement of [13] when the p-constrained is present.
The anchor group of an irreducible character of G was defined as the defect group of the primitive G-interior algebra by R. Kessar, B. Külshammer, and M. Linckelmann in [14]. In this paper, we prove the relative version of the result for D. Wales [12], which states the following. Let with a positive height and an anchor group . If the normalizer is p-constrained, then . A similar result holds for the normalizer for .
In 1987, G. Cliff, W. Plesken, and A. Weiss [15] proved that for any p block of G with a positive defect. In 1990, G. O. Michler [16] introduced another proof for this result using Brauer’s main result [7] which states that , where is the dimension of B as an F space.
Recall that the group G is said to be p-solvable if each of its composition factors is either a p group or a group. We say is p-special if it satisfies the following: the degree of is a p number (a multiple of the prime number p), and if Q is a subnormal value of G and such that , then the determinant order of , is a p number. (Since is a linear character of G according to [17] (Exercise 2.3), then it is an element of the group of linear characters of G.) If we can factorize the irreducible character of G in a unique way such that , where is p-special and is -special, then is called p-factorable. For more information, see [18,19].
In 2002, G. Navarro [20] introduced the concept of a vertex for an ordinary irreducible character of a p-solvable group. In 2005, C.W. Eaton [21] extended the concept of Navarro vertices for ordinary irreducible characters of a p-solvable group to irreducible characters of any finite group belonging to the p blocks, with defect groups which are contained in a normal p-solvable subgroup.
In 2022, A. Laradji [22] proved that a relative version of the previous result for G. H. Cliff, W. Plesken, and A. Weiss in the case where G is a p-solvable group. A. Laradji in [22] proved the result in the case where G is a finite p-solvable group and S is a normal subgroup of G. Let B be a p block of G with a defect group D such that If with a height of zero, then the number of irreducible characters of a height of zero in which lie over is greater than or equal to two.
A p-solvable group is characterized by the existence of normal subgroups. Thus, it is considered a suitable environment to use Clifford theory (see [23]). But we know that any p-solvable element is a p-constrained group [24] (VI, 6.5) which again has many normal subgroups, and then we can use the tool of Clifford theory.
One of our main methods is character theory, which includes the restrictions, induction, orthogonality relations, and inner product of characters (see [1,17]). In addition, the most important theorem for studying character theory and the p blocks of finite groups is Clifford theory. Given a finite group G with its normal subgroup S and , assume that is the inertia group of in G, Clifford theory could be employed for creating a bijection between any and such that and , where e is a nonnegative integer. The nonnegative integer e is said to be the ramification index of relative to S, which satisfies . Here, is the conjugate character of such that for all . (See [1,3,19] for more details about Clifford theory). The motivation of this paper is to prove that A. Laradji’s result in [22] is true in the case of a p-constrained group. Also, we illustrate with an example that the generalization of the concept of Navarro’s vertices in a p-constrained group is generally undefined.
The concept of a p-constrained group appeared in [25] (Section 8.1) and in [26] (VII, 13.3). In Section 2, we present the basic facts of a p-constrained group and the essential theories which were used in the proofs of the main results of this paper. In Section 3, we present the main results. In Section 4, titled Future Work, we propose several problems which extend many results from the class of p-solvable groups to the class of p-constrained groups. We end this paper with two sections: Section 5 contains the discussion about this topic, and Section 6 contains the conclusion that we came up with from our work.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we provide some details about p-constrained groups. We offer the essential theories that we rely on to prove our main results.
Assume that G is a finite group and p is a prime divisor of . Write to mean the second term of the lower p series which are linked through the following relation:
where is the maximal normal p subgroup of G and is the maximal normal subgroup of G. Write to mean the centralizer of in We say that G is p-constrained if it satisfies , where P is any Sylow p subgroup of G. If , then . It follows that if , then G is said to be p-constrained if it satisfies
The following corollary is immediate from the definition of a p-constrained group:
Corollary 1.
If G is a finite group which possesses a normal p subgroup that contains its centralizer, then G is p-constrained and .
Modulo the maximal normal subgroup of G, the quotient of a p-constrained group is p-constrained. The proof can be seen in [25] (Theorem 1.1 (ii), p. 269).
Theorem 1.
If G is a p-constrained group, then is p-constrained.
Let M be a normal subgroup of G and . Assume that . We call the character the lift of to G if it satisfies for From Lemma 2.22 in [17], if , then if Consequently, we consider to be a subset of . From [2] (p. 137), there exists a unique p block B of G that contains the p block of , say ; that is, . The following theorems appeared in [2] (Theorem 9.9 (C) and Theorem 9.1, respectively).
Theorem 2.
In accordance with the above notations, if M is a -normal subgroup of G and , then , and the set of all defect groups of is of the form
Theorem 3.
Let S be a normal subgroup of G. Let and . Then, ψ lies over θ if and only if for all conjugacy classes C of G which are contained in S.
As is well known, a p block with a defect value of zero has only one irreducible ordinary character as well having only an irreducible Brauer character (see [1] (Chapter 3, Theorem 6.29) and [2] (Theorem 3.18)), while a p block with a positive defect appeared in [15] (Proposition 3.3).
Proposition 1.
Let B be a p block of G with a positive defect. Then, .
3. Main Results
In this section, we extend the result from [22] (Theorem 2.1) in the case of a p-constrained group. Then, we give some examples. Let with a positive height and an anchor group . We prove that if the normalizer is p-constrained, then . A similar result holds for the normalizer for .
Theorem 4.
Suppose that G is a p-constrained group and S is a normal subgroup of G. Let B be a p block of G with a defect group D such that Let with a height of zero. Assume that Then,
Proof.
Suppose that G is a p-constrained group. We have two cases for this group:
- Case 1: G is p-solvable. According to [24] (VI, 6.5), any p-solvable group is a p-constrained group. Then, the result from A. Laradji holds (Theorem 2.1 in [22]).
- Case 2: G is not p-solvable, and We use induction on the order of G. Since G is p-constrained, then under Theorem 1, is p-constrained. We write as the maximal normal subgroup of Let be a p block of and According to Theorem 2, if is a defect group of , then , and . Without loss of generality, we may assume that . We have , which implies that Since , then under the second isomorphism theorem [27], and as Now, let , and assume that Since, under Theorem 2, , then We have as a p-constrained group with an order less than that of G and . Therefore, by induction, Now, according to Theorem 2,
- Case 3: G is not p-solvable, and Then, from the definition of a p-constrained group, we have Hence, G has a unique p block, namely the principal block from [9] (Chapter V, Corollary 3.11). thus, from Proposition 1, there are at least two irreducible characters with a height of zero which belong to . Since we have , assume that . It follows that . Then, under Theorem 3, for all conjugacy classes C of G which are contained in S. We know from [1] (Chapter 3, Theorem 6.24) that two irreducible characters belong to the same p block if and only if for all conjugacy classes C of G. Thus, . Then, from Theorem 3 again, It follows that
□
In the following examples, we verify our theorem above in the case of p-constrained groups. The wreath product (cyclic group (p), alternating group (5)) for is a typical example of a p-constrained group which is not p-solvable. The wreath product arises naturally from the symmetric group. We emphasize that there is a strong relationship between our work and the concept of symmetry. The information for these examples about the height of the irreducible character, the defect of the block, and the structure of the defect group are from the GAP [28].
Example 1.
Let wreath product (cyclic group (2), alternating group (5)) be a group of the order 1920. We set . We have and such that Therefore, the group G is 2-constrained by the definition above. From [9] (Chapter V, Corollary 3.11.), there is only one 2-block of G. It contains 24 irreducible characters with and the defect group of an order of 128. We have as the normal subgroup of G such that is a group of the order 64. Let have a height of zero. Then, there are exactly two irreducible characters of G of a height of zero over θ. Note that this group is 2-constrained, making it not a 2-solvable group because it has the alternating group as a non-Abelian composition factor of G for neither a 2-group nor a -group.
Example 2.
Let wreath product (cyclic group (3), alternating group (5)) be a group of the order . We set . The group G is 3-constrained. Because we see that , then under the definition of a p-constrained group, the unique largest normal 3 subgroup of G, , is self-centralizing; that is, It follows that there is only one 3-block of G. It contains 72 irreducible characters with , and the defect group is of the order 729. We have as the normal subgroup of G and as a group of the order Let have a height of zero. Note that there are at least two irreducible characters of G of a height of zero over θ. Note that this group is 3-constrained, meaning it is not a 3-solvable group because it has the alternating group as a non-Abelian composition factor of G for neither a 3 group nor a group.
Example 3.
Let wreath product (cyclic group (5), alternating group (5)) be a group of the order . We set . We see that the unique largest normal 5 subgroup of G is . This is a group of the order 3125 such that Under Corollary 1, the group G is 5-constrained, and . We have only one 5-block of G which contains 337 irreducible characters with , and the defect group is a group of the order . We have as the normal subgroup of G and as a group of the order 3125. Let have a height of zero. Note that there are exactly five irreducible characters of G with a height of zero which lie over θ. Also, this group is 5-constrained, meaning it is not a 5-solvable group because it has the alternating group , which is a non-Abelian composition factor of G for neither a 5 group nor a group.
Consider the p-solvable group G and A nucleus of [23] is a unique (up to G conjugacy) canonical pair such that , is p-factorable, and The nucleus is defined as a result of repeated construction standard inducing pairs. If is p-factorable, then is a nucleus of If it is not p-factorable, then let be a pair under such that S is a maximal normal subgroup of G and is p-factorable such that . Assume that is the inertia group of in G. If , then under Clifford theory, . Assume that is the Clifford correspondent of . Hence, . Then, by induction, there is a nucleus for It follows that is a nucleus for since
We say that is Navarro’s vertex of if there exists a nucleus for such that V is a Sylow p subgroup of H and (see [20]).
Note that in this case, G is a p-constrained finite group Navarro’s vertex is generally undefined. In 2005, C. W. Eaton gave a generalization of the concept of Navarro’s vertices to vertices of ordinary irreducible characters of any finite group, with the additional condition that the irreducible character belongs to a p block with a defect group contained in a normal p-solvable subgroup of G in [21] (Theorem 4.2).
Example 4.
Consider G to be a 2-constrained group in a case where
with an order of In Example 1, G has only one 2-block, namely the principal 2-block with a defect group , which is a Sylow 2 subgroup of G of the order Note that there is no a normal 2-solvable subgroup of G which contains a defect group of the 2-block Moreover, not all irreducible characters of G are 2-factorable. There are irreducible characters of a degree of 10 which are not 2-factorable, and they cannot be associated with a nucleus.
Recall that the ordinary irreducible character with a height of zero, which belongs to a p block B, has an anchor equal to a defect group of the p block B from [14] (Theorem 1.3 (d)). As is well known, the principal p block contains the principal irreducible character (the trivial character), and it has a Sylow p subgroup of G as a defect group (see [1] p. 316).
Theorem 5.
Consider G to be a finite group. Let with a positive height and a nontrivial anchor group . Let Q be a subgroup of G which contains , with . If Q is p-constrained, then .
Proof
(Proof). We have with a positive height. Hence, cannot be the principal irreducible character of G. Assume that belongs to a non-principal p block B of G. If is the defect group of the p block B, then the result holds from [12] (Theorem 1). Now, assume that the anchor of is a proper subgroup of the defect group D of the p block B. We have , where . From [14] (Theorem 1.2 (a)), since , then Again, from [12] (Theorem 1), if Q is p-constrained, then . □
The following corollary is immediately from the above theorem:
Corollary 2.
Consider G to be a finite group. Let with positive height and a nontrivial anchor group . Suppose that . Let Q be a subgroup of contains , that is If Q is a p-constrained, then .
4. Future Work
The class of p-constrained groups is very large. It includes the class of p-solvable groups. So our project is to extend many and important results in the literature from the class of p-solvable groups to the class of p-constrained groups. In particular, according to recent work [29,30,31]. We raise the following questions:
Problem 1: Let G be p-constrained group and Q be a Sylow p-subgroup of G. Write to denote the commutator subgroup of Q. Then
where denotes to the number of irreducible ordinary characters of height zero in the principal p block of G, denotes to the number of irreducible ordinary characters of height zero in the principal p block of and refers to the number of irreducible ordinary characters in the group .
For more details on the commutator subgroup see [27,32,33].
Problem 2: If G is p-constrained group and its principal p block satisfies the Alperin-Mckay conjecture, then
Recall that Alperin-Mckay conjecture states: Let B be a p block of G, with defect group , and let b be the Brauer correspondence of B in . Then For more details on Brauer correspondence of blocks, see [4], Section 12.6.
Problem 3: Let G be p-constrained group and Q be its Sylow p-subgroup. For each linear character of Q, then
Here
Problem 4: Let G be p-constrained group and Q be its Sylow p-subgroup. If , then is a sum of characters induces from p-subgroup P of G which contained in Q such that .
Let be the set of all Brauer irreducible characters of G. We write refers to the restriction of to the set of all p-regular elements of G, that is (p does not divide the order of the elements). One of the most prominent theories that distinguish p-solvable group is the Fong-Swan theorem in [1], Theorem 7.5 and Wolf theorem [2], Theorem 10.3. We raise the following questions.
Problem 5: Consider G to be p-constrained group. If , then there is that satisfies
Problem 6: Let Q be normal subgroup of G. Assume that is p-constrained group and with and . Suppose that does not divisible by p. If , then there is that satisfies .
Remark 1.
We can think of the above problems in different ways. The first one is to get a theorem that extends the result from p-solvable groups to p-constrained groups. The second one is to look at an example that distinguishes between two classes of groups.
5. Discussion
In this work, let with positive height and an anchor group . We prove that if the normalizer is p-constrained, then . The same discussion holds for the normalizer for . This result is the relative version of the result for D. Wales in [12] which states: if the normalizer of the nontrivial defect group D for a nonprincipal p block, is a p-constrained then . Since the anchor of irreducible character is the defect group of the primitive G-interior -algebra , the previous conclusion is logical. The main result of this paper is the generalization of A. Laradji’s result in [22] to the case that G is a finite p-constrained group and S is a normal subgroup of G: let B be a p block of G with defect group D such that If with height zero then the number of irreducible characters of height zero in which lie over is greater than or equal to 2. We have applied this result on some examples for p-constrained group which is not p-solvable group. A p-solvable group is characterized by the existence of normal subgroups. Thus, it is considered a suitable environment to use Clifford theory. But we know that any p-solvable is p-constrained group which again has many normal subgroups and then we can use the tool of Clifford theory. If G is a finite p-constrained which is not p-solvable group, then we have either or In the first case to prove this result we used the method “induction on the order of G”. In the second case we used the group properties also the block theory. While the generalization the concept of Navarro’s vertex for an irreducible character of a p-solvable group to a p-constrained group is fails in general. The outcomes of work are important because contains generalize the related theory of p-solvable group to a p-constrained group. We plan to study the necessary conditions to generalize the concept of Navarro’s vertex in a p-constrained group. We plan to generalize properties of an irreducible character of a p-solvable group to a p-constrained group.
6. Conclusions
Consider G to be a p-constrained group and S to be a normal subgroup of G and with height zero. Let B be a p block of G with defect group D such that Our research shows that the number of is greater than or equal to 2. We have applied this result on some examples for p-constrained group. We have introduced the example to show that Navarro’s vertex for an irreducible character in a p-constrained group G is generally undefined. For is an irreducible character of a finite group G with positive height and a nontrivial anchor group . We have proved that if has a p-constrained normalizer group then is nontrivial. A similar result holds for the normalizer for . The theories that we extended above which have been developed before by other influential scientists, see [12,22]. In the future we will try to establish the necessary conditions for the generalization of the concept of Navarro’s vertex for an irreducible character of a p-solvable group and some of its characteristics to a p-constrained group.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.H.A. and A.M.A.; Methodology, M.H.A.; Validation, M.H.A.; Investigation, M.H.A.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.H.A.; Writing—review and editing, M.H.A.; Supervision, A.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
This work forms part of the first author’s PhD studies at the Mathematics Department, Faculty of Sciences at Umm Al-Qura University. Ahmad M. Alghamdi would like to thank A. Laradji for some valuable discussions regarding the subject of his paper [22]. The authors are grateful to the reviewers for his/her valuable comments and suggestions which improve the writing of this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Nagao, H.; Tsushima, Y. Representations of Finite Groups; Academic Press Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 1989; pp. 186–316. [Google Scholar]
- Navarro, G. Characters and Blocks of Finite Groups; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 60–200. Volume 250. [Google Scholar]
- Curtis, C.W.; Reiner, I. Methods of Representation Theory; John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 262–472. Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Webb, P. A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 167–176. Volume 161. [Google Scholar]
- Craven, D.A. Representation Theory of Finite Groups: A Guidebook; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 26–49. [Google Scholar]
- Brauer, R. On blocks of characters of groups of finite order. I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1946, 32, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brauer, R. Notes on representations of finite groups, I. J. London Math. Soc. 1976, 13, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curtis, C.W.; Reiner, I. Methods of Representation Theory; John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 407–529. Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Feit, W. The Representation Theory of Finite Groups, Volume 25 of North-Holland Mathematical Library; North-Holland Publishing Co.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982; pp. 23–206. [Google Scholar]
- Green, J.A. Some remarks on defect groups. Math. Z. 1968, 107, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thévenaz, J. G-Algebras and Modular Representation Theory; Oxford University Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 76–167. [Google Scholar]
- Wales, D. Defect Groups in p-Constrained Groups. J. Algebra 1970, 14, 572–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Brauer, R. zur Darstellungstheorie der Gruppen endlicher Ordnung. II. Math. Z. 1959, 72, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kessar, R.; Külshammer, B.; Linckelmann, M. Anchors of irreducible characters. J. Algebra 2017, 475, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cliff, G.H.; Plesken, W.; Weiss, A. Order-theoretic properties of the centre of a block. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 1987, 47, 413–420. [Google Scholar]
- Michler, G.O. Trace and defect of a block idempotent. J. Algebra 1990, 131, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isaacs, I.M. Character Theory of Finite Groups; Academic Press, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1976; pp. 9–72. [Google Scholar]
- Isaacs, I.M. Characters of π-separable groups. J. Algebra 1984, 86, 98–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huppert, B. Character Theory of Finite Groups; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 1998; pp. 252–547. [Google Scholar]
- Navarro, G. Vertices for characters of p-solvable groups. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2002, 354, 2759–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eaton, C.W. Vertices for irreducible characters of a class of blocks. J. Algebra 2005, 286, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laradji, A. On height zero characters of p-solvable groups. Osaka J. Math. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Isaacs, I.M. Characters of Solvable Groups; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2018; pp. 7–102. Volume 189. [Google Scholar]
- Huppert, B. Endliche Gruppen I; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 688–696. [Google Scholar]
- Gorenstein, D. Finite Groups, 2nd ed.; Chelsea Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1980; pp. 267–269. [Google Scholar]
- Huppert, B.; Blackburn, N. Finite Groups, II; Volume 242 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften (Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences); Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1982; pp. 184–187. [Google Scholar]
- Dummit, D.; Foote, R. Abstract Algebra, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; p. 97. [Google Scholar]
- The GAP Group. GAP—Groups, Algorithms, and Programming. Version 4.12.1. 2022. Available online: Http://www.gap-system.org (accessed on 1 October 2022).
- Hung, N.N.; Schaeffer Fry, A.A.; Vallejo, C. Height zero characters in principal blocks. J. Algebra 2023, 622, 197–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isaacs, I.M.; Navarro, G. Characters of p´-degree of p-solvable groups. J. Algebra 2001, 246, 394–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Rossi, D.; Sambale, B. Restrictions of characters in p-solvable groups. J. Algebra 2021, 587, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hungerford, T.W. Abstract Algebra: An Introduction, 3rd ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2012; p. 286. [Google Scholar]
- Rose, J.S. A Course in Group Theory; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1978; pp. 58–60. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).