Next Article in Journal
Hybrid Nil Radical of a Ring
Next Article in Special Issue
Convolution Properties of q-Janowski-Type Functions Associated with (x,y)-Symmetrical Functions
Previous Article in Journal
On Ulam Stability of Functional Equations in 2-Normed Spaces—A Survey II
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Einstein Function on Bi-Univalent Functions Defined on the Unit Disc
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hankel Determinants and Coefficient Estimates for Starlike Functions Related to Symmetric Booth Lemniscate

1
Department of Mathematics, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
2
Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Lahore 54900, Pakistan
3
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Faroe Islands, Vestarabryggja 15, FO 100 Torshavn, Faroe Islands
4
Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2022, 14(7), 1366; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071366
Submission received: 21 April 2022 / Revised: 27 May 2022 / Accepted: 29 May 2022 / Published: 2 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geometric Function Theory and Special Functions)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we find Hankel determinants and coefficient bounds for a subclass of starlike functions related to Booth lemniscate. In particular, we obtain the first four sharp coefficient bounds, Hankel determinants of order two and three, and Zalcman conjecture for this class of functions.

1. Introduction

Let A denote the class of functions f of the form
f ( ζ ) = ζ + n = 2 b n ζ n ,
which are analytic in the open unit disk E = ζ C : ζ < 1 . Let S be a subclass of A , which contains univalent functions in E . A function f is in class S of starlike functions if it satisfies R e ζ f ζ / f ζ > 0 in E . Denote by P , the class of functions h of the form
h ( ζ ) = 1 + n = 1 t n ζ n
satisfying R e h ( ζ ) > 0 in E . A function f is said to be subordinate to a function g written as f g , if there is a Schwarz function w with w 0 = 0 and w ( ζ ) < 1 such that f ( ζ ) = g w ( ζ ) . In particular, if g is univalent in E and f 0 = g 0 , then f E g E .
Ma and Minda [1] gave a unified presentation of various subclasses of starlike and convex functions by using subordination, where they introduced the classes
S ( ψ ) : = f A : ζ f ( ζ ) / f ( ζ ) ψ ( ζ )
and
C ( ψ ) : = f A : 1 + ζ f ( ζ ) / f ( ζ ) ψ ( ζ )
of starlike and convex functions, respectively. Here, the function ψ is analytic and univalent in E , such that ψ E is convex with ψ 0 = 1 and R e ψ ( ζ ) > 0 , z E . For particular choices of function ψ , we obtain several classes of analytic and univalent functions.
Several authors have studied the subclasses of S of starlike and C of convex functions by choosing particular function ψ . The classes S [ A , B ] : = S ( ( 1 + A ζ ) / ( 1 + B ζ ) ) and C [ A , B ] : = C ( ( 1 + A ζ ) / ( 1 + B ζ ) ) for 1 B < A 1 , denote the classes of Janowski starlike and convex functions [2], respectively. Further, the classes of starlike and convex functions of order α 0 , 1 are defined by S α : = S [ 1 2 α , 1 ] and C α : = C [ 1 2 α , 1 ] , respectively. By choosing α = 0 , we obtain the well-known classes of starlike and convex functions, which are represented as S and C , respectively. The class of strongly starlike functions of order β 0 , 1 is given as S S β : = S ( 1 + ζ ) / ( 1 ζ ) β . The class SL : = S 1 + ζ related to lemniscate of Bernouli was introduced by Sokół and Stankiewicz [3]. The classes S RL : = S 2 2 1 1 ζ / 1 + 2 2 1 ζ 1 / 2 and S e : = S ( e ζ ) were introduced by Mendiratta et al. [4,5]. The class S C : = S ( 1 + 4 ζ / 3 + 2 ζ 2 / 3 ) was introduced and studied by Sharma et al. [6]. The class S Δ : = S ζ + 1 + ζ 2 was introduced by Raina et al. [7] while the class S s : = S 1 + sin ( ζ ) was studied by Cho et al. [8]. The class S cos : = S cos ζ was introduced by Bano and Raza [9]. For some recent work in this direction, we refer to [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] and references therein, which include the study of analytic functions associated with certain functions and domains such as sigmoid function, Pascal snail function, cardioid domain, petal-type domain, limacon domain, and nephroid domain. Furthermore, factional and q-fractional derivatives are applied to the classes defined by using the above domains to study various generalizations of the classes of univalent functions. For some details on the applications of fractional operators, we refer to [19,20,21,22,23,24].
Piejko and Sokół [25] introduced a one-parameter family of functions given by
J α ( ζ ) = ζ 1 α ζ 2 = n = 1 α n 1 ζ 2 n 1 , ζ E , 0 α 1 .
The function J α is starlike univalent when 0 α < 1 and convex for 0 α 3 2 2 . It is observed that J α ( E ) = D ( α ) , where
D ( α ) = { x + i y C : ( x 2 + y 2 ) 2 x 2 ( 1 α ) 2 y 2 ( 1 + α ) 2 < 0 , 0 α < 1 }
and
D ( 1 ) = { x + i y C : s ( , i 2 ] [ i 2 , ) , [ x + i y i s ] } .
It is clear that the curve
( x 2 + y 2 ) 2 x 2 ( 1 α ) 2 y 2 ( 1 + α ) 2 = 0 , ( x , y ) ( 0 , 0 ) ,
is the Booth lemniscate of elliptic type. Karger et al. [26] have introduced the class BS ( α ) of starlike univalent functions related to Booth lemniscate. It is defined as:
BS ( α ) = f A : ζ f ( ζ ) f ( ζ ) 1 ζ 1 α ζ 2 , 0 α 1 , ζ E .
The authors also found some non-sharp coefficient bounds for the class BS ( α ) . Cho et al. [27] studied the differential subordination and radius results for the class BS ( α ) . The class BS ( α ) is further studied in [28,29].
Pommerenke [30] introduced the q-th Hankel determinant for analytic function, and it is stated as:
H q , n f : = b n b n + 1 b n + q 1 b n + 1 b n + 2 b n + q b n + q 1 b n + q b n + 2 q 2 ,
where n 1 and q 1 . It is easy to see that H 2 , 2 ( f ) = b 2 b 4 b 3 2 and
H 3 , 1 ( f ) = 2 b 2 b 3 b 4 b 3 3 b 4 2 + b 3 b 5 b 2 2 b 5 .
These Hankel determinants for different subclasses of analytic and univalent functions have been investigated by many authors. Recently, sharp bounds for | H 3 1 ( f ) | were obtained using a result from [31]; see [32,33,34,35,36,37] for some detailed work on Hankel determinants. A new form for the fourth Hankel determinant is given in [38], which is studied for a new subclass of analytic functions introduced, and the upper bound of the fourth Hankel determinant for this class is obtained. A new class of analytic functions associated with exponential functions is introduced in [39] and the upper bound of the third Hankel determinant is found. Sine function is used in [40] to introduce a new class of analytic functions, for which the second Hankel inequality is discussed.
In the 1960s, L. Zalcman conjectured that if f S , then
b n 2 b 2 n 1 ( n 1 ) 2 , n 2 ,
which would be sharp for the Koebe function. The Zalcman conjecture implies the famous Bieberbach conjecture b n n for n 2 ; see [41,42]. As example of research, in [43] a class of starlike functions with respect to symmetric points is defined involving the sine function, and the third Hankel determinant and Zalcman functional are investigated.
In the present research, we determine the upper bound of Hankel determinants of order two and three for functions in the class BS ( α ) . We also find the first four sharp coefficient bounds and Zalcman conjecture for the class BS ( α ) .
We need the following results of class P to prove our theorems.
Lemma 1
([44]). If h P is defined in (2), 0 B 1 , B ( 2 B 1 ) D B , then
t 3 2 B t 1 t 2 + D t 1 3 2 .
Lemma 2
([45]). If h P is defined in (2), 0 < a < 1 , 0 < b < 1 and if
8 a ( 1 a ) { ( b β 2 λ ) 2 + ( b a + b β ) 2 } + b ( 1 b ) ( β 2 a b ) 2 4 b 2 a ( 1 b ) 2 ( 1 a ) .
Then
λ t 1 4 + a t 2 2 + 2 b t 1 t 3 3 2 β t 1 2 t 2 t 4 2 .
Lemma 3
([31,46]). If h P is defined in (2) and t 1 > 0 , then
2 t 2 = t 1 2 + δ ( 4 t 1 2 ) ,
4 t 3 = t 1 3 + 2 ( 4 t 1 2 ) t 1 δ ( 4 t 1 2 ) t 1 δ 2 + 2 ( 4 t 1 2 ) ( 1 | δ | 2 ) η ,
8 t 4 = t 1 4 + ( 4 t 1 2 ) δ ( t 1 2 ( δ 2 3 δ + 3 ) + 4 δ ) 4 ( 4 t 1 2 ) ( 1 | δ | 2 ) ( t 1 ( δ 1 ) η + δ ¯ η 2 ( 1 | η | 2 ) ρ ) ,
for some ρ, δ and η such that | ρ | 1 , | δ | 1 and | η | 1 .

2. Main Results

In the following first theorem proved, sharp bounds of the first four coefficients are obtained for functions in class BS ( α ) defined by (3) .
Theorem 1.
Let f BS ( α ) be of the form (1) . Then
b n 1 n 1 , 0 α 1 , n = 2 , 3 , 4 , b 5 1 4 , 0 α α ,
where α 403549870 is the solution of 73224 α 2 1008 α 1301 = 0 . Results are sharp for the function
f n ( ζ ) = ζ e x p tan 1 α ζ n n α , n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 .
Proof. 
Let f BS ( α ) . Then
ζ f ζ f ζ 1 + ζ 1 α ζ 2 , 0 α 1 .
By using the definition of subordination, we have
ζ f ζ f ζ = 1 + w ζ 1 α w 2 ζ ,
where w is analytic and maps origin onto the origin and w ζ < 1 for ζ E . Now for h P , we have
w ( ζ ) = h ( ζ ) 1 h ( ζ ) + 1 .
Let h be of the form (2) . Then
1 + w ζ 1 α w 2 ζ = 1 + 1 2 t 1 ζ + 1 2 t 2 1 4 t 1 2 ζ 2 + 1 8 ( 1 + α ) t 1 3 1 2 t 1 t 2 + 1 2 t 3 ζ 3 + 1 16 ( 1 3 α ) t 1 4 + 3 8 ( 1 + α ) t 1 2 t 2 1 2 t 1 t 3 + 1 2 t 4 1 4 t 2 2 ζ 4 + .
We also have
ζ f ζ f ζ = 1 + b 2 ζ + 2 b 3 b 2 2 ζ 2 + 3 b 4 3 b 2 b 3 + b 2 3 ζ 3 + 4 b 5 4 b 2 b 4 2 b 3 2 + 4 b 3 b 2 2 b 2 4 ζ 4 + .
Putting these values in (9) and comparing the coefficients, we obtain
b 2 = 1 2 t 1 ,
b 3 = 1 4 t 2 ,
b 4 = 1 24 t 1 t 2 + 1 24 t 1 3 α + 1 6 t 3 ,
b 5 = 5 192 α t 1 4 1 24 t 1 t 3 1 32 t 2 2 + 1 + 9 α 96 t 1 2 t 2 + 1 8 t 4 .
Results for n = 2 , 3 is a simple application of the coefficient bounds for class P . For n = 4 , consider
b 4 = 1 6 t 3 1 4 t 1 t 2 + 1 4 t 1 3 α = 1 6 t 3 2 B t 1 t 2 + D t 1 3 .
Here, B = 1 8 and D = 1 4 α . Now 0 < B < 1 and D B for 0 α 1 . Additionally, B 2 B 1 = 3 32 < D . Using Lemma 1, we obtain the required result. Now,
b 5 = 1 8 5 α 24 t 1 4 + 1 4 t 2 2 + 1 3 t 1 t 3 1 + 9 α 12 t 1 2 t 2 t 4 = 1 8 λ t 1 4 + a t 2 2 + 2 b t 1 t 3 3 2 β t 1 2 t 2 t 4 ,
where λ = 5 α 24 , a = 1 4 , b = 1 6 and β = 1 + 9 α 18 . Consider
8 a ( 1 a ) { ( b β 2 λ ) 2 + ( b a + b β ) 2 } + b ( 1 b ) ( β 2 a b ) 2 4 b 2 a ( 1 b ) 2 ( 1 a ) = 1 93,312 73,224 α 2 1008 α 1301 .
The above relation has negative value when α α 0.1403549870 , where α is the root of the equation 73,224 α 2 1008 α 1301 = 0 . Using Lemma 2, we obtain the required result. Consider the function f n : E C defined as f n ( ζ ) = ζ e x p ( tan 1 α ζ n 1 n 1 α . Then
ζ f n ( ζ ) f n = 1 + ζ n 1 α ζ 2 n .
Hence, it is clear that f n BS ( α ) . Now
f 1 ( ζ ) = ζ e x p tan 1 α ζ α = ζ + ζ 2 + 1 2 ζ 3 + 1 6 ( 1 + 2 α ) ζ 4 + ,
f 2 ( ζ ) = ζ e x p tan 1 α ζ 2 2 α = ζ + 1 2 ζ 3 + 1 8 ζ 5 + ,
f 3 ( ζ ) = ζ e x p tan 1 α ζ 3 3 α = ζ + 1 3 ζ 4 + 1 18 ζ 7 + ,
f 4 ( ζ ) = ζ e x p tan 1 α ζ 4 4 α = ζ + 1 4 ζ 5 + .
Hence, the result is sharp for the function f n ( ζ ) = ζ e x p tan 1 α ζ n n α , n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 .
The following result investigates the sharp upper bound of b 2 b 3 b 4 for the functions of class BS ( α ) defined by (3) .
Theorem 2.
Let f BS ( α ) be of the form (1) . Then
b 2 b 3 b 4 1 3 .
Result is sharp.
Proof. 
Consider
b 2 b 3 b 4 = 1 6 t 1 t 2 1 4 t 1 3 α t 3 .
Putting the values of t 2 and t 3 from (6) and (7) in (18) , we can write
b 2 b 3 b 4 = 1 24 4 t 1 t 2 t 1 3 α 4 t 3 = 1 24 1 α t 1 3 + ( 4 t 1 2 ) δ 2 t 1 2 ( 4 t 1 2 ) ( 1 δ 2 ) η 1 24 1 α t 3 + ( 4 t 2 ) u 2 t + 2 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 u 2 ) ,
where t 1 = t 0 , 2 and δ = u 0 , 1 . Let
φ t , u = 1 α t 3 + ( 4 t 2 ) u 2 t + 2 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 u 2 ) .
Differentiating φ with respect to u , then
φ t , u u = 2 u ( 4 t 2 ) t 2 .
Now, φ t , u u 0 for u [ 0 , 1 ] and t [ 0 , 2 ] . Hence, φ t , u is decreasing. This implies that max φ ( t , u ) = φ ( t , 0 ) . Let
φ ( t , 0 ) = φ 1 ( t ) = 1 α t 3 + 2 ( 4 t 2 ) .
Now φ 1 ( t ) = 3 1 α t 2 4 t and φ 1 ( 0 ) = 4 < 0 . Hence max φ 1 ( t ) = φ 1 ( 0 ) = 8 . This implies that
b 2 b 3 b 4 1 3 .
The result is sharp for the function f 3 given in (16) .
Now, we compute the sharp upper bound of the second Hankel determinant for the class BS ( α ) defined by (3) .
Theorem 3.
Let f BS ( α ) be of the form (1) . Then
H 2 , 2 ( f ) 1 4 .
Result is sharp.
Proof. 
Consider
H 2 , 2 ( f ) = b 3 2 b 2 b 4 = 1 48 α t 1 4 + 1 48 t 1 2 t 2 1 12 t 3 t 1 + 1 16 t 2 2 .
Putting the values of t 2 and t 3 from (6) and (7) in (19), we can write
H 2 , 2 ( f ) = 1 192 1 4 α t 1 4 + 3 ( 4 t 1 2 ) 2 δ 2 + 4 ( 4 t 1 2 ) δ 2 t 1 2 8 ( 4 t 1 2 ) ( 1 δ 2 ) η t 1 1 192 1 4 α t 4 + 3 ( 4 t 2 ) 2 u 2 + 4 ( 4 t 2 ) u 2 t 2 + 8 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 u 2 ) t ,
where t 1 = t 0 , 2 and δ = u 0 , 1 . Suppose
φ t , u = 1 4 α t 4 + 3 ( 4 t 2 ) 2 u 2 + 4 ( 4 t 1 2 ) u 2 t 2 + 8 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 u 2 ) t .
Differentiating φ with respect to u , we obtain
φ t , u u = 2 ( 4 t 2 ) 6 t 2 t u .
Now, ψ t , u u > 0 for u [ 0 , 1 ] and t [ 0 , 2 ] . Hence, φ is increasing function of φ . This implies that max φ t , u = φ t , 1 . Suppose that
φ t , 1 = φ 1 t = 1 4 α t 4 + 3 ( 4 t 2 ) 2 + 4 ( 4 t 2 ) t 2 .
Differentiating φ 1 with respect to t , then
φ 1 t = 16 t α t 2 + 1 , 0 α 1 / 4 , 4 t ( 4 α 2 ) t 2 4 , 1 / 4 α 1 .
For the case 0 α 1 / 4 , the function φ 1 t < 0 . This implies that max φ 1 t = φ 1 0 = 48 . For the case 1 / 4 α 1 , the equation
4 t ( 4 α 2 ) t 2 4 = 0
has three roots, namely t = 0 , t = ± 2 4 α 2 . Now φ 1 t = 12 4 α 2 t 2 16 . It is easy to see that φ 1 ± 2 4 α 2 = 32 > 0 and φ 1 0 = 16 . This shows that max φ 1 t = φ 1 0 = 48 . Hence, we have the required result. Inequality is sharp for the function f 2 given in (15) .
The next result establishes the sharp inequality for upper bound of b 3 2 b 5 for the functions of class BS ( α ) defined by (3) .
Theorem 4.
Let f BS ( α ) be of the form (1) . Then,
b 3 2 b 5 1 4 , 0 α α 1 ,
where α 1 0.28494 is the solution of 53784 α 2 16992 α + 475 = 0 . The result is sharp for the function f 4 given in (17) .
Proof. 
Now
b 3 2 b 5 = 1 8 5 24 α t 1 4 + 3 4 t 2 2 + 1 3 t 1 t 3 1 + 9 α 12 t 1 2 t 2 t 4 = 1 8 λ t 1 4 + a t 2 2 + 2 b t 1 t 3 3 2 β t 1 2 t 2 t 4 ,
where λ = 5 α 24 , a = 3 4 , b = 1 6 and β = 1 + 9 α 18 . Consider
8 a ( 1 a ) { ( b β 2 λ ) 2 + ( b a + b β ) 2 } + b ( 1 b ) ( β 2 a b ) 2 4 b 2 a ( 1 b ) 2 ( 1 a ) = 1 93312 53784 α 2 3168 α 1301 .
Equation (20) has negative value when α α 1 = 118 / 747 + 143934 / 2988 0.28494 , where α 1 is the root of the equation 53784 α 2 16992 α + 475 = 0 . Using Lemma 2, we obtain the required result. □
Finally, we compute the upper bound of third Hankel determinant for the class BS ( α ) defined by (3) .
Theorem 5.
Let f BS ( α ) be of the form (1) . Then
| H 3 , 1 ( f ) | 5 16 , α 0 , 23 27 , 41,796 α 4 + 95,363 α 3 + 648 α 3 A 1729 α 2 A 33,336 α 2 12,105 α + 528 A α + 129 A 621 3888 ( 4 α 2 4 α 1 ) 2 , α 23 27 , 1
where A = 129 528 α + 1729 α 2 648 α 3 .
Proof. 
From (4), we have
H 3 , 1 ( f ) = 2 b 2 b 3 b 4 b 2 2 b 5 b 3 3 + b 3 b 5 b 4 2 .
By putting the values from (10)–(13) in (21), we have
H 3 , 1 ( f ) = 1 2304 ( 4 α 2 + 15 α ) t 1 6 + ( 37 α 6 ) t 2 t 1 4 + ( 32 α + 24 ) t 3 t 1 3 + ( ( 54 α 4 ) t 2 2 72 t 4 ) t 1 2 + 104 t 2 t 1 t 3 54 t 2 3 + 72 t 2 t 4 64 t 3 2 ,
where 0 < α < 1 . By using the invariance of class P under the rotation, we take t 1 [ 0 , 2 ] . Let t : = t 1 . Then, by using the Equalities (6)–(8) and upon some simplification, we are able to obtain
H 3 , 1 ( f ) = 1 2304 Υ 1 ( t , δ ) + Υ 2 ( t , δ ) η + Υ 3 ( t , δ ) η 2 + Ψ ( t , δ , η ) ρ ,
where ρ , η , δ E ¯ ,
Υ 1 ( t , δ ) = t 6 2 α 1 4 4 α 2 + ( 4 t 2 ) 15 2 t 4 α δ + 8 t 4 α δ 2 18 t 2 δ 2 + 3 4 t 4 δ + 5 2 t 4 δ 2 9 2 t 4 δ 3 + ( 4 t 2 ) 2 27 2 t 2 α δ 2 21 2 δ 3 t 2 + 1 2 δ 4 t 2 + 9 4 t 2 δ 2 + 18 δ 3 27 4 δ 3 ( 4 t 2 ) 3 , Υ 2 ( t , δ ) = 2 t ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 | δ | 2 ) t 2 ( 2 9 δ + 8 α ) + ( 4 t 2 ) ( δ 2 6 δ ) , Υ 3 ( t , δ ) = 2 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 | δ | 2 ) ( 4 t 2 ) ( 8 + | δ | 2 ) 9 t 2 δ ¯ , Ψ ( t , δ , η ) = 18 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 | δ | 2 ) ( 1 | η | 2 ) ( 4 t 2 ) δ t 2 .
By taking u : = | δ | , v : = | η | and using | ρ | 1 , we have
| H 3 , 1 ( f ) | 1 2304 | Υ 1 ( t , δ ) | + | Υ 2 ( t , δ ) | v + | Υ 3 ( t , δ ) | v 2 + | Ψ ( t , δ , η ) | = : G ( t , u , v ) ,
where
G ( t , u , v ) : = 1 2304 g 1 ( t , u ) + g 2 ( t , u ) v + g 3 ( t , u ) v 2 + g 4 ( t , u ) ( 1 v 2 ) ,
with
g 1 ( t , u ) : = t 6 2 α 1 2 2 + ( 4 t 2 ) 15 2 t 4 u α + 8 t 4 u 2 α + 18 t 2 u 2 + 3 4 t 4 u + 5 2 t 4 u 2 + 9 2 t 4 u 3 + ( 4 t 2 ) 2 27 2 t 2 u 2 α + 21 2 u 3 t 2 + 1 2 u 4 t 2 + 9 4 t 2 u 2 + 18 u 3 + 27 4 u 3 ( 4 t 2 ) 3 , g 2 ( t , u ) : = 2 t ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 u 2 ) t 2 ( 2 + 9 u + 8 α ) + ( 4 t 2 ) ( u 2 + 6 u ) , g 3 ( t , u ) : = 2 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 u 2 ) ( 4 t 2 ) ( 8 + u 2 ) + 9 t 2 u , g 4 ( t , u ) : = 18 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 u 2 ) ( 4 t 2 ) u + t 2 .
Thus, we need to maximize G ( t , u , v ) over the closed cuboid S : [ 0 , 2 ] × [ 0 , 1 ] × [ 0 , 1 ] . To do this, we find the maximum values in the interior of the six faces, on the twelve edges and in the interior of S.
I. 
Interior points of cuboid:
Let ( t , u , v ) ( 0 , 2 ) × ( 0 , 1 ) × ( 0 , 1 ) . Differentiating G ( t , u , v ) with respect to v, we obtain (after some simplification)
G v = 1 1152 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 1 u 2 ) [ 2 v ( u 1 ) ( ( 4 t 2 ) ( u 8 ) + 9 t 2 ) + t ( u ( 4 t 2 ) ( u + 6 ) + t 2 ( 9 u + 8 α + 2 ) ) ] .
So that G v = 0 when
v = t ( u ( 4 t 2 ) ( u + 6 ) + t 2 ( 9 u + 8 α + 2 ) ) 2 ( 1 u ) ( ( 4 t 2 ) ( u 8 ) + 9 t 2 ) : = v 0 .
If v 0 is a critical point inside S, then v 0 ( 0 , 1 ) , which is possible only if
t ( u ( 4 t 2 ) ( u + 6 ) + t 2 ( 9 u + 8 α + 2 ) ) < 2 ( 1 u ) ( ( 4 t 2 ) ( u 8 ) + 9 t 2 )
and
t 2 > 4 ( u 8 ) u 17 .
Let g ( u ) : = 4 ( u 8 ) / ( u 17 ) . Since g ( u ) < 0 for ( 0 , 1 ) , g ( u ) is decreasing in ( 0 , 1 ) , and so t 2 > 7 4 . A simple exercise shows that (23) does not hold in this case for all values of u 7 18 , 1 ; thus, there are no critical points of G in ( 0 , 2 ) × 7 18 , 1 × ( 0 , 1 ) .
Suppose that there is a critical point ( t ˜ , u ˜ , v ˜ ) of G existing in the interior of cuboid S. Clearly, it must satisfy that u ˜ < 7 18 . From the above discussion, it can be also known that t ˜ > 548 299 and when u ˜ 0 , then t ˜ 1.433783077 . Thus, we conclude that a possible solution exists in 1.433783077 , 2 × 0 , 7 18 , for inequality (23). A computation shows
G t | y = y 0 0 ,
in this interval. Therefore, no critical point exists in the interior of S.
II. 
Interior of all the six faces of the cuboid:
On the face t = 0 , G ( t , u , v ) reduces to
h 1 ( u , v ) : = G ( 0 , u , v ) = 2 ( 1 u 2 ) ( u 1 ) ( u 8 ) v 2 + 9 u ( 3 u 2 + 2 ) 144 , x , y ( 0 , 1 ) .
As h 1 has no critical point in ( 0 , 1 ) × ( 0 , 1 ) since
h 1 y = ( 1 u 2 ) ( u 1 ) ( u 8 ) v 36 0 , x , y ( 0 , 1 ) .
On the face t = 2 , G ( t , u , v ) reduces to
G ( 2 , u , v ) = ( 4 α 1 ) 2 144 1 16 , u , v ( 0 , 1 ) .
On u = 0 , G ( t , u , v ) takes the form G ( t , 0 , v ) which is given by
h 2 ( t , v ) : = 8 v 2 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 32 17 t 2 ) + 16 t 3 ( 4 t 2 ) ( 4 α + 1 ) v + ( 4 α 1 ) 2 t 6 72 t 4 + 288 t 2 9216 ,
where t ( 0 , 2 ) and v ( 0 , 1 ) . We solve h 2 v = 0 and h 2 t = 0 to obtain the critical points. On solving h 2 v = 0 , we obtain
v = ( 4 α + 1 ) t 3 32 17 t 2 = : v 1 .
For the given bound of v, v 1 must belong to ( 0 , 1 ) , which implies that t > t 0 , t 0 1.371988681 . From h 2 t = 0 , we have
( 272 t 2 800 ) v 2 + 8 t ( 12 5 t 2 ) ( 4 α + 1 ) v + 3 ( 4 α 1 ) 2 t 4 144 t 2 + 288 = 0 .
By substituting (25) in (26) and simplifying, we obtain
98304 + ( 2448 α 2 3400 α + 153 ) t 8 + ( 14336 α 14256 6144 α 2 ) t 6 ( 16384 α 79968 ) t 4 153600 t 2 = 0 .
After some computations, we see that there are different solutions of (27) for different values of α ( 0 , 1 ) , which does not satisfy the condition t > t 0 . So h 2 has no maxima in ( 0 , 2 ) × ( 0 , 1 ) .
On u = 1 , G ( t , u , v ) can be written as
h 3 ( t , v ) : = G ( t , 1 , v ) = 720 + ( 4 α 2 4 α 1 ) t 6 + 2 ( 3 23 α ) t 4 + ( 216 α 184 ) t 2 2304 , t ( 0 , 2 ) .
The equation h 3 t = 0 has five roots that depend on the value of α , from which two roots make two cases for α .
Case 1.
For all the values of α , the root t = : t 0 = 0 is satisfied. Since h 3 has minimum value at this root, we neglect it.
Case 2.
For α 23 27 , 1 , the root
t = : t 1 = ( 24 α 2 24 α 6 ) ( 23 α + 3 + A ) 3 ( 4 α 2 4 α 1 ) , t [ 0 , 2 ] ,
where A = 129 528 α + 1729 α 2 648 α 3 , is satisfied. Since h 3 achieves its maxima at t 1 , hence we may write that
h 3 ( t , v ) = 41796 α 4 + 95363 α 3 + 648 α 3 A 1729 α 2 A 33336 α 2 12105 α + 528 A α + 129 A 621 3888 ( 4 α 2 4 α 1 ) 2 53 424 486 7505 3888 0.315250606 , t [ 0 , 2 ] , v [ 0 , 1 ] ,
for α 23 27 , 1 .
On v = 0 , G ( t , u , v ) reduces to
h 4 ( t , u ) : = G ( t , u , 0 ) = 1 9216 ( 4 α 1 ) 2 t 6 + ( 4 t 2 ) ( u ( 4 t 2 ) ( 15 u 2 t 2 + 2 u 3 t 2 + 9 t 2 u + 108 u 2 + 72 + 54 t 2 u α ) + 72 t 2 + 3 t 4 u + 32 t 4 u 2 α + 30 t 4 u α + 10 t 4 u 2 + 18 t 4 u 3 ) .
After some computations, we see that the system of equations h 4 u = 0 and h 4 t = 0 has roots depending upon α . In particular, we have solution ( 1.999999994 , 0.06954329322 ) for α = 0.9 , and ( 1.999999994 , 0.2109628665 ) for α = 1 in ( 0 , 2 ) × ( 0 , 1 ) . We also see that the maximum of h 4 ( t , u ) for these points is attained at ( 1.999999994 , 0.2109628665 ) . Thus, we conclude that h 4 ( t , u ) 0.06249999999 .
On v = 1 , G ( t , u , v ) can be written as
G ( t , u , 1 ) = 1 9216 ( 4 α + 1 ) 2 t 6 + ( 4 t 2 ) ( ( 4 t 2 ) ( 8 t u 4 56 u 2 + 180 u 3 + 54 t 2 u 2 α 8 u 4 48 t u 3 + 15 u 3 t 2 + 8 t u 2 + 9 t 2 u 2 + 2 u 4 t 2 + 48 t u + 64 ) + 3 t 4 u + 18 t 4 u 3 16 t 3 u 2 72 t 3 u 3 + 72 t 2 u 2 + 30 t 4 u α + 72 t 3 u + 72 t 2 u + 32 t 4 u 2 α 64 u 2 t 3 α + 16 t 3 + 10 t 4 u 2 + 64 t 3 α 72 u 3 t 2 ) . = : h 5 ( t , u ) .
We see that the system of equations h 5 u = 0 and h 5 t = 0 has roots depending upon α . In particular, ( 0.1095160521 , 0.1289017775 ) for α = 0 , ( 0.1097676030 , 0.1276141649 ) for α = 0.1 , ( 0.1099305749 , 0.1264798400 ) for α = 0.2 , ( 0.1101093763 , 0.1252480620 ) for α = 0.3 , and so on in ( 0 , 2 ) × ( 0 , 1 ) . The max value is on the interval ( 0.1107687201 , 0.1163024505 ) for α = 1 , that is h 5 ( t , u ) 0.1108016596 .
III. 
On the vertices of the cuboid:
G ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) = 0 , G ( 0 , 0 , 1 ) = 1 36 , G ( 0 , 1 , 0 ) = 5 16 , G ( 0 , 1 , 1 ) = 5 16 , G ( 2 , 0 , 0 ) = G ( 2 , 0 , 1 ) = G ( 2 , 1 , 0 ) = G ( 2 , 1 , 1 ) = 1 16 .
IV. 
On the edges of the cuboid:
Finally, we find the points of maxima of G ( t , u , v ) on the 12 edges of S.
G ( t , 0 , 0 ) = ( 4 α 1 ) 2 t 6 72 t 4 + 288 t 2 9216 G ( t 1 , 0 , 0 ) = ( 30 + 48 α 96 α 2 6 ) ( 30 + 48 α 96 α 2 4 + 32 α 2 16 α ) 24 ( 4 α 1 ) 4 1 24 0.04166666667 , t ( 0 , 2 ) .
where
t = : t 1 = 2 ( 4 α 1 ) 2 ( 30 96 α 2 + 48 α 6 ) ( 4 α 2 1 ) 2 .
for t [ 0 , 2 ] and α ( 0 , 1 + 6 4 ) ( 0 , 0.8623724358 )
G ( t , 0 , 1 ) = 1024 + ( 4 α 1 ) 2 t 6 16 ( 1 + 4 α ) t 5 + 64 t 4 + 64 ( 1 + 4 α ) t 3 512 t 2 9216 G ( 0 , 0 , 1 ) = 1 9 0.11111 , t ( 0 , 2 ) .
G ( t , 1 , 0 ) = 720 + ( 4 α + 4 α 2 1 ) t 6 + 2 ( 3 23 α ) t 4 + ( 216 α 184 ) t 2 2304 G ( t 2 , 1 , 0 ) = 41796 α 4 + 95363 α 3 + 648 α 3 A 1729 α 2 A 33336 α 2 12105 α + 528 α A + 129 A 621 3888 ( 4 α 1 + 4 α 2 ) 2 53 424 486 7505 3888 0.315250606 , t ( 0 , 2 ) ,
where
t : = t 2 = ( 24 α 2 24 α 6 ) ( 23 α + 3 + 1729 α 2 528 α 129 648 α 3 ) 3 ( 4 α 2 4 α 1 ) ( 0 , 2 )
for α 23 27 , 1 and A = 129 528 α + 1729 α 2 648 α 3 .
G ( 0 , u , 0 ) = u ( 2 + 3 u 2 ) 16 G ( 0 , 1 , 0 ) = 5 16 0.3125 , u ( 0 , 1 )
G ( 0 , u , 1 ) = 2 u 4 + 45 u 3 14 u 2 + 16 144 G ( 0 , 0 , 1 ) = 1 9 , u ( 0 , 1 ) .
G ( 2 , u , 0 ) = 1 16 , u ( 0 , 1 ) . G ( 2 , u , 1 ) = 1 16 , u ( 0 , 1 ) . G ( 0 , 0 , v ) = 1 9 v 2 1 9 , v ( 0 , 1 ) . G ( 0 , 1 , v ) = 5 16 0.3125 , v ( 0 , 1 ) . G ( 2 , 0 , v ) = 1 16 , v ( 0 , 1 ) . G ( 2 , 1 , v ) = 1 16 , v ( 0 , 1 ) .
Now, by viewing all the above cases, we get
| H 3 , 1 ( f ) | 41796 α 4 + 95363 α 3 + 648 α 3 A 1729 α 2 A 33336 α 2 12105 α + 528 α A + 129 A 621 3888 ( 4 α 1 + 4 α 2 ) 2 53 424 486 7505 3888 0.315250606 ,
where A = 129 528 b + 1729 b 2 648 b 3 for α 23 27 , 1 and | H 3 , 1 ( f ) | 5 16 for α 0 , 23 27 . Hence, the proof is completed. □

3. Conclusions

In this paper, we studied the starlike functions associated with booth lemniscate, defined in the open unit disk, given in (3). Certain inequalities, such as coefficient bounds and upper bounds of Hankel determinants, were established. Based on our findings, Zalcman conjecture was proposed for said starlike functions. For future work, many fractional operators can be applied on the discussed class BS ( α ) . Some suitable fractional operators for the said purpose can be found in [19,20,21,22,47,48] and the references therein.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R., A.R. and Q.X.; methodology, M.R., A.R. and Q.X.; software, S.N.M.; validation, S.N.M. and M.R.; formal analysis, M.R.; investigation, M.R. and A.R.; resources, S.N.M. and Q.X.; data curation, M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N.M. and M.R.; writing—review and editing, S.N.M.; visualization, A.R.; supervision, M.R.; project administration, M.R. and S.N.M.; funding acquisition, M.R. and S.N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the heads of their institutes for support and providing research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ma, W.; Minda, D. A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions. In Proceeding of the Conference on Complex Analysis; Li, Z., Ren, F., Yang, L., Zhang, S., Eds.; International Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1994; pp. 157–169. [Google Scholar]
  2. Janowski, W. Extremal problems for a family of functions with positive real part and for some related families. Ann. Polon. Math. 1973, 23, 159–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sokół, J.; Stankiewicz, J. Radius of convexity of some subclasses of strongly starlike functions. Zesz. Nauk. Politech. Rzesz. Mat. 1996, 19, 101–105. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mendiratta, R.; Nagpal, S.; Ravichandran, V. A subclass of starlike functions associated with left-half of the lemniscate of Bernoulli. Int. J. Math. 2014, 25, 1450090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mendiratta, R.; Nagpal, S.; Ravichandran, V. On a subclass of strongly starlike functions associated with exponential function. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2015, 38, 365–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, K.; Jain, N.K.; Ravichandran, V. Starlike functions associated with a cardioid. Afr. Math. 2016, 27, 923–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Raina, R.K.; Sokół, J. On coefficient for certain class of starlike functions. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2015, 44, 1427–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cho, N.E.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, V.; Ravichandran, V. Radius problems for starlike functions associated with the sine function. Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 2019, 45, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bano, K.; Raza, M. Starlike functions associated with cosine functions. Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 2021, 47, 1513–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goel, P.; Kumar, S.S. Certain class of starlike functions associated with modified sigmoid function. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2020, 43, 957–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kanas, S.; Masih, V.S. On the behaviour of analytic representation of the generalized Pascal snail. Anal. Math. Phy. 2021, 11, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, S.S.; Gangania, K. A cardioid domain and starlike functions. Anal. Math. Phy. 2021, 11, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Malik, S.N.; Raza, M.; Sokół, J.; Zainab, S. Analytic functions associated with cardioid domain. Turk. J. Math. 2020, 44, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Malik, S.N.; Mahmood, S.; Raza, M.; Farman, S.; Zainab, S. Coefficient Inequalities of Functions Associated with Petal Type Domains. Mathematics 2018, 6, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Malik, S.N.; Raza, M.; Xin, Q.; Sokół, J.; Manzoor, R.; Zainab, S. On Convex Functions Associated with Symmetric Cardioid Domain. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Masih, V.S.; Kanas, S. Subclasses of starlike and convex functions associated with the limaçon domain. Symmetry 2020, 12, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wani, L.A.; Swaminathan, A. Starlike and convex functions associated with nephroid domain. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2021, 44, 79–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Altınkaya, Ş.; Yalçın, S. Third Hankel determinant for Bazilevic functions. Adv. Math. Sci. J. 2016, 5, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  19. Aouf, M.K. Neighborhoods of a certain family of multivalent functions defined by using a fractional derivative operator. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 2009, 16, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aouf, M.K.; Dziok, J. Distortion and convolutional theorems for operators of generalized fractional calculus involving Wright function. J. Appl. Anal. 2008, 14, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Aouf, M.K.; Mostafa, A.O.; Zayed, H.M. Some characterizations of integral operators associated with certain classes of p-valent functions defined by the Srivastava-Saigo-Owa fractional differintegral operator. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 2016, 10, 1267–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aouf, M.K.; Mostafa, A.O.; Zayed, H.M. Subordination and superordination properties of p-valent functions defined by a generalized fractional differintegral operator. Quaest. Math. 2016, 39, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Riaz, S.; Nisar, U.A.; Xin, Q.; Malik, S.N.; Raheem, A. On Starlike Functions of Negative Order Defined by q-Fractional Derivative. Fractal Fract. 2022, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zainab, S.; Raza, M.; Xin, Q.; Jabeen, M.; Malik, S.N.; Riaz, S. On q-Starlike Functions Defined by q-Ruscheweyh Differential Operator in Symmetric Conic Domain. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Piejko, K.; Sokół, J. Hadamard product of analytic functions and some special regions and curves. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kargar, R.; Ebadian, A.; Sokół, J. On Booth lemniscate and starlike functions. Anal. Math. Phys. 2019, 9, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cho, N.E.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, V.; Ravichandran, V. Differential subordination and radius estimates for starlike functions associated with the Booth lemniscate. Turk. J. Math. 2018, 42, 1380–1399. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kargar, R.; Ebadian, A.; Trojnar-Spelina, L. Further results for starlike functions related with Booth lemniscate. Iran. Sci. Tech. Trans. Sci. 2019, 43, 1235–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Najmadi, P.; Najafzadeh, S.; Ebadian, A. Some properties of analytic functions related with Booth lemniscate. Acta Univ. Sapientiae Math. 2018, 10, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pommerenke, C. On the coefficients and Hankel determinants of univalent functions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1966, 41, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kwon, O.S.; Lecko, A.; Sim, Y.J. On the fourth coefficient of functions in the Carathéodory class. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 2018, 18, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Banga, S.; Kumar, S.S. The sharp bounds of the second and third Hankel determinants for the class SL*. Math. Slovaca 2020, 70, 849–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kowalczyk, B.; Lecko, A.; Sim, Y.J. The sharp bound of the Hankel determinant of the third kind for convex functions. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2018, 97, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kowalczyk, B.; Lecko, A.; Lecko, M.; Sim, Y.J. The sharp bound of the third Hankel determinant for some classes of analytic functions. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2018, 55, 1859–1868. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kwon, O.S.; Lecko, A.; Sim, Y.J. The bound of the Hankel determinant of the third kind for starlike functions. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2019, 42, 767–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lecko, A.; Sim, Y.J.; Smiarowska, B. The sharp bound of the Hankel determinant of the third kind for starlike functions of order 1/2. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 2019, 13, 2231–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Riaz, A.; Raza, M.; Thomas, D.K. Hankel determinants for starlike and convex functions associated with sigmoid functions. Forum Math. 2021, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rahman, I.A.R.; Atshan, W.G.; Oros, G.I. New Concept on Fourth Hankel Determinant of a Certain Subclass of Analytic Functions. Afr. Mat. 2022, 33, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Breaz, V.D.; Cătaș, A.; Cotîrlă, L. On the Upper Bound of the Third Hankel Determinant for Certain Class of Analytic Functions Related with Exponential Function. Analele Stiintifice Univ. Ovidius Constanta 2022, 30, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tang, H.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Li, S.H.; Ma, L.N. Fekete-Szegö and Hankel inequalities for certain class of analytic functions related to the sine function. AIMS Math. 2022, 7, 6365–6380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brown, J.E.; Tsao, A. On the Zalcman conjecture for starlike and typically real functions. Math. Z. 1986, 191, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vasudevarao, A.; Pandey, A. The Zalcman conjecture for certain analytic and univalent functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2020, 492, 124466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khan, M.G.; Ahmad, B.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Mashwani, W.K.; Yalcin, S.; Shaba, T.G.; Salleh, Z. Third Hankel determinant and Zalcman functional for a class of starlike functions with respect to symmetric points related with sine function. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2022, 25, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ali, R.M. Coefficients of the inverse of strongly starlike functions. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2003, 26, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ravichandran, V.; Verma, S. Bound for the fifth coefficient of certain starlike functions. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 2015, 353, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Libera, R.J.; Zlotkiewicz, E.J. Early coefficients of the inverse of a regular convex functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1982, 85, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Srivastava, H.M.; Owa, S. Some characterization and distortion theorems involving fractional calculus, linear operators and certain subclasses of analytic functions. Nagoya Math. J. 1987, 106, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Srivastava, H.M.; Owa, S. Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and Their Applications; Halstead Press: Sydney, Australia; Ellis Horwood Ltd.: Chichester, UK; JohnWiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA; Chichester, UK; Brisbane, Australia; Toronto, ON, Canada, 1989. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raza, M.; Riaz, A.; Xin, Q.; Malik, S.N. Hankel Determinants and Coefficient Estimates for Starlike Functions Related to Symmetric Booth Lemniscate. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071366

AMA Style

Raza M, Riaz A, Xin Q, Malik SN. Hankel Determinants and Coefficient Estimates for Starlike Functions Related to Symmetric Booth Lemniscate. Symmetry. 2022; 14(7):1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raza, Mohsan, Amina Riaz, Qin Xin, and Sarfraz Nawaz Malik. 2022. "Hankel Determinants and Coefficient Estimates for Starlike Functions Related to Symmetric Booth Lemniscate" Symmetry 14, no. 7: 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop