Abstract
In this paper, we mainly count the number of subgroup chains of a finite nilpotent group. We derive a recursive formula that reduces the counting problem to that of finite p-groups. As applications of our main result, the classification problem of distinct fuzzy subgroups of finite abelian groups is reduced to that of finite abelian p-groups. In particular, an explicit recursive formula for the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of a finite abelian group whose Sylow subgroups are cyclic groups or elementary abelian groups is given.
1. Introduction
All of the groups considered in this paper are finite. Basic notations and concepts correspond to [1,2,3].
One of the most important problems in combinatorial group theory is to count the number of subgroup chains of a group (see [4]). Many papers have treated various aspects of this problem in the last few years. For example, in [5], the subgroup chains of cyclic group are investigated, and [6] deals with the number of subgroup chains of an elementary abelian p-group. Furthermore, some classes of special subgroup chains are studied in several papers, like, in [4], the authors count the number of maximal subgroup chains of nilpotent groups. In addition, this topic also has close connection with some open questions of other fields of mathematics. For example, in [7,8], the authors study the well-known Delannoy numbers, and prove that they are just the numbers of the subgroup chains of a cyclic group that satisfy a certain property. Another interesting question is the classifying of distinct fuzzy subgroups of abelian groups, which can be translated into a combinatorial problem on the subgroup lattice of a group G: counting the number of some kind of subgroup chains of G. Now, many important results has been given (for example, see [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]).
In the present paper, we are concerned with the number of subgroup chains of nilpotent groups. Let G be a nilpotent group. Subsequently, G can be written as a direct product of its Sylow p-subgroups and all the subgroup chains of G can be constructed from the subgroup chains of its Sylow p-subgroups. We derive a simple recursive formula for counting the number of subgroup chains of a nilpotent group by using that of its Sylow p-subgroups. As applications of our main result, the classification problem of distinct fuzzy subgroups of abelian groups be reduced to the computational problem of the number of subgroup chains of abelian p-groups. In particular, an explicit recursive formula for the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of abelian groups whose Sylow subgroups are cyclic groups or elementary abelian groups is given. In addition, we make two specific examples of our applications at the end of the paper.
2. Preliminaries
For convenience, we recall some elementary definitions and results in this section.
Let G be a group. A subgroup chain of G is a set of subgroups of G linearly ordered by set inclusion. In this case the integer is called the length of the subgroup chain . The subgroup chain of G is called rooted (more precisely G-rooted) if . Otherwise, it is called unrooted. Additionally, note that we say two subgroup chains and of G are same and denoted by if and contain same subgroups of G. Otherwise, we say that and are different and denoted by .
Now set
We use and to denote the cardinal numbers of , and , respectively.
Remark 1.
A single subgroup H of G is also a subgroup chain of G, and its length is 0; Note that and when G is the trivial group , and when G is any group with .
The following two simple observations are useful for counting subgroup chains of a group.
Proposition 1.
Ref. [8] Let G be a group. Then and .
Proposition 2.
Let G be a group with . Then
Proof.
Let Afterwards, it is easy to see that and . Additionally, for any subgroup chain in , we may construct a subgroup chain in by adding identity subgroup in . Hence, . Thus, . Subsequently, according to the above definitions, we obtain the following equality immediately:
□
3. The Number of Subgroup Chains of Nilpotent Groups
Let be a set of primes and the complement of in the set of all primes. Recall that a -number is a positive integer whose prime divisors all belong to . A subgroup H of a group G is called a Hall -subgroup if is a -number and is a -number.
Now, let G be a group. Let A and B be proper subgroups of G such that with . Let and be the sets of prime divisors of and , respectively. If H is a subgroup of G, then, by [2] (Chapter I. Lemma 3.2), is a Hall -subgroup and is a Hall -subgroup of H and, therefore, . It is clear that this kind of decomposition of H is uniquely determined by H. Thus, if
is a subgroup chain in , there exist a unique subgroup of A and a unique subgroup of B, such that for each . Hence, we have subgroup chains and . If we remove redundant terms and the identity subgroup in these two subgroup chains, then we have the two subgroup chains in and , as follows:
Notice that the subgroup chains and are uniquely determined by the subgroup chain . We call the subgroup chains and the factor chains of the subgroup chain for the subgroups A and B. By the above discussion, we state the lemma, as follows:
Lemma 1.
Let G be a group with . Let A and B be proper subgroups of G such that with . Then
(1) For any subgroup chain , there exist two unique subgroup chains and , such that and are the factor chains of Γ for the subgroups A and B;
(2) The positive integers satisfy that .
Note that, for any given subgroup chains and , there may exist different subgroup chains in , such that their factor chains for the subgroups A and B are and . For example, the factor chains of the next two subgroup chains are and :
Now, let and be two subgroup chains in and , respectively. Assume that positive integers satisfy . Let
We use to denote the cardinality of . Then according to Lemma 1, it is easy to see that
The next result tells us that the sets are pairwise disjoint sets.
Corollary 1.
Let G be a group with . Let A and B be proper subgroups of G such that with . Let , be two subgroup chains in and , two subgroup chains in . Now, set
If is different from or is different from , then .
Proof.
This follows immediately from Lemma 1. □
Corollary 2.
Let G be a group with . Let A and B be proper subgroups of group G, such that with . Then
Next lemma tells us for any two given subgroup chains and , how many subgroup chains there are the factor chains of are and .
Lemma 2.
Let G be a group with . Let A and B be proper subgroups of G such that with . Let
and
be arbitrary subgroup chains in and , respectively. Additionally, assume that the positive integers satisfy that . Then
Proof.
Let
be a subgroup chain in . Afterwards, by the above discussion, the subgroup chain has the decomposition as follows:
For the next two subgroup chains
and
we delete the identity subgroup first, and then delete redundant terms. Note that we always delete the right one for repeated two subgroups. For example, if , we always delete . By using this agreement, the subgroup chains and become the following subgroup chains:
It is obvious that and are the factor chains of . Accordingly, by Lemma 1, we see that and That is to say for any and for any . Now, we consider the dimensional vector . We see that it is uniquely determined by the subgroup chain . We call the location vector of the subgroup chain for the subgroups A and B.
Let be the set of all vectors with satisfying the following conditions:
- (i)
- ;
- (ii)
- and ;
- (iii)
- .
We can prove that . In fact, by the above discussion, it is clear that the vector satisfies , and Subsequently, we only need to prove that satisfies the condition (iii). Assume that , there exists a positive integer such that and . Hence, we must delete the both subgroups in and in when we delate redundant terms in the above. That means and , which contradicts that the subgroup chain is a proper subgroup chain. Thus, , and, therefore, .
Now, we claim that there is a one-to-one correspondence between and . Consider the map
where is the location vector of the subgroup chain . Next we prove that the map is a bijective map.
For any vector of , we may construct a subgroup chain in , such that by using the following natural process. If , then and it is easy to see that is the subgroup chain we need. If , since , then we have or . We set , as follows:
Now, we assume that is given and , where and . Then we consider the case t. Additionally, since or , there exists , such that or exists such that . Accordingly, we may set , as follows.
By using the above methods, we may construct the following subgroup chain of G
Additionally, it is easy to see that and . Accordingly, the map is a surjective map. Furthermore, let
and
be two subgroup chains in . Let and be the location vectors of and , respectively. If , then there exists a positive integer such that and for any . If we assume and , then we have or . Without loss of generality, we may assume that . Subsequently, we see that
or
That is to say . Hence, the map is also an injective map. Hence, the claim is proved.
By the above claim, we have
Now, we calculate the . For any vector , it is easy to see that can be determined once and are given. Notice that
Hence,
Therefore,
The lemma is proved. □
From Lemma 2, we can see that for another different two given subgroup chains and , the number is equal to the number .
Now, we can give the main result of this paper.
Theorem 1.
Let be positive integers with , and let be different primes. If is a nilpotent group with , the Sylow -subgroup of G and for , then
for any .
Proof.
For , since , according to Corollarys 1 and 2, and Lemma 2, we can see that
The theorem is proved. □
4. The Number of Distinct Fuzzy Subgroups of Abelian Groups
A recent problem that involves some combinatorial aspects on subgroup chains is the classifying of distinct fuzzy subgroups of abelian groups. This topic has enjoyed a rapid evolution in the last years and many results have been given. For example, the authors in [10] determine the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of a cyclic group of square-free order, and the authors in [11,15] deal with the number for cyclic groups of order ( are primes). In addition, Tărnăuceanu and Bentea in [14] give an explicit formula for the number of fuzzy subgroups of a cyclic group and establish a recurrence relation verified by the number of fuzzy subgroups of an elementary abelian p-group. Ngcibi, Murali, and Makamba in [13] obtain a formula for the number of fuzzy subgroups of the group ( is a cyclic p-group of order ) for , which has been extended by Oh in [12] for all values of n. Additionally, in [9], the authors count the distinct fuzzy subgroups of some rank-3 abelian p-groups. Although the classification problem of distinct fuzzy subgroups of cyclic groups, elementary abelian p-groups, and some special abelian p-groups has been solved, it is still an open question for an arbitrary abelian group.
Now, we recall some basic notions and the results of fuzzy groups.
Definition 1.
Ref. [14] Let S be a set. A mapping is called a fuzzy subset of S.
Definition 2.
Ref. [14] Let G be a group and be a fuzzy subset of G. We say that μ is a fuzzy subgroup of G if it satisfies the next two conditions:
- (1)
- , for all
- (2)
- , for any
The fuzzy subgroups of a group can be classified up to some natural equivalence relations. A widely used equivalence relation is shown below: let and be two fuzzy subgroups of a group G. We say and are equivalent if . Additionally, we say and are distinct if and are not equivalent. In [15], a necessary and sufficient condition for and to be equivalent was given, where it is proved that
“μ and η are equivalent if and only if μ and η determine the same rooted subgroup chains of G”.
That is to say there exists a one-to-one correspondence between the set of distinct fuzzy subgroups of G and the set of rooted subgroup chains of G. Therefore, the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of G is equal to the number of the rooted subgroup chains of G. According to this result, we can apply our main result in the classifying of distinct fuzzy subgroups of abelian groups.
It is known that abelian groups are nilpotent groups, so, by Proposition 2 and Theorem 1, we obtain the next theorem.
Theorem 2.
Let be positive integers with , and let be different primes. If is an abelian group with the Sylow -subgroup of G and for , then the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of G is
where the satisfy the following recursive formula
for any .
Now, assume that the Sylow subgroups of an abelian group G are cyclic groups or elementary abelian groups. Subsequently, according to Theorem 2, if we can clarify the number of subgroup chains of cyclic p-groups and elementary abelian p-groups for any prime p, then we may count the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of the abelian group G.
Let p be a prime and n a positive integer. We use to denote a cyclic p-group of order and use to denote an elementary abelian p-group of order . We need to recall two well-known results in group theory first in order to count the number of subgroup chains of and .
Lemma 3.
[3] (Chapter I. Theorem 2.20) Let G be a cyclic group of order n. Then there is a unique subgroup of G of order d for any positive divisor d of n.
Lemma 4.
[3] (Chapter III. Theorem 8.5) Let p be a prime and let G be an elementary abelian p-group of order with . We denote the number of subgroups of G of order by .Then
The above two lemmas allow for us to obtain the formulas for calculating the number of subgroup chains of cyclic p-groups and elementary abelian p-groups.
Lemma 5.
Let with . Then
Proof.
By Lemma 3, we can see that all the subgroups of G are , where for . Additionally, these subgroups satisfy
Now, it easily is verified that
Subsequently, we have
The lemma is proved. □
Lemma 6.
Let with . Then
Proof.
It is clear that Let be a subgroup chain in with as follows:
Afterwards, we can naturally have the following s-dimensional vector
For convenience, we call the order vector of . It is clear that
Now, set
and for any ,
Subsequently, it is clear that
and
Thus
It is easy to see that
Notice that the subgroups of an elementary abelian p-group are still elementary abelian p-groups, we see, by Lemma 4, that
The lemma is proved. □
Now, by Theorem 2, Lemmas 5 and 6, we can obtain a formula for counting the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of the abelian groups, whose Sylow subgroups are cyclic groups or elementary abelian groups.
Theorem 3.
Let be positive integers with , and let be different primes. If is an abelian group with the Sylow -subgroup of G and for . Assume that are cyclic groups or elementary abelian groups. Then the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of G is
where satisfy the following recursive formula
for any , and for any , if is a cyclic group of order , then
If is an elementary abelian group of order , then
5. Examples
In this section, we provide two examples to illustrate our results.
Example 1.
Let be different primes. Let . Then the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of G is
Proof.
According to Theorem 3, it is easy to obtain
For convenience we define . Then
;
;
;
;
.
Afterwards,
;
;
;
;
;
;
.
Then
□
Example 2.
Let be different primes. Let . Then the number of distinct fuzzy subgroups of G is
Proof.
According to Theorem 3, it is easy to obtain
For convenience we define . Then
;
;
;
;
.
Subsequently,
;
;
;
;
;
;
.
Afterwards,
□
Author Contributions
Both authors have contributed to this paper. Writing-original draft, L.H. and X.G., Writing-review and editing, X.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 11771271].
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Aigner, M. Combinatorial Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Doerk, K.; Hawkes, T. Finite Solvable Groups; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Huppert, B. Endliche Gruppen I; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Ştefǎnescu, M.; Tǎrnǎuceanu, M. Counting maximal chains of subgroups of finite nilpotent groups. Carpathian J. Math. 2009, 25, 119–127. [Google Scholar]
- Tărnăuceanu, M. The number of fuzzy subgroups of finite cyclic groups and Delannoy numbers. Eur. J. Comb. 2009, 30, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tărnăuceanu, M. The number of chains of subgroups of a finite elementary abelian p-group. Politehn. Univ. Bucharest Sci. Bull. Ser. A Appl. Math. Phys. 2015, 77, 65–68. [Google Scholar]
- Caughman, J.S.; Haithcock, C.R.; Veerman, J.J.P. A note on lattice chains and Delannoy numbers. Discrete Math. 2008, 308, 2623–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Oh, J.M. The number of chains of subgroups of a finite cyclic group. Eur. J. Comb. 2012, 33, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appiah, I.K.; Makamba, B.B. Counting distinct fuzzy subgroups of some rank-3 abelian groups. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 14, 163–181. [Google Scholar]
- Murali, V.; Makamba, B.B. On an equivalence of fuzzy subgroups, II. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2003, 136, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murali, V.; Makamba, B.B. Counting the number of fuzzy subgroups of an abelian group of order pnqm. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2004, 144, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, J.M. An explicit formula for the number of fuzzy subgroups of a finite abelian p-group of rank two. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2013, 10, 125–135. [Google Scholar]
- Ngcibi, S.; Murali, V.; Makamba, B.B. Fuzzy subgroups of rank two abelian p-group. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2010, 7, 149–153. [Google Scholar]
- Tărnăuceanu, M.; Bentea, L. On the number of fuzzy subgroups of finite abelian groups. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2008, 159, 1084–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volf, A.C. Fuzzy subgroups and chains of subgroups. FSAI 2004, 10, 87–98. [Google Scholar]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).