Decoupling Relationship and Optimization Path of Cropland Use Intensity and Carbon Emission in Henan Province
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Overview of the Study Area
2.2. Data and Methods
2.3. Research Methods
2.3.1. Calculation of Carbon Emissions from Cropland Use
2.3.2. Calculation of CLUI
2.3.3. Tapio Decoupling Model
3. Results
3.1. Spatiotemporal Evolution of CLUI in Henan Province from 2000 to 2022
3.1.1. Temporal Characteristics of CLUI in Henan Province from 2000 to 2022
3.1.2. Spatial Evolution Characteristics of CLUI in Henan Province from 2000 to 2022
3.2. Temporal Pattern of CUCE in Henan Province
3.2.1. Evolution Trend of Carbon Emissions from Different Carbon Sources in Agricultural Production in Henan Province from 2000 to 2022
3.2.2. Spatial Evolution of CUCE in Henan Province from 2000 to 2022
3.3. Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Decoupling Relationship Between CLUI and CUCE in Henan Province
3.3.1. Analysis of the Overall Decoupling Relationship Between CLUI and CUCE in Henan Province
3.3.2. Spatial Evolution of the Decoupling Between CLUI and CUCE in Henan Province
3.4. Territorial Spatial Planning in Henan Province Considering the Decoupling Between CLUI and CUCE
3.4.1. Regional Differentiation in CLUI Management
3.4.2. Spatiotemporal Adaptability Adjustment of Cropland Utilization Policies
4. Discussion
4.1. Optimization Strategies for CLUI in Henan Province
4.2. Low-Carbon Pathways for CUCE in Henan Province
4.3. Systematic Optimization of the Decoupling Nexus Between CLUI and CUCE in Henan Province
4.4. Research Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, S.; Wang, Z. The effects of agricultural technology progress on agricultural carbon emission and carbon sink in China. Agriculture 2023, 13, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, Y.; Su, X.; Xu, H. Correlation between levels of cultivated land intensive use and carbon emission efficiency in Hebei Province. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2016, 32, 258–267. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, X.; Kuang, B.; Li, J. Regional differences and its influencing factors of cultivated land use efficiency under carbon emission constraint. J. Nat. Resour. 2018, 33, 657–668. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, J.; Qiao, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.-R.; Tu, W.; Zhang, Y.-X. The higher grain production, the more social deprivation? A case study of Henan province in traditional agricultural areas of China. J. Mt. Sci. 2018, 15, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lu, X.; Qu, Y.; Sun, P.; Yu, W.; Peng, W. Green transition of cultivated land use in the Yellow River Basin: A perspective of green utilization efficiency evaluation. Land 2020, 9, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Al-Musawi, Z.K.; Vona, V.; Kulmány, I.M. Utilizing Different Crop Rotation Systems for Agricultural and Environmental Sustainability: A Review. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gavrilescu, M. Water, Soil, and Plants Interactions in a Threatened Environment. Water 2021, 13, 2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kleijn, D.; Kohler, F.; Báldi, A.; Batáry, P.; Concepción, E.; Clough, Y.; Díaz, M.; Gabriel, D.; Holzschuh, A.; Knop, E.; et al. On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 276, 903–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Felipe-Lucia, M.R.; Soliveres, S.; Penone, C.; Fischer, M.; Ammer, C.; Boch, S.; Boeddinghaus, R.S.; Bonkowski, M.; Buscot, F.; Fiore-Donno, A.M.; et al. Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 28140–28149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhuang, D.; Liu, J. Study on the Model of Regional Differentioation of Land Use Degree in China. J. Nat. Resour. 1997, 12, 10–16. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, L.; Deng, X.; Seto, K.C. The impact of urban expansion on agricultural land use intensity in China. Land Use Policy 2013, 35, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, E.; Zhang, H. Aggregating land use quantity and intensity to link water quality in upper catchment of Miyun Reservoir. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 66, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Qin, S.; Li, L.; Huang, H. Review of research and application of forest canopy closure and its measuring methods. World For. Res. 2008, 21, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.; Huang, H.; Dai, Q.; Guo, Z.-D.; Zheng, Z.-W.; Pan, Y.-C. Spatial-temporal variation in net primary productivity in terrestrial vegetation ecosystems and its driving forces in southwest China. Environ. Sci. 2023, 44, 2704–2714. [Google Scholar]
- Neumann, K.; Verburg, P.H.; Stehfest, E.; Müller, C. The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis. Agric. Syst. 2010, 103, 316–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Erb, K.; Haberl, H.; Jepsen, M.; Kuemmerle, T.; Lindner, M.; Müller, D.; Verburg, P.H.; Reenberg, A. A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huang, H.; Jia, J.; Chen, D.; Liu, S. Evolution of spatial network structure for land-use carbon emissions and carbon balance zoning in Jiangxi Province: A social network analysis perspective. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 158, 111508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Martinez-Harms, M.J.; Bryan, B.A.; Figueroa, E.; Pliscoff, P.; Runting, R.K.; Wilson, K.A. Scenarios for land use and ecosystem services under global change. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 25, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Q.; Yang, C.; Wang, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, Y.-C.; Zhang, Q.-P.; Zhang, C.-Y. Decoupling analysis to assess the impact of land use patterns on carbon emissions: A case study in the Yellow River Delta efficient eco-economic zone, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 412, 137415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, J.; Huang, X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2021, 13, 3907–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bai, J.; Chen, H.; Gu, X.; Ji, Y.; Zhu, X. Temporal and spatial characteristics of carbon emissions from cultivated land use and their influencing factors: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta region. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2024, 96, 103501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- West, T.; Marland, G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: Comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 91, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, B.; Zhang, J.; Hai, P. Research on Spatial-temporal Characteristics and Affecting Factors Decomposition of Agricultural Carbon Emission in China. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2011, 21, 80–86. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physicle Science Basis Technical Summary; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Zhi, J.; Gao, J. Analysis of Carbon Emission Caused by Food Consumption in Urban and Rural Inhabitants in China. Prog. Geogr. 2009, 28, 429–434. [Google Scholar]
- Dubey, A.; Lal, R. Carbon footprint and sustainability of agricultural production systems in Punjab, India, and Ohio, USA. J. Crop Improv. 2009, 23, 332–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, C.; He, H. The evolution of spatiotemporal patterns and the influencing factors of the multiple cropping index of cultivated land in Southwest China. Agric. Res. Arid. Areas 2020, 38, 222–230. [Google Scholar]
- Yi, J.; Guo, J.; Ou, M.; Shen, L. Urban expansion and arable land use intensity: Adjustment effect of industrial development and farmers’ resource endowment. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2018, 28, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
- Tapio, P. Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp. Policy 2005, 12, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, X.; Wen, J.; Xie, P.; Cai, G. Construction and application of decoupling model between sustainable development and carbon emissions. Resour. Sci. 2024, 46, 2194–2209. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q.; Su, M. Drivers of decoupling economic growth from carbon emission–an empirical analysis of 192 countries using decoupling model and decomposition method. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2020, 81, 106356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]








| Data Name | Accuracy | Data Source |
|---|---|---|
| Land Use Data | 30 m × 30 m | Annual China Land Cover Dataset (CLCD) [20] |
| Administrative Boundary Data | − | Scientific Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (SDCRES, CAS) |
| Agricultural Data | − | National and Henan Provincial Statistical Yearbooks |
| Carbon Source Type | Carbon Emission Coefficient () | Unit | Data Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fertilizer | 0.89 | kg/kg | Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) [22] |
| Pesticides | 4.95 | kg/kg | ORNL [22] |
| Agricultural Films | 5.18 | kg/kg | Research from Nanjing Agricultural University [23] |
| Diesel | 0.59 | kg/kg | IPCC 2013 “Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report” [24] |
| Agricultural Sowing | 312.60 | kg/km2 | Calculations based on field experiments from China Agricultural University [25] |
| Agricultural Irrigation | 266.48 | kg/hm2 | Related research by scholars [26] |
| Decoupling Type | Variable Change Characteristics | Elasticity Coefficient Range | Development Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Decoupling | CLUI and environmental pressure are decoupled, which is the most ideal state. | ||
| Weak Decoupling | .8 | CLUI dominates, with a slowdown in the growth rate of environmental pressure. | |
| Expansion Connection | .2 | CLUI and environmental pressure grow in sync. | |
| Expansion Negative Decoupling | .2 | CLUI rises slowly but environmental pressure surges. | |
| Strong Negative Decoupling | CLUI decreases while environmental pressure increases. | ||
| Weak Negative Decoupling | .8 | The rate of decrease in CLUI is faster than that of environmental pressure. | |
| Recession Connection | ≤ 1.2 | CLUI and environmental pressure decrease in sync. | |
| Recession Decoupling | > 1.2 | The rate of decrease in CLUI is slower than that of environmental pressure. |
| Research Period | ΔCLUCE | ΔCLUI | Decoupling Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000–2005 | 0.148 | −0.073 | −2.641 | Strong Negative Decoupling |
| 2005–2010 | 0.258 | −0.017 | −17.607 | Strong Negative Decoupling |
| 2010–2015 | 0.070 | 0.021 | 3.178 | Expansion Negative Decoupling |
| 2015–2020 | −0.088 | 0.134 | −0.761 | Strong Decoupling |
| 2020–2022 | −0.062 | −0.014 | 5.249 | Recessive Decoupling |
| Study Area | Decoupling State | Corresponding Zone | Study Area | Decoupling State | Corresponding Zone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhengzhou | Strong Decoupling | Core Decoupling Zone | Xuchang | Expansion Connection | Potential Optimization Zone |
| Kaifeng | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone | Luohe | Strong Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone |
| Luoyang | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone | Sanmenxia | Expansion Connection | Potential Optimization Zone |
| Pingdingshan | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone | Nanyang | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone |
| Anyang | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone | Shangqiu | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone |
| Hebi | Strong Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone | Xinyang | Strong Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone |
| Xinxiang | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone | Zhoukou | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone |
| Jiaozuo | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone | Zhumadian | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone |
| Puyang | Expansion Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone | Jiyuan | Strong Negative Decoupling | Transition Regulation Zone |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wei, Y.; Zhu, H. Decoupling Relationship and Optimization Path of Cropland Use Intensity and Carbon Emission in Henan Province. Land 2026, 15, 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15010133
Wei Y, Zhu H. Decoupling Relationship and Optimization Path of Cropland Use Intensity and Carbon Emission in Henan Province. Land. 2026; 15(1):133. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15010133
Chicago/Turabian StyleWei, Yinxue, and Honghui Zhu. 2026. "Decoupling Relationship and Optimization Path of Cropland Use Intensity and Carbon Emission in Henan Province" Land 15, no. 1: 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15010133
APA StyleWei, Y., & Zhu, H. (2026). Decoupling Relationship and Optimization Path of Cropland Use Intensity and Carbon Emission in Henan Province. Land, 15(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15010133
