Determinants of Smallholder Farmers’ Income-Generating Activities in Rubber Monoculture Dominated Region Based on Sustainable Livelihood Framework
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Analytical Framework
2.1. IGAs Typology
2.2. Sustainable Livelihood Framework to Unfold Decision on IGAs
3. Methodology
3.1. Study Area
3.2. Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Emerging IGAs in the Study Area
4.2. Overview of the Determinants of IGAs Adoption
4.3. The Importance of Determinants of Each IGAs Adoption
4.4. IGAs Adoption Tendency Detection
5. Discussion
5.1. Determinants of IGAs Adoption
5.2. Pathways to Promote New IGAs
- (1)
- Awareness of the vulnerability context
- (2)
- Improvement of livelihood assets
- (3)
- Strengthening the institutional assistance in the transforming processes
5.3. Methodological Issues
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- del Giorgio, O.; Robinson, B.E.; le Polain de Waroux, Y. Impacts of Agricultural Commodity Frontier Expansion on Smallholder Livelihoods: An Assessment through the Lens of Access to Land and Resources in the Argentine Chaco. J. Rural Stud. 2022, 93, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vicol, M.; Pritchard, B.; Htay, Y.Y. Rethinking the Role of Agriculture as a Driver of Social and Economic Transformation in Southeast Asia’s Upland Regions: The View from Chin State, Myanmar. Land Use Policy 2018, 72, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, S.; Zhou, X.; Wan, C.; Li, Y.; Kong, W. Land Use Changes to Cash Crop Plantations: Crop Types, Multilevel Determinants and Policy Implications. Land Use Policy 2016, 50, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achterbosch, T.J.; van Berkum, S.; Meijerink, G.W.; Asbreuk, H.; Oudendag, D.A. Cash Crops and Food Security: Contributions to Income, Livelihood Risk and Agricultural Innovation; LEI Wageningen UR: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2014; ISBN 9086156738. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, S.; Huang, J.; Waibel, H. Location and Economic Resilience in Rubber Farming Communities in Southwest China. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 2020, 13, 367–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fox, J.; Castella, J.-C. Expansion of Rubber (Hevea Brasiliensis) in Mainland Southeast Asia: What Are the Prospects for Smallholders? J. Peasant Stud. 2013, 40, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuma, T.; Dereje, M.; Hirvonen, K.; Minten, B. Cash Crops and Food Security: Evidence from Ethiopian Smallholder Coffee Producers. J. Dev. Stud. 2019, 55, 1267–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Min, S.; Huang, J.; Waibel, H.; Yang, X.; Cadisch, G. Rubber Boom, Land Use Change and the Implications for Carbon Balances in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 156, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tolno, E.; Kobayashi, H.; Ichizen, M.; Esham, M.; Balde, B.S. Economic Analysis of the Role of Farmer Organizations in Enhancing Smallholder Potato Farmers’ Income in Middle Guinea. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 7, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, C.; Dorward, P.; Osbahr, H. Developing a Holistic Approach to the Analysis of Farmer Decision-Making: Implications for Adaptation Policy and Practice in Developing Countries. Land Use Policy 2016, 59, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahrends, A.; Hollingsworth, P.M.; Ziegler, A.D.; Fox, J.M.; Chen, H.; Su, Y.; Xu, J. Current Trends of Rubber Plantation Expansion May Threaten Biodiversity and Livelihoods. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 34, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.S.H.; Miteva, D.A.; Carlson, K.M.; Heilmayr, R.; Saif, O. Does Oil Palm Certification Create Trade-Offs between Environment and Development in Indonesia? Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 15, 124064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.; Min, S.; Huang, J.; Waibel, H. Falling Price Induced Diversification Strategies and Rural Inequality: Evidence of Smallholder Rubber Farmers. World Dev. 2021, 146, 105604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, C.B.; Reardon, T.; Webb, P. Nonfarm Income Diversification and Household Livelihood Strategies in Rural Africa: Concepts, Dynamics, and Policy Implications. Food Policy 2001, 26, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, S.M.; Lorenzen, K.A.I. Livelihood Diversification in Rural Laos. World Dev. 2016, 83, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, H.; Zhang, X. Sustainable Livelihoods and Rural Sustainability in China: Ecologically Secure, Economically Efficient or Socially Equitable? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 120, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashley, C.; Carney, D. Sustainable Livelihoods: Lessons from Early Experience; Department for International Development London: London, UK, 1999; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
- Amalric, F.; Chambers, R.; Conway, G. The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach: General Report of the Sustainable Livelihoods Project 1995–1997; Society for International Development: Rome, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Chambers, R.; Conway, G. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century; Institute of Development Studies (UK): Falmer, UK, 1992; ISBN 0903715589. [Google Scholar]
- Scoones, I. Livelihoods Perspectives and Rural Development. J. Peasant Stud. 2009, 36, 171–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brammer, H.; Ravenscroft, P. Arsenic in Groundwater: A Threat to Sustainable Agriculture in South and South-East Asia. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, M.; Huang, J. The Asymmetric Response of Farmers to an Expected Change in the Price of Rubber: The Roles of Sunk Costs and Path Dependency. Land Use Policy 2018, 79, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talukder, A.; Haq, I.; Ali, M.; Drope, J. Factors Associated with Cultivation of Tobacco in Bangladesh: A Multilevel Modelling Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Isaac, M.E.; Erickson, B.H.; Quashie-Sam, S.J.; Timmer, V.R. Transfer of Knowledge on Agroforestry Management Practices: The Structure of Farmer Advice Networks. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Zhou, L. Farmers’ Perception of the Decade-Long Grazing Ban Policy in Northern China: A Case Study of Yanchi County. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vista, B.M.; Nel, E.; Binns, T. Land, Landlords and Sustainable Livelihoods: The Impact of Agrarian Reform on a Coconut Hacienda in the Philippines. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Zheng, J.; Bu, M. Rural-Urban Income Gap and Agricultural Growth in China: An Empirical Study on the Provincial Panel Data, 1978–2010. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 2014, 6, 92–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Häuser, I.; Martin, K.; Germer, J.; He, P.; Blagodatskiy, S.; Liu, H.-X.; Krauß, M.; Rajaona, A.; Shi, M.; Pelz, S. Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of Rubber Cultivation in the Mekong Region: Challenges for Sustainable Land Use. CABI Rev. 2015, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahlheim, M.; Börger, T.; Frör, O. The Ecological Price of Getting Rich in a Green Desert: A Contingent Valuation Study in Rural Southwest China; FZID Discussion Paper: Stuttgart, Germany, 2012; Available online: http://opus.ub.unihohenheim.de/volltexte/2012/751/ (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Xiao, C.; Li, P.; Feng, Z. Monitoring Annual Dynamics of Mature Rubber Plantations in Xishuangbanna during 1987–2018 Using Landsat Time Series Data: A Multiple Normalization Approach. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2019, 77, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Xu, J.; Zhai, D.L. Integrating Phenological and Geographical Information with Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Map Rubber Plantations in Xishuangbanna. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aenis, T.; Wang, J. From information giving to mutual scenario definition: Stakeholder participation towards Sustainable Rubber Cultivation in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. In Farming Systems Facing Global Challenges: Capacities and Strategies; Aenis, T., Knierim, A., Riecher, M., Ridder, R., Schobert, H., and Fischer, H., Eds.; Publikationsserver der Humboldt-Universität: Berlin, Germany, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Aenis, T.; Hofmann-Souki, S. Triangulation in Participation: Dynamic Approaches for Science-Practice Interaction in Land-Use Decision Making in Rural China. Land Use Policy 2018, 72, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, S.; Huang, J.; Bai, J.; Waibel, H. Adoption of Intercropping among Smallholder Rubber Farmers in Xishuangbanna, China. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2017, 15, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Aenis, T. Stakeholder Analysis in Support of Sustainable Land Management: Experiences from Southwest China. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 243, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, H.; Hu, H.; Chen, A.; Cui, J. Agrobiodiversity Loss and Livelihood Vulnerability as a Consequence of Converting from Subsistence Farming Systems to Commercial Plantation-Dominated Systems in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China: A Household Level Analysis. L. Degrad. Dev. 2010, 21, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzanku, F.M. Rational but Poor? An Explanation for Rural Economic Livelihood Strategy. J. Agric. Econ. 2018, 69, 365–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellis, F. Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000; ISBN 0198296967. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Liu, L. Characteristics and Driving Factors of Rural Livelihood Transition in the East Coastal Region of China: A Case Study of Suburban Shanghai. J. Rural Stud. 2016, 43, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van den Berg, M. Household Income Strategies and Natural Disasters: Dynamic Livelihoods in Rural Nicaragua. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 592–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walelign, S.Z.; Pouliot, M.; Larsen, H.O.; Smith-Hall, C. Combining Household Income and Asset Data to Identify Livelihood Strategies and Their Dynamics. J. Dev. Stud. 2017, 53, 769–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, X.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Y. Evaluating the Role of Livelihood Assets in Suitable Livelihood Strategies: Protocol for Anti-Poverty Policy in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 78, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panichvejsunti, T.; Kuwornu, J.K.M.; Shivakoti, G.P.; Grünbühel, C.; Soni, P. Smallholder Farmers’ Crop Combinations under Different Land Tenure Systems in Thailand: The Role of Flood and Government Policy. Land Use Policy 2018, 72, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, E.; Ringler, C.; Okoba, B.; Roncoli, C.; Silvestri, S.; Herrero, M. Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change in Kenya: Household Strategies and Determinants. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 114, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oyinbo, O.; Chamberlin, J.; Vanlauwe, B.; Vranken, L.; Kamara, Y.A.; Craufurd, P.; Maertens, M. Farmers’ Preferences for High-Input Agriculture Supported by Site-Specific Extension Services: Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Nigeria. Agric. Syst. 2019, 173, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smit, B.; McNabb, D.; Smithers, J. Agricultural Adaptation to Climatic Variation. Clim. Change 1996, 33, 7–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Gong, J.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Y. Exploring the Effects of Rural Site Conditions and Household Livelihood Capitals on Agricultural Land Transfers in China. Land Use Policy 2021, 108, 105523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Yi, Z.F.; Schmidt-Vogt, D.; Ahrends, A.; Beckschäfer, P.; Kleinn, C.; Ranjitkar, S.; Xu, J. Pushing the Limits: The Pattern and Dynamics of Rubber Monoculture Expansion in Xishuangbanna, SW China. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hammond, J.; van Wijk, M.T.; Smajgl, A.; Ward, J.; Pagella, T.; Xu, J.; Su, Y.; Yi, Z.; Harrison, R.D. Farm Types and Farmer Motivations to Adapt: Implications for Design of Sustainable Agricultural Interventions in the Rubber Plantations of South West China. Agric. Syst. 2017, 154, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Emtage, N.; Herbohn, J.; Harrison, S. Landholder Profiling and Typologies for Natural Resource–Management Policy and Program Support: Potential and Constraints. Environ. Manag. 2007, 40, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tittonell, P.; Muriuki, A.; Shepherd, K.D.; Mugendi, D.; Kaizzi, K.C.; Okeyo, J.; Verchot, L.; Coe, R.; Vanlauwe, B. The Diversity of Rural Livelihoods and Their Influence on Soil Fertility in Agricultural Systems of East Africa–A Typology of Smallholder Farms. Agric. Syst. 2010, 103, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, A. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1982; ISBN 0198284632. [Google Scholar]
- Chambers, R. Poverty and Livelihoods: Whose Reality Counts? Environ. Urban. 1995, 7, 173–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DFID, U.K. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. London: Department for International Development. 1999. Available online: https://www.livelihoodscentre.org/- (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Scoones, I. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis; IDS: Brighton, Australia, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, L.D.; Lippe, R.S.; Grote, U. Determinants of Farmers’ Land Use Decision-Making: Comparative Evidence From Thailand and Vietnam. World Dev. 2017, 89, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, S.I.C.; Cutler, J.; Kinkel, C.; Kuebke, L.; Larson, M.; Liebig, G.; Longanecker, J.; Martin, F.; Ohlendorf, K.; Ridder, R. Rubber Cultivation and Livelihood-A Stakeholder Analysis in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: Berlin, Germany, 2014; Available online: https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/14229/29jESAnTGIY2.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Polkinghorne, D.E. Language and Meaning: Data Collection in Qualitative Research. J. Couns. Psychol. 2005, 52, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Misra, M. Smallholder Agriculture and Climate Change Adaptation in Bangladesh: Questioning the Technological Optimism. Clim. Dev. 2017, 9, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyatzis, R.E. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development; Sage: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 1998; ISBN 0761909613. [Google Scholar]
- Patton, M.Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1990; ISBN 0803937792. [Google Scholar]
- Anzul, M.; Downing, M.; Ely, M.; Vinz, R. On Writing Qualitative Research: Living by Words; Routledge: London, UK, 2003; ISBN 0203451422. [Google Scholar]
- Pham, N.T.T.; Nong, D.; Garschagen, M. Farmers’ Decisions to Adapt to Flash Floods and Landslides in the Northern Mountainous Regions of Vietnam. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 252, 109672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habtemariam, L.T.; Gandorfer, M.; Kassa, G.A.; Sieber, S. Risk Experience and Smallholder Farmers’ Climate Change Adaptation Decision. Clim. Dev. 2020, 12, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicod, T.; Bathfield, B.; Bosc, P.M.; Promkhambut, A.; Duangta, K.; Chambon, B. Households’ Livelihood Strategies Facing Market Uncertainties: How Did Thai Farmers Adapt to a Rubber Price Drop? Agric. Syst. 2020, 182, 102846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, M.; Routray, J.K.; Saeed, M. Determinants of Farmers’ Choice of Coping and Adaptation Measures to the Drought Hazard in Northwest Balochistan, Pakistan. Nat. Hazards 2014, 73, 1451–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onyeneke, R.U. Does Climate Change Adaptation Lead to Increased Productivity of Rice Production? Lessons from Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2021, 36, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelling, M.; High, C. Understanding Adaptation: What Can Social Capital Offer Assessments of Adaptive Capacity? Glob. Environ. Chang. 2005, 15, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackmore, I.; Rivera, C.; Waters, W.F.; Iannotti, L.; Lesorogol, C. The Impact of Seasonality and Climate Variability on Livelihood Security in the Ecuadorian Andes. Clim. Risk Manag. 2021, 32, 100279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Huang, K.; Deng, X.; Xu, D. Livelihood Capital and Land Transfer of Different Types of Farmers: Evidence from Panel Data in Sichuan Province, China. Land 2021, 10, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, F.; Jin, J.; He, R.; Ning, J.; Wan, X. Farmers’ Livelihood Risks, Livelihood Assets and Adaptation Strategies in Rugao City, China. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 264, 110463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Li, M.; Jin, B.; Yao, L.; Ji, H. Does Livelihood Capital Influence the Livelihood Strategy of Herdsmen? Evidence from Western China. Land 2021, 10, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quiroga, S.; Suárez, C.; Solís, J.D.; Martinez-Juarez, P. Framing Vulnerability and Coffee Farmers’ Behaviour in the Context of Climate Change Adaptation in Nicaragua. World Dev. 2020, 126, 104733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricart, S.; Olcina, J.; Rico, A.M. Evaluating Public Attitudes and Farmers’ Beliefs towards Climate Change Adaptation: Awareness, Perception, and Populism at European Level. Land 2018, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fisher, M.; Holden, S.T.; Thierfelder, C.; Katengeza, S.P. Awareness and Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Malawi: What Difference Can Farmer-to-Farmer Extension Make? Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2018, 16, 310–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eakin, H.; Tucker, C.M.; Castellanos, E.; Diaz-Porras, R.; Barrera, J.F.; Morales, H. Adaptation in a Multi-Stressor Environment: Perceptions and Responses to Climatic and Economic Risks by Coffee Growers in Mesoamerica. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2014, 16, 123–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darnhofer, I. Resilience and Why It Matters for Farm Management. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2014, 41, 461–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vongvisouk, T.; Dwyer, M. Falling Rubber Prices in Northern Laos: Local Responses and Policy Options. Project Report 2016. pp. 1–59. Available online: https://data.opendevelopmentmekong.net/dataset/falling-rubber-prices-in-northern-laos-local-responses-and-policy-options (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Slothuus, C.F.; Schmidt-Vogt, D.; Mertz, O. Navigating between Tea and Rubber in Xishuangbanna, China: When New Crops Fail and Old Oneswork. Land 2020, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ellis, F. The Determinants of Rural Livelihood Diversification in Developing Countries. J. Agric. Econ. 2000, 51, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Xie, H. Influence of the Farmer’s Livelihood Assets on Livelihood Strategies in the Western Mountainous Area, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, L.; Liu, M.; Min, Q.; Li, W. Specialization or Diversification? The Situation and Transition of Households’ Livelihood in Agricultural Heritage Systems. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2018, 16, 455–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pour, M.D.; Barati, A.A.; Azadi, H.; Scheffran, J. Revealing the Role of Livelihood Assets in Livelihood Strategies: Towards Enhancing Conservation and Livelihood Development in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, Iran. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 94, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, A.; Arshad, M.; Kächele, H.; Khan, A.; Mahmood, N.; Müller, K. Information Asymmetry, Input Markets, Adoption of Innovations and Agricultural Land Use in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Land Use Policy 2020, 90, 104261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balana, B.B.; Mathijs, E.; Muys, B. Assessing the Sustainability of Forest Management: An Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Community Forests in Northern Ethiopia. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 1294–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shiferaw, B.A.; Okello, J.; Reddy, R.V. Adoption and Adaptation of Natural Resource Management Innovations in Smallholder Agriculture: Reflections on Key Lessons and Best Practices. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2009, 11, 601–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- He, X.; Yan, J.; Yang, L.E.; Zhou, H.; Wu, Y.; Wu, S. The Role of Government Interventions in Household Climate Adaptation on the Tibetan Plateau. J. Rural Stud. 2022, 95, 544–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiani, A.K.; Sardar, A.; Khan, W.U.; He, Y.; Bilgic, A.; Kuslu, Y.; Raja, M.A.Z. Role of Agricultural Diversification in Improving Resilience to Climate Change: An Empirical Analysis with Gaussian Paradigm. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perret, S.R.; Kirsten, J.F. Studying the Local Diversity of Rural Livelihoods Systems: An Application of Typological Techniques for Integrated Rural Development Support in the Eastern Cape (South Africa); Working Papers 18083; University of Pretoria, Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development: Pretoria, South Africa, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Whittard, D.; Ritchie, F.; Musker, R.; Rose, M. Measuring the Value of Data Governance in Agricultural Investments: A Case Study. Exp. Agric. 2022, 58, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whatmore, S. Farm Household Strategies and Styles of Farming: Assessing the Utility of Farm Typologies. In Born from Within-Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development; Royal Van Gorcum BV: Assen, The Netherlands, 1994; pp. 31–37. [Google Scholar]
- Huynh, P.T.A.; Le, N.D.; Le, S.T.H.; Tran, T.N. Adaptive Livelihood Strategies among Small-Scale Fishing Households to Climate Change-Related Stressors in Central Coast Vietnam. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2021, 13, 492–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staub, C.G.; Clarkson, G. Farmer-Led Participatory Extension Leads Haitian Farmers to Anticipate Climate-Related Risks and Adjust Livelihood Strategies. J. Rural Stud. 2021, 81, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, N.T.T.; Nong, D.; Sathyan, A.R.; Garschagen, M. Vulnerability Assessment of Households to Flash Floods and Landslides in the Poor Upland Regions of Vietnam. Clim. Risk Manag. 2020, 28, 100215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Time | Method | Number of Participants | |
---|---|---|---|
Village Heads | Farmers | ||
2013.03 | Semi-structured interviews | 8 | 47 |
2013.11 | Focus group 1 | 7 | |
2013.12 | Focus group 2 | 6 | |
2014.04 | Focus group 3 | 2 | 6 |
2015.03 | Semi-structured interviews | 4 | 31 |
2015.03 | Focus group 4 | 6 |
Villages | Nr. of Interviewees | Number of IGA Practitioners | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN | OCC | LM | PTJ | LRO | ||
Na Ban | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 9 |
Zhong Zhi Chang | 8 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Cha Chang | 9 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Pan Bing | 13 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 |
Ban Qian Di | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Ke Mu | 11 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Man Dian | 10 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
SUM | 68 | 31 | 23 | 11 | 27 | 21 |
Category | Sub-Category | Determinant | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Livelihood assets | Natural | Age of rubber plantation | The not-yet-tapped young rubber trees (less than 6–8 years) and tapped matured rubber trees |
Mutual suitability with rubber | The synergy or reciprocity between rubber and intercropping species | ||
Land availability | Available land can be used to conduct certain IGAs | ||
Maturation period | The time IN/OCC species will take to be harvested for marketing | ||
Financial | Price/rental/wage | The economic return farmers acquire from IGAs | |
Financial investment | The money invested in IGAs to pursue specific livelihood objectives | ||
Social | Peer example | The IGAs practice of surrounding farmers | |
Collective action | People act together to practice certain IGAs | ||
Decision power | Land ownership and the right to decide non-farm and off-farm activities | ||
Information | Related information on IGAs required by the potential adopters before acting | ||
Physical | Infrastructure | Transportation conditions and the irrigation system | |
Human | Labor availability | Labor quantity and quality to meet the requirement of implementing certain IGAs | |
Knowledge and technology | Specific knowledge and technology required by certain IGAs | ||
Vulnerability context | Shock | Price change | Global rubber price decrease |
Environmental degradation | Soil erosion, soil fertility loss, landslide | ||
Seasonality | Seasonality of rubber cultivation | Seasonal rubber cultivation restraining farmers’ time to perform IGAs | |
Instability of PTJ opportunities | The endogenous characteristic of PTJ in the busy season and off-season of rubber cultivation | ||
Transforming structure and processes | Structure | Extension service | Agricultural extension services provided by government and research institutes |
Process | Environmental-friendly rubber plantation | The transition towards a more environmental-friendly way of rubber cultivation led by local government |
Determinant | IN | OCC | LM | PTJ | LRO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Livelihood assets | |||||
Age of rubber plantation | √ | √ | |||
Mutual suitability with rubber | √ | √ | |||
Land availability | √ | √ | |||
Maturation period | √ | √ | |||
Price/rental/wage | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Financial investment | √ | √ | √ | ||
Peer example | √ | √ | |||
Collective action | √ | √ | |||
Decision power | √ | ||||
Information | √ | √ | √ | ||
Infrastructure | √ | ||||
Labor availability | √ | √ | √ | ||
Knowledge and technology | √ | √ | √ | ||
Vulnerability context | |||||
Price change | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Environmental degradation | √ | √ | |||
Seasonality of rubber cultivation | √ | √ | |||
Instability of PTJ opportunities | √ | ||||
Transforming Structures and Processes | |||||
Extension service | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Environmental-friendly rubber plantation | √ |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, J.; Jiang, H.; He, Y. Determinants of Smallholder Farmers’ Income-Generating Activities in Rubber Monoculture Dominated Region Based on Sustainable Livelihood Framework. Land 2023, 12, 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020281
Wang J, Jiang H, He Y. Determinants of Smallholder Farmers’ Income-Generating Activities in Rubber Monoculture Dominated Region Based on Sustainable Livelihood Framework. Land. 2023; 12(2):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020281
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Jue, Haiwei Jiang, and Yuan He. 2023. "Determinants of Smallholder Farmers’ Income-Generating Activities in Rubber Monoculture Dominated Region Based on Sustainable Livelihood Framework" Land 12, no. 2: 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020281
APA StyleWang, J., Jiang, H., & He, Y. (2023). Determinants of Smallholder Farmers’ Income-Generating Activities in Rubber Monoculture Dominated Region Based on Sustainable Livelihood Framework. Land, 12(2), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020281