Function Evolution of Oasis Cultivated Land and Its Trade-Off and Synergy Relationship in Xinjiang, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Connotation, Classification, and Evaluation Index of the OCL Function in Xinjiang
2.2.2. Measurements for CLFs
2.2.3. Analysis Method for the Evolution of CLFs
2.2.4. Analysis Method of Interaction between CLFs
- i
- When and are not zero simultaneously,
- ii
- When and are not zero simultaneously, or when and are zero simultaneously, ; when and are not zero simultaneously, then .
2.3. Data Sources and Processing
3. Results
3.1. Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of CLFs
3.1.1. General Characteristics
3.1.2. Spatial Differences
- Social function;
- 2.
- Economic function;
- 3.
- Ecological function.
3.2. Trade-Off and Synergy Relationship between CLFs
3.2.1. Temporal Scale
3.2.2. Spatial Scale
4. Discussion
4.1. Similarities and Differences between Xinjiang and Other Regions in the Functional Evolution of CL
4.2. Policy Recommendations of Multi-Function Synergistic Management of OCL in Xinjiang
4.3. Advantages, Limitations, and Prospects
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- Evolution Features of CLFs: There were obvious differences in the evolution trends of the three functions of OCL in Xinjiang from 1990 to 2018. Among them, the economic function continued to increase, the ecological function was gradually degraded, and the social function was relatively stable. In general, the evolution of CLFs in Xinjiang was first dominated by ecological and social functions and then became economic-function-oriented. At the county level of Xinjiang, the SFC presents the regional characteristics of “increasing in the north and decreasing in the south”; the growth rate of the ENFC shows the regional characteristics of “growing fast in the northeast and slow in the southwest”; the deceleration of the ELFC presents the regional characteristics of “growing fast in the southeast and slow in the northwest”.
- (2)
- Interaction between CLFs: The relationship between SFC and ENFC in Xinjiang has evolved into a trade-off from synergy. The evolution characteristics of the relationship between ENFC and ELFC are the same as above. Although the relationship between SFC and ELFC are synergistic, it shows a different synergistic intensity tendency that first increased and then decreased. Spatially, the SFC and ENFC at the county level in Xinjiang are dominated by synergy. The ENFC and ELFC at the county level in Xinjiang shows a pattern dominated by trade-offs. The SFC and ELFC at the county level in Xinjiang show a pattern of equivalence between synergies and trade-offs.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
Item | Descriptions |
CL | Cultivated land |
CLFs | Cultivated land functions |
OCL | Oasis cultivated land |
SFC | The social function of cultivated land |
ENFC | The economic function of cultivated land |
ELFC | The ecological function of cultivated land |
References
- UN. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, L.; Bryan, B.A. Finding Pathways to National-Scale Land-Sector Sustainability. Nature 2017, 544, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heck, V.; Hoff, H.; Wirsenius, S.; Meyer, C.; Kreft, H. Land Use Options for Staying Within the Planetary Boundaries—Synergies and Trade-offs Between Global and Local Sustainability Goals. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2018, 49, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, P. Managing the Global Land Resource. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 285, 20172798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockstrom, J.; Cornell, S.E.; Fetzer, I.; Bennett, E.M.; Biggs, R.; Carpenter, S.R.; de Vries, W.; de Wit, C.A.; et al. Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science 2015, 347, 1259855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris, France, 2001.
- Long, H.; Ma, L.; Zhang, Y.; Qu, L. Multifunctional Rural Development in China: Pattern, Process and Driving Mechanism. Habitat Int. 2022, 121, 102530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouma, J. How to Realize Multifunctional Land Use as a Contribution to Sustainable Development. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 620285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renting, H.; Rossing, W.A.H.; Groot, J.C.J.; Van der Ploeg, J.D.; Laurent, C.; Perraud, D.; Stobbelaar, D.J.; Van Ittersum, M.K. Exploring Multifunctional Agriculture. A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Prospects for an Integrative Transitional Framework. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, S112–S123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodbod, J.; Barreteau, O.; Allen, C.; Magda, D. Managing Adaptively for Multifunctionality in Agricultural Systems. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 183, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Jia, J.; Fan, F.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, J. Research Progresses on Farmland Soil Ecosystem Multifunctionality. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2022, 59, 1177–1189. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Andersen, P.S.; Vejre, H.; Dalgaard, T.; Brandt, J. An Indicator-Based Method for Quantifying Farm Multifunctionality. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 25, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, G.; Wang, M.; Qu, Y.; Zhou, D.; Ma, W. Towards Cultivated Land Multifunction Assessment in China: Applying the “Influencing Factors-Functions-Products-Demands” Integrated Framework. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Ouyang, Z. Connotation of Multifunctional Cultivated Land and Its Implications for Cultivated Land Protection. Prog. Geogr. 2012, 31, 859–868. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- de Groot, R. Function-Analysis and Valuation as A Tool to Assess Land Use Conflicts in Planning for Sustainable, Multi-functional Landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan 2006, 75, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fagioli, F.F.; Rocchi, L.; Paolotti, L.; Słowiński, R.; Boggia, A. From the Farm to the Agri-Food System: A Multiple Criteria Framework to Evaluate Extended Multi-functional Value. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 79, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coyle, C.; Creamer, R.E.; Schulte, R.P.O.; O’Sullivan, L.; Jordan, P. A Functional Land Management Conceptual Framework Under Soil Drainage and Land Use Scenarios. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 56, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firbank, L.; Bradbury, R.B.; McCracken, D.I.; Stoate, C. Delivering Multiple Ecosystem Services from Enclosed Farmland in the UK. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 166, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Long, H.; Ge, D.; Tu, S.; Qu, Y. Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Dynamic Mechanism of Farmland Functions Evolution in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2018, 73, 518–534. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S.; Hu, W.; Huang, L.; Du, H. Exploring the Effectiveness of Multifunctional Cultivated Land Protection Linking Supply to Demand in Value Engineering Theory: Evidence from Wuhan Metropolitan Area. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.; Jin, X.; Yang, X.; Guan, X.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, Y. Determining the Effects of Land Consolidation on the Multifunctionlity of the Cropland Production System in China Using a SPA-Fuzzy Assessment Model. Eur. J. Agron. 2015, 63, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, F.; Chi, Y.; Lal, R. Spatiotemporal Characteristics Analysis of Multifunctional Cultivated Land: A Case Study in Shenyang, Northeast China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2020, 31, 1812–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, J.; Fu, M.; Sun, J.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, D. Multifunctional Assessment and Zoning of Crop Production System Based on Set Pair Analysis-A comparative Study of 31 Provincial Regions in Mainland China. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 2014, 19, 1400–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.; Su, C.; Xie, Y.; Li, T.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y. Controlling Non-Grain Production Based on Cultivated Land Multifunction Assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zou, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J. Theory Building and Empirical Research of Production-Living-Ecological Function of Cultivated Land Based on the Elements. Geogr. Res. 2021, 40, 839–855. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xiong, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Luan, Q.; Liu, X. Multi-Function Evaluation and Zoning Control of Cultivated Land in China. China Land Sci. 2021, 35, 104–114. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Cao, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Z.; Liu, X. Net Value of Farmland Ecosystem Services in China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 2291–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Hu, W.; Zhao, Z. Dynamic Analysis on Spatial-Temporal Pattern of Trade-Offs and Synergies of Multifunctional Cultivated Land—Evidence from Hubei Province. Econ. Geogr. 2018, 38, 143–153. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Fonseca, A.M.P.; Marques, C.A.F.; Pinto-Correia, T.; Guiomar, N.; Campbell, D.E. Emergy Evaluation for Decision-Making in Complex Multifunctional Farming Systems. Agric. Syst. 2019, 171, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Huang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Ouyang, Z. Does Cultivated Land Function Transition Occur in China? J. Geogr. Sci. 2015, 25, 817–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Li, X. Theoretical Explanation and Case Study of Regional Cultivated Land Use Function Transition. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2019, 74, 992–1010. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, G.A. From ‘Weak’ to ‘Strong’ Multifunctionality: Conceptualising Farm-Level Multifunctional Transitional Pathways. J. Rural Stud. 2008, 24, 367–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S.; Su, Y.; Shahtahmassebi, A.R.; Huang, L.; Zhou, M.; Gan, M.; Deng, J.; Zhao, G.; Wang, K. Assessing and Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Flow of Farmlands in the Hangzhou Metropolitan Area, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 692, 756–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, H.; Cai, Y.; Wang, Y. Spatial Heterogeneity and Individual Differences of Arable Land Use Functions in Peasant Household: A Case Study of Representative Area in Hubei Province. J. Nat. Resour. 2016, 31, 228–240. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Yang, X.; Tan, M. Changes and Relationships of Arable Land Functions in Beijing in Recent Years. J. Nat. Resour. 2014, 29, 733–743. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, C.; Li, W.; Du, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, K. Spatial-Temporal Change, Trade-Off and Synergy Relationships of Cropland Multifunctional Value in Zhejiang Province, China. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 263–272. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, X.; Shao, C.; He, R.; Shi, R. Evolution and Efficiency Assessment of Pesticide and Fertiliser Inputs to Cultivated Land in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X. Physical Geography of Arid Areas in China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Xue, J.; Gui, D.; Lei, J.; Sun, H.; Zeng, F.; Mao, D.; Jin, Q.; Liu, Y. Oasification: An Unable Evasive Process in Fighting Against Desertification for the Sustainable Development of Arid and Semiarid Regions of China. Catena 2019, 179, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Kuang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, X.; Qin, Y.; Ning, J.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, S.; Li, R.; Yan, C.; et al. Spatiotemporal Characteristics, Patterns, and Causes of Land-Use Changes in China Since the Late 1980s. J. Geogr. Sci. 2014, 24, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, W.; Liu, J.; Tian, H.; Shi, H.; Dong, J.; Song, C.; Li, X.; Du, G.; Hou, Y.; Lu, D.; et al. Cropland Redistribution to Marginal Lands Undermines Environmental Sustainability. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 9, nwab091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, T.; Zhang, X.; Xia, F.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, J.; Wu, S. The Process-Mode-Driving Force of Cropland Expansion in Arid Regions of China Based on the Land Use Remote Sensing Monitoring Data. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statistics Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook; Chinese Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hang, D. Artificial Oasis in Xinjiang; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Bi, G.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, X. China’s Rural Land Institutional Reform in the Past 40 Years Since the Reform and Opening up and Its Future Directions. China Land Sci. 2018, 32, 1–7. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xie, G.; Zhen, L.; Lu, C.; Xiao, Y.; Li, W. Applying Value Transfer Method for Eco-Service Valuation in China. J. Resour. Ecol. 2010, 1, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, T. Study on The Mechanism and Efficiency of Emergy Metabolism of Oasis System in Xinjiang. Ph.D. Thesis, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y. The Development of China’s Low-Carbon Agriculture: Production Efficiency, Spatial Differences and Influencing Factors. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.; Wang, L.; Hua, C.; Jin, S.; Liu, P. Potentialities of Fertilizer Reduction for Grain Produce and Effects on Carbon Emissions. Resour. Sci. 2016, 38, 790–797. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.; Zhang, J.; Li, H. Research on Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Affecting Factors Decomposition of Agricultural Carbon Emission in China. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2011, 21, 80–86. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Huang, H.; Wang, H. Improvements on the Gray T-related Dergee. Math. Pract. Theory 2016, 46, 131–139. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Lai, B.; Tan, M.; Chai, Z.; Chen, B.; Li, Q.; Dong, J.; Wang, F.; Tian, C. Investigation and Evaluation of the Chemical Fertilizer Application Situation of Farmland in Xinjiang. Arid Zone Res. 2014, 31, 1024–1030. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.; Fang, S.; Ma, X.; Zhu, Q. Prevention and Control Strategy for the Pollution of Agricultural Plastic Film. Chin. Eng. Sci. 2018, 20, 96–102. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Function Layer | Index Layer | Calculation Method | Unit |
---|---|---|---|
Social function | Grain yield per unit area | Total grain output/sown area of crops | ton/hm2 |
Grain self-sufficiency ratio | Total grain output/(total regional population × 400 kg) × 100% | ton/hm2 | |
Agricultural dependency of employment | Number of agricultural employees/rural employees × 100% | % | |
Population-carrying capacity of OCL | (Rural population − animal husbandry population)/CL area | person/hm2 | |
Economic function | Contribution of agriculture to the national economy | Gross output of the planting industry/GDP × 100% | % |
Management benefit of OCL | Gross output of the planting industry/CL area | 104 yuan/hm2 | |
Farmer’s income level | Per capita net income of rural households | yuan | |
Planting proportion of non-food crops | Sown area of non-grain crops/total sown area of crops × 100% | % | |
Ecological function | Ecological service value of CL conversion area a | Calculation based on ArcGis software and Xie’s method | 109 yuan |
Farmland biodiversity b | −∑pi·ln(pi), pi is the proportion of the sown area of various crops | - | |
Agrochemical load of farmland c | (Chemical fertilizer + pesticide + plastic film) /CL area | 1015 sej/hm2 | |
Net carbon sink level of farmland d | (CL carbon sink − CL carbon release)/CL area | ton C/hm2 |
Function Group | Gray T-Relational Coefficients | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2018 | |
SFC—ENFC | 0.1812 | 0.1039 | 0.0685 | −0.0491 |
SFC—ELFC | 0.0859 | 0.0530 | 0.1025 | 0.1160 |
ENFC—ELFC | 0.1814 | 0.0716 | −0.0779 | −0.1021 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cai, T.; Zhang, X.; Xia, F.; Lu, D. Function Evolution of Oasis Cultivated Land and Its Trade-Off and Synergy Relationship in Xinjiang, China. Land 2022, 11, 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091399
Cai T, Zhang X, Xia F, Lu D. Function Evolution of Oasis Cultivated Land and Its Trade-Off and Synergy Relationship in Xinjiang, China. Land. 2022; 11(9):1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091399
Chicago/Turabian StyleCai, Tianyi, Xinhuan Zhang, Fuqiang Xia, and Danni Lu. 2022. "Function Evolution of Oasis Cultivated Land and Its Trade-Off and Synergy Relationship in Xinjiang, China" Land 11, no. 9: 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091399
APA StyleCai, T., Zhang, X., Xia, F., & Lu, D. (2022). Function Evolution of Oasis Cultivated Land and Its Trade-Off and Synergy Relationship in Xinjiang, China. Land, 11(9), 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091399