Next Article in Journal
Sea Surface Temperature Variability over the Tropical Indian Ocean during the ENSO and IOD Events in 2016 and 2017
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Atmosphere-Ocean Coupling on the Structure and Intensity of Tropical Cyclone Bejisa in the Southwest Indian Ocean
Previous Article in Journal
Speciation of Magnesium in Aerosols Using X-ray Absorption Near-Edge Structure Related to Its Contribution to Neutralization Reactions in the Atmosphere
Previous Article in Special Issue
C-Band SAR Winds for Tropical Cyclone Monitoring and Forecast in the South-West Indian Ocean
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of Climate Change Projections for Mozambique under the Representative Concentration Pathways

Atmosphere 2021, 12(5), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050588
by Alberto F. Mavume 1,*, Bionídio E. Banze 1, Odete A. Macie 1 and António J. Queface 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Atmosphere 2021, 12(5), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050588
Submission received: 10 March 2021 / Revised: 16 April 2021 / Accepted: 24 April 2021 / Published: 1 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tropical Cyclones in the Indian Ocean)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I like the study, but I believe there are some points which should be improved:

  • the introduction tells more about the models and simulation than the methods data section. I recommend to shift the detailed description of models and simulations to the methods section
  • the methods section introduces Mozambique, which could fit nicely in the introduction
  • the text claims that mainly two seasons exist in Mozambique, but uses 4 seasons in the evaluation. Why this is neccessary should be clarified.
  • I believe a significance test (t-test) on the results for the 30-year periods is neccessary. For which periods are the observed changes statistically significant?
  • there are two figures with number 1. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors, 

Accurate climate projections serve an important purpose in policymaking or mitigation plan. The efforts presented in the manuscript are remarkable. A few comments and suggestions. The Introduction can be made more clear and crisp. The ideas are all over, e.g., Jump from L 102 to 103 - 118 Paragraph lacks flow. Then a sudden jump to the food production in the next paragraph lacks some connection while reading. I believe the authors listed the rationale appropriately but need a little rework to make Introduction centric to solutions provided to the research questions stated. 

I appreciate the analysis part done in the manuscript. However, I think the authors did not address the verification of the estimation.

A few references that can be helpful: Fildes, R. and Kourentzes, N., 2011. Validation and forecasting accuracy in models of climate change. International Journal of Forecasting27(4), pp.968-995.

Stewart, T.R. and Lusk, C.M., 1994. Seven components of judgmental forecasting skill: Implications for research and the improvement of forecasts. Journal of Forecasting13(7), pp.579-599.

Mehan, S., Gitau, M.W. and Flanagan, D.C., 2019. Reliable future climatic projections for sustainable hydro-meteorological assessments in the Western Lake Erie Basin. Water11(3), p.581.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I recommend to accept the article in present form.

Reviewer 2 Report

Great work with revisions

Back to TopTop