Next Article in Journal
MLH1 Promoter Methylation Could Be the Second Hit in Lynch Syndrome Carcinogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
Pharmacogenomics of Cardiovascular Drugs for Atherothrombotic, Thromboembolic and Atherosclerotic Risk
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/genes14112059
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Barcoding (COI) Sea Cucumber Holothuria mammata Distribution Analysis: Adriatic Rare or Common Species?

by
Maya Sertić Kovačević
1,2,
Ana Baričević
3,
Petar Kružić
1,
Maja Maurić Maljković
2,4,* and
Bojan Hamer
2,*
1
Laboratory for Marine Biology, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Laboratory for Marine Nanotechnology and Biotechnology, Center for Marine Research, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Giordano Paliaga 5, 52210 Rovinj, Croatia
3
Laboratory for Evolutionary Ecology, Center for Marine Research, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Giordano Paliaga 5, 52210 Rovinj, Croatia
4
Department of Animal Breeding and Livestock Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Heinzelova 55, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(11), 2059; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14112059
Submission received: 12 September 2023 / Revised: 6 November 2023 / Accepted: 7 November 2023 / Published: 9 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The overexploitation of the western Pacific Ocean has expanded the sea cucumber fishery into new regions to supply the Asian market. In 2013, sea cucumbers were removed from the Croatian marine protected species list, and commercial fishery took place for a short period (2017–2018) in the Eastern Adriatic Sea. However, holothuroid species are difficult to distinguish. Holothuria mammata is a species that has rarely been reported in this region and strongly resembles the common species Holothuria tubulosa. This is the first study to assess the genetic diversity of sea cucumbers in the Adriatic Sea using genetic barcoding of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI). Specimens for barcoding were collected from the northern and central Adriatic, along with a specimen that had been previously identified as H. sp. cf. mammata based on its morphological characteristics. While genetic analyses showed identified this specimen as H. tubulosa, 30% of the collected specimens were genetically identified as H. mammata. These results call into question the historically accepted sea cucumber assemblage in the Adriatic Sea, which regarded H. mammata as a rare species and generally disregarded its presence in large census studies. Such species distribution data are extremely important in developing and monitoring a sustainable fishery.

1. Introduction

Sea cucumbers are a traditional delicacy in many Asian countries, including Singapore, Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong [1]. Due to overharvesting and stock depletion of these organisms in most of the world’s traditional fisheries, there has been a recent expansion of the industry into temperate regions where sea cucumbers have little economic value in local cultures [2,3,4]. The Mediterranean Sea is among the least harvested regions of the world, with Turkey leading the industry with over 500 tons harvested per year [5,6].
Commercial interest in Adriatic Sea cucumbers can be traced back to the early 1900s, with particular interest placed on the species Holothuria tubulosa [7]. More recently, sea cucumbers were commercially exploited in the central Adriatic. The fishery opened in 1994 off the coast of Makarska, and the area was entirely depleted of sea cucumbers by 1995 [8]. The sudden drop in population density compelled the Croatian government to place all sea cucumber species under special protection, prohibiting any form of collection for commercial purposes [9]. This drastic measure was implemented because these organisms’ life history and ecology were relatively unknown, including which species experienced a population decline and why.
Since then, the knowledge gap has not been filled, and the lack of commercial interest in these organisms has also led to a decrease in scientific interest. However, special protection for sea cucumbers was lifted in 2013. After this, a short trial of intensive fishing began, just for them to be protected again from March 2018 until today [10].
Taxonomic research on sea cucumbers in the Adriatic is sparse compared to the Mediterranean Sea, and existing studies have all relied on morphological traits for classification [11,12,13,14,15]. Holothuria tubulosa is regarded as the most common species in the region, but the lack of genetic information and population analyses has resulted in uncertainty on the presence of certain species in the Adriatic Sea [4,12,15].
One uncertainty concerns the existence and distribution of Holothuria mammata in the Adriatic. While it is included in official species lists of Adriatic Sea cucumbers [9], the species is almost never recorded in scientific literature from the region. Only two individuals have been recorded and described in detail to date, with the specimens (fixed in ethanol) residing in Brussels, Belgium, and Rovinj, Croatia [12]. Zavodnik [12] suggested that H. mammata is rare in the Adriatic Sea. However, he was not confident in identifying the two specimens and emphasised the importance of re-evaluating the holothurian species assemblage in the region. Based on Zavodnik’s morphological description of the two H. sp. cf. mammata specimens, ref. [16] have expressed suspicion that these specimens were misidentified and are H. tubulosa. Hence, it has remained unclear whether H. mammata inhabits the Adriatic Sea.
Cryptic species are common among the Holothuroidea [17,18], making species identification based on morphological characteristics problematic [4,19]. Morphologically, distinguishing H. mammata from H. tubulosa is very difficult. Both exhibit high morphological diversity, and many morphotypes overlap between the two species, including ossicle shape, which is often used for sea cucumber species identification [6,16]. Historically, H. mammata was distinguished by large mammilate papillae arranged longitudinally on the bivium [20]. However, recent studies have shown that both species can have mammilate and smooth morphotypes [16].
The presence of Cuvierian tubules in H. mammata is the most straightforward characteristic distinguishing it from H. tubulosa, but these Cuvierian tubules are few in number, small, and never expelled [16,21]. In a pilot study, several H. sp. cf. mammata specimens, classified as such by their extremely mammilate appearance [20], were dissected to verify their species by the presence of Cuvierian organs. However, no Cuvierian organs were found in any of the examined specimens, suggesting they are H. tubulosa. The problem is that the organism needs to be dissected to verify the presence of Cuvierian tubules, which is an ineffective method for simple species identification.
Genetic barcoding has become widely used for taxonomic discrimination of cryptic species. The mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) has been found to accurately classify species in the genus Holothuria [19,22], and many mitochondria have already been sequenced [19,23,24,25]. While many specimens have been barcoded in the western and eastern Mediterranean Sea (mainly in the Alboran and Aegean Seas) [26,27,28,29,30], no such efforts and genetic identification have been used to date, for sea cucumber specimens in the Adriatic.
The Adriatic, as the northernmost offshoot of the Mediterranean Sea, is known for having different species distributions compared to other regions of the Mediterranean. The Adriatic Sea is noted as one of the major barriers to larval dispersal in the Mediterranean due to its hydro-geographic isolation, and varying hydrographic conditions in the Ionian Sea heavily impact the species assemblage in this region [27,31]. According to [27], the lack of information on the Adriatic Sea cucumber species distribution has led to a knowledge gap in the gene flow of these Mediterranean Sea organisms.
Our study is a follow-up to previous research on sea cucumbers [11,12,13,14,15]. It aims to clarify the uncertainty considering the presence of H. mammata in the Adriatic Sea by using genetic barcoding of the COI mitochondrial gene.

2. Materials and Methods

Samples: Ten sea cucumbers of the H. sp. cf. tubulosa morphospecies were collected from 6 locations along the northern and central coast of Croatia between June and August 2015. These locations included Lim Bay (LB), Rovinj (RO), Ičići (IC), Nerezine on the island Cres (CN), Novi Vinodolski (NV), and Biograd na moru (BI) (Table 1). Most samples were collected at depths up to 10 m using skin diving or SCUBA, while samples from offshore Rovinj (RO) were collected using grab sampling at 30 m. Each collection site’s depth and bottom type were noted (Table 1). All sea cucumbers were transported alive in coolers with seawater to the Ruđer Bošković Institute Center for Marine Research (Rovinj, Croatia) on the same day they were collected.
Along with the H. tubulosa morphospecies, representative specimens of H. forskali and H. poli were collected for genetic analysis (barcoding) to check for the correct species assessment. Holothuria forskali was easily recognised by the Cuvierian tubules it released when handled, and H. poli was recognised by its smaller size, smooth texture, and white-tipped ventral podia [20,32]. All collected specimens were photographed dorsally, ventrally, and laterally.
Genetic analysis: Six H. sp. cf. tubulosa individuals from each location (7 individuals from RO) were selected for genetic analysis. Samples of longitudinal muscle tissue were taken from each individual and frozen at −20 °C. The sea cucumbers were kept in tanks with fresh running seawater to allow their wounds to heal before they were returned to the sea. A piece of longitudinal muscle tissue was also removed from the H. sp. cf. mammata specimen stored in the Ruđer Bošković Institute collection (Figure 1; Cat. No. CMRR 2290) [12].
Genomic DNA was isolated using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, cat. no. 69504). DNA concentration and purity were estimated using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (NanoPhotometer, Implen, München, Germany). Based on these values, genomic DNA was diluted from 1:50 to 1:500. According to previous studies on these species in the Mediterranean [27,29], a fragment of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) was amplified using PCR and the following primers: COIceF 5′-ACTGCCCACGCCCTAGTAATGATATTT-3′ and COIceR 5′-TCGTGTGTCTACGTCCATTCCTACTGT-3′ [33]. Thermocycling was conducted in a C1000 thermocycler (Bio-Rad T100 PCR Thermal Cycler, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 4 min, 36 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and ending with a 7 min final extension time at 72 °C. PCR products were purified using a MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen. cat. no. 28004, Düsseldorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and were sent to Macrogen (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for sequencing. Each DNA sample was sequenced using both the forward and reverse primers.
Bioinformatics: The raw forward and reverse genetic sequences were assembled, and the resulting consensus sequences were aligned and edited using Geneious Prime ver. 2023.2.1 (Biomatters, Inc., Auckland, New Zealand). The low-quality sections at the ends of each sequence were removed, and the final sequences were cut to the shortest sequence length so they could be compared. Average pairwise tree distances within and between groups were calculated using the Geneious Species Delimitation plugin.
The NCBI GenBank’s Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) was used to find corresponding sequences for phylogenetic analysis. All sequences with a 100% cover rate were downloaded, aligned using ClustaW in Mega7 [34] together with our 40 sequences, and cut to the same length. Additionally, the only three available sequences with a 100% cover rate were downloaded for H. forskali. After the alignment of all sequences, identification of the different haplotypes was done using DNAsp v6 software [35]. Haplotypes represented by just one sequence retained their name (species, country from where they came, and ordinal number), while haplotypes represented by more than one sequence were grouped under a haplotype name (Table 2). The final alignment comprised of unique haplotypes. Estimation of the most probable nucleotide substitution model for the Neighbor-joining tree using the maximum likelihood method was carried out using the model selection analysis implemented in Mega7 [34]. The model with the lowest BIC score (Bayesian Information Criterion) was considered to best describe the substitution pattern. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the HKY + G + I model [36] with 1000 bootstrap replicates, and the tree with the highest log likelihood is shown. The numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap percentages. The initial tree for the heuristic search was automatically obtained by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and the topology with the superior log likelihood value was selected. Within and between mean group/species p-distances were calculated in Mega7 [34].

3. Results

This first genetic study of Holothuria species in the Croatian Adriatic Sea has resulted in the addition of 40 new COI sequences to the NCBI GenBank database, under accession numbers KY774322-KY774361 [37]. In total, 412 COI gene base pairs from 196 sequences were analysed: our 40 sequences representing three expected morphospecies (H. tubulosa, H. poli, and H. forskali) and 156 sequences obtained from the NCBI GenBank database. Z Mljet (ZM1; ac. no. KY774360) is a specimen that was extracted from the IRB collection, and was previously described by Zavodnik as H. sp. cf. mammata [12]. H.f. Rovinj (H. f. RO1; KY774322) and H.p. MDraga (MD1; KY774323) are collected specimens of H. forskali and H. poli from the Adriatic Sea. After the alignment of all 196 sequences and the identification of different haplotypes, the final alignment comprises 129 haplotypes (see Table 2 for haplotypes represented by more than one sequence and grouped under haplotype names, and Table S1 for complete information on sequences used and identified haplotypes).
A comparison of the 38 sequences belonging to the H. sp. cf. tubulosa morphospecies using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano model with 1000 replicates showed a clear division into two groups/species (Figure 2 and Figure S1). The bootstrap percentage at the node diverging between H. tubulosa and H. mammata was 84%. The within group/species p-distances calculated for H. tubulosa (N = 34) was 0.012, and for H. mammata (N = 55), it was 0.011, while the between group/species p-distance was 0.086. Mean pairwise tree distances within and between groups, and between groups and H. forskali and H. poli are listed in Table 3. Group 1 consisted of 12 (31.60%) of the analysed specimens (GenBank accession numbers KY774324-KY774335) and matched the nucleotide pattern of H. mammata. Two of the six haplotypes in Group 1 were present in more than one specimen. A maximum of 8 nucleotide differences (1.94%) was found between individuals IC-6 and LB-1. Group 2 consisted of 26 (68.40%) of the analysed specimens (GenBank accession numbers KY774336-KY774361), with 12 haplotypes recorded, of which three haplotypes were present in more than one specimen. A maximum of 8 (1.94%) nucleotide differences was found in several pairwise comparisons and they all matched the nucleotide pattern of H. tubulosa.
Our H. forskali (H. f. RO1) and H. poli (MD1) sequences (Genbank accession numbers KY774322 and KY774323, respectively) matched the expected species sequences from the NCBI database, suggesting the correct species assessment based on morphological characteristics (Figure 2 and Figure S1).
The specimen Z Mljet (ac. no. KY774360), previously labelled as H. sp. cf. mammata [12], was genetically grouped into Group 2, matching the H. tubulosa sequences (Figure 2 and Figure S1). Our results indicate that the two species (Group 1 and Group 2) are distributed throughout the Adriatic Sea, and their populations can mix. While in some locations, only one species was found, in others, both were present. Specimens collected from LB were all genetically grouped into Group 1, while the specimens from RO and CN all belonged to Group 2. The other three collection sites contained mixed populations (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

Until now, sea cucumber identification in the Adriatic Sea relied on exterior morphological characteristics as described by [20]. All previous research on the distribution, abundance, and biometry of H. tubulosa in the Adriatic Sea did not include genetic assessment and concluded that H. mammata is rare [12]. Stemming from this assessment, distribution and abundance censuses in the Adriatic disregarded H. mammata, and only H. tubulosa, H. poli, and H. forskali appeared in the region’s scientific literature. Genetic analysis from this research strongly points towards the presence of two species whose exterior morphologies fit the H. tubulosa morphospecies in the Adriatic Sea, suggesting a different species distribution, with up to a third of the H. tubulosa morphospecies belonging to H. mammata. Considering that H. mammata is present in relatively large numbers in the Adriatic Sea and shares its habitat with the very similar H. tubulosa, it is possible that the two species were previously treated as one. Thus, it is likely that previous research combined data on both species and should be used with care in the future.
Barcoding analyses showed that the mean pairwise tree distance was 7.9% between Groups, and the p-distance was more than 7 times greater between than within groups, suggesting that each group represents a species. Genetic studies of cryptic species suggest that organisms can be distinguished at the species level if the interspecific genetic distance is ten times the intraspecific distance (often 2–3%) [17,38,39]. In a large-scale barcoding study of commercially valuable holothurians from the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans, [22] showed that conspecific variation never exceeded 4.5% and was generally <2%, while sequence differences greater than 5% almost always indicated different species.
Sequence comparison with the NCBI database reveals that Group 1 sequences closely resemble H. mammata, and Group 2 sequences best match H. tubulosa. Genetic barcoding showed that Zavodnik’s specimen, labelled as H. sp. cf. mammata in the Ruđer Bošković Institute collection in Rovinj, is indeed misidentified and is a mammilate morphotype of H. tubulosa, as [16] had predicted (Figure 2). Even though we did not find any research showing hybridisation between H. mammata and H. tubulosa, recent studies indicated that it is possible between H. tubulosa and H. poli [40]. Given that this analysis was carried out based on mtDNA, further analyses that combine nDNA and mtDNA markers are needed to ascertain the presence of hybrids. Nevertheless, due to 30% of our samples being genetically classified as H. mammata, even if hybrids were present, it is still a very strong indication that this species is present in the Adriatic Sea.
Even though some locations had only H. mammata or H. tubulosa, in other areas, both species were present, despite the small sample size (N = 6–7) collected from each location (Figure 3). It should be underlined that due to this small sample size, the proportions of each species within local holothurian populations are not representative and should be further investigated; however, these findings are still worth mentioning as they indicate that the two species may share the same habitat.
Unlike the descriptions of H. mammata’s preference for deeper depths, as given by the IUCN Redlist and Turk’s guide to species identification in the Mediterranean Sea [41], we found this species at depths ranging from 3 to 20 m. We did not find H. mammata at our only deep location (RO, 30 m). This may be due to the small sample size or local environmental conditions and does not preclude the existence of H. mammata in deeper habitats in the Adriatic Sea.
The result that H. mammata may be widely distributed in the Adriatic Sea is not unexpected. Holothurians have a relatively long-lasting planktonic phase and high larval dispersal rates [30,42]. Because the Adriatic is connected to the Mediterranean, with currents flowing northward from the Ionian Sea [31,43], the presence of species in both bodies of water, especially eurytopic species, is consistent with oceanographic expectations.
A recent checklist of the echinoderm fauna in the Adriatic Sea, based on a detailed investigation of all available literature with temporal coverage from the end of the 18th century to present-day records, has confirmed the presence of both H. mammata and H. tubolosa species [44]. Additionally, a species from the same Holothuriidae family, H. stellati, was added to this checklist by compiling previous records. It is known that this species has frequently been misidentified as H. tubulosa. This points out that, without genetic identification supported by morphological observations, the presence and distribution of certain Holothuroiidae in the Adriatic Sea remains unclear.

5. Conclusions

The primary aim of this study was to employ barcoding identification to identify, determine, and clarify the presence/absence of H. mammata in the Adriatic Sea. Ultimately, we found that H. mammata is relatively abundant and widespread in the Adriatic Sea, and it shares its habitat with the very similar species H. tubulosa, so it is possible that these two species have been previously treated as one [14,42]. It appears that in the case of heavy commercial fishing, given their lack of strict depth preferences, both species would be similarly vulnerable to exploitation threats as both have been found at depths ranging from 1 to 30 m. Thus, further research, clarification, and quantification of the presence of sea cucumber species in the Adriatic Sea is needed, so that if commercial fishing is reopened, quotas for each species can be defined.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14112059/s1, Figure S1: Fully expanded phylogenetic tree (maximum likelihood), unrooted, based on 129 haplotypes from partial sequences of COI gene obtained from this study and NCBI GenBank; Table S1: Sequence Name/Tag used, NCBI GenBank accession numbers of all the sequences used in the analysis, and Haplotype name (if more than one sequence collapsed in one identical haplotype).

Author Contributions

M.S.K., B.H. and P.K. conceived and planned the experiments. M.S.K. and B.H. carried out the sampling. M.S.K. and B.H. carried out the laboratory analyses. B.H., A.B. and M.M.M. carried out the genetic analyses. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results. M.S.K., P.K. and B.H. wrote the original draft preparation, which was afterwards reviewed and edited by B.H. and M.M.M. to achieve the final version. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol of the animal study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the RUĐER BOŠKOVIĆ INSTITUTE—Decision on the capture and keeping of protected wild animal species Republic of Croatia, Ministry of Culture, Directorate for Nature Protection (CLASS: UP/I-612-07/11-33/1015, No: 532-08-01-01/1-11-04, Zagreb, 25 October 2011).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or in the online NCBI GenBank database under accession numbers KY774322-KY774361.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank our colleagues from Ruđer Bošković Institute Center for Marine Research and our colleagues from the University of Zagreb Faculty of Science. They demonstrated the importance of having a strong, supportive, and coherent team with a variety of skills. We want to thank Andrej Jaklin, Rudolf Marić, Nika Drljević, and Korana Hamer for their help in sample collection, and Dora Sertic for helping with lab work and sample collection. This publication is the result of research for Maya Sertic’s Master’s thesis under the dual mentorship of Petar Kružić and Bojan Hamer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aydin, M. The commercial sea cucumber fishery in Turkey. SPC Beche Inf. Bull. 2008, 28, 40–41. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sicuro, B.; Levine, J. Sea cucumber in the Mediterranean: A potential species for aquaculture in the Mediterranean. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2011, 19, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thandar, A.S. Biodiversity and distribution of the southern African sea cucumbers (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). Zootaxa 2015, 4058, 341–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pasquini, V.; Porcu, C.; Marongiu, M.F.; Follesa, M.C.; Giglioli, A.A.; Addis, P. New insights upon the reproductive biology of the sea cucumber Holothuria tubulosa (Echinodermata, Holothuroidea) in the Mediterranean: Implications for management and domestication. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 1029147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sicuro, B.; Piccino, M.; Gai, F.; Abete, M.C.; Danieli, A.; Dapra, F.; Mioletti, S.; Vilella, S. Food Quality and Safety of Mediterreanean Sea Cucumbers Holothuria tubulosa and Holothuria polii in Southern Adriatic Sea. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2012, 7, 851–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. González-Wangüemert, M.; Aydin, M.; Conand, C. Assessment of sea cucumber populations from the Aegean Sea (Turkey): First insights to sustainable management of new fisheries. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2014, 92, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sella, A.; Sella, M. L’Industria del Trepang. Thalassia 1940, 4, 1–116. [Google Scholar]
  8. Šimunović, A.; Grubelić, I. A contribution to the knowledge of the species Holothuria tubulosa GMELIN, 1788 (Holothuria, Echinodermata) in the coastal area of the central eastern Adriatic. Acta Adriat. 1998, 39, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  9. Croatian Parliament (1998) NN 76/98: Pravilnik o Zaštiti Trpova (Holothuroidea); Narodne Novine d.d. 76/1998; Narodne Novine d.d.: Zagreb, Croatia, 1998.
  10. Croatian Parliament (2018) NN 29/18: Pravilnik o Lovostaju Trpova (Holothuroidea); Narodne Novine d.d. 29/2018; Narodne Novine d.d.: Zagreb, Croatia, 2018.
  11. Zavodnik, D. Echinodermata of Kaštela Bay (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). Acta Adriat. 1999, 40, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zavodnik, D. Marine fauna of Mljet National park (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). 2. Echinodermata. Acta Adriat. 2003, 44, 105–160. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zavodnik, D.; Legac, M.; Gluhak, T. An account of the marine fauna of Pag Island (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). Nat. Croat. 2006, 15, 65–107. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kašćelan, S.; Mandić, S.; Radović, I.; Krpo-Ćetković, J. An annotated checklist of Echinodermata of Montenegro (the south Adriatic Sea). Zootaxa 2009, 2275, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Petović, S.; Krpo-Ćetković, J. Additions to the echinoderm (Echinodermata) fauna of Montenegro (Adriatic Sea). Stud. Mar. 2014, 27, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  16. Borrero-Pérez, G.H.; Pérez-Ruzafa, A.; Marcos, C.; González-Wangüemert, M. The taxonomic status of some Atlanto-Mediterranean species in the subgenus Holothuria (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea: Holothuriidae) based on molecular evidence. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 157, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Michonneau, F.; McPherson, S.; O’Loughlin, P.M.; Paulay, G. More than Meets the Eye: Diversity and Geographic Patterns in Sea Cucumbers; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Michonneau, F. Cryptic and not-so-cryptic species in the complex “Holothuria (Thymiosycia) impatiens” (Forsskal 1775) (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea: Holothuriidae). BioRxiv 2015, 2015, 014225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, B.; Li, Z.; Lv, Y.; E, Z.; Fang, J.; Ren, C.; Luo, P.; Hu, C. Analysis of Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Bohadschia argus (Jaeger, 1833) (Aspidochirotida, Holothuriidae). Animals 2022, 12, 1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koehler, R. Faune de France I: Echinodermes; Lechevalier, P., Ed.; Librairie de la Faculte des Sciences: Paris, France, 1921; pp. 148–178. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vandenspiegel, D.; Jangoux, M. Les tubes de Cuvier d’Holothuria mammata Grube 1840 (Holothuroidea, Echinodermata). Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg. 1988, 118, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  22. Uthicke, S.; Byrne, M.; Conand, C. Genetic barcoding of commercial Bêche-de-mer species (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 634–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, T.; Shin, S. Complete mitochondrial genome of sea cucumber, Holothuria (Stauropora) pervicax (Holothuroidea, Holothuriida, Holothuriidae), from Jeju Island, Korea. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 1047–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhong, S.; Liu, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, G. The complete mitochondrial genome of black sea cucumber Holothuria leucospilota (Aspidochirotida holothuriidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 3377–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhong, S.; Huang, L.; Liu, Y.; Huang, G. The first complete mitochondrial genome of Actinopyga from Actinopyga echinites (Aspidochirotida: Holothuriidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020, 5, 854–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Borrero-Pérez, G.H.; Gómez-Zurita, J.; González-Wangüemert, M.; Marcos, C.; Pérez-Ruzafa, A. Molecular systematics of the genus Holothuria in the Mediterranean and Northeastern Atlantic and a molecular clock for the diversification of the Holothuriidae (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 57, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Borrero-Pérez, G.H.; González-Wangüemert, M.; Marcos, C.; Pérez-Ruzafa, A. Phylogeography of the Atlanto-Mediterranean sea cucumber Holothuria (Holothuria) mammata: The combined effects of historical processes and current oceanographical pattern. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20, 1964–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Valente, S.; Serrao, E.A.; González-Wangüemert, M. West versus East Mediterranean Sea: Origin and genetic differentiation of the sea cucumber Holothuria polii. Mar. Ecol. 2014, 36, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. González-Wangüemert, M.; Valente, S.; Aydin, M. Effects of fishery protection on biometry and genetic structure of two target sea cucumber species from the Mediterranean Sea. Hydrobiologia 2014, 743, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maggi, C.; González-Wangüemert, M. Genetic differentiation among Parastichopus regalis populations in the Western Mediterranean Sea: Potential effects from its fishery and current connectivity. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2015, 16, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Batistić, M.; Garić, M.; Molinero, J.C. Interannual variations in Adriatic Sea zooplankton mirror shifts in circulation regimes in the Ionian Sea. Clim. Res. 2014, 61, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aydin, M.; Erkan, S. Identification and some biological characteristics of commercial sea cucumber in the Turkey coast waters. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2015, 3, 260–265. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoareau, T.B.; Boissin, E. Design of phylum—Specific hybrid primers for DNA bar coding: Addressing the need for efficient COI amplification in the Echinodermata. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 960–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rozas, J.; Ferrer-Mata, A.; Sánchez-DelBarrio, J.C.; Guirao-Rico, S.; Librado, P.; Ramos-Onsins, S.E.; Sánchez-Gracia, A. DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 3299–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hasegawa, M.; Kishino, H.; Yano, T. Dating the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 1985, 22, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sertić, M. Genetic and Morphological Diversity of the Sea Cucumber Morphospecies Holothuria tubulosa (Gmelin, 1788) in the Northern and Central Adriatic Sea. Master’s Thesis, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 2016; 60p. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hebert, P.D.N.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; deWaard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003, 270, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hebert, P.D.N.; Penton, E.H.; Burns, J.M.; Janzen, D.H.; Hallwachs, W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 14812–14817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gkafas, G.A.; Sarantopoulou, J.; Apostologamvrou, C.; Antoniadou, C.; Exadactylos, A.; Fleris, G.; Vafidis, D. Admixture of Holothurian Species in the Hellenic Seas (Eastern Mediterranean) as Revealed by RADseq. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Turk, T. Pod Površinom Mediterana (Under the Surface of the Mediterranean Sea); Školska Knjiga: Zagreb, Croatia, 2011; pp. 360–363. [Google Scholar]
  42. Domínguez-Godino, J.A.; Slater, M.J.; Hannon, C.; González-Wangüemert, M. A new species for sea cucumber ranching and aquaculture: Breeding and rearing of Holothuria arguinensis. Aquaculture 2015, 438, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hamad, N.; Millot, C.; Taupier-Letage, I. A new hypothesis about the surface circulation in the eastern basin of the Mediterranean Sea. Prog. Oceanogr. 2005, 66, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Despalatović, M.; Cvitković, I.; Žuljević, A. Checklist of the echinoderm fauna of the Adriatic Sea. Zootaxa 2017, 4353, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 14 02059 g001
Figure 1. Specimen collected in 1997 and identified as Holothuria sp. cf. mammata, based on exterior morphology. The specimen is stored in the Ruđer Bošković Institute collection (Cat. No. CMRR 2290) [12]. The specimen’s light colouration is likely due to long-term storage in ethanol. In this study, the specimen is referred to as Z Mljet (ZM1).
Figure 1. Specimen collected in 1997 and identified as Holothuria sp. cf. mammata, based on exterior morphology. The specimen is stored in the Ruđer Bošković Institute collection (Cat. No. CMRR 2290) [12]. The specimen’s light colouration is likely due to long-term storage in ethanol. In this study, the specimen is referred to as Z Mljet (ZM1).
Genes 14 02059 g001
Genes 14 02059 g002
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree (maximum likelihood), unrooted, based on partial sequences of the COI gene obtained from this study and the NCBI GenBank. The analysed specimens from the Holothuria tubulosa morphospecies group divide into two distinct groups/species. NCBI GenBank accession numbers for all the sequences used are available in Table S1. The nodes for species other than H. tubulosa and H. mammata were collapsed for a clearer view of H. tubulosa’s and H. mammata’s distribution. The full tree, without collapsed nodes, is presented in Figure S1. Collapsed nodes are as follows: H. arguinensis Spain 1, 3, 4, 7–9, 11, 12, 14–16, 19–21, 23–33, Hap15, Hap18; H. polii Spain 1, H. polii Mexico, H. polii Italy, Hap11; H. kefersteini Mexico 1, 5, Hap19; H. forskali Spain 1, 2, H. forskali Germany, H. forskali RO1.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree (maximum likelihood), unrooted, based on partial sequences of the COI gene obtained from this study and the NCBI GenBank. The analysed specimens from the Holothuria tubulosa morphospecies group divide into two distinct groups/species. NCBI GenBank accession numbers for all the sequences used are available in Table S1. The nodes for species other than H. tubulosa and H. mammata were collapsed for a clearer view of H. tubulosa’s and H. mammata’s distribution. The full tree, without collapsed nodes, is presented in Figure S1. Collapsed nodes are as follows: H. arguinensis Spain 1, 3, 4, 7–9, 11, 12, 14–16, 19–21, 23–33, Hap15, Hap18; H. polii Spain 1, H. polii Mexico, H. polii Italy, Hap11; H. kefersteini Mexico 1, 5, Hap19; H. forskali Spain 1, 2, H. forskali Germany, H. forskali RO1.
Genes 14 02059 g002
Genes 14 02059 g003
Figure 3. Ratio of sea cucumber specimens belonging to Group 1 (Holothuria mammata) and Group 2 (Holothuria tubulosa) at each collection site. All 6 analysed individuals at Lim Bay (LB) belonged to the species H. mammata, while only H. tubulosa was found at Rovinj (RO) and Cres–Nerezine (CN). Both species were present at Ičići (IC), Novi Vinodolski (NV), and Biograd (BI).
Figure 3. Ratio of sea cucumber specimens belonging to Group 1 (Holothuria mammata) and Group 2 (Holothuria tubulosa) at each collection site. All 6 analysed individuals at Lim Bay (LB) belonged to the species H. mammata, while only H. tubulosa was found at Rovinj (RO) and Cres–Nerezine (CN). Both species were present at Ičići (IC), Novi Vinodolski (NV), and Biograd (BI).
Genes 14 02059 g003
Table 1. Collection site ID and basic information on each location where sea cucumbers were sampled.
Table 1. Collection site ID and basic information on each location where sea cucumbers were sampled.
Site IDCollection SiteGPS PositionDepth (m)Number of SpecimensBottom Type
LBLim Bay45°08′10.8″ N 13°42′32.0″ E12–176Gravel with rocky outcroppings
RORovinj45°04′34.9″ N 13°35′53.7″ E307Sand/mud
ICIčići45°18′32.7″ N 14°17′12.6″ E4–66Gravel with rocky outcroppings
CNCres–Nerezine44°40′28.3″ N 14°24′38.6″ E2–36Sand/mud and Posidonia
NVNovi Vinodolski45°08′00.6″ N 14°45′09.7″ E5–76Gravel
BIBiograd na moru43°55′50.5″ N 15°26′31.2″ E2–36Sand/mud and Posidonia
Table 2. Haplotype name, number of sequences comprised in that haplotype, countries where the haplotype was found, and sequence names.
Table 2. Haplotype name, number of sequences comprised in that haplotype, countries where the haplotype was found, and sequence names.
Haplotype NameNr. of Sequences ComprisedCountries FoundSequence Names
Hap118Spain, Portugal, CroatiaNV3, ZM1, RO2, RO1, IC2, IC1, CN5, CN2, BI6, BI5, BI4; H. t. Portugal 1–3; H. t. Spain 1–4
Hap24Spain, CroatiaRO4; H. t. Spain 14, 17, 19
Hap37Spain, CroatiaRO3, NV5, CN6, CN4; H. t. Spain 26–28
Hap42Spain, CroatiaNV4, H. t. Spain 32
Hap52Spain, CroatiaNV2, H. t. Spain 10
Hap63Spain, CroatiaIC5, IC3, H. t. Spain 24
Hap710Spain, CroatiaNV1, LB6, LB4, BI2, BI1; H. m. Spain 24, 38, 40–42
Hap810Spain, Portugal, CroatiaLB5, LB2, BI3, O. d. Portugal; H. m. Portugal 2–4; H. m. Spain 22, 32, 39
Hap92Spain, CroatiaLB3, H. m. Spain 47
Hap102Spain, CroatiaIC4, H. m. Spain 8
Hap112Spain, CroatiaMD1, H. p. Spain 2
Hap123SpainH. t. Spain 5, 8, 13
Hap132Spain, PortugalH. m. Portugal 1, H. m. Spain 6
Hap144SpainH. m. Spain 10, 14, 15, 17
Hap152Spain, MexicoH. t. Mexico, H. m. Spain 34
Hap163SpainH. a. Spain 2, 5, 6
Hap172SpainH. m. Spain 45, 51
Hap185SpainH. a. Spain 10, 13, 17, 18, 22
Hap193MexicoH. k. Mexico 2–4
Table 3. Mean pairwise tree distances within and between groups. N denotes the number of specimens analysed in each group.
Table 3. Mean pairwise tree distances within and between groups. N denotes the number of specimens analysed in each group.
GroupsMean Pairwise Tree DistanceN
Mean pairwise tree distances within groups
Group 1/H. mammata0.00612
Group 2/H. tubulosa0.00726
H. poli 1
H. forskali 1
Mean pairwise tree distances between groups
Group 1–Group 20.079
Group 1—H. poli0.144
Group 1—H. forskali0.261
Group 2—H. poli0.159
Group 2—H. forskali0.275
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sertić Kovačević, M.; Baričević, A.; Kružić, P.; Maurić Maljković, M.; Hamer, B. Barcoding (COI) Sea Cucumber Holothuria mammata Distribution Analysis: Adriatic Rare or Common Species? Genes 2023, 14, 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14112059

AMA Style

Sertić Kovačević M, Baričević A, Kružić P, Maurić Maljković M, Hamer B. Barcoding (COI) Sea Cucumber Holothuria mammata Distribution Analysis: Adriatic Rare or Common Species? Genes. 2023; 14(11):2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14112059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sertić Kovačević, Maya, Ana Baričević, Petar Kružić, Maja Maurić Maljković, and Bojan Hamer. 2023. "Barcoding (COI) Sea Cucumber Holothuria mammata Distribution Analysis: Adriatic Rare or Common Species?" Genes 14, no. 11: 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14112059

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop