You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Genes
Download PDF
  • Brief Report
  • Open Access

22 April 2022

Association of SNP rs5069 in APOA1 with Benign Breast Diseases in a Mexican Population

,
,
,
and
1
Doctoral Program in Biomedical Sciences, Physiology Department, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco 44340, Mexico
2
Department of Molecular Biology and Genomics, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco 44340, Mexico
3
Immunometabolism in Complex Diseases and Aging, Department of Molecular Biology and Genomics, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco 44340, Mexico
4
Traslational Bioengineering Department, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco 44430, Mexico
Genes2022, 13(5), 738;https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050738
This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases
Version Notes
Order Reprints
Review Reports

Abstract

Breast cancer (BCa) is the most common type of cancer affecting women worldwide. Some histological subtypes of benign breast disease (BBD) are considered risk factors for developing BCa. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genes encoding apolipoproteins A-I (APOA1) and B (APOB) have been associated with BCa in Tunisian, Chinese, and Taiwanese populations. The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the possible contribution of APOA1 and APOB polymorphisms to BCa and BBD in the Mexican population. We analyzed the association of 4 SNPs in genes encoding apolipoproteins: rs670 and rs5069 in the APOA1 gene, and rs693 and rs1042031 in the APOB gene, by performing PCR-RFLP with DNA extracted from the biopsy tissue of Mexican women with BCa or BBD and whole blood samples obtained from the general population (GP). Our results showed an association between the CT + TT genotypes of the SNP rs5069 and BBD (p = 0.03201). In the A-T haplotype, the frequency of the SNPs rs670 and rs5069 differed significantly between the BBD group and the GP and BCa groups (p = 0.004111; p = 0.01303). In conclusion, the SNP rs5069 is associated with BBD but not with BCa in the Mexican population.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer (BCa) is the most common female cancer worldwide. In Latin America, it is the leading cause of female cancer-related mortality [1]; 37% of women in Mexico have BCa [2].
A relationship between obesity and cancer has been reported, and abnormal lipid metabolism is implicated in carcinogenesis mechanisms [3,4]. Lipids are small hydrophobic or amphipathic molecules that serve as energy sources and play a key role as signaling molecules and regulators of various cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, signaling, and metabolism [5,6]. The deregulation of these processes in cancer cells shows that lipids are essential in promoting cancer cell growth and survival. The connection between altered lipid levels and the cancer process suggests that lipid profiles can be used to diagnose and assess disease progression [6]. Lipid biomarkers are expressed differently between healthy subjects and patients with breast tumors and can help distinguish between benign and malignant lesions [7,8].
Apolipoproteins play a crucial role in lipid metabolism and cancer development, and the polymorphisms in their genes influence lipid abnormalities related to cancer [9]. High-Density Lipoproteins (HDL), Low-Density Lipoproteins (LDL), Apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I), and Apolipoprotein B-100 (ApoB-100) levels are associated with BCa development and severity [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Also of interest is their role in benign breast diseases (BBD), a heterogeneous group of non-malignant lesions [16] associated with lipid control variation, with BBD patients having higher HDL and lower LDL levels than healthy controls and BCa patients, respectively [17,18]. Both BCa and BBD patients have high levels of serum ApoA-I [19]. In addition, proliferative BBD increases the risk of developing in situ BCa up to 5-fold, depending on proliferation and atypia [16,20,21,22,23], making BBD an important risk factor for BCa development.
ApoA-I is the major protein constituent of HDL and is involved in cholesterol transport from peripheral tissues to the liver [24,25]. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs670 involves an A->G substitution at 75 bp upstream of the APOA1 transcription initiation site [26]. The A allele is associated with BCa risk in Tunisian and Taiwanese populations [24,27]. SNP rs5069 in APOA1 replaces a C>T in intron 1 [26], and its CT genotype is associated with BCa lymph node spread in the Tunisian population [24]. Both rs670 and rs5069 affect the expression of ApoA-I. The A allele of rs670 and the CT genotype of rs5069 are associated with higher levels of this apolipoprotein [24,28,29].
ApoB-100 is a part of VLDL (Very Low-Density Lipoproteins), IDL (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins), LDL, and chylomicrons [30]. SNP rs693 is a silent C->T substitution in APOB exon 26, while SNP rs1042031 changes a G->A in exon 29, resulting in glutamate instead of lysine. These SNPs have an opposite role in ApoB-100 expression and cholesterol metabolism. The T allele of rs693 increases the expression of this apolipoprotein, while the change of amino acid provoked by rs1042031 disrupts its binding to the LDL receptor. These variants were associated with BCa risk in a Chinese population [31]. Although SNPs in APOA1 and APOB are associated with BCa, none of the studies have assessed both genes in BCa or BBD. In this pilot study, we investigated the association between APOA1 and APOB SNPs and breast neoplasms in a Mexican population. Our results showed a positive association between APOA1 SNPs and BBD risk, rather than with BCa.

2. Materials and Methods

Samples of unrelated individuals without a family history of BCa and without prior treatment were selected from a collection of 109 genomic DNA samples extracted from paraffin-embedded neoplastic tissues studies previously [32,33]. Samples genotyped for all four SNPs from two genes (APOA1-rs670, APOA1-rs5069, APOB-rs693, APOB-rs1042031) were sorted according to the diagnosis, with 39 in the BCa group, and 19 in the BBD group (Table S1), and were compared to 150 peripheral blood genomic DNA samples from nonrelated and healthy women of ages 18 to 72 years from a general population (GP), analyzed previously [34]. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects. The Institutional Ethics Committee of CIBO-IMSS approved this study.
SNP assays were performed using PCR-RFLP. Table S2 lists the reagents, experimental conditions, and the length of amplified fragments. We designed all primers except for MSP1 [35]. The rs670 and rs5069 regions were amplified using MSP1 and MSP2 primers. Each APOA1 site was also amplified with pairs MSP1-MSP3 and MSP2-MSP4 for rs670 and rs5069, respectively. SNPs in APOB were amplified with the primers listed in Table S2.
Statistical analyses were performed with PLINK v1.07 [36]. The genotypic association was tested with χ2 test. Fisher’s exact test was used for the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) calculation in each group, and the association model tests, and p-values were adjusted using false discovery rate (FDR). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was calculated using the squared correlation coefficient based on genotypic allele counts. Haplotype-specific tests were performed for all SNPs. Results with p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results and Discussion

To test the association of APOA1 and APOB SNPs with BCa and BBD, samples from breast tumor biopsies were genotyped for rs670, rs5069, rs693, and rs1042031. From the 109 DNA samples initially considered in the archive collection, only 58 samples could be genotyped for all four polymorphisms. Table 1 lists these SNPs’ genotype and allele distributions in our sample groups.
Table 1. Genotype and allelic distribution in the studied groups.
The APOA1 SNPs rs670 and rs5069 were in HWE in all our groups, and only their genotype distributions differed significantly between the BBD and GP groups (p = 0.0197 and p = 0.0454, respectively, Table 1). The rs670 A allele was associated with BCa [24,27] and renal cancer [37] in previous studies. In our study, the rs670 variant did not show any association with the BCa group; however, the frequencies of this allele and its AA genotype were significantly different between the BBD and GP groups (p = 0.0335 and p = 0.0268, respectively, Table 2). After the FDR correction, no differences were noted. Further studies are needed to characterize APOA1 variants in non-malignant breast pathologies.
Table 2. rs670, rs5069, rs693 and rs1042031 association analysis under different genetic models for all groups.
Our analysis showed a significant FDR-corrected association between the TT + CT genotypes and BBD (p = 0.032, Table 2). After independently testing the TT and CT genotypes with the CC genotype as a reference, only the CT genotype presented an association with BBD (p = 0.0116, Table S3). Interestingly, in our study, the CT genotype frequencies observed in BCa were lower than in BBD. These frequency distributions could be a reflection of the increased ApoA-I levels associated with this genotype. The evidence for apolipoproteins and HDL roles in cancer is mounting, yet some results are conflicting, and many questions remain. In terms of ApoA-I levels, some studies of ApoA-I expression in BCa development report a direct association, while for others, it is inverse [9]. An assay in neoplastic mice reported that an elevated ApoA-I/HDL ratio protects against tumor development; moreover, after tumor establishment, some of these mice were infused with Human ApoA-I, leading to tumor shrinkage [14]. Another venue of studies has tried to relate ApoA-I genotypes with HDL cholesterol and serum ApoA-I levels with mixed results. Most studies have not shown any significant genotype [29,38,39,40,41,42]. Those with a significant result associate the CT genotype with higher levels of both [28,43,44,45]. The only exception was a Spanish population that related the T allele with lower HDL-cholesterol levels [46]. Since cancer progression is a non-linear multistage event where mutations are not always additive toward malignancy and heterogeneous genotypes present an advantage against several diseases, we hypothesize that the CT genotype increases BBD risk in Mexican populations while at the same time lowering BCa risk. Elucidating the role of APOA1 in BCa progression warrants further exploration
Liu et al. [31] analyzed a BCa population by BMI and found an overrepresentation of rs693 CT + TT genotypes and rs1042031 GA + AA genotypes in overweight and obese individuals, respectively, despite statistical insignificance. In our results, rs1042031 deviated from HWE in the GP group and rs693 in the BCa group (p = 0.011 and p = 0.0181, respectively). None of these SNPs showed an association. The equilibrium skewness of rs693 in the BCa group suggested either a cancer-based genetic drift or LD with another cancer-promoting locus; however, the small sample size in our study hindered further analysis. As previously reported [31], we also found that the rs1042031 GA + AA genotypes were overrepresented in overweight individuals in the GP group. The results persisted after excluding this subgroup from the analysis. Our case groups could not be tested for any BMI-based genotype trend because such information was unavailable. Cancer studies should evaluate BMI since APOB SNPs probably have shifting relevance in cancer, depending on an individual’s BMI.
In LD analysis, we observed low values for r2, indicating weak SNP pairwise cor-relations (Table 3). Haplotype frequency distributions (Table 4) show that the H1 haplotype (A-T) was significantly different between the BBD and the GP (p = 0.0041) and between the BCa and the BBD groups (p = 0.01303). These results are consistent with the genotype analysis results of rs670 and rs5069, in that the rs670 A and rs5069 T alleles are associated with BBD in the Mexican population. Because we didn’t find an association with BCa, we surmise that these alleles could promote benign proliferative changes in breast tissue and have a potential role as tissue biomarkers to identify benign breast diseases. However, as the small sample size limits our ability to interpret the results, future studies are needed to determine its prognostic value further. The H4 haplotype frequency (G-C) differs significantly between the BBD and GP groups (p = 0.0111). Given its low frequency in BBD, it could affect cancer initiation and progression, warranting further research.
Table 3. Linkage disequilibrium analysis for general population, breast cancer, and benign breast disease groups.
Table 4. Haplotype association analysis in breast cancer, benign breast disease, and general population groups.
Notably, in our study, GP genomic DNA was obtained from peripheral blood, while in BCa and BBD patients, DNA was obtained from breast biopsies, which may present with loss of heterozygosity, potentially influencing local lipid-immune metabolism pathways that induce carcinogenicity. This could be tested by analyzing germline genotypes derived from non-tumoral tissue or blood cells, but this data was unavailable for our groups. Despite such limitations, this is the first pilot study to examine the interactions of rs670, rs5069, rs693, and rs1042031 and their association with BCa and BBD.

4. Conclusions

Our results, while limited due to the sample size, show that the CT + TT genotypes of rs5069 and the H1 haplotype due to the rs670 A allele and rs5069 T allele are associated with BBD. While further studies are necessary, our pilot study suggests that rs670 and rs5069 could increase benign tumor risk in Mexican women.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13050738/s1, Table S1: Diagnosis and age distribution for breast cancer and benign breast disease groups; Table S2: PCR-RFLP conditions for the analyzed polymorphisms; Table S3: Genotype independent testing against reference genotype for rs670, rs5069, rs693 in all groups.

Author Contributions

C.D.-D.: Methodology, Data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, Investigation, Original draft writing, review, and editing. M.C.M.-M.: Study conceptualization and design, Methodology, Data interpretation. R.E.N.-H.: Study conceptualization and design, Methodology, Data interpretation. R.R.-V.: Methodology, Investigation, Data analysis and interpretation. A.P.M.-R.: Study conceptualization and design, Methodology, Data analysis and interpretation, Investigation, Original draft writing, review, and editing, Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (Number R-2003249019).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chavarri-Guerra, Y.; Blazer, K.R.; Weitzel, J.N. Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment for Breast Cancer in Latin America. Rev. Investig. Clin. 2017, 69, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. INEGI. Estadísticas a Propósito Del Día Mundial Contra El Cáncer. Datos Nacionales; Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática: Mexico, 2021.
  3. Danilo, C.; Frank, P.G. Cholesterol and Breast Cancer Development. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2012, 12, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Radišauskas, R.; Kuzmickienė, I.; Milinavičienė, E.; Everatt, R. Hypertension, Serum Lipids and Cancer Risk: A Review of Epidemiological Evidence. Medicina 2016, 52, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Guo, R.; Chen, Y.; Borgard, H.; Jijiwa, M.; Nasu, M.; He, M.; Deng, Y. The Function and Mechanism of Lipid Molecules and Their Roles in The Diagnosis and Prognosis of Breast Cancer. Molecules 2020, 25, 4864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Butler, L.M.; Perone, Y.; Dehairs, J.; Lupien, L.E.; de Laat, V.; Talebi, A.; Loda, M.; Kinlaw, W.B.; Swinnen, J.V. Lipids and Cancer: Emerging Roles in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Intervention. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 159, 245–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, L.; Cui, X.; Zhang, N.; Li, M.; Bai, Y.; Han, X.; Shi, Y.; Liu, H. Comprehensive Lipid Profiling of Plasma in Patients with Benign Breast Tumor and Breast Cancer Reveals Novel Biomarkers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 5065–5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.; Chen, H.; Dai, M.; Ai, J.; Li, Y.; Mahon, B.; Dai, S.; Deng, Y. Plasma Lipidomics Profiling Identified Lipid Biomarkers in Distinguishing Early-Stage Breast Cancer from Benign Lesions. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 36622–36631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ren, L.; Yi, J.; Li, W.; Zheng, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Du, G. Apolipoproteins and Cancer. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 7032–7043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Borgquist, S.; Butt, T.; Almgren, P.; Shiffman, D.; Stocks, T.; Orho-Melander, M.; Manjer, J.; Melander, O. Apolipoproteins, Lipids and Risk of Cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 138, 2648–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martin, L.J.; Melnichouk, O.; Huszti, E.; Connelly, P.W.; Greenberg, C.V.; Minkin, S.; Boyd, N.F. Serum Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Nested Case-Control Study Using Multiple Time Points. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2015, 107, djv032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. His, M.; Zelek, L.; Deschasaux, M.; Pouchieu, C.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Hercberg, S.; Galan, P.; Latino-Martel, P.; Blacher, J.; Touvier, M. Prospective Associations between Serum Biomarkers of Lipid Metabolism and Overall, Breast and Prostate Cancer Risk. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 29, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Touvier, M.; Fassier, P.; His, M.; Norat, T.; Chan, D.S.M.; Blacher, J.; Hercberg, S.; Galan, P.; Druesne-Pecollo, N.; Latino-Martel, P. Cholesterol and Breast Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 114, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zamanian-Daryoush, M.; DiDonato, J.A. Apolipoprotein A-I and Cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chandler, P.D.; Song, Y.; Lin, J.; Zhang, S.; Sesso, H.D.; Mora, S.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Rexrode, K.E.; Moorthy, M.V.; Li, C.; et al. Lipid Biomarkers and Long-Term Risk of Cancer in the Womens Health Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dyrstad, S.W.; Yan, Y.; Fowler, A.M.; Colditz, G.A. Breast Cancer Risk Associated with Benign Breast Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015, 149, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dixit, A.K.; Raza, M.A.; Sharan, J.; Chauhan, C.G.S.; Das, B.; Popat, A. Serum Lipid Profiles in Breast Carcinoma and Benign Breast Diseases in Rohilkhand Region of Uttar Pradesh. IJSS J. Surg. 2016, 2, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gönenç, A.; Erten, D.; Aslan, S.; Akinci, M.; Simşek, B.; Torun, M. Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Status in Blood and Tissue of Malignant Breast Tumor and Benign Breast Disease. Cell Biol. Int. 2006, 30, 376–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nasim, F.-U.-H.; Ejaz, S.; Ashraf, M.; Asif, A.R.; Oellerich, M.; Ahmad, G.; Malik, G.A. Attiq-Ur-Rehman Potential Biomarkers in the Sera of Breast Cancer Patients from Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Biomark. Cancer 2012, 4, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dupont, W.D.; Parl, F.F.; Hartmann, W.H.; Brinton, L.A.; Winfield, A.C.; Worrell, J.A.; Schuyler, P.A.; Plummer, W.D. Breast Cancer Risk Associated with Proliferative Breast Disease and Atypical Hyperplasia. Cancer 1993, 71, 1258–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kabat, G.C.; Jones, J.G.; Olson, N.; Negassa, A.; Duggan, C.; Ginsberg, M.; Kandel, R.A.; Glass, A.G.; Rohan, T.E. A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study of Benign Breast Disease and Risk of Subsequent Breast Cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2010, 21, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hartmann, L.C.; Sellers, T.A.; Frost, M.H.; Lingle, W.L.; Degnim, A.C.; Ghosh, K.; Vierkant, R.A.; Maloney, S.D.; Pankratz, V.S.; Hillman, D.W.; et al. Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Visscher, D.W.; Frank, R.D.; Carter, J.M.; Vierkant, R.A.; Winham, S.J.; Heinzen, E.P.; Broderick, B.T.; Denison, L.A.; Allers, T.M.; Johnson, J.L.; et al. Breast Cancer Risk and Progressive Histology in Serial Benign Biopsies. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2017, 109, djx035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hamrita, B.; Ben Nasr, H.; Gabbouj, S.; Bouaouina, N.; Chouchane, L.; Chahed, K. Apolipoprotein A1 −75 G/A and +83 C/T Polymorphisms: Susceptibility and Prognostic Implications in Breast Cancer. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 1637–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Al-Bustan, S.A.; Al-Serri, A.E.; Annice, B.G.; Alnaqeeb, M.A.; Ebrahim, G.A. Re-Sequencing of the APOAI Promoter Region and the Genetic Association of the −75G > A Polymorphism with Increased Cholesterol and Low Density Lipoprotein Levels among a Sample of the Kuwaiti Population. BMC Med. Genet. 2013, 14, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hosseini-Esfahani, F.; Mirmiran, P.; Daneshpour, M.S.; Mottaghi, A.; Azizi, F. The Effect of Interactions of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of APOA1/APOC3 with Food Group Intakes on the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome. Avicenna J. Med. Biotechnol. 2017, 9, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Hsu, M.-C.; Lee, K.-T.; Hsiao, W.-C.; Wu, C.-H.; Sun, H.-Y.; Lin, I.-L.; Young, K.-C. The Dyslipidemia-Associated SNP on the APOA1/C3/A5 Gene Cluster Predicts Post-Surgery Poor Outcome in Taiwanese Breast Cancer Patients: A 10-Year Follow-up Study. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yan, Q.M.; Thomas, G.N.; Tomlinson, B. Association of Two Apolipoprotein A-I Gene MspI Polymorphisms with Lipid and Blood Pressure Levels. Int. J. Cardiol. 2005, 102, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liao, B.; Cheng, K.; Dong, S.; Liu, H.; Xu, Z. Effect of Apolipoprotein A1 Genetic Polymorphisms on Lipid Profiles and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease. Diagn. Pathol. 2015, 10, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al-Bustan, S.A.; Alnaqeeb, M.A.; Annice, B.G.; Ebrahim, G.A.; Refai, T.M. Genetic Association of APOB Polymorphisms with Variation in Serum Lipid Profile among the Kuwait Population. Lipids Health Dis. 2014, 13, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Qu, H.; Hou, M.; Cao, W.; Ma, Z.; Wang, H. Associations of Polymorphisms of Rs693 and Rs1042031 in Apolipoprotein B Gene with Risk of Breast Cancer in Chinese. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol 2013, 43, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mendizábal-Ruiz, A.P.; Morales, J.; Castro Martinez, X.; Gutierrez Rubio, S.A.; Valdez, L.; Vásquez-Camacho, J.G.; Sanchez Corona, J.; Moran Moguel, M.C. RAS Polymorphisms in Cancerous and Benign Breast Tissue. J. Renin. Angiotensin. Aldosterone. Syst. 2011, 12, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Quevedo, E.G.C.; Aguilar, G.M.M.; Aguilar, L.A.J.; Rubio, S.A.G.; Martínez, S.E.F.; Rodríguez, I.P.D.; Corona, J.S.; Morán, M.I.T.; Gómez, R.C.R.; Moguel, M.C.M. Polymorphisms Rs12998 and Rs5780218 in KiSS1 Suppressor Metastasis Gene in Mexican Patients with Breast Cancer. Dis. Markers 2015, 2015, 365845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chavarria-Ávila, E.; Ruíz Quezada, S.L.; Guzmán-Ornelas, M.-O.; Castro-Albarrán, J.; Aguilar Aldrete, M.E.; Vásquez-Del Mercado, M.; Navarro-Hernández, R.-E. Association of Resistin Gene 3′UTR+62G>A Polymorphism with Insulin Resistance, Adiposity and the Adiponectin-Resistin Index in Mexican Population. Nutr. Hosp. 2013, 28, 1867–1876. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Smith, J.D.; Brinton, E.A.; Breslow, J.L. Polymorphism in the Human Apolipoprotein A-I Gene Promoter Region. Association of the Minor Allele with Decreased Production Rate in Vivo and Promoter Activity In Vitro. J. Clin. Investig. 1992, 89, 1796–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.R.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.W.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Tang, L.; Jiang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Wei, Q.; Lu, Y. Apolipoprotein A1 -75 G/A and +83 C/T Polymorphisms and Renal Cancer Risk. Lipids Health Dis. 2015, 14, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sinha, R.; Singh, R. Role of Apolipoprotein AI Gene Polymorphism (G-75A and C+83T) in Essential Hypertension in Indian Population. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2014, 44, 298–303. [Google Scholar]
  39. Heng, C.K.; Low, P.S.; Saha, N. Variations in the Promoter Region of the Apolipoprotein A-1 Gene Influence Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Asian Indian Neonates from Singapore. Pediatr. Res. 2001, 49, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Carmena-ramon, R.F.; Ordovas, J.M.; Ascaso, J.F.; Real, J.; Priego, M.A.; Carmena, R. Influence of Genetic Variation at the Apo A-I Gene Locus on Lipid Levels and Response to Diet in Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 1998, 139, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kamboh, M.I.; Bunker, C.H.; Aston, C.E.; Nestlerode, C.S.; Mcallister, A.E.; Ukoli, F.A. Genetic Association of Five Apolipoprotein Polymorphisms with Serum Lipoprotein-Lipid Levels in African Blacks. Genet. Epidemiol. 1999, 222, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bora, K.; Pathak, M.S.; Borah, P.; Hussain, M.I.; Das, D. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of APOA1 Gene and Their Relationship with Serum Apolipoprotein A-I Concentrations in the Native Population of Assam. Meta Gene 2016, 7, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dawar, R.; Gurtoo, A.; Singh, R. Apolipoprotein A1 Gene Polymorphism (G–75A and C+83T) in Patients With Myocardial Infarction. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2010, 134, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, X.L.; Liu, S.X.; McCredie, R.M.; Wilcken, D.E. Polymorphisms at the 5′-End of the Apolipoprotein AI Gene and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 98, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kamboh, M.I.; Aston, C.E.; Nestlerode, C.M.; McAllister, A.E.; Hamman, R.F. Haplotype Analysis of Two APOA1/MspI Polymorphisms in Relation to Plasma Levels of Apo A-I and HDL-Cholesterol. Atherosclerosis 1996, 127, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Reguero, J.R.; Cubero, G.I.; Batalla, A.; Alvarez, V.; Hevia, S.; Cortina, A.; Coto, E. Apolipoprotein A1 Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Early Coronary Disease. Cardiology 1998, 90, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Double-Stranded Break Repair in Mammalian Cells and Precise Genome Editing
Previous
Estrogen Receptor Type 1 and Type 2 Presence in Paravertebral Skeletal Muscles: Expression Level and Relation to Phenotype in Children with Idiopathic Scoliosis
Next