Next Article in Journal
Regulatory T Cell Stability and Plasticity in Atherosclerosis
Previous Article in Journal
N-Formylated Peptide Induces Increased Expression of Both Formyl Peptide Receptor 2 (Fpr2) and Toll-Like Receptor 9 (TLR9) in Schwannoma Cells—An In Vitro Model for Early Inflammatory Profiling of Schwann Cells
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes as Therapeutic Approach for Neurodegenerative Disorders: From Biology to Biotechnology

Cells 2020, 9(12), 2663; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9122663
by Rodrigo Pinheiro Araldi 1,2,3, Fernanda D’Amelio 1, Hugo Vigerelli 1, Thatiana Correa de Melo 1 and Irina Kerkis 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cells 2020, 9(12), 2663; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9122663
Submission received: 13 November 2020 / Revised: 26 November 2020 / Accepted: 26 November 2020 / Published: 11 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Stem Cells)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors comprehensively reviewed the relations of exosome with neurodegenerative diseases in various aspects including disease mechanism, cell therapy effect and its own application as free-cell therapy.  They also overviewed the detail history, nature, extraction and measurement methods of exosomes. By the way, it should be more attractive to readers if they add a little more specific knowledge and/or idea about the application of exosomes to neurodegenerative diseases.   

 

Author Response

Point 1. By the way, it should be more attractive to readers if they add a little more specific knowledge and/or idea about the application of exosomes to neurodegenerative diseases

 

We thanks the suggestion and, aiming to add more details about the application of exosomes as a therapeutic approach for different neurodegenerative diseases, we include a new section (section 10) - lines 547-607

Reviewer 2 Report

Rodrigo Pinheiro Araldi and co-authors give an overview of the nature of MSC derived exosomes and their possible use in neurogenerative disease treatment. They also include a dissertation on extracellular vesicles and how to isolate and characterize them. Even if the review appears well done overall, there are some points that should be addressed:

The part regarding therapeutic uses of EVs may be expanded. The review seems to focus more on the general aspects of EVs than on their particular clinic use.

When talking of precipitating polymers, the lower purity of samples that can be obtained should be underlined.

 

Minor points:

In my opinion the title doesn’t appear to be fully pertinent since the entire review focuses on a particular field (EVs) rather than a multitude of cell-free techniques. This focus should be somehow present in the title.

Even though EVs are universally recognized as a promising therapeutic tool, it is clear that their production, quantitation and use are at least hard to standardize. The authors mention this fact in the review. From personal experience I can say that a way to bypass the problem might be inducing the production of in vivo engineered exosomes, or modified endogenous exosomes. the authors may want to check literature for in vitro and in vivo studies.

A grammar check is needed, for instance lines 52, 87, 202, 273, 398, 443.

 

 

Author Response

Point 1. The part regarding therapeutic uses of EVs may be expanded

 

We thanks for this suggestion and, aiming to provide more details exploring the therapeutic potential of exosomes for the treatment of neurodegenerative disease, we included a new section (section 10) - lines 550-610

 

Point 2. When talking of precipitating polymers, the lower purity of samples that can be obtained should be underlined

 

The information about the low purity of exosomes isolated by polymer-based coprecipitation was added in lines 524-525

 

Point 3. In my opinion the title doesn’t appear to be fully pertinent since the entire review focuses on a particular field (EVs) rather than a multitude of cell-free techniques. This focus should be somehow present in the title

 

Based on this comment, we changed the review title to "Stem cell-derived exosomes as therapeutic approach for neurodegenerative disorders: From biology to biotechnology" in order to focus in therapeutic action of exosomes.

 

Point 4. Even though EVs are universally recognized as a promising therapeutic tool, it is clear that their production, quantitation and use are at least hard to standardize. The authors mention this fact in the review. From personal experience I can say that a way to bypass the problem might be inducing the production of in vivo engineered exosomes, or modified endogenous exosomes. the authors may want to check literature for in vitro and in vivo studies.

 

These informations were included into de section 10 (lines 547-607), focus on in vivo studies

 

Point 5. A grammar check is needed, for instance lines 52, 87, 202, 273, 398, 443

 

We apologize for these grammar mistakes and inform that they were corrected

Back to TopTop