Review Reports
- Rubén Rodríguez1,2,†,
- Isabel Gaivão3 and
- Leticia Aguado1,2
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Alain Nepveu Reviewer 2: Ricard Marcos
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
I am satisfied with the responses provided by the authors. The quality of the text could certainly be improved, however, in my opinion this is the job of the editors.
The English could still be improved, however, as I mentioned above this job should be performed by editors.
Reviewer 2 Report
Authors respond adequately to my comments/questions