Next Article in Journal
Emerging Role of miR-21-5p in Neuron–Glia Dysregulation and Exosome Transfer Using Multiple Models of Alzheimer’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Improved Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency Anemia in the Critically Ill via Fluorescence Flowcytometric Hemoglobin Biomarkers
Previous Article in Journal
Upregulation of Nav1.6 Mediated by the p38 MAPK Pathway in the Dorsal Root Ganglia Contributes to Cancer-Induced Bone Pain in Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endothelial Progenitor Cells as Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Pathologies: A Narrative Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Inflammatory Glycoprotein YKL-40 Is Elevated after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Correlates with Leukocyte Chemotaxis and Myocardial Injury, a Pilot Study

Cells 2022, 11(21), 3378; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11213378
by Antti Laurikka 1, Katriina Vuolteenaho 1, Vesa Toikkanen 2, Timo Rinne 2,3, Tiina Leppänen 1, Mari Hämäläinen 1, Matti Tarkka 2, Jari Laurikka 2,4 and Eeva Moilanen 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Cells 2022, 11(21), 3378; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11213378
Submission received: 8 August 2022 / Revised: 7 October 2022 / Accepted: 19 October 2022 / Published: 26 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers and Cellular Biology in Perioperative Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for providing an opportunity to review this manuscript. Although this research tried to establish an association of YKL-40 with myocardial injury, the sample size was too small to have such a conclusion. Several important covariates, such as age and sex differences, might influence this association. Therefore, since the outcome (myocardial injury is common), it is suggested that the authors can continue this research, add more samples and re-submit this manuscript. Authors are also suggested to do subgroup analysis, stratification, and interaction analysis.

Authors only presented/measured the YKL-40 up to 24 hrs. But they did not explain why they had taken samples only up to 24 hrs. Thus, they have been suggested that at least the injury is recovered (maybe 5-7days).

The authors concluded that “Thus YKL-40 may be an effector and biomarker of myocardial inflammation and injury and subsequent fibrosis following heart surgery”. In their discussion section, I recommend that the authors compare their findings with animal or cell line studies before concluding this study.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have analyzed  YKL-40 and markers of myocardial injury (troponin T [TnT]),  leukocyte activation (monocyte chemotactic protein-1 [MCP-1] and interleukin 8 [IL-8]) and oxidative stress (8-isoprostane)  in blood samples  undergoing elective CABG surgery.  They found that  YKL-40 may participate in the  inflammatory cascade following open heart surgery utilizing CPB and  function as  a biomarker of inflammation and myocardial injury.

Comments:

1. A Table summarized the clinical characteristics of the patients has to be provided.

2. The lipid profile, body mass index, blood pressure, glycemia, drug therapy have to be reported.

3.In the introduction section at line 62, they reported that 32 patients were underwent elective CABG surgery but in the Methods four patients were excluded. Please correct it.

4. In the result section, they reported that during surgery, YKL-40 levels remained relatively constant. However, Figure 1 shows that the plasma levels of YKL-40, MCP-1, 91 IL-8 and 8-isoprostane significantly  increased at the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in comparison of  baseline ( BL).  Please explain this point. 

5. YKL-40, MCP-1, 91 IL-8  increased at 4 hours after onset of 121 CPB (CPB+4 h) but not 8-isoprostane levels. What are the physiological causes of these effects?

6. How is the level of troponin during surgery steps in comparison to baseline?

7. There is no a clear scientific evidence that KL-40 may participate in the  inflammatory cascade following open heart surgery utilizing CPB.

 

 

Author Response

Please see attacment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is impoved and the authors have addressed to reviewer's comments

Back to TopTop