Next Article in Journal
Bioconversion of Sweet Sorghum Residues by Trichoderma citrinoviride C1 Enzymes Cocktail for Effective Bioethanol Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Two Scenarios of Dechlorination of the Chlorinated Hydrocarbons over Nickel-Alumina Catalyst
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Molybdenum Carbide/Heteroatom-Doped Carbon Electrocatalyst for Advanced Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Hydrogen Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrodechlorination of Different Chloroaromatic Compounds at Room Temperature and Ambient Pressure—Differences in Reactivity of Cu- and Ni-Based Al Alloys in an Alkaline Aqueous Solution
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Hydrodechlorination of CHClF2 (HCFC-22) over Pd–Pt Catalysts Supported on Thermally Modified Activated Carbon

Catalysts 2020, 10(11), 1291; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10111291
by Monika Radlik 1,*, Wojciech Juszczyk 2, Krzysztof Matus 3, Wioletta Raróg-Pilecka 4 and Zbigniew Karpiński 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Catalysts 2020, 10(11), 1291; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10111291
Submission received: 10 October 2020 / Revised: 5 November 2020 / Accepted: 6 November 2020 / Published: 8 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Catalytic Hydrodechlorination)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this article authors Monika Radlik et al reported their work on Pd/Pt bi-metallic catalysts synthesized by impregnation in different series of precursors. The synergetic effect of their bi-metallic catalyst study is very interesting and could be useful. The paper itself is not hard to follow and the methods/results part is well presented. I think the paper is acceptable to publish in its current form. 

Author Response

Reviewer 1 had no specific comments. The manuscript was checked and corrected by a native speaker.

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript authors have synthesized and studied bimetallic Pd-Pt catalysts. In my opinion the concept is not so noble so they could have tested their catalyst for some other chemical reactions too. The language of the manuscript can be improved. Some of the sentences are too long. Conclusion part needs improvement.

Author Response

The revised version was prepared with the help of a native speaker. The section "Conclusions" was extended to cover more experimental findings.

Reviewer 3 Report

See attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please, see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Thanks the authors for the revised manuscript, the detailed rebuttal letter and the new information added, particularly Table 2SM (comparison of catalytic activity and performance). They have taken into account the remarks and comments and submit a well balanced and improved article that can be accepted with few minor additions if possible:

  • Missing data: could the authors add a sentence explaining why it was not useful to prepare and evaluate samples Pd20Pt80(acac) and Pd20Pt80(Cl), following the reply letter.

  • Same remark for: "Figure 3: the x range between 10 and 30 ° 2 theta is missing." Explain why.

  • Fig. 4 SM: add card numbers in caption.

Author Response

Thanks for the remarks. Our action:

1) Our remark about the 'Missing' catalyst composition (Pd20Pt80) is now at the end of subsection 3.1. (Methods, Catalyst preparation).

2) The remark about showing only the xrd range 30-90 deg. is in caption to figure 3 (main text).

3) Numbers of PDF cards are now in caption to figure  4SM.

 

Thanks again, the authors

Back to TopTop