Cancer Vaccine Targeting Mutated GNAQ-Expressing Uveal Melanoma
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. DNA Vaccine Construction and Vaccination
2.2. Cells
2.3. IFNγ ELISpot Assay
2.4. mtGNAQ Model for In Vivo Animal Studies
2.5. Ex Vivo T Cell Activation and Analysis
2.6. Immuno-Sequencing and Analysis of T Cell Repertoire
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Fusion DNA Vaccine Enhance Q209L-Specific T Cell Immunity In Vivo
3.2. Fusion DNA Vaccine Potentiates Cellular Immunity Sufficient to Prevent Metastatic Lesions
3.3. Anchor Modifications of mtGNAQ Enhance Human T Cell Activation Ex Vivo
3.4. TCR Repertoire Suggests a Predominant Expansion of a Specific T Cell Clones in DNA Vaccine-Activated T Cell Population
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| UM | Uveal melanoma |
| MUM | Metastatic uveal melanoma |
| HLA | Human lymphocyte antigen |
| PADRE | Pan-DR-binding epitope |
| ICI | immune checkpoint inhibitors |
| PFS | Progression-free survival |
| OS | Overall survival |
| mt | Mutant |
| wt | Wild-type |
| DNA | Deoxyribonucleic acid |
| RNA | Ribonucleic acid |
| RT | Reverse transcription |
| VP22 | Viral protein 22 |
| TPA | 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate |
| CD | Cluster differentiation |
| DC | Dendritic cells |
| FACS | Fluorescence activated cell sorting |
| IFN | Interferon |
| ANOVA | analysis of variance |
| TCR | T cell receptor |
| CDR3 | Complementarity-determining region 3 |
| CCL21 | -C-motif chemokine 21; Secondary lymphoid chemokine 21 |
| CCR7 | -C-motif chemokine receptor 7 |
| ELISpot | Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot |
| CTL | Cytotoxic T lymphocyte |
References
- Singh, A.D.; Turell, M.E.; Topham, A.K. Uveal melanoma: Trends in incidence, treatment, and survival. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 1881–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberger, Y.; Bena, J.; Singh, A.D. Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival (SEER 1975–2020). Ocul. Oncol. Pathol. 2025, 11, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diener-West, M.; Earle, J.D.; Fine, S.L.; Hawkins, B.S.; Moy, C.S.; Reynolds, S.M.; Schachat, A.P.; Straatsma, B.R.; Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma, II: Characteristics of patients enrolled and not enrolled. COMS Report No. 17. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2001, 119, 951–965. [Google Scholar]
- Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. Assessment of metastatic disease status at death in 435 patients with large choroidal melanoma in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS): COMS report no. 15. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2001, 119, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvajal, R.D.; Butler, M.O.; Shoushtari, A.N.; Hassel, J.C.; Ikeguchi, A.; Hernandez-Aya, L.; Nathan, P.; Hamid, O.; Piulats, J.M.; Rioth, M.; et al. Clinical and molecular response to tebentafusp in previously treated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: A phase 2 trial. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 2364–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carvajal, R.D.; Nathan, P.; Sacco, J.J.; Orloff, M.; Hernandez-Aya, L.F.; Yang, J.; Luke, J.J.; Butler, M.O.; Stanhope, S.; Collins, L.; et al. Phase I Study of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tebentafusp Using a Step-Up Dosing Regimen and Expansion in Patients With Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40, 1939–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pelster, M.S.; Gruschkus, S.K.; Bassett, R.; Gombos, D.S.; Shephard, M.; Posada, L.; Glover, M.S.; Simien, R.; Diab, A.; Hwu, P.; et al. Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Results From a Single-Arm Phase II Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Raamsdonk, C.D.; Bezrookove, V.; Green, G.; Bauer, J.; Gaugler, L.; O’Brien, J.M.; Simpson, E.M.; Barsh, G.S.; Bastian, B.C. Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi. Nature 2009, 457, 599–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Raamsdonk, C.D.; Griewank, K.G.; Crosby, M.B.; Garrido, M.C.; Vemula, S.; Wiesner, T.; Obenauf, A.C.; Wackernagel, W.; Green, G.; Bouvier, N.; et al. Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Terai, M.; Shimada, A.; Chervoneva, I.; Hulse, L.; Danielson, M.; Swensen, J.; Orloff, M.; Wedegaertner, P.B.; Benovic, J.L.; Aplin, A.E.; et al. Prognostic Values of G-Protein Mutations in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shariati, A.; Khezrpour, A.; Shariati, F.; Afkhami, H.; Yarahmadi, A.; Alavimanesh, S.; Kamrani, S.; Modarressi, M.H.; Khani, P. DNA vaccines as promising immuno-therapeutics against cancer: A new insight. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1498431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, D.C.; Cooper, P.J.; Hart, I.R. A line of non-tumorigenic mouse melanocytes, syngeneic with the B16 melanoma and requiring a tumour promoter for growth. Int. J. Cancer 1987, 39, 414–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engelhorn, M.E.; Guevara-Patino, J.A.; Merghoub, T.; Liu, C.; Ferrone, C.R.; Rizzuto, G.A.; Cymerman, D.H.; Posnett, D.N.; Houghton, A.N.; Wolchok, J.D. Mechanisms of immunization against cancer using chimeric antigens. Mol. Ther. 2008, 16, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.Y.; Jin, D.H.; Lee, C.M.; Jang, M.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Shin, H.S.; Chung, Y.H.; Kim, K.Y.; Kim, S.S.; Lee, W.B.; et al. CD4+ TH1 cells generated by Ii-PADRE DNA at prime phase are important to induce effectors and memory CD8+ T cells. J. Immunother. 2010, 33, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igoucheva, O.; Grazzini, M.; Pidich, A.; Kemp, D.M.; Larijani, M.; Farber, M.; Lorton, J.; Rodeck, U.; Alexeev, V. Immunotargeting and eradication of orthotopic melanoma using a chemokine-enhanced DNA vaccine. Gene Ther. 2013, 20, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Irwin, M.J.; Heath, W.R.; Sherman, L.A. Species-restricted interactions between CD8 and the alpha 3 domain of class I influence the magnitude of the xenogeneic response. J. Exp. Med. 1989, 170, 1091–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santegoets, S.J.; Schreurs, M.W.; Masterson, A.J.; Liu, Y.P.; Goletz, S.; Baumeister, H.; Kueter, E.W.; Lougheed, S.M.; van den Eertwegh, A.J.; Scheper, R.J.; et al. In vitro priming of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes using allogeneic dendritic cells derived from the human MUTZ-3 cell line. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2006, 55, 1480–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Escobar, P.; Yu, Z.; Terskikh, A.; Holmes, N.; Corradin, G.; Mach, J.P.; Healy, F. Induction in transgenic mice of HLA-A2.1-restricted cytotoxic T cells specific for a peptide sequence from a mutated p21ras protein. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1999, 116, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivas, A.; Samlowski, W.; McCannel, T.A. Unexpectedly Low Rate of Metastasis and Death Among Patients Treated for Uveal Melanoma with Brachytherapy, Vitrectomy, and Silicone Oil. Cancers 2025, 17, 2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Royer-Bertrand, B.; Torsello, M.; Rimoldi, D.; El Zaoui, I.; Cisarova, K.; Pescini-Gobert, R.; Raynaud, F.; Zografos, L.; Schalenbourg, A.; Speiser, D.; et al. Comprehensive Genetic Landscape of Uveal Melanoma by Whole-Genome Sequencing. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 99, 1190–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leonard-Murali, S.; Bhaskarla, C.; Yadav, G.S.; Maurya, S.K.; Galiveti, C.R.; Tobin, J.A.; Kann, R.J.; Ashwat, E.; Murphy, P.S.; Chakka, A.B.; et al. Uveal melanoma immunogenomics predict immunotherapy resistance and susceptibility. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cintolo, J.A.; Datta, J.; Xu, S.; Gupta, M.; Somasundaram, R.; Czerniecki, B.J. Type I-polarized BRAF-pulsed dendritic cells induce antigen-specific CD8+ T cells that impact BRAF-mutant murine melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2016, 26, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahma, O.E.; Hamilton, J.M.; Wojtowicz, M.; Dakheel, O.; Bernstein, S.; Liewehr, D.J.; Steinberg, S.M.; Khleif, S.N. The immunological and clinical effects of mutated ras peptide vaccine in combination with IL-2, GM-CSF, or both in patients with solid tumors. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wainberg, Z.A.; Weekes, C.D.; Furqan, M.; Kasi, P.M.; Devoe, C.E.; Leal, A.D.; Chung, V.; Perry, J.R.; Kheoh, T.; McNeil, L.K.; et al. Lymph node-targeted, mKRAS-specific amphiphile vaccine in pancreatic and colorectal cancer: Phase 1 AMPLIFY-201 trial final results. Nat. Med. 2025, 31, 3648–3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, J.R.; MacLachlan, B.J.; Harper, S.; Sewell, A.K.; Cole, D.K. Unconventional modes of peptide-HLA-I presentation change the rules of TCR engagement. Discov. Immunol. 2022, 1, kyac001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baleeiro, R.B.; Dunmall, L.S.C.; Liu, P.; Lu, S.; Lone, Y.; Lemoine, N.R.; Wang, Y. Optimized Anchor-Modified Peptides Targeting Mutated RAS Are Promising Candidates for Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 902709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borbulevych, O.Y.; Baxter, T.K.; Yu, Z.; Restifo, N.P.; Baker, B.M. Increased immunogenicity of an anchor-modified tumor-associated antigen is due to the enhanced stability of the peptide/MHC complex: Implications for vaccine design. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 4812–4820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, D.K.; Edwards, E.S.; Wynn, K.K.; Clement, M.; Miles, J.J.; Ladell, K.; Ekeruche, J.; Gostick, E.; Adams, K.J.; Skowera, A.; et al. Modification of MHC anchor residues generates heteroclitic peptides that alter TCR binding and T cell recognition. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 2600–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irvine, K.R.; Parkhurst, M.R.; Shulman, E.P.; Tupesis, J.P.; Custer, M.; Touloukian, C.E.; Robbins, P.F.; Yafal, A.G.; Greenhalgh, P.; Sutmuller, R.P.; et al. Recombinant virus vaccination against “self” antigens using anchor-fixed immunogens. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 2536–2540. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Posnett, D.N.; Engelhorn, M.E.; Lin, Y.; Merghoub, T.; Duan, F.; Wolchok, J.D.; Houghton, A.N. Development of effective vaccines for old mice in a tumor model. Vaccine 2009, 27, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Tegeler, C.M.; Scheid, J.; Rammensee, H.G.; Salih, H.R.; Walz, J.S.; Heitmann, J.S.; Nelde, A. HLA-DR Presentation of the Tumor Antigen MSLN Associates with Clinical Outcome of Ovarian Cancer Patients. Cancers 2022, 14, 2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Alexeev, V.; Terai, M.; Koshkin, S.; Igoucheva, O.; Sato, T. Cancer Vaccine Targeting Mutated GNAQ-Expressing Uveal Melanoma. Cancers 2026, 18, 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030480
Alexeev V, Terai M, Koshkin S, Igoucheva O, Sato T. Cancer Vaccine Targeting Mutated GNAQ-Expressing Uveal Melanoma. Cancers. 2026; 18(3):480. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030480
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlexeev, Vitali, Mizue Terai, Sergei Koshkin, Olga Igoucheva, and Takami Sato. 2026. "Cancer Vaccine Targeting Mutated GNAQ-Expressing Uveal Melanoma" Cancers 18, no. 3: 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030480
APA StyleAlexeev, V., Terai, M., Koshkin, S., Igoucheva, O., & Sato, T. (2026). Cancer Vaccine Targeting Mutated GNAQ-Expressing Uveal Melanoma. Cancers, 18(3), 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030480

