You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Cancers
  • Reply
  • Open Access

15 November 2021

Reply to Stummer, W.; Thomas, C. Comment on “Hosmann et al. 5-ALA Fluorescence Is a Powerful Prognostic Marker during Surgery of Low-Grade Gliomas (WHO Grade II)—Experience at Two Specialized Centers. Cancers 2021, 13, 2540”

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2
Comprehensive Cancer Center—Central Nervous System Tumours Unit (CCC-CNS), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
3
Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
4
Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
We greatly appreciate Dr. Stummer’s and Dr. Thomas’s interest in our study and their important comments [1]. Due to their pioneering work in the field of the application of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in brain tumor surgery [2,3,4], it is a special honor that we added “an important contribution to the field” according to the authors’ opinion.
We congratulate Jaber et al. [5] on conducting the first systematical single center study in a large patient cohort and again pioneering work in this field investigating the prognostic value of 5-ALA in World Health Organization (WHO) grade II gliomas. As stated in our manuscript [6] and the comment, we performed “the first study […] in two specialized independent centers”. As also stated in our manuscript, “We were able to confirm […] the findings of the recent study conducted by Jaber et al.” [5]. Therefore, the results of our current independent study conducted at two specialized centers confirm and thus highlight the importance of visible intraoperative 5-ALA fluorescence as a prognostic factor in pure WHO grade II gliomas as first shown in the single center study by Jaber et al. [5].
We also thank the authors for the effort of summarizing and comparing the results of both studies [5,6]. Indeed, the number of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype low-grade gliomas (LGG) was lower in our cohort (n = 5) compared to the study of Jaber et al. [5]. However, the exact number of IDH wildtype LGG included in this study by Jaber et al. is not fully clear for us. According to Table 1 of your comment, 46 IDH mutated gliomas were included; i.e., 28 IDH wildtype gliomas should be expected in this cohort accordingly. Interestingly, according to the Results section, including Table 2 of the original publication of Jaber et al. [5], only 16 IDH wildtype gliomas were indicated. Nevertheless, a higher portion of IDH wildtype gliomas were analyzed in the study by Jaber et al. [5] compared to our study [6]. Due to the low number of IDH wildtype gliomas in our cohort (n = 5), the statistical power of a multivariate survival analysis was thus too low. Since we were not able to perform a multivariate analysis, we cannot compare our results based on univariate analysis with the findings of the multivariate analysis of Jaber et al. [5], which identified IDH mutational status and fluorescence as independent prognostic factors for survival. Ideally, future studies including multiple centers with a high number of IDH wildtype LGG would be desirable to finally clarify the precise relationship between 5-ALA fluorescence and molecular markers in LGG, such as IDH status.
We fully agree with the authors of the comment that visible intraoperative 5-ALA fluorescence is an unfavorable prognostic factor in pure LGG according to the data of both studies, and thus we also agree with the comment that early initiation of radio- and chemotherapy should be considered in these patients.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stummer, W.; Thomas, C. Comment on Hosmann et al. 5-ALA Fluorescence Is a Powerful Prognostic Marker during Surgery of Low-Grade Gliomas (WHO Grade II)—Experience at Two Specialized Centers. Cancers 2021, 13, 2540. Cancers 2021, 13, 5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stummer, W.; Pichlmeier, U.; Meinel, T.; Wiestler, O.D.; Zanella, F.; Reulen, H.-J. ALA-Glioma Study Group Fluorescence-Guided Surgery with 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Resection of Malignant Glioma: A Randomised Controlled Multicentre Phase III Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006, 7, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stummer, W.; Stocker, S.; Wagner, S.; Stepp, H.; Fritsch, C.; Goetz, C.; Goetz, A.E.; Kiefmann, R.; Reulen, H.J. Intraoperative Detection of Malignant Gliomas by 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Induced Porphyrin Fluorescence. Neurosurgery 1998, 42, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stummer, W.; Novotny, A.; Stepp, H.; Goetz, C.; Bise, K.; Reulen, H.J. Fluorescence-Guided Resection of Glioblastoma Multiforme by Using 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Induced Porphyrins: A Prospective Study in 52 Consecutive Patients. J. Neurosurg. 2000, 93, 1003–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jaber, M.; Ewelt, C.; Wölfer, J.; Brokinkel, B.; Thomas, C.; Hasselblatt, M.; Grauer, O.; Stummer, W. Is Visible Aminolevulinic Acid-Induced Fluorescence an Independent Biomarker for Prognosis in Histologically Confirmed (World Health Organization 2016) Low-Grade Gliomas? Neurosurgery 2018, 84, 1214–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hosmann, A.; Millesi, M.; Wadiura, L.I.; Kiesel, B.; Mercea, P.A.; Mischkulnig, M.; Borkovec, M.; Furtner, J.; Roetzer, T.; Wolfsberger, S.; et al. 5-ALA Fluorescence Is a Powerful Prognostic Marker during Surgery of Low-Grade Gliomas (WHO Grade II)-Experience at Two Specialized Centers. Cancers 2021, 13, 2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.