Next Article in Journal
Verotoxin-1-Induced ER Stress Triggers Apoptotic or Survival Pathways in Burkitt Lymphoma Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring Emotional Distress, Psychological Traits and Attitudes in Patients with Chronic Migraine Undergoing OnabotulinumtoxinA Prophylaxis versus Withdrawal Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Chronic Joint Pain: Clinical and Experimental Evidence
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

High Dosage of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Adult Subjects with Spasticity Following Acquired Central Nervous System Damage: Where Are We at?

by Domenico Intiso 1,*, Valentina Simone 1, Michelangelo Bartolo 2, Andrea Santamato 3, Maurizio Ranieri 3, Maria Teresa Gatta 1 and Filomena Di Rienzo 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 15 April 2020 / Revised: 28 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 May 2020 / Published: 10 May 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very interesting and valuable work, but I had a difficult time following the manuscript due to the writing style. I would suggest major revision to improve readability. In addition, during the revision I would encourage editing to streamline the text and avoid repetition of phrases.

 

The results section seemed to overlap a great deal with the discussion- there was a significant amount of discussion/conjecture rather than strict presentation of the data. I did appreciate the organization of the results section by diagnosis and toxin. I would only pare down the text and move the discussion to the discussion section itself.

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1

We do thank Reviewer n. 1 for her/his interest in our research and for thoughtful words.

Her/his suggestions were added to text in the section BTX-A

Page 2, lines 75-83

Botulinum neurotoxin (BTX), so called botulinum toxin, is a protein synthesized by the gram-negative anaerobic bacteria Clostridium botulinum. It occurs in the form of seven serologically distinct types. Each of which comprises numerous isoforms. Most of the research available in the medical literature regards the neurotoxin type A (BTX-A). The classic site of the impact of the toxin is the protein complexes of the presynaptic membrane and synaptic vesicles, implementing the acetylcholine exocytosis. Type A botulinum toxin can be effective in the treatment of drug-resistant migraine. It is also widely used in aesthetic medicine for the correction of age-related changes in muscle tension, but also otherwise for the treatment of painful bladder, chronic myalgia, blepharospasm and some kinds of neuralgia

Reviewer 2 Report

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT, BTX), so called botulinum toxin, is a protein synthesized by the gram-negative anaerobic bacteria Clostridium botulinum. It occurs in the form of seven serologically distinct types. Each of which comprises numerous isoforms. Most of the research available in the medical literature regards the neurotoxin type A (BTX-A). The classic site of the impact of the toxin is the protein complexes of the presynaptic membrane and synaptic vesicles, implementing the acetylcholine exocytosis. Type A botulinum toxin can be effective in the treatment of drug-resistant migraine. It is also widely used in aesthetic medicine for the correction of age-related changes in muscle tension, but also otherwise for the treatment of painful bladder, chronic myalgia, blepharospasm and some kinds of neuralgia.

This very comprehensive review is an accurate, well-written and wide-ranged source of current data dealing with the application of BTXs in the treatment of post stroke spasticity, multiple sclerosis and brain injury. The topic is particularly timely and of potential interest for the readers, especially for neurologists. After precise and critical analysis, Authors conclude, that there is no sufficient evidence to recommend BTXs injection as a standard procedure, however the neurotoxin is often efficacious and had a satisfactory safety profile in the clinical practice. This work is an important and valuable contribution to the field.

 

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2

We do thank Reviewer n. 2 for her/his insightful comments and observations, which were considered in the revised version of our manuscript.

C 1. This is a very interesting and valuable work, but I had a difficult time following the manuscript due to the writing style. I would suggest major revision to improve readability. In addition, during the revision I would encourage editing to streamline the text and avoid repetition of phrases.

Reply: we revised and deleted some redundant sentences through the text, in particular for the section “discussion” that was globally reworded and simplified. The section “stroke” was in part reworded. Before submitting the paper for peer review process, English language was revised by Proof-Reading- Service.com Ltd, Devonshire Business Centre, Work Road, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire (United Kingdom).  

Section Stroke

Line 100-101: deleted.

Lines 134-135: deleted.

Section Multiple Sclerosis

Lines 286-289: deleted

Line 322: incoBTX-A or onaBTX-A doses higher 600 U in a large sample of 342…. was deleted

Line 366: due to their reporting of fewer than four subjects.. deleted

C 2. The results section seemed to overlap a great deal with the discussion- there was a significant amount of discussion/conjecture rather than strict presentation of the data. I did appreciate the organization of the results section by diagnosis and toxin. I would only pare down the text and move the discussion to the discussion section itself.

Reply:  we agree with reviewer’s comments that some parts of results overlap discussion, but some important considerations about the topic were intentionally reported in the section of results to avoid a too long discussion. The strict presentation of the data is essential, but the hypotheses to explain those should be carried out. The aim of paper was to ascertain evidence about the use of BTX-A high doses in treating spasticity following several diseases affecting CNS in subjects requiring rehabilitation. In this regard, the reasons and significance in using this particular therapeutic strategy should be considered and discussed. However, according with reviewer’s comments, we reworded and simplified the discussion.

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Excellent revisions. Again, this review paper is timely and should be of great interest to the readership.

Back to TopTop