You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sustainability
  • Review
  • Open Access

20 December 2010

National and International Standardization (International Organization for Standardization and European Committee for Standardization) Relevant for Sustainability in Construction

,
and
1
Faculty of Engineering, Oslo University College, Pilestredet 35, 0130 Oslo, Norway
2
Dipartimento di Progettazione Urbana e di Urbanistica, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, via Forno Vecchio, 36, 80134, Napoli, Italy
3
Department of Science for Architecture (DSA), University of Genoa, Stradone S.Agostino 37, 16123, Genova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Constructions - Integrated Approach to Life-time Structural Engineering

Abstract

Sustainability in construction has a short history in terms of principles, standardizations and applications. From the Brundtland Report “Our Common Future”, a new vision of the resource deficits, climate impacts and the social responsibility gave growth to the idea of sustainability also in design and construction. Consequently, in around 2000, the international and national organizations for standardization started to develop standards for the application of sustainable principles. This paper gives an overview of existing and planned standards, and examples on how to use them as a framework for the development of methods and tools for assessment.

1. Introduction

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) wrote in an overview of its system: “If there were no standards, we would soon notice. Standards make an enormous contribution to most aspects of our lives, although very often, that contribution is invisible. It is when there is an absence of standards that their importance is brought home. For example, as purchasers or users of products, we soon notice when they turn out to be of poor quality, do not fit, are incompatible with equipment we already have, are unreliable or dangerous. When products meet our expectations, we tend to take this for granted. We are usually unaware of the role played by standards in raising levels of quality, safety, reliability, efficiency and interchangeability, as well as in providing such benefits at an economical cost”. This explanation of what would happen if standards did not exist is useful to understand the why of this work.
Sustainability and, in particular, sustainability in construction, has a short developing history in terms of principles, standardizations and applications. Since the Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future [1], in which the concept of sustainable development was coined (by Brundtland, the Prime Minister of Norway), the term “sustainability” has been used more and more in many fields, from the industry to the common people. The focus on environmental aspects in the construction field has increased in an exponential manner from when, for instance, the reports of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) showed that almost one-third of bear energy is used for constructions and from when the Kyoto Protocol was written.
This new vision of need for more sustainable products, design and construction processes were noticed by the international, and consequently, national organizations for standardization and these organizations started to analyze and develop new standards for the application of sustainable principles in the field of construction. The basic idea of the standardization work for sustainability in this field is that all construction works must fulfill functional and technical performance requirements, but additionally they have to consider the environmental, social and economic performances. An important issue is that every product or element involved in a construction work has to be considered in the assessment of those performances. Thus, the standardizations for production, transport, building process, use and end of life have to be considered together.
While the challenge of sustainable development is global, the strategies for addressing sustainability in building construction are essentially local and differ in context and content from region to region. Thus, these strategies will reflect the context, the preconditions and the priorities and needs, not only in the built environment, but also in the social environment. In particular, the social environment includes social equity, cultural issues, traditions, heritage issues, human health and comfort, social infrastructure and safe and healthy environments. In developing countries in particular, the social environment may include poverty reduction, job creation, access to safe, affordable and healthy shelter and loss of livelihoods.

6. Conclusions

The ongoing international standardization work related to sustainability in construction will make assessments of the sustainability aspects of new and existing construction works more transparent and the results more comparable than what is possible with today’s methods. Standards for the environmental product declaration of construction products will make it easier for actors to decide which products, but also which systems, to use in construction.
An increased interest for using the standards, and the information given according to the standards, will aid in more sustainable constructions. The described standards will give companies a reliable business environment and enable the exchange of sustainability information related to internationally traded products and services.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the COST (the Intergovernmental Framework for European Cooperation in Science and Technology) for its contribution to allowing the development of the action COST-25 (Sustainability of Constructions: Integrated Approach to Life-time Structural Engineering) in which the present work was carried out.

References and Notes

  1. Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987.
  2. UNI EN 12354:2002 Building Acoustics—Estimation of Acoustic Performance of Buildings from the Performance of Elements—Airborne Sound Insulation between Rooms
  3. UNI TR 11175:2005 Building Acoustics—Guideline to the Standards UNI EN 12354 for the estimate of the Acoustic Performance of Buildings—Application to the National Building Types
  4. UNI EN ISO 13788:2003 Hygrothermal Performance of Building Components and Building Elements—Internal Surface Temperature to Avoid Critical Surface Humidity and Interstitial Condensation—Calculation Methods
  5. ISO 14020:2000 Environmental Labels and Declarations—General Principles; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
  6. ISO 14021:1999 Environmental Labels and Declarations—Self-Declared Environmental Claims (Type II Environmental Labelling); International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
  7. ISO 14024:1999 Environmental Labels and Declarations—Type I Environmental Labelling—Principles and Procedures; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
  8. ISO 14025:2006 Environmental Labels and Declarations—Type III Environmental Declarations—Principles and Procedures; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  9. ISO 14040:2006 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  10. ISO 14044:2006 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  11. ISO/TR 14047:2003 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Impact Assessment—Examples of Application of ISO 14042; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
  12. ISO/TS 14048:2002 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Data Documentation Format; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  13. ISO/TR 14049:2000 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Examples of Application of ISO 14041 to Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
  14. ISO 14025:2006 Environmental Labels and Declarations—Type III Environmental Declarations—Principles and Procedures; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  15. ISO 15392:2008 Building Construction—Sustainability in Building Construction—General Principles; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  16. ISO/TS 21929-1:2006 Building Construction—Sustainability in Building Construction—Sustainability Indicators—Part 1—Framework for Development of Indicators for Buildings; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  17. ISO 21930:2007 Building Construction—Sustainability in Building Construction—Environmental Declaration of Building Products; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
  18. ISO/TS 21931-1:2010 Building Construction—Sustainability in Building Construction—Framework for Methods of Assessment for Environmental Performance of Construction Works—Part 1—Buildings; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  19. ISO/DTR 21932 Building Construction—Sustainability in Building Construction—Terminology; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  20. Life-Cycle Assessment in Building and Construction: A State-Of-The-Art Report of Setac Europe; Kotaji, S.; Schuurmans, A.; Edwards, S. (Eds.) Setac-Europe: Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
  21. Fava, J.A. Can ISO life cycle assessment standards provide credibility for LCA? Build. Des. Construct. 2005, 11, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  22. ISO 15686-1:2000 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service Life Planning—Part 1: General Principles; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
  23. ISO 15686-2:2001 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service Life Planning—Part 2: Service Life Prediction Procedures; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  24. ISO 15686-3:2002 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service Life Planning—Part 3: Performance Audits and Reviews; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  25. ISO 15686-5:2008 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service-Life Planning—Part 5: Life-Cycle Costing; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  26. ISO 15686-6:2004 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service Life Planning—Part 6: Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  27. ISO 15686-7:2006 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service Life Planning—Part 7: Performance Evaluation for Feedback of Service Life Data from Practice; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  28. ISO 15686-8:2008 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service-Life Planning—Part 8: Reference Service Life and service-life Estimation; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  29. ISO/TS 15686-9:2008 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service-Life Planning—Part 9: Guidance on Assessment of Service-Life Data; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  30. ISO 15686-10:2010 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service Life Planning—Part 10: When to Assess Functional Performance; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  31. EN 15643-1: 2010 Sustainability of Construction Works—Assessment of Buildings Part 1: General Framework; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
  32. FprEN 15643-2: 2011-03 Sustainability of Construction Works—Assessment of Buildings Part 2: Framework for the Assessment of Environmental Performance; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  33. prEN 15643-3: 2012-01 Sustainability of Construction Works—Assessment of Buildings—Part 3: Framework for the Assessment of Social Performance; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
  34. prEN 15643-4: 2012-01 Sustainability of Construction Works—Assessment of Buildings—Part 4: Framework for the assessment of economic performance; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
  35. prEN 15978: 2012-02 Sustainability of Construction Works—Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings—Calculation Method; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
  36. FprEN 15942: 2011-02 Sustainability of Construction Works—Environmental Product Declarations—Communication Format—Business to Business; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  37. CEN/TR 15941: 2010 Sustainability of Construction Works—Environmental Product Declarations—Methodology and Data for Generic Data; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.