You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sustainability
  • Article
  • Open Access

14 March 2024

Stochastic Modelling Frameworks for Dragon Fruit Supply Chains in Vietnam under Uncertain Factors

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
2
Biofluids and Biosystems Modeling Laboratory (BBML), Department of Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada
3
Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7906, USA
4
Postgraduate Studies Office, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (VNU-HCMC), Ho Chi Minh City 740030, Vietnam
This article belongs to the Special Issue Supply Chain Sustainability, Data-Driven Supply Chains, Supply Chain Intelligence

Abstract

Managing uncertainties and risks is always a difficult but fascinating task in fresh fruit supply chains, especially when dealing with the strategy for the production and conveyance of fresh fruit in Vietnam. Following the COVID-19 outbreak, the confluence of economic recession and persistent adverse weather conditions has exacerbated challenges faced by dragon fruit cultivators. This research investigates a two-stage stochastic programming (TSSP) approach which is developed and served as a valuable tool for analyzing uncertainties, optimizing operations, and managing risks in the fresh fruit industry, ultimately contributing to the sustainability and resilience of supply chains in the agricultural sector. A prototype is provided to illustrate the complex and dynamic nature of dragon fruit cultivation and consumption in Vietnam. Data on the selling prices of dragon fruit were collected from several sources between 2013 and 2022 in Binh Thuan Province, Vietnam. The results were obtained from the model by using three different approaches in order of their versatility and efficacy: (1) Scenario tree generation; (2) Sample average approximation; (3) Chance-constrained programming.

1. Introduction

Effectively managing a supply chain that can be impacted by volatile circumstances poses a significant challenge for all involved stakeholders. The supply chain of agricultural products, particularly fresh agricultural products, is inherently challenging due to its susceptibility to numerous unknown and unpredictable elements, such as climate change influences. A farm’s longevity and production are adversely impacted by various factors, including drought, seawater intrusion, dangerous pests, illnesses, and overutilization of fertilizers and pesticides.
Uncertainty can manifest at several stages within the fresh fruit supply chain, encompassing production by farmers, post-harvest storage, processing, transportation, and distribution. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the level of uncertainty varies at each point and stage of the supply chain.
The year 2020 presented a multitude of arduous and demanding circumstances within the realm of agriculture, which have been unprecedented in nature for all involved individuals. The global outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic had a significant impact on farmers across several countries, while distinct meteorological conditions posed challenges to individual locations. The movement of agricultural products from production sites to end consumers shows significant challenges due to constraints on mobility, disruptions in supply chains, restrictions on borders or ports, escalating transportation expenses, and the closure of numerous markets.
The distribution of fruit and vegetable production is subject to significant fluctuations in both demand and prices. According to a report by the FAO in 2020, there has been a significant increase in the pricing of certain items, particularly those that are seen to have immune-boosting properties such as garlic, ginger, and all fruits rich in vitamin C. Conversely, the prices of other products have experienced a sharp decline [1].
The implementation of travel restrictions or limitations between nations exacerbates labor shortages, particularly in countries that heavily depend on seasonal labor [2]. Insufficient labor resources for timely harvesting may result in the spoilage of produce within the agricultural field. Delays in transit and unloading might result in damage to fresh produce while it is being stored in containers.
According to [3], there appears to be a shift in consumer purchasing patterns as a result of imposed limitations on travel. During the initial stages of the pandemic, there was a significant surge in consumer demand for stockpiling commodities, driven by dread and apprehension. Consequently, the fruit and vegetable market experienced a decline, with prices beginning to decrease. This can be attributed to customers purchasing larger quantities of merchandise, thereby contributing to the weakening of the market. Perishable fruits and vegetables saw reduced consumer demand, while their non-perishable counterparts, such as apples and carrots, exhibited greater purchasing power and were prone to price escalation.

1.1. Context of the Vietnamese Agriculture

The emergence of the COVID-19 epidemic exacerbated the existing challenges faced by Vietnam’s agriculture sector, mostly manifested in decreased output levels and disruptions in agricultural supply chains. In rural regions, there has been a notable increase in the supply of agricultural commodities, including vegetables, flowers, fruits, and seafood, as a consequence of diminished consumer demand. Consequently, these excess commodities remain unutilized and, in certain instances, are subject to destruction. The oversupply has had a discernible influence on the market, resulting in a substantial decrease in prices, particularly for perishable agricultural commodities such as vegetables, flowers, fruits, and seafood. The disparity in pricing between farmers’ selling prices and consumers’ purchasing prices can be related to issues experienced within the circulation and distribution sector. The escalation of rice prices in the international market can be attributed to the surge in import demand from various nations. Consequently, this surge has resulted in a parallel increase in local prices, particularly for rice [4].
The data provided by The Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam [5] shows that, in 2020, the export value of significant agricultural and fishery products had a decline compared to 2019. Specifically, the seafood industry generated a total revenue of USD 8.41 billion, experiencing a decline of 1.5%. Fruits and vegetables, on the other hand, reached a revenue of USD 3.27 billion, showing a significant decrease of 12.7%. Cashew nuts achieved a volume of 515 thousand tons, resulting in a turnover of USD 3.21 billion, which increased by 13.0% in volume but decreased by 2.3% in turnover. Coffee production amounted to 1.57 million tons, with a turnover of USD 2.74 billion, representing a decline of 5.6% in volume and 4.2% in turnover. Pepper production reached 285 thousand tons, generating a turnover of USD 661 million, which increased by 0.4% in volume but decreased by 7.5% in turnover. Lastly, tea production amounted to 135 thousand tons, with a turnover of USD 218 million, experiencing a decline of 1.8% in volume and 7.8% in turnover.
In the context of Vietnam, a nation mostly reliant on agriculture, it is noteworthy that the primary revenue stream for numerous farmers has also confronted adverse effects. Since the commencement of 2020 till the present, the agricultural industry has experienced significant disruptions to its production and commercial operations, thereby impacting the financial well-being and livelihoods of farmers. The occurrence of disease poses significant challenges to various operations, including the provision of raw materials, trading, transportation, distribution, and exportation of agricultural products. Numerous enterprises, production facilities, and commercial establishments have experienced temporary closures or terminated contractual agreements, resulting in significant adverse effects on agricultural production. There is a significant prevalence of underemployment and unemployment among laborers in agricultural producing businesses, leading to a substantial decline in the average income of workers [6].

1.2. The Need for Mathematical Model of Fresh Fruit Supply Chains in the Vietnamese Context

The use of mathematical models provides substantial advantages in improving the production and distribution of fresh fruit. By tackling the obstacles and making well-informed decisions, these models may have a significant impact on establishing a fruit supply chain that is more effective, environmentally friendly, and adaptable. Nguyen et al. [7] stated that a wide range of mathematical models have been used in the last four decades to identify the most effective solutions for different requirements within the fresh fruit supply chain. Previous review papers [8,9,10,11,12] on mathematical models applied to the agri-food supply chain demonstrate that stochastic models are capable of efficiently addressing challenges including risk and uncertainty.
This paper, in consideration of all above-mentioned contexts, aims to examine the uncertainties associated with the production and distribution of fresh fruit in Vietnam. It specifically focuses on the cultivation of dragon fruit as a case study and the use of a two-state stochastic programming model was involved to respond to the need for sustainable solutions under uncertainties. The deterministic model developed by Nguyen et al. [13] served as a valuable tool for analyzing uncertainties, optimizing operations, and managing risks in fresh fruit production and distribution. Ultimately, this model has contributed to the sustainability and resilience of supply chains in the agricultural sector. The results were obtained from the model by using three different approaches in order of their versatility and efficacy: (1) Scenario tree generation; (2) Sample average approximation; (3) Chance-constrained programming. The application of these methods to the two-stage stochastic model is a potential new direction to address the uncertainties that affect the production and distribution of fresh fruit. Based on the derived solutions, a comparison will be made to assist managers or decision-makers in determining the most suitable strategy for their needs.
But, before presenting our conceptual framework and model, we try to describe a panoramic picture of dragon fruit in the Vietnamese market, to review some contexts of mathematical models existing in the literature for this issue.

3. Methodology

3.1. Conceptual Framework

The proposed models for research on the fresh fruit supply chain in Vietnam are developed based on existing problems of production and processing dragon fruit to deal with the uncertain parameters of the agriculture by using stochastic optimization and robust approaches. The models handle middle- and long-term decisions such as crop planting plans, growing and harvesting plans, and distribution plans for dragon fruit plants in Vietnam. A basic network of dragon fruit production and processing is considered and described in Figure 3 that presents the different combination of transactions between parties of the supply chain network.
Figure 3. Dragon fruit production and processing chain.
Firstly, a recourse stochastic model is extended from the deterministic model proposed by Nguyen et al. [13] and it includes two stages. To make decisions that are reliant on random variables such as the market price, the TSSP approach is suggested and summarized in Figure 4. Due to the characteristics of perennial tropical fruit plants, the first-stage solution for the problem is made considering planting factors such as constraints of land, water, labor, limitations on investment for first years of planting, and annual costs for year-by-year crops. The objective of the first stage is supporting the farmers to evaluate and make better decisions and policies that not only increase the expected revenue but also reduce their risk by considering different scenarios.
Figure 4. The two-stage decision-making process for fresh fruit production and distribution.
In the second stage, to provide satisfactory service to customers, the cognitive process to make decisions requires trustworthy and detailed statistics such as the capacity to harvest and the quantity to ship to selected customers while the prices fluctuate. Then, to better provide detailed distributing plans, reduced production and market uncertainty are approximated using the vicinity of the operational planning to the actual harvesting period. The environment of decision-making of this TSSP model is described in Figure 5.
Figure 5. The environment of decision-making of the recourse two-stage stochastic model (TSSP).
This study presents two sampling procedures that are proposed as appropriate approaches to tackle the uncertain difficulties associated with fresh fruit production and delivery in Vietnam. The approaches employed in this study include scenario tree generation and sample average approximation. These methodologies are designed to conceptualize and evaluate ambiguity in order to identify feasible resolutions to the issue. The inherent flexibility and scalability of both approaches [54] offer significant advantages, making them effective instruments for addressing difficulties in stochastic programming. Figure 6 shows the methodological steps that are implemented in this paper.
Figure 6. Methodological procedures implemented for the study of the production and distribution of dragon fruit in Vietnam.
The model was tested by using a dataset of a Vietnamese fresh fruit to verify the validity of results. The data were collected using methods such as surveys and direct observation. In the modeling phase, the historical data taken from the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Binh Thuan Province and General Statistics Office of Vietnam were used to validate the results. To ensure the usefulness and the applicability of the models in the real life, the data used to validate were collected directly from farmers, traders, and wholesalers who are involved in a fresh fruit supply chain by using interviewing or performing surveys.

3.2. Formulation of the Stochastic Model

  • Objective: maximizing the profit of crop harvesting for T years.
m a x s ρ s ( j i t p j i t s S T j i t s + j m t q j m t s S W M j m t s + j t r j t s S B j t s j i t c P N T 1 j i t ϵ j i t s 1 j m t c P N T 2 j m t ϵ j m t s 1 t c b p t j S B j t s ) j t c p j t Y j t t c h t j k X j k t t c r t j k Z j k t t F t c l a b f t t H i r e t c l a b p t k c w a t e r w k j t X j k t j c l i g h t i n g v j k t X j k t
The model is designed to optimize decisions around planting and harvesting to maximize predicted revenues for farmers. This highlights the discrepancy in aspects such as revenue projections from selling to markets (SWM), traders (ST), and byproduct providers, compared to the overall expenditures incurred for rooting, truncating, byproduct processing, penalties for demand shortfall, water costs, laboring, and lighting.
  • Constraints: the below constraints are applied annually.
    -
    Land availability.
Each crop has an expanse of j at an age of k that does not exceed the available land ( L ).
j k X j k t L
  • -
    Age-class balance in planting
The planning structure of agricultural models is related to the third category of limitations (3)–(8). Catalá [55] modeled the process of chopping down in a study of planting new apple and pear trees.
Yjt resolves the plantation decisions. A freshly cultivated fruit tree is always considered to be of age 0. Constraint (3) specifies that only crops in age class 1 can be planted in year 1.
X j k t = Y j t 1 j J k = 1
Constraint (4) ensures that the newly planted crops are uncut in the same year.
Z j k t = 0 1 j J k = 1
Only the first year is subject to constraints (5) and (6), while other age classes (k = 2 … 10) are not. Based on this, the planted sector is the number of trees in age class k − 1 in year 0 less than the amount that can be felled in the first year once the trees have survived for a year.
X i j t = I j , k 1 Z j k t 1 j J 2 k K
Z j k t = I i , k 1 1 j J k = K
In the planning horizon, periods t > 1 are subject to constraints (7) and (8). For crops with age classes 10 ≥ k > 1, constraint (7) is applicable. Relative to the optionally cleared area, the extent of the plantation each year is determined by the preceding year.
X j k t = X j , k 1 , t 1 Z j k t 1 j J 2 k K
All crops that reach the age of 9 in the considered year t − 1 should be truncated in the following year, according to constraint (8).
Z j k t = X j , k 1 , t 1 1 j J k = K
  • -
    Constraint (9) makes sure that the total harvest in each scenario is less than the product of the planting area (in hectares) by the yield (metric tons/hectare).
i S T j i t s + m S W M j m t s + S B j t s j y j k t X j k s t 1 j J 1 s S
  • -
    In each scenario, constraints (10)–(12) set the demand satisfaction in each year.
T j i t s = d j i t ϵ j i t s 1 1 j J 1 i I 1 s S
S W M j m t s = e j m t ϵ j m t s 2 1 j J 1 m M 1 s S
S B j t s = f j t 1 j J 1 s S
  • -
    Labor constraints
F t + H i r e t P t . j Y j t H t . j X j t R t . j Z j k t = 0                         t
Constraint (13) stands for the labor requirements to plant, cut, and harvest in a given year, in which
F t = M                       t .
There may occasionally be a set number of full-time employees. In this case, it is expressed using
H i r e t N                             t .
The requirements of cultivating, harvesting, or truncating could determine the hiring of the part-time workforce. However, as noted in constraint (15), this number is restricted by the limits of the budget.
  • -
    Water limitation
j k X j k s t . w j k s t W s t                                                               t , s
For each age k of a tree, the water requirement per hectare for a specific crop j varies in season s of year t. The variables must not surpass the water available, since excessive watering of trees leads to decreased output.
  • -
    Lighting limitation
j X j s . v s V s                                                                         s

3.3. Scenario Tree Generation

The method of generating scenario trees is a highly effective tool in the field of stochastic programming, and it has been extensively employed in the resolution of various practical issues. The method in question possesses characteristics that render it adaptable, interpretable, accurate, and scalable.
The utilization of the scenario tree generation technique is prevalent in various domains such as finance, operations research, and strategic planning. This tool facilitates the ability of decision-makers to create models that account for uncertainties, generate estimations of potential outcomes, and enhance the process of decision-making across a range of conditions. The process entails the creation of a hierarchical arrangement characterized by interconnected nodes, wherein each node corresponds to a distinct decision, event, or consequence.
The methodology was initially presented by Howard Raiffa in his publication titled “Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty” [56]. The concept has been subsequently extended and improved upon by several academics, such as Dantzig and Infanger [57] who employed the technique to address complex linear programming issues on a significant scale.
In a study, Calfa et al. [58] introduced a novel approach to construct multi-stage scenario trees that maintain consistency with both historical and projected data. The methodology employed in this study follows a two-step process. Firstly, statistical property matching is utilized to develop a collection of scenarios that exhibit statistical features similar to those observed in the historical data. Secondly, a Distribution Matching Problem is addressed to verify that the generated scenarios also align with the forecasted distribution of the data. The method suggested in this study presents a novel and effective approach for generating scenario trees in the context of multi-stage stochastic programming issues. The methodology is based on robust statistical principles and demonstrates computational efficiency. Consequently, it will be selected for implementation in the context of optimizing the production and distribution processes pertaining to fresh fruit in Vietnam.
In this paper, based on the algorithm proposed by Calfa et al. [58], a Distribution Matching Problem (DMP) model is developed using the Moment Matching Problem combined with the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (ECDF) and is designed to be applied to build scenario trees based on the fresh fruit price dataset collected in Vietnam. The procedure of the algorithm and an illustrated scenario tree are depicted in Figure 7 and Figure 8 below.
Figure 7. The procedure of building a scenario tree for the selling price of the dragon fruits.
Figure 8. Illustrated scenario tree for the selling price of the dragon fruits.
The objective of using the Distribution Matching Problem is to determine the ideal values of random variables and probabilities associated with scenario trees, with the aim of minimizing discrepancies between statistical features derived from the tree and those computed directly from the available data [58]. The mathematical model of the DMP is described in Appendix B.

3.4. Sample Average Approximation

In stochastic optimization issues where the objective function cannot be determined precisely but can be estimated through simulation, sample average approximation (SAA) is a common approach. To solve the approximate problem using deterministic optimization techniques, the original problem is replaced by an approximation based on a finite sample of random scenarios. With independent training samples, SAA has strong asymptotic performance guarantees, but these assurances might not be universally true with dependent samples [59,60].
The SAA method in our study uses Monte Carlo simulation to address optimization problems with stochastic elements. In this approach, the predicted objective function is estimated by calculating the sample mean from a random sample [61]. To deal with the fresh fruit production and distribution problem, the SAA operates by producing a collection of scenarios that accurately depict the outcomes of uncertain price fluctuations.
The procedure for applying SAA is described in Figure 9, as follows.
Figure 9. The procedure for applying SAA for the production and distribution fresh fruit stochastic model.

3.5. Chance-Constrained Programming

Chance-constrained programming (CCP) is a robust and adaptable optimization technique utilized to formulate and address stochastic programming issues in the presence of uncertainty [62]. The optimization framework is enhanced by the inclusion of probabilistic constraints, which guarantee that the solution adheres to a specified probability threshold for constraint satisfaction [63].
The idea of CCP was initially mentioned by Markowitz [63] to address portfolio optimization issues. In their seminal paper on optimizing oil distribution systems, Charnes and Cooper [64] formally established CCP, marking a significant milestone in the field of stochastic optimization. Subsequently, this concept has been expanded to encompass a wide range of applications, such as energy management, supply chain planning, financial risk management, and project scheduling.
The issue of fulfilling demand was resolved with the implementation of a penalty system for any instances of insufficient supply. Our objective is to ensure that the requirements of every product from each dealer are met with a probability that exceeds a specified level of reliability (Rel). The concept is denoted as a chance constraint.
Let Rel be a desirable dependability value, where 0 ≤ Rel ≤ 1. The presence of shortage factor ε is no longer necessary; yet, it remains crucial to ascertain whether the demand will be satisfied or not. In the context of the chance-constrained deterministic formulation, it is necessary to introduce binary variables to accurately describe the chance constraint. In this section, therefore, we redefine ϵ as a binary variable.
  • ϵ j i t s 1 is 1 if a shortage of crop j happens at trader i in period t for scenario s—0 otherwise.
  • ϵ j m t s 2 is 1 if a shortage of crop j happens at wholesaler m in period t for scenario s—0 otherwise.
Since the deficiency penalty no longer needs to be minimized, the new objective function (18) developed and modified from the objective function (1) is introduced as follows:
m a x s ρ s ( j i t p j i t s S T j i t s + j m t q j m t s S W M j m t s + j t r j t s S B j t s t c b p t j S B j t s ) j t c p j t Y j t t c h t j k X j k t t c r t j k Z j k t t F t c l a b f t t H i r e t c l a b p t k c w a t e r w k j t X j k t j c l i g h t i n g v j k t X j k t
Furthermore, to ensure the attainment of the necessary level of reliability, the following constrains are incorporated:
s ρ s . ϵ j i t s 1 1 R e l 1   1 j J 1 i I 1 s S ;
s ρ s . ϵ j m t s 2 1 R e l 2 1 j J 1 m M 1 s S .
However, a limitation of the above constraints is the absence of a guarantee that variables ϵ will assume a value of 1 in the event of a shortage. Constraints (10) and (11) will be rewritten to satisfy the requirement that, when there is a shortage, the variable ϵ will have the value 1:
d j i t S T j i t s = 10,000 ϵ j i t s 1 1 j J 1 i I 1 s S ,
e j m t S W M j m t s = 10,000 ϵ j m t s 2 1 j J 1 m M 1 s S .
Constraints (2)–(9) and (12) of the stochastic model remain unchanged.
Finally, the rewritten model with probabilistic constraints is solved by using the sample average approximation method with 200 iterations.
The case study aims to optimize the production and distribution of dragon fruit from growers to traders, wholesalers, and byproducts, with the objective of maximizing profits. To achieve this, three approaches are employed: scenario tree generation, sample average approximation, and chance-constrained programming. These methodologies are utilized to identify potential solutions for the case study. The obtained results from the used methodologies are presented and analyzed to provide a comprehensive conversation. This discussion aims to offer help and guidance to growers or managers involved in the production of dragon fruit, aiding them in making informed decisions.
The stochastic model was coded and solved in Python language on a computer configured with a 12th Gen Intel (R) Core (TM) i7 Processor and RAM of 32.0 GB.

4. Results and Discussion

The results herein obtained are, in fact, the extension study of the scenarios deterministically solved and presented in Nguyen et al. [13]. These findings can assist farmers in making decisions regarding the allocation of land for several varieties of dragon fruit throughout a 20-hectare area over an 8-year period with fluctuating selling prices. As mentioned above, selling prices of dragon fruits completely plunged during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic; the question “ how dragon fruit growers would act if a similar thing were to happen, and how they could maximize their profit as well as minimize their risks in the future”, requires further investigation.
According to Nguyen et al. [13], three kinds of dragon fruit are planted for local demands and exporting including red-skin, white-flesh (Crop 1); red-skin, red-flesh (Crop 2); and yellow-skin, white-flesh (Crop 3). Since China is the largest dragon fruit importer market, the prices are dominated mostly by Chinese traders. The selling price agreed between the growers and the traders is mainly based on trust (verbal contract); if the trader terminates the contract because of finding a better source of dragon fruits, the farmer will suffer.
Before the COVID-19 pandemic in January 2020, the price of Crop 1 remained stationary during episode 1 (peak season) and slightly rose in episode 2 (off-peak season). Crop 2 was priced double as high due to its cultivation for sale to the Chinese markets, where there is an extremely high demand. The price of Crop 3 cultivated in Vietnam was below expectations. Vietnamese farmers then aimed to sell their locally grown fruits at a price equivalent to the selling price of Crop 3 imported from Malaysia, which is 20 times greater than white-flesh dragon fruits. Its greatest price is equivalent to the price of red-flesh ones.
During the pandemic period, the prices of all three kinds of dragon fruit dramatically fell when the lockdowns were declared due to the outbreaks. Many farms did not have traders, so ripe dragon fruits were used as food for cattle or on a big sale— USD 0.1–0.2 per kilogram. At that selling price, the growers do not have enough revenue to compensate for production costs for the next season.
The current study presumes that Crop 1 is the established supply chain for both local and international trade with a recognized measurable demand. Crop 2 is exclusively cultivated for importation into Chinese markets, whereas Crop 3 is grown to assess its market potential. The selling prices of all crops in the model were assumed to randomly vary following a normal distribution curve over the years.
Establishing a specific land ratio for different types of dragon fruit is envisaged to help dragon fruit growers protect their profits from market price fluctuations caused by such COVID-19 pandemic events or severe unpredicted weather conditions resulting from climate change in the next several years.

4.1. Scenario Tree Generation

A look at historical data shows the variation in selling prices of red-skinned, white-fleshed dragon fruit and red-fleshed, red-skin dragon fruit, with monthly average data from July 2019 to December 2022 (Figure 10) and average annual data from 2013 to 2022 (Figure 11).
Figure 10. Historic data of monthly selling prices of white-flesh, red-skin and red-flesh, red-skin DF.
Figure 11. Historic data of yearly selling prices of white-flesh, red-skin and red-flesh, red-skin DF.
An uncomplicated method for constructing the framework of a multi-period scenario tree is to have three potential outcomes at each node. These outcomes consist of the predicted value as well as two values obtained by adding and subtracting 1.5 standard deviation from the predicted value for each period. The predicted value is derived from the ARIMA model, with a 95% level of confidence and the parameters p, d, and q set to 1, 0, and 0, respectively. Since the selling price data are applied based on the ARIMA model, it is expected that the forecasted value will conform to a normal distribution. The standard deviation (σ) value is derived from statistical analysis of historical data on dragon fruit selling prices in Binh Thuan, Vietnam. There are eight time periods corresponding to the annual production planning problem over an eight-year period. Hence, the number of possible scenarios for planning dragon fruit production and distribution over an 8-year period is 6562 (3 raised to the power of 8). The variability in the selling price of the three different varieties of dragon fruit cultivated and consumed in Vietnam is considered: white-flesh, red-skinned dragon fruit; red-flesh, red-skinned dragon fruit; and white-flesh, yellow-skinned dragon fruit. The scenario tree for each selling price is assessed separately and subsequently merged into a unified tree, as shown in Figure 12.
Figure 12. Scenario tree for selling prices of dragon fruits in an 8-year period.
In order to proceed, it is necessary to ascertain the probability associated with each potential outcome of the scenario tree by utilizing the Distribution Matching Problem (DMP) model that was presented in the preceding section. The statistical parameters utilized in the DMP model, including the mean value, standard deviation, variance, and covariance, are derived from the ARIMA forecasting model introduced in the preceding stage. The likelihood value was calculated promptly upon acquiring the forecast value, upper value, and lower value. Hence, a total of 3280 iterations of the DMP model were conducted to determine the probability of all possible outcomes in the scenario tree over the course of the 8-year study period. An assumption was made that the chance of the selling price being the same for each outcome is equal for all three types of dragon fruit.
The stochastic programming model was implemented and solved using the Python programming language, resulting in a value of USD 34,574,662.31 after a computation time of around 9400 s.

4.2. Sample Average Approximation

The sample average approximation (SAA) is a method for solving stochastic optimization issues by utilizing Monte Carlo simulation. Given the extensive research period and the large number of scenarios involved in determining the optimal model for the production and distribution of fresh dragon fruit in Vietnam, the Monte Carlo sampling method is a prudent choice. This method is both simple and reliable, as the results obtained from the sample average approximation (SAA) are addressed using deterministic optimization techniques.
A Normal distribution was found to be followed by the selling price of dragon fruit, as can be seen from the historical data that was collected. The variable that represents the selling price of three different kinds of dragon fruit should be created and given random values in accordance with the Normal distribution. This objective function of the model should be computed using these random values, and the results should be recorded. The random values of the variables should be regenerated and reassigned. Perform another calculation of the objective function. Repeat the processes that were just described many times and then determine the average. The iterations of 200, 500, and 1000 are the ones that are suggested in this study. The results of the model are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Results of SAA model.

4.3. Chance-Constrained Programming

The objective function of the TSSP model that is introduced in the previous section has been rewritten in order to optimize the production and distribution of dragon fruit in Vietnam. Additionally, probabilistic constraints are added to specify the minimum probability with which the solution should satisfy the original constraints. In this study, the production and distribution plan is required to guarantee at least a percentage of chance of meeting customer demand (traders and wholesalers) in the 8-year period. The problem is solved in a sequential manner, with the anticipated levels of reliability being 80%, 85%, 90%, and 95% respectively. The outcomes of this procedure can be seen in the Figure 13.
Figure 13. Objective function results of chance-constrained programming with different reliability levels.
The most optimal outcomes derived from those mentioned methodologies or approaches are briefly presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Summary of results.
Based on the results shown in Table 3, it is evident that the stochastic programming model outperforms the linear programming deterministic model. Specifically, the sample average approximation approach delivers more optimum outcomes compared to the other two stochastic methods. The chance-constrained programming technique is favored by us due to its ability to maximize profits while ensuring that 90% of client demands are addressed via the implementation of a powerful and robust SAA method.

5. Conclusions

This work introduces a stochastic model for planning and organizing the production and distribution of dragon fruit in Vietnam, taking into account the unpredictable fluctuations in selling prices. Two methods, scenario tree generation and sample approximation average, are used to address the uncertainty of the issue by estimating the expected value of the objective function. Furthermore, a very effective and adaptable optimization approach called chance-constrained programming is suggested to consider the uncertainty in the dragon fruit trading price and its impact on meeting consumer demand.
Our stochastic approach in this paper encompasses the benefits of the linear programming model proposed by Nguyen et al. [13], which involves deciding whether to cultivate dragon fruit when its selling price is high or rising and discarding dragon fruits with lower prices or that are old. This stochastic model can additionally address the limitation of the deterministic model by effectively handling the unpredictability and ambiguity associated with dragon fruit selling prices. This helps dragon fruit producers and managers in gaining a more comprehensive understanding when making choices on the selection of dragon fruit types and cultivation areas in medium- and long-term plans.
Nevertheless, this paper does possess some constraints. Our research does not consider random elements such as demand and yield due to the challenges associated with data collection. Furthermore, the forecasting technique used for the stochastic approach is simplistic and lacks a high level of reliability.
Investigating the production and distribution of dragon fruit, as well as other fresh fruits, remains arduous and challenging. In the future, reliable sample and forecasting techniques will be used to enhance the accuracy of planning. In addition, other stochastic methodologies are being investigated and implemented to provide decision-makers with more valuable information or a wider range of possibilities to consider when formulating long-term strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: T.-D.N., U.V. and T.N.-Q.; Data curation: T.-D.N. and T.N.-Q.; Format analysis: T.-D.N., U.V. and T.N.-Q.; Funding acquisition: T.N.-Q.; Investigation: T.-D.N. and U.V.; Methodology: T.-D.N., U.V. and T.N.-Q.; Software: T.-D.N., D.-H.P., H.-T.P., L.-K.P. and P.-C.N.; Supervision: T.N.-Q. and U.V.; Validation: T.-D.N., U.V., T.N.-Q., C.D. and M.A.; Visualization: C.D. and M.A.; Writing—original draft: T.-D.N., U.V. and T.N.-Q.; Writing—review and editing: all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this research are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

All authors express their gratitude to Vietnamese colleagues, collaborators, and farmers from Binh Thuan Province (Vietnam) for their data collection. We acknowledge the 911 research scholarship program from Vietnam International Education Development (VIED) addressed to T.-D.N.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Nomenclature

ADBAsian Development Bank
ARIMAAutoregressive Integrated Moving Average
CCPChance-constrained programming
COVID-19Coronavirus disease 2019
DFDragon fruit
DMPDistribution Matching Problem
ECDFEmpirical Cumulative Distribution Function
ENSOEl Niño–Southern Oscillation
FAOFood and Agriculture Organization
FFSCFresh fruit supply chain
KKTKarush–Kuhn–Tucker
MILPMixed-integer linear programming
MONREMinistry of Natural Resources and Environment, Vietnam
MOSPMulti-objective Stochastic Programming
PMPPositive Mathematical Planning
RORobust optimization
SAASample average approximation
SLPStochastic linear programming
SOFRISouthern Horticultural Research Institute, Vietnam
SMILPStochastic mixed-integer linear programming
TSSPTwo-stage stochastic programming

Appendix A. Definition of Indices, Variables, and Parameters of the Stochastic Model

Table A1. Indices.
Table A1. Indices.
SymbolDescriptionSymbol for Max Value
j Dragon fruit species J
k Age classes K
i Traders I
m Wholesale markets M
t Time periods T
s Scenarios S
Table A2. Variables.
Table A2. Variables.
IndexerSymbolDescription
year, crop, trader, scenario S T j i t s Amount of crop j delivered to trader i in time t for scenario s
year, crop, trader, scenario ϵ j i t s 1 Amount of crop j under delivered to trader i in time t for scenario s
year, crop, market, scenario S W M j m t s Amount of crop j delivered to wholesaler m in time t for scenario s
year, crop, market, scenario ϵ j m t s 2 Amount of crop j under delivered to wholesaler m in time t for scenario s
year, crop, scenario S B j t s Amount of crop j harvested for byproducts in time t for scenario s
year, crop, age X j k t Area of crop j planted in time t within age class k
year, crop, age Z j k t Area cut of crop j of age class k in time t
year, crop Y j t Area newly cultivated with crop j in year t
year F t Quantity of permanent employees in t
year H i r e t Part-time employees recruited during time t
Table A3. Parameters.
Table A3. Parameters.
IndexerSymbolDescription
L Amount of land available
Maximum lighting per hectare
Maximum water per hectare
age w k Water   required   per   hectare   for   age   class   k
age c w a t e r Cost of required water per hectare
crop v j Lighting   required   per   hectare   for   crop   j
crop c l i g h t i n g Cost of required light per hectare
year c r t Cos t   of   cutting   per   hectare   during   time   t
year c h t Cos t   of   harvesting   per   hectare   during   time   t
year c b p t Processing   cos ts   per   ton   during   time   t
year c l a b f t Periodic cost of fixed staff
year c l a b p t Cost of labor for part-time employees each period
year R t Number of employees required to cut one hectare
year H t Number of employees required to harvest one hectare
year P t Number of employees required to plant one hectare
crop, age I j k Initial   area   of   crop   j   of   age   class   k
year, crop f j t Demand   for   byproducts   of   crop   j   in   period   t
year, crop u j t Minimum   planting   area   per   crop   j   in   period   t
year, crop c p j t Cos t   per   hectare   of   planting   for   crop   j   in   period   t
year, scenario ρ s Estimated   price   probability   of   scenario   s
year, crop, age y j k t Production   in   tons   per   hectare   of   crop   j   in   age   class   k   during   the   given   period   t
year, crop, market e j m t The   wholesale   market s   demand   for   crop   j   during   that   time   t
year, crop, market c P N T 2 j m t Penalty for wholesaler m not satisfying demand for each ton of crop j during period t
year, crop, scenario r j t s Price   per   ton   of   byproducts   in   period   t   in   scenario   s
year, crop, trader d j i t The trader’s demand for crop j during that time t
year, crop, trader c P N T 1 j i t Penalty for trader i not satisfying demand for each ton of crop j during period t
year, crop, market, scenario p j i t s For   trader   i   in   period   t   in   scenario   s ,   the   price   per   ton   of   crop   j
year, crop, trader, scenario q j m t s For   wholesaler   m   in   period   t   in   scenario   s ,   the   price   per   ton   of   crop   j

Appendix B. The Mathematical Model of Distribution Matching Problem

Indices:
Different species of cropj
The outcomes (branches) from the root nodeo
Variables:
Probabilities of outcomes o p r o b o
Positive and negative variances of crop j calculated from the tree v a r j + , v a r j
Positive and negative co-variances of crop j and j’ calculated from the tree c o v j j + , c o v j j
Positive and negative deviations of crop j calculated from ECDF δ j o + , δ j o
Parameters:
Uncertain parameters of the SP problem (prices) x j o
Mean values of price dataset of crop j M e a n j
Variance values of price dataset of crop j V a r j
Co-variance values of price dataset between crop j and crop j’ C o V j j
Standard deviation value of crop j S t d j
Number of observations of crop j dataset n j
Weight value of variance of crop j price w _ v a r j
Weight value of co-variance crop j and crop j’ w c o v j j
Weight value of deviations of crop j w j o
Objective
min Z = μ + γ + ξ
S.t.
o = 1 O p r o b o = 1
o = 1 O x j o × p r o b o = M e a n j
o = 1 O x j o M e a n j 2 p r o b o + v a r j + v a r j = V a r j
o = 1 O x j o M e a n j x j o M e a n j p r o b o + c o v j j + c o v j j = C o V j j
E C D F ^ x j o o = 1 o p r o b o = δ j o + δ j o o = 1 O
With
E C D F ^ x j o = Φ x j o M e a n j V a r j
μ w _ v a r j × v j +
μ w _ v a r j × v j
γ w _ c o v j j × c o v j j +
γ w _ c o v j j × c o v j j
ξ ω j o × δ j o +
ξ ω j o × δ j o
v a r j + , v a r j , c o v j j + , c o v j j , δ j o + , δ j o 0
p r o b o 0,1
x j o x j , o + 1

References

  1. FAO; WFP; UNECE; UNICEF; WHO; WMO. Regional Overview of Food Security and Nutrition in Europe and Central Asia 2020: Affordable Healthy Diets to Address All Forms of Malnutrition for Better Health; Europe and Central Asia—Regional Overview of Food Security and, Nutrition; FAO: Budapest, Hungary; WFP: Budapest, Hungary; UNECE: Budapest, Hungary; UNICEF: Budapest, Hungary; WHO: Budapest, Hungary; WMO: Budapest, Hungary, 2021; Volume 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bochtis, D.; Benos, L.; Lampridi, M.; Marinoudi, V.; Pearson, S.; Sørensen, C.G. Agricultural workforce crisis in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. OECD. Connecting Businesses and Consumers during COVID-19: Trade in Parcels; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2020; Available online: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/connecting-businesses-and-consumers-during-covid-19-trade-in-parcels-d18de131/#biblio-d1e1182 (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  4. Le, T.H.X. Báo Cáo Thị Trường Gạo Tháng 11 Năm 2021; VietnamBiz.vn: Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. MOIT. Vietnam Import—Export Report 2020; Industry and Trade Newspaper: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Trinh, N.T.T. Impact of the COVID-19 on the labor market in Vietnam. Int. J. Health Sci. 2022, 6, 8355–8367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen, T.-D.; Venkatadri, U.; Nguyen-Quang, T.; Diallo, C.; Adams, M. Mathematical programming models for fresh fruit supply chain optimization: A review of the literature and emerging trends. AgriEngineering 2021, 3, 519–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Glen, J.J. Mathematical models in farm planning: A survey. Oper. Res. 1987, 35, 641–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lowe, T.J.; Preckel, P.V. Decision technologies for agribusiness problems: A brief review of selected literature and a call for research. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2004, 6, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lucas, M.T.; Chhajed, D. Applications of location analysis in agriculture: A survey. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2004, 55, 561–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahumada, O.; Villalobos, J.R. Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 196, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Soto-Silva, W.E.; Nadal-Roig, E.; González-Araya, M.C.; Pla-Aragones, L.M. Operational research models applied to the fresh fruit supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016, 251, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nguyen, T.-D.; Venkatadri, U.; Nguyen-Quang, T.; Diallo, C.; Adams, M. Optimization Model for Fresh Fruit Supply Chains: Case-Study of Dragon Fruit in Vietnam. AgriEngineering 2020, 2, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nguyen, H. Giải Pháp Thúc Đẩy Tiêu Thụ Nông Sản Trong Mùa Dịch Corona. Available online: https://mof.gov.vn/webcenter/portal/vclvcstc/pages_r/l/chi-tiet-tin?dDocName=MOFUCM171933 (accessed on 28 February 2022).
  15. Van_Anh. Thanh Long Vàng Giá 700.000 đồng/kg Vẫn Hút Khách Nhà Giàu. Available online: https://eva.vn/bep-eva/thanh-long-vang-gia-700000-dong-kg-van-hut-khach-nha-giau-c162a286921.html (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  16. Minh_Dam; Trong_Linh. Trồng Thử Thanh Long vỏ Vàng. Available online: https://ngocyen.com.vn/vi/trong-thu-thanh-long-vo-vang/n1577.html (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  17. Eckstein, D.; Künzel, V.; Schäfer, L.; Winges, M. Global Climate Rate Index 2020: Who Suffers Most from Extreme Weather Events? Weather-Related Loss Events in 2018 and 1999 to 2018; Germanwatch e.V.: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. ADB. Climate Change Risk and Adaptation Assessment for Irrigation in Southern Viet Nam: Water Efficiency Improvements in Drought-Affected Provinces; Asian Development Bank: Manila, Philippines, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hai, L.T.; Gobin, A.; Hens, L. Risk assessment of desertification for Binh Thuan province, Vietnam. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2013, 19, 1544–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gobin, A.; Le Trinh, H.; Pham Ha, L.; Hens, L. Land Use and Desertification in the Binh Thuan Province of Southeastern Vietnam: Mitigation and Adaptation Options Now and under Climate Change; European Geosciences Union: Vienna, Austria, 2012; p. 8398. [Google Scholar]
  21. Climate Change Phan Thiết; University of Basel: Basel, Switzerland, 2021; Available online: https://www.meteoblue.com (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  22. Le, T.; Sun, C.; Choy, S.; Kuleshov, Y. Regional drought risk assessment in the Central Highlands and the South of Vietnam. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2021, 12, 3140–3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Doutreloup, S.; Erpicum, M.; Fettweis, X.; Ozer, P. Analysis of the past (1970–1999) and future (2046–2065 and 2081–2100) evolutions of precipitation and temperature, in the Province of Binh Thuan, South East Vietnam, based on IPCC models. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Energy, Environment and Climate Change, Washington DC, USA, 29 November–2 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dang, T.B.; Phan, H. Mối Quan hệ “Nước và Biến Đổi Khí Hậu”—“Khí Hậu và Nước” Tại Ninh Thuận. Available online: http://vmha.gov.vn/public/index.php/tin-tuc-bdkh-112/moi-quan-he-“nuoc-va-bien-doi-khi-hau”-“khi-hau-va-nuoc”-tai-ninh-thuan-6103.html (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  25. Vinh, P.Q.; Hương, P.T.T. Assessing agricultural drought for Binh Thuan province under climate change scenario. Vietnam. J. Earth Sci. 2012, 34, 513–523. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tran, T.; Nguyen, V.; Huynh, T.; Mai, V.; Nguyen, X.; Doan, H. Scenarios of Climate Change and Sea Level Rise for Vietnam; Vietnam Map and Resource Environment Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Hong, N.; Nguyen, V.T. The impact of Climate Change on the transportation in Binh Thuan Province. Vietnam. J. Hydrometeorol. 2021, 8, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Agnolucci, P.; Rapti, C.; Alexander, P.; De Lipsis, V.; Holland, R.A.; Eigenbrod, F.; Ekins, P. Impacts of rising temperatures and farm management practices on global yields of 18 crops. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 562–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. USEPA. Climate Impacts on Agriculture and Food Supply. Available online: https://climatechange.chicago.gov/climate-impacts/climate-impacts-agriculture-and-food-supply#:~:text=Climate%20change%20can%20disrupt%20food,result%20in%20reduced%20agricultural%20productivity (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  30. Knight, F.H. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit; Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA, USA; New York, NY, USA, 1921; Volume 31. [Google Scholar]
  31. Carøe, C.C.; Schultz, R. Dual decomposition in stochastic integer programming. Oper. Res. Lett. 1999, 24, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pourmohammadi, F.; Teimoury, E.; Gholamian, M. A scenario-based stochastic programming approach for designing and planning wheat supply chain (A case study). Decis. Sci. Lett. 2020, 9, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jacquet, F.; Pluvinage, J. Climatic uncertainty and farm policy: A discrete stochastic programming model for cereal-livestock farms in Glgeria. Agric. Syst. 1997, 53, 387–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Darby-Dowman, K.; Barker, S.; Audsley, E.; Parsons, D. A two-stage stochastic programming with recourse model for determining robust planting plans in horticulture. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2000, 51, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kazaz, B. Production planning under yield and demand uncertainty with yield-dependent cost and price. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2004, 6, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ahumada, O.; Villalobos, J.R.; Mason, A.N. Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty. Agric. Syst. 2012, 112, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tan, B.; Çömden, N. Agricultural planning of annual plants under demand, maturation, harvest, and yield risk. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 220, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Costa, A.M.; dos Santos, L.M.R.; Alem, D.J.; Santos, R.H. Sustainable vegetable crop supply problem with perishable stocks. Ann. Oper. Res. 2014, 219, 265–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marchal, P.C.; Gila, D.M.; García, J.G.; Ortega, J.G. Stochastic season-wide optimal production planning of virgin olive oil. J. Process Control. 2018, 72, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Flores, H.; Villalobos, J.R. A stochastic planning framework for the discovery of complementary, agricultural systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2020, 280, 707–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bohle, C.; Maturana, S.; Vera, J. A robust optimization approach to wine grape harvesting scheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 200, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Munhoz, J.R.; Morabito, R. Optimization approaches to support decision making in the production planning of a citrus company: A Brazilian case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2014, 107, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. An, K.; Ouyang, Y. Robust grain supply chain design considering post-harvest loss and harvest timing equilibrium. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2016, 88, 110–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Banasik, A.; Kanellopoulos, A.; Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M.; Claassen, G. Accounting for uncertainty in eco-efficient agri-food supply chains: A case study for mushroom production planning. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 216, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chavez, M.M.M.; Sarache, W.; Costa, Y.; Soto, J. Multiobjective stochastic scheduling of upstream operations in a sustainable sugarcane supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects; Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; p. 1132. [Google Scholar]
  47. Dai, A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat. Clim. Change 2013, 3, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lesk, C.; Rowhani, P.; Ramankutty, N. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature 2016, 529, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Duangdai, E.; Likasiri, C. Mathematical model analyses on the effects of global temperature and forest cover on seasonal rainfalls: A Northern Thailand case study. J. Hydrol. 2015, 524, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lim, C.H.; Cheah, Z.H.; Lee, X.H.; How, B.S.; Ng, W.P.Q.; Ngan, S.L.; Lim, S.; Lam, H.L. Harvesting and evacuation route optimisation model for fresh fruit bunch in the oil palm plantation site. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 307, 127238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, G.-Q.; Li, L.; Li, J.; Liu, C.; Wu, Y.-P.; Gao, S.; Wang, Z.; Feng, G.-L. Impacts of climate change on vegetation pattern: Mathematical modelling and data analysis. Phys. Life Rev. 2022, 51, 239–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ghaffari, A.; Nasseri, M.; Someeh, A.P. Assessing the economic effects of drought using Positive Mathematical Planning model under climate change scenarios. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kung, C.-C.; Wu, T. Influence of water allocation on bioenergy production under climate change: A stochastic mathematical programming approach. Energy 2021, 231, 120955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Birge, J.R.; Louveaux, F. Introduction to Stochastic Programming; Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering; Mikosch, T.V., Resnick, S.I., Robinson, S.M., Eds.; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  55. Catalá, L.P.; Durand, G.A.; Blanco, A.M.; Bandoni, J.A. Mathematical model for strategic planning optimization in the pome fruit industry. Agric. Syst. 2013, 115, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Raiffa, H. Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Statistician 1968, 19, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dantzig, G.B.; Infanger, G. Large-scale stochastic linear programs: Importance sampling and Benders decomposition. IMACS 1991, 91, 111. [Google Scholar]
  58. Calfa, B.A.; Agarwal, A.; Grossmann, I.E.; Wassick, J.M. Data-driven multi-stage scenario tree generation via statistical property and distribution matching. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2014, 68, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kim, S.; Pasupathy, R.; Henderson, S.G. A guide to sample average approximation. In Handbook of Simulation Optimization; Fu, M., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 216, pp. 207–243. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, Y.; Pan, B.; Tu, W.; Liu, P.; Jiang, B.; Gao, C.; Lu, W.; Jui, S.; Kong, L. Sample average approximation for stochastic optimization with dependent data: Performance guarantees and tractability. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Virtual, 28 June 2022; pp. 3859–3867. [Google Scholar]
  61. Verweij, B.; Ahmed, S.; Kleywegt, A.J.; Nemhauser, G.; Shapiro, A. The sample average approximation method applied to stochastic routing problems: A computational study. Comput. Optim. Appl. 2003, 24, 289–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Prékopa, A. Stochastic Programming; Mathematics and Its Applications; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995; Volume 324. [Google Scholar]
  63. Markowitz, H. Portfolio Selection. J. Financ. 1952, 7, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.W. Chance-constrained programming. Manag. Sci. 1959, 6, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.