Next Article in Journal
Design for Six Sigma in the Product Development Process Under a Sustainability Point of View: A Real-Life Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
ST_AGCNT: Traffic Speed Forecasting Based on Spatial–Temporal Adaptive Graph Convolutional Network with Transformer
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Environmentally Friendly Concrete Containing Fly-Ash and Waste Face Mask Fibers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Lane Imbalance on Capacity Drop and Emission in Expressway Merging Areas: A Simulation Analysis

1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10388; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310388
Submission received: 23 October 2024 / Revised: 22 November 2024 / Accepted: 23 November 2024 / Published: 27 November 2024

Abstract

Lane imbalance does not provide sufficient space for merging vehicles to adjust their speed and change lanes smoothly. This leads to improper driving behavior that disrupts mainline traffic flow stability, resulting in capacity drops and increased vehicle emissions. However, quantitative analyses, specifically the effects of lane imbalance on capacity and emissions, remain limited. Existing traffic simulation platforms struggle to capture the effects of geometric design changes on capacity. To address these gaps, we developed a simulation method incorporating interactions between geometric design and traffic flow demand into an XGBoost model, enhancing the predictive accuracy for driving behavior parameters. Implemented within the TESS NG platform, this model enables real-time adjustments in driving behavior parameters as traffic demand varies under different lane balance conditions. The simulation results indicated a 42.4% capacity drop and a 34.9% increase in CO2 emissions when the balanced merging area was shifted to lane imbalance. Conversely, shifting to lane balance increases capacity by 8.2% and reduces CO2 emissions by 39.8% under severe congestion conditions. Under lane imbalance, vehicle speeds are lower across all traffic demand levels. When the demand exceeds 1300 pcu/h/ln, lane changes occur closer to the end of the acceleration lane, with higher speed differentials. These insights underscore the potential of lane balance optimization to mitigate capacity drops and emissions, providing a valuable simulation approach for the design and evaluation of merging areas.
Keywords: capacity drop; lane balance; vehicle emissions; driving behavior; traffic simulation; XGBoost model; geometric design; sustainable transportation capacity drop; lane balance; vehicle emissions; driving behavior; traffic simulation; XGBoost model; geometric design; sustainable transportation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, K.; Rong, J.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Y. Effects of Lane Imbalance on Capacity Drop and Emission in Expressway Merging Areas: A Simulation Analysis. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310388

AMA Style

Zhang K, Rong J, Gao Y, Chen Y. Effects of Lane Imbalance on Capacity Drop and Emission in Expressway Merging Areas: A Simulation Analysis. Sustainability. 2024; 16(23):10388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Kai, Jian Rong, Yacong Gao, and Yue Chen. 2024. "Effects of Lane Imbalance on Capacity Drop and Emission in Expressway Merging Areas: A Simulation Analysis" Sustainability 16, no. 23: 10388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310388

APA Style

Zhang, K., Rong, J., Gao, Y., & Chen, Y. (2024). Effects of Lane Imbalance on Capacity Drop and Emission in Expressway Merging Areas: A Simulation Analysis. Sustainability, 16(23), 10388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310388

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop