You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sustainability
  • Review
  • Open Access

25 January 2023

Road Racing Event Management Satisfaction: A Scoping Review of the Literature in Different Populations

,
,
,
and
1
Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
2
Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
3
GDOT Research Group, Faculty of Sport, Universidad Católica de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain
4
Mediterranean Institute for Protocol Studies—IMEP, 03003 Alicante, Spain
This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Sport Management in the Post-COVID19 Era

Abstract

The main purpose of this scoping literature review is to map empirical research concerning the satisfaction of road race participants, as well as what leads to their return and how events should be promoted and managed. The search was made on EBSCO, Academic Search Complete, Business Source Complete, Web of Science online database for studies between 2000 and 2020 using the following as keywords: “road race”, “marathon”, “running event”, “running”, “satisfaction”, “event loyalty”, “consumer behaviour”, “marketing”, and “communication”. After applying the inclusion criteria, 32 studies were selected. The descriptive analysis showed that satisfaction with the event depends on the quality of service provided, the image of the event, satisfaction with personal performance, perceived economic value, and disconfirmation of expectation, while the intention to revisit is largely affected by satisfaction with the event in different populations. In addition, various market segmentations are obtained according to the age and the gender, as well as important management and marketing information. The conclusions of this review can contribute to a better management and organization of road racing events around the world.

1. Introduction

Sports events are used to enhance sport and the organization that manages and coordinates them. Events nowadays increasingly belong to the leisure industry, so modern events are also one of the strongest ways for socializing and for people to be able to relax and to have fun [].
Management and control of the customer decision efficient require services in marketing management. One of its advantages is the positioning of prestigious events, which utilizing all essential communication tools leads to a much wider audience reach []. Marketing, when applied to sport, has several advantages, given that its main function is value creation and communication with potential customers, all for the sake of sports organization []. Not forgetting that all strategies must consider external opportunities and threats to the service, the event itself is already a great marketing and communication medium as it becomes much more effective through the athlete’s personal experience when competing in the race [].
An analysis carried out together with the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) with results from the United States and Europe showed from 2009 to 2019 an increase of 57.8% of participants in road races, thus increasing from 5 million to almost 8 million participants []. Road races events can differ in the size, considering the people they attract, and it can be a small, local event or a mega event in large cities, having a huge audience.
The road racing event market is on the rise, but it has become increasingly crowded, where companies are increasingly competing [].
With the increase in adherence to mass sporting events, more specifically road racing, companies also began to invest in innovation, trying to differentiate themselves in the market, opening up a new range of types of events offered []. Attending to this reality, managers must be able to grasp which aspects of the service will influence their participants or viewers and consequently affect their satisfaction. Therefore, they can later define marketing strategies in terms of the services offered and the prices that bring advantages to them [].
Furthermore, with the growth of the sporting events industry, consumer experiences come to gain an increasingly important role []. Attending to this scenario and considering the fact that the satisfaction component only occurs after all costumer decision-making is completed [], it is necessary to meet the customers’ expectations regarding the quality of service; consequently, this will enable the organization to keep the customer loyal to its services [].
The intention of revisiting the events is a consequence not only of satisfaction but also of what leads the client to decision making []. Service loyalty is what all organizations look for with their customers, as loyal customers make repeat purchases [], so their intention to attend the event will be higher. The intention to revisit can be more determined by the factors and elements of the service that actually attracts customers than even by what satisfies them, but satisfaction remains an essential element in this decision [].
Loyalty and satisfaction are positively correlated, as one increases, the other in turn also increases—thus, the greater the satisfaction, the greater the favourable attitudes towards the organization and the recommendation of the organization, and the greater the repurchase behaviours []. On the other hand, satisfaction has a direct positive effect on commitment, which is emotional, and this, in turn, is directly related to loyalty []. Even in small-scale events, the psychological benefits of the participants are evident, and inspiration to participate can lead to satisfaction with life and potential behaviours of individuals such as the intention to participate and their recommendation [].
Attending to this scenario, the purpose of this review was to provide a synthesis of empirical research concerning the satisfaction of road race participants, as well as what leads to their return and how events should be promoted and managed according to different demographics variables. In this way, taking into account the studies already carried out, we intend to offer relevant information that provide reflections and strategies that managers can adopt when planning and organizing future events, more specifically, identification of the main common aspects that lead to the satisfaction of participants, identification of the main aspects mentioned that lead participants to revisit the event, and identification of the best management and promotion strategies for events that have the greatest impact on participants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Databases and Selection Process

This review focused on publications from January 2000 to December 2020. This type of literature review is an easy tool to map studies on various topics of interest and goes through five steps: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, organizing the study selection, charting the data, and, finally, collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. Starting from the research question to investigate the extent to which empirical research provides evidence on the elements that can lead to better management and organization of sporting events, the search was made on EBSCO, Academic Search Complete, Business Source Complete, Web of Science online database for studies between 2000 and 2020 using the following research equations in the search fields Summary, Subject, and Title: road race AND satisfaction; marathon AND satisfaction; running event AND satisfaction; running AND satisfaction; road race AND event loyalty; marathon AND event loyalty; running event AND event loyalty; running AND event loyalty; road race AND consumer behaviour; marathon AND consumer behaviour; running event AND consumer behaviour; running AND consumer behaviour; road race OR marathon OR running event AND marketing OR communication.
Inclusion criteria were added: only peer-reviewed studies, both empirical and conceptual studies, in English, published between January 2000 and December 2020 in academic journals, with a focus on the theme under study. This period was chosen because the type of events under study had a thorough development over the last two decades. The exclusion criteria included were (a) comments, commentaries and opinions, letters to the editor, interviews, specific editorials, conference abstracts or posters, book chapters, and books; (b) lacking details or quantitative information. Resources with these characteristics were not included in the review.
The initial research resulted in a total of 2141 studies. After removing 712 duplicates using the EndNote X7 software, the abstract and subject of the remaining 1429 studies were screened to assess their relevance using the inclusion criteria, resulting in the exclusion of 1367 studies because of the following reasons: 382 were not empirical studies, 158 did not have full text, 37 were not written in English, and 790 were not related to the focus on the subject under study. Search parameters were strictly applied to the remaining 62 full-text studies. Studies that did not explore the purpose of this study were excluded, that is, all studies that did not study participants’ satisfaction, which leads to their intention to revisit and how the management and promotion of road racing events should be carried out. The final number was 32 empirical research studies that were thoroughly reviewed. A PRISMA flowchart [] was used to show the extraction process (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Scoping review PRISMA flowchart.

2.2. Analytical Framework

Descriptive information (author, years, journal, and country) about each study was provided to map the studies included in the scoping review. After this overview, an in-depth analysis was made using the procedures of an inductive hematic analysis []. Initially, all the studies’ information was compressed into tables to better analyse the more important information. Subsequently, there is an analysis of each study related to its objectives, abstracts, and results in order to label it with initial codes before grouping them into more generic topics; finally, generic topics were organized into two major themes: (1) satisfaction and intention to revisit road racing events; (2) promotion and management of road racing events. Some studies fit both themes and, therefore, were framed in the theme of greatest interest and focus on each study.

3. Results

The number of publications varies throughout the years, with more stability evident between 2015 and 2016 (Figure 2). Interestingly, the number of studies per year does not change too much, ranging from one to three studies, except in 2020 with the largest number of studies (n = 10). It is also important to note that from 2015 there are more studies (n = 24) than from 2002 to 2014 (n = 8).
Figure 2. Number of studies per year.

3.1. Thematic Analysis

3.1.1. Satisfaction and Intention to Revisit Road Racing Events

After analysing the studies, the themes of satisfaction and intention to revisit road racing events were identified (Table 1) in studies from three continents, America, Europe, and Asia. All surveys used the quantitative method of analysis, using questionnaires as tools, all of which were duly validated. Quantitative data were used in the 21 studies and analysed on Likert scales, and only one study used qualitative data—two open questions. In most studies, the sample refers only to athletes who actively participated in competitions, and in two of the studies spectators were either part of the sample or were the main focus. Despite the samples not being completely homogeneous, we also decided to include spectators, due to the fact that they bring important information to the study from the perspective of passive participants who do not interact directly in the competition but interact with the other aspects of the event, and, therefore, their reasoning must be taken into account when managing and organizing the event.
Table 1. Analysis of studies on satisfaction and intention to revisit road racing events.
According to the authors, satisfaction of the athletes with the events can result from several factors. The results of the studies show that the quality of service provided [,] as well as the perceived economic value, which refers to the comparison of the investment that was made with the gains from the participation at the event [], will positively affect satisfaction with the event.
Another factor that also leads athletes to be satisfied with the event is its image. The better the athletes’ image of the event, the greater their satisfaction; it is important to mention that this image will depend on two aspects, one cognitive and the other affective []. This factor is also identified as having a positive effect on participation intent [,]. According to Lee et al. [], satisfaction and participatory loyalty are affected indirectly by the image of the event, as well as by the attraction of sports tourism, through sports motivation, that is, the reasons that led them to participate. In terms of image, Vegara-Ferri et al. [] mentioned that the destination image and staff directly affect satisfaction. Communication as well as eWOM will indirectly affect satisfaction through the image of the destination.
Regarding the intention of athletes to revisit the events, several authors agree that the overall satisfaction of the event influences this intention, that is, the higher their satisfaction, the greater their intention to participate in the event again [,,,,,,,,,,]. Satisfaction with event operations [] as well as total quality management [] will also positively affect revisit intent.
Just as it was found that quality of service and expectancy disconfirmation positively affect satisfaction, they also affect the intention to revisit the event [], and even service quality for foreign participants will affect this intention []. The same happens to eWOM that will positively affect future intentions []. Consumer behaviour is also affected by consumer socialization, notably through intergenerational influence, peer influence, and traditional media [].
Another factor that influences this intention is the interaction between participants’ sources of inspiration and the type of event. Since athletes of shorter distances (5 km and 10 km) maintain their high intention through being inspired by any of the sources such as profile and services or characteristics of events, personal goals, interpersonal and intrapersonal connections, and social experience. On the other hand, marathon runners only hold this intention highly if they are inspired by interpersonal and intrapersonal connections, not differing in this source of inspiration from short distance athletes [].
This intention of athletes to participate in the future is also positively associated with past behaviour (experience in other events), area of residence (living near where the event takes place), distance from the event (shorter tests), existence of children in the household, and marital status (single) []. On the other hand, this intention can also be explained by the reasons for challenge, stress management, health pressure, strength and endurance, social recognition, social affiliation, disease avoidance, and weight control, in a positive way and competition as a negative predictor [].
Concerning the loyalty to the event, it is positively affected by the connection established with the event but also by the suitability to the place where the event takes place [].

3.1.2. Promotion and Management of Road Racing Events

Subsequently, studies on marketing and road race event management were analysed (Table 2). A quantitative method of analysis was used in all studies, using questionnaires as a tool in all 11 studies. Only one study used qualitative data, and the remaining ones used quantitative data analysed on scales. In most studies, the sample refers only to athletes who participated in the competitions, and, in one study, the stakeholders of this events were the main focus of the study which helps us to have an internal perspective on some matters related to management.
Table 2. Analysis of studies on promotion and management of road racing events.
The importance of identifying runners’ motivation in order to promote important insights for the development of marketing strategies, such as market segmentation, to be used by event organizers is clarified. In this context, five types of athletes were identified that varied according to their reasons for participation. The former sought entertainment, going with friends, partners, or even co-workers. The second attended just for their participation in the event, being alone or accompanied by family. The third participated for recreation and could go alone or with family and could be over 40 and go with friends. The fourth participated in order to meet with other athletes, either competing in races with an organized group of athletes or could be over 40 and going with friends or colleagues. Finally, the fifth competed with the goal of achieving a result and self-assertion, who came alone or with the family [].
Still, to identify market segments, two types of athletes were identified: serious and recreational. The most serious athletes were the most likely to repeat the event again: ones for whom a club had registered, the decision to participate was not made well in advance, they visited other tourist attractions in the area but did not participate in other tourist activities beyond the race. Recreational athletes were not sure whether they would participate again: they were aware of the event through word-of-mouth, journals, and recommendations; they decided to participate well in advance; and there were more receptive to participating in other sporting activities [].
Concerning the management of events, the results of the studies also showed some essential ideas. From a viewer’s perspective, they identified the critical success factors for a memorable experience as amenities, marketing, personnel and provisions, and comfort and visibility [].
From the athlete’s perspective, some factors of event selection were identified, as well as which services of the organization are most important. Regarding the factors of choice of events, athletes give more importance to having all the necessary information in a friendly site, the event being well organized, offering new experiences every time at events, providing scenic and interesting route, expecting good weather, showing good atmosphere at the party event. These factors are common to athletes with high and low levels of involvement, but athletes with high involvement also value the reputation and prestige of the event [].
Regarding the management and organization of these same events, major risks were identified, such as inclement weather; bomb threat; crowd control; medical issues; active shooter; logistical failure; and emergency response time. Consequently, to manage these risks, it is necessary to have interagency communication, staff/volunteer recruitment and training, knowledge of jurisdictional responsibilities, finances, course logistics/equipment, and balancing the public safety with a race friendly environment [].

4. Discussion

The current review allows us to identify several important factors that help event organizers understand which changes can be made to create greater satisfaction with the event that will directly lead to greater intention to revisit the event. Thus, we can think that all elements found to positively affect athletes’ satisfaction with the event, such as quality of service, perceived economic value, satisfaction with performance, and the physical environment, indirectly will also lead to a greater intention to revisit the event.
Although athletes’ satisfaction is affected by the parameters mentioned above, some studies carried out by other authors have ended up showing contradictory results. Hyun and Jordan [] reported that the perceived economic value as well as the quality of service affect satisfaction with the event; on the contrary, Du et al. [] indicate that the perceived value is not statistically significant as an element influencing satisfaction, and Theodorakis et al. [] report that not all dimensions of the quality of service affect satisfaction, identifying the quality of interaction as not being statistically significant.
Concerning the intention to revisit, there are also some disagreements. In general, the main characteristics identified that influence the intention to revisit are satisfaction with the event, quality of service, expectancy disconfirmation, quality of the physical environment and results, image of the event, previous behaviours, and sports involvement.
Unlike Duan et al. [], Hsiao et al. [] considered that social interaction is an important factor that can influence consumer behaviour in marathon events.
Regarding sports involvement and its link with the intention to revisit the event, according to Chao-Sen [], the involvement will have a positive effect on the willingness to participate again, just as Baker et al. [] say that the intention to participate in the future is positively associated with past behaviours. On the contrary, Ninomiya et al. [] identified in their study that involvement, that is, both previous races and experiences, has no influence on the intentions to participate in the event. According to Fam et al. [], the perceived organization will not positively influence the perceived value of the marathon.
The athletes who participate in these events are not homogeneous groups, and these differences may be the results of the geographic distribution of the studies. It is also important not to forget that these events are full of athletes with different participation goals, having varying emphases on the leisure aspect, leading to athletes with different levels of involvement, motivations, and aspirations.
According to Alexandris [], the quality of the results will positively affect the intention to revisit. On the contrary, Du et al. [] state that personal performance is important for satisfaction with the event, but it is not statistically significant for the future behaviour of athletes to repeat the race again. This issue can be justified by the event distance factor that is linked to the intention to revisit the event. Athletes who participated in shorter runs had a greater intention to revisit the event than athletes who ran longer distances.
According to Okayasu et al. [], the factors that lead to satisfaction and intention to revisit vary between the United States and Japan. This variance may be due to the differences between western and eastern cultures in the way they have different perceptions of life and sport.
As for the results found that segment the market, it is essential for event managers to know their market so that they can structure their event. It is a valuable piece of information so that customer acquisition marketing strategies can be developed later, bringing numerous advantages to the organization, thus having implications for managing the event [,].
The importance of creating consumer profiles was clearly defined in order to be able to manage marketing strategies in the most effective way. Having to define specific strategies for different groups, general strategies may not be the most suitable for certain profiles and, thus, compromise the success of the event.
In these marketing strategies, the information obtained about price expectations can be included, applying the best price strategy that is profitable for the organization. Consumers’ response to prices has been an important question for event organizers. This response will be highly influenced by the choices of communication strategies, and the implementation of more effective strategies will lead to greater acceptance by consumers in relation to the price increase [].
The motivations of participants in the events are also an important theme of study because after knowing the true motivations, managers will be able to keep athletes connected with the events, making their participation recurrent. Still, regarding the motivation for participating, Malchrowicz-Mośko et al. [] managed to highlight the most important motivations for children and adolescents. In this way, they managed to carry out a marketing strategy increasingly targeted at the groups in question, not only focused on adults but also on youths, promoting these events in the best way and encouraging participation at all ages.
Results about sponsors are also beneficial to the organization. If athletes remember the sponsors, the sponsors will be happier, so the organization–sponsor relationship will also improve. It, thus, becomes a beneficial relationship for both parties, for the sponsors because they will have their due recognition and for the organization as it becomes more likely that supporters will sponsor the event again in a future edition, and if there is good will on the part of the sponsor and if the image of the sponsor is positive, these will also lead to positive future behavioural intentions. The ambush marketing study proves to be a source of discoveries for managers, being important in that it can increase the ability to renew sponsors. Although sporting events may be hampered by this type of marketing, events such as large marathons can benefit [].
The achievement of the success of the event also applies to the identification of risks, and it is essential for the risk management team to develop strategies for each of them, achieving a better performance even if they happen, leading to an effective and efficient management, not neglecting these important factors that never should be forgotten. Hall et al. [] end up highlighting factors that must be considered when carrying out risk management planning effectively so that the organization of the event can be prepared for any eventuality, putting aside the risk of cancelling the event.

5. Conclusions

The analysis emphasizes important aspects that lead to the athletes’ satisfaction and their return to the event as well as ideas that must be considered regarding the management and promotion of the event, believing that they can contribute to a better management and organization of sports events. Findings reveal that satisfaction with the event will depend on the quality of service provided, the image of the event, satisfaction with personal performance, perceived economic value, and expectancy disconfirmation; in general, the better the participants’ view of the to these aspects, the better their satisfaction with the event. The intention to revisit will be affected by satisfaction with the event; if participants are satisfied, they are more tolerant of revisiting. Regarding the marketing discoveries, several profiles were identified that make it possible to make the market better known which offers a best approach to each profile, perceiving their needs in order to be satisfied with the event, which deserves attention on the part of the organization. Although there is a growing interest in understanding the factors that can lead to the management of sport events, notably road racing, further studies are needed to address some discrepancies in the results and to understand the origin of these differences. It is essential to utilize all information in order to lead to better management of road racing and greater satisfaction and intention of athletes to revisit, leading to the success and prestige of the event according to demographics variables such as age or gender.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.F., P.B. and M.J.C.; methodology, S.F.; software, P.B. and M.J.C.; validation, J.S.-S. and J.A.S.-S.; formal analysis, S.F.; investigation, P.B. and M.J.C.; resources, S.F.; data curation, P.B. and M.J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.F.; writing—review and editing, J.A.S.-S. and J.S.-S.; visualization, J.A.S.-S. and J.S.-S.; supervision, P.B. and M.J.C.; project administration, P.B. and M.J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maussier, B. The new ethical dimension of sports events: A reflection on the evolution from the ancient greek olympic sports festival to postmodern sports events. Cult. Cienc. Deporte 2017, 12, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Belovski, S. Comparison of marketing and communication strategy of the Prague International Marathon and Valencia Marathon. Ekon. Manag. 2014, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Correia, A.; Biscaia, R.; Menezes, V. Lições de Marketing do Desporto; Visão e Contextos; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco: Recife, Brazil, 2014. (In Portugal) [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersen, J. The State of Running 2019; RunRepeat: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Buning, R.J.; Walker, M. Differentiating mass participant sport event consumers: Traditional Versus non-traditional events. Sport Mark. Q. 2016, 25, 47–58. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bodet, G.; Bernache-Assollant, I. Consumer loyalty in sport spectatorship services: The relationships with consumer satisfaction and team identification. Psychol. Mark. 2011, 28, 781–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hyun, M.; Jordan, J.S. Athletic goal achievement: A critical antecedent of event satisfaction, re-participation intention, and future exercise intention in participant sport events. Sport Manag. Rev. 2020, 23, 256–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Um, S.; Chon, K.; Ro, Y. Antecedents of revisit intention. Ann. Tour. Res. 2006, 33, 1141–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Javadein, S.R.S.; Khanlari, A.; Estiri, M. Customer loyalty in the sport services industry: The role of service quality, customer satisfaction, commitment, and trust. J. Hum. Sci. 2008, 5, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  10. Caruana, A. Service loyalty: The effects of service quality and the mediating role of customer satisfaction. Eur. J. Mark. 2002, 36, 811–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dimitriades Zoe, S. Customer satisfaction, loyalty and commitment in service organizations: Some evidence from Greece. Manag. Res. News 2006, 29, 782–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, R.; Kaplanidou, K.; Papadimitriou, D.; Theodorakis, N.D.; Alexandris, K. Understanding the inspiration among active participants in sport events. Int. J. Event Festiv. Manag. 2018, 9, 332–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009, 62, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bardin, L. Análise de Conteúdo, 5th ed.; Edições 70: Lisbon, Portugal, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hsiao, C.-H.; Wang, F.-J.; Lu, Y.-C. Development of sustainable marathon running: The consumer socialization perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vegara-Ferri, J.M.; López-Gullón, J.M.; Valantine, I.; Suárez, A.D.; Angosto, S. Factors influencing the tourist’s future intentions in small-scale sports events. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martínez-Cevallos, D.; Proaño-Grijalva, A.; Alguacil, M.; Duclos-Bastías, D.; Parra-Camacho, D. Segmentation of participants in a sports event using cluster analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Duan, Y.; Liu, B.; He, Y. Study on relationships among sports spectator motivations, satisfaction and behavioral intention: Empirical evidence from Chinese marathon. Int. J. Sport. Mark. Spons. 2020, 21, 409–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xiao, Y.; Ren, X.; Zhang, P.; Ketlhoafetse, A. The effect of service quality on foreign participants’ satisfaction and behavioral intention with the 2016 Shanghai International Marathon. Int. J. Sport. Mark. Spons. 2020, 21, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Du, J.; Kennedy, H.; James, J.D.; Funk, D.C. Leveraging event participation benefits beyond the running course: Deciphering the motivational basis of event satisfaction. J. Sport Manag. 2020, 34, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, S.S.; Tseng, Y.C.; Lin, Y.S.; Su, Y.C.; Sia, W.Y.; Lin, C.W. Constructing an international marathon participants’ behavioral model in Taiwan. Afr. J. Hosp. Tour. Leis. 2019, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ninomiya, H.; Kaplanidou, K.; Hu, W.; Matsunaga, K.; Nagazumi, J. An examination of the relationship between destination image and marathon participants’ behaviours. J. Sport Tour. 2019, 23, 225–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chao-Sen, W. Application of TQM to road races: Study on the sports involvement and willingness to re-participate. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2018, 5, 1509811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Baker, B.J.; Jordan, J.S.; Funk, D.C. Run Again another day: The role of consumer characteristics and satisfaction in repeat consumption of a sport-related experience product. J. Sport Manag. 2018, 32, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alexandris, K. Event quality and loyalty among runners with different running involvement levels. Int. J. Event Festiv. Manag. 2017, 8, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, S.; Liu, J.D.; Love, A. The Impact of event prestige on intent to continue sport participation. J. Sport Behav. 2016, 39, 180–201. [Google Scholar]
  27. Okayasu, I.; Nogawa, H.; Casper, J.M.; Morais, D.B. Recreational sports event participants’ attitudes and satisfaction: Cross-cultural comparisons between runners in Japan and the USA. Manag. Sport Leis. 2016, 21, 164–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Halpenny, E.A.; Kulczycki, C.; Moghimehfar, F. Factors effecting destination and event loyalty: Examining the sustainability of a recurrent small-scale running event at Banff National Park. J. Sport Tour. 2016, 20, 233–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Du, J.; Jordan, J.S.; Funk, D.C. Managing mass sport participation: Adding a personal performance perspective to remodel antecedents and consequences of participant sport event satisfaction. J. Sport Manag. 2015, 29, 688–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Theodorakis, N.D.; Kaplanidou, K.; Karabaxoglou, I. Effect of event service quality and satisfaction on happiness among runners of a recurring sport event. Leis. Sci. 2015, 37, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koo, S.K.; Byon, K.K.; Baker Iii, T.A. Integrating Event image, satisfaction, and behavioral intention: Small-scale marathon event. Sport Mark. Q. 2014, 23, 127–137. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wicker, P.; Hallmann, K.; Zhang, J. What is influencing consumer expenditure and intention to revisit? An investigation of marathon events. J. Sport Tour. 2012, 17, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Funk, D.; Jordan, J.; Ridinger, L.; Kaplanidou, K. Capacity of mass participant sport events for the development of activity commitment and future exercise intention. Leis. Sci. 2011, 33, 250–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fam, K.-S.; Ting, H.; Tan, K.-L.; Hussain, K.; Cheah, J.-H. Does it matter where to run? Intention to participate in destination marathon. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2020, 32, 1475–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Malchrowicz-Mośko, E.; Castañeda-Babarro, A.; Guereño, P.L. On the way to the marathon—Motivation for participating in mass running events among children and adolescents: Results of the poznan half marathon pilot study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Koronios, K.; Dimitropoulos, P.E.; Kriemadis, A.; Douvis, J.; Papadopoulos, A. Determinants of the intention to participate in semi-marathons events. Int. J. Sport Manag. Mark. 2020, 20, 153–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hall, S.A.; Manning, R.D.; Keiper, M.; Jenny, S.E.; Allen, B. Stakeholders’ perception of critical risks and challenges hosting marathon events: An exploratory study. J. Contemp. Athl. 2019, 13, 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  38. Eddy, T.; Cork, B.C. Sponsorship antecedents and outcomes in participant sport settings. Int. J. Sport. Mark. Spons. 2019, 20, 26–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Slak Valek, N.; Lesjak, M.; Bednarik, J.; Gorjanc, M.; Podovšovnik Axelsson, E. Identifying the runners at 1st Istrian Marathon using CHAID analyses. Kinesiol. Slov. 2015, 21, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kruger, M.; Saayman, M. Who are the comrades of the comrades marathon? S. Afr. J. Res. Sport Phys. Educ. Recreat. 2013, 35, 71–92. [Google Scholar]
  41. McKelvey, S.; Sandler, D.; Snyder, K. Sport participant attitudes toward ambush marketing: An exploratory study of ING New York City marathon runners. Sport Mark. Q. 2012, 21, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
  42. Getz, D.; Andersson, T.D. The Event-Tourist Career Trajectory: A study of high-involvement amateur distance runners. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2010, 10, 468–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kyle, G.T.; Kerstetter, D.L.; Guadagnolo, F.B. Manipulating consumer price expectations for a 10K road race. J. Sport Manag. 2003, 17, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kyle, G.T.; Kerstetter, D.L.; Guadagnolo, F.B. Market Segmentation Using Participant Involvement Profiles. J. Park Recreat. Adm. 2002, 20, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kruger, M.; Saayman, M. Creating a memorable spectator experience at the Two Oceans Marathon. J. Sport Tour. 2012, 17, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.