Next Article in Journal
Green Technology Investment with Data-Driven Marketing and Government Subsidy in a Platform Supply Chain
Next Article in Special Issue
A Combined IO-DEMATEL Analysis for Evaluating Sustainable Effects of the Sharing Related Industries Development
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Pesticide, Dioxin-like Polychlorinated Biphenyl, and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Existence around Galindez Island, and Comparison with the Organic Pollution Bibliography of the Antarctic Peninsula
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Relation between Collaborative Consumption and Subjective Well-Being: An Analysis of P2P Accommodation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

An Abductive Analysis of Debates on the Impact of the Sharing Economy: A Systematic Review in a Sustainable Framework

1
Economic Research Center for Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(7), 3996; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073996
Submission received: 21 February 2022 / Revised: 19 March 2022 / Accepted: 25 March 2022 / Published: 28 March 2022

Abstract

The sharing economy (SE) is a new production and consumption model that improves social efficiency through the usage-based acquisition of idle resources. Owing to its friendly economic and environmental attributes, the SE spans various regions, industries, and backgrounds worldwide. Given the complex and controversial outputs of the SE, there is an unmet need to perform a comprehensive and systematic survey of its impacts. We systematically review the recent studies of the multi-dimensional effects of the SE, including its profound impacts on the economy, society, and environment, from the WoS database via NVivo. A comparison of the positive, negative, and conditional attitudes among each dimension and an abductive analysis of the contradictions’ underlying causes by deconstructing each conclusion into the cognitive background, empirical path, and supporting evidence is implemented to sort out the current debates. It is shown that the impacts on the social dimension are most debated, while the influences on the environment reach the strongest consensus. Notably, the effects on the economy are mostly hierarchical. Furthermore, the differences in the ontologically guiding ideology of sustainable development, the definitions of the SE, socioeconomic backgrounds, individual preferences, group interests, and empirical approaches co-trigger the varied conclusions and disputes. Hence, this study promotes a systematic and dialectical understanding of the SE’s benefits and pitfalls, which is of significance to fundamental investigations and practical applications.
Keywords: sharing economy; impacts study; contradictory conclusion; abductive analysis; sustainability; literature review sharing economy; impacts study; contradictory conclusion; abductive analysis; sustainability; literature review

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, D.; Yan, L.; Ruan, F.; Zeng, X. An Abductive Analysis of Debates on the Impact of the Sharing Economy: A Systematic Review in a Sustainable Framework. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073996

AMA Style

Wang D, Yan L, Ruan F, Zeng X. An Abductive Analysis of Debates on the Impact of the Sharing Economy: A Systematic Review in a Sustainable Framework. Sustainability. 2022; 14(7):3996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073996

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Dan, Liang Yan, Fangli Ruan, and Xiaohuang Zeng. 2022. "An Abductive Analysis of Debates on the Impact of the Sharing Economy: A Systematic Review in a Sustainable Framework" Sustainability 14, no. 7: 3996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073996

APA Style

Wang, D., Yan, L., Ruan, F., & Zeng, X. (2022). An Abductive Analysis of Debates on the Impact of the Sharing Economy: A Systematic Review in a Sustainable Framework. Sustainability, 14(7), 3996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073996

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop