Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an excellent manuscript dealing with a complex topic of LULC changes in relation to CS at a regional level and clearly highlights the value of future considerations in different land use types of carbon storage, biodiversity and economic proliferation.  Carbon neutrality in a country like China is very necessary. 

I enjoyed reviewing the manuscript and only found a few typographical errors. 

Firstly, Figure 2 should revert to EDP instead of EP for all the components of the graphic. 

Secondly, Figure 5 legend must be corrected to Forest instead of Froest. 

line 556 should change frist to first. 

line 585 a change from rep-resented to represented must also be dealt with. 

 

Author Response

Thank you. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Topic of the paper relevant in today's context. Presentation of paper is well structured.

Abstract: need to compact it

Introduction: too lengthy...modify

Method: Good

Results and Discussion: upto date

Conclusion: need modification.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a much improved paper, specifically the structure of the paper enabling the reader to understand better what is a complex processing chain of integrated models.