Review Reports
- Mingmin Kong,
- Shuaiming Feng and
- Qi Xia
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Please see my comments in the file attached.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewers,
Please download the attachment for the reviewer’s point-by-point response, and the content changes in the text have been marked.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Please see the attachment.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
Please download the attachment for the reviewer’s point-by-point response.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The work is good, but there are some Abbreviations needs explanation(line 35). The length L1, L2, L3 does not have a logical explanation[ line 97 - 101]. No mention about Torsion angle 180deg, which is contradictory to the explanation under the Results and discussions section [line 251-252 and 271-272]. Overall the work is good.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
Please download the attachment for the reviewer’s point-by-point response, and the content changes in the text have been marked.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
- Minor revision,
- Improve English level,
- Read ALL the comments and answer to the ones you have doubts
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer:
Thank you for your comment. The relevant content has been re-edited in this paper. Please refer to the attachment for detailed details.
Reviewer 2 Report
Please see the attachment.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer:
Thanks for the comment. The relevant content has been re-edited in this paper. Please see the attachment for details.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 3
Reviewer 2 Report
Please see the attachment
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf