Next Article in Journal
Socio-Ecological Controversies in the News as Trigger of a Model-Based Inquiry Instructional Sequence about the Effect of Global Warming on the Great Barrier Reef
Next Article in Special Issue
Smart, Sustainable and Citizen Centered: A Network Analysis of Urban R&D Trends in Seoul, South Korea
Previous Article in Journal
On the Use of Historical Flights for the Urban Growth Analysis of Cities Through Time: The Case Study of Avila (Spain)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Learnings from Local Collaborative Transformations: Setting a Basis for a Sustainability Framework
Article

The Quest for an Adequate Test: Justifying the Sustainable City as an Order of Worth

Urban Studies Program and Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, 515 W. Hastings St., Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3, Canada
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4670; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114670
Received: 10 May 2020 / Revised: 30 May 2020 / Accepted: 4 June 2020 / Published: 8 June 2020
The sustainable city represents an ideal of good and just living that has inspired urban development work for at least 25 years. While criticized by many for its scientific, social and political vagueness, the concept of the sustainable city has nonetheless continued to frame material and political efforts in urban redevelopment. From a perspective grounded in the pragmatic sociology of critique, this article takes this phenomenon as evidence of an international movement to generate not just political pronouncements or technical fixes, but a new order of worth, from the concept of the sustainable city. After presenting the pragmatic sociology of critique and the application of this body of social research as it pertains to better understanding sustainable urban development, we reflect on the factors that challenge the acceptance of the sustainable city as an order of worth, or as a mode and manner of justifying significant decisions in the public domain, recognizable and understandable to a majority. For efforts to create the sustainable city to justify themselves, socioculturally, in this way, the work demands a clear test of worthiness. This article illustrates the search for an adequate test through a review of two distinct efforts to generate new systems of assessment for sustainable building projects, and points out the contrasting nature of these two tests: one which aims to be accessible to thoroughgoing public debate fit to transform a context toward a political discourse of urban sustainability as well-being; the other that interprets the need for a test as affirmation of expertise related to the unfolding climate emergency. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable city; pragmatic sociology of critique; sustainability assessment; sustainable neighbourhoods; urban redevelopment sustainable city; pragmatic sociology of critique; sustainability assessment; sustainable neighbourhoods; urban redevelopment
MDPI and ACS Style

Holden, M. The Quest for an Adequate Test: Justifying the Sustainable City as an Order of Worth. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114670

AMA Style

Holden M. The Quest for an Adequate Test: Justifying the Sustainable City as an Order of Worth. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114670

Chicago/Turabian Style

Holden, Meg. 2020. "The Quest for an Adequate Test: Justifying the Sustainable City as an Order of Worth" Sustainability 12, no. 11: 4670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114670

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop