You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • Journal of Market Access & Health Policy (JMAHP) is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 1 (2024). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Taylor & Francis.
  • Article
  • Open Access

4 April 2020

Clinical Efficacy Assessment in Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis: Preliminary Validation of a New Penalties-Adjusted Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score

,
and
1
Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
2
MDSTAT Consulting, Lyon, France
3
Hospital Necker Enfants Malades, APHP, and CNRS Unit FR 3636, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a rare allergic eye condition that occurs in children and is characterised by a combination of debilitating symptoms. Repeated use of topical corticosteroid rescue therapy is often necessary in severe forms. This study aims to assess the validity of a new composite endpoint: the penalties-adjusted corneal staining score (PACS-S) proposed as primary endpoint in VEKTIS trial evaluating the efficacy of a new corticosteroid-sparing treatment, VERKAZIA® (ciclosporin 1 mg/ml eye drops), in severe VKC patients. Methodology: This research comprised a systematic literature review to identify efficacy endpoints being proposed in clinical trials for pediatric patients with severe VKC, followed by a remote expert advisory board assessing the validity of the PACS-S. Results: While no agreed or validated endpoint for assessing efficacy in VKC was identified when VEKTIS trial started, the experts’ board acknowledged a high face validity of PACS-S as a subjective integrated measure matching the current clinical practice. A fair external validity was considered with regards to VEKTIS trial secondary endpoints. Conclusion: PACS-S appears to be a reliable, valid and clinically meaningful primary endpoint that allows significant improvement over existing endpoints in severe VKC trials. Additional research is needed to validate this endpoint.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.