Intestinal Permeation Characteristics via Non-Everted Gut Sac of Diterpene Lactones from Pure Andrographolide and Three Different Andrographis Extracts: An Investigation into Liqui-Mass with Different Solvents
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Plant Material and Extract
2.1.2. Chemicals and Solvents
2.1.3. Animals
2.2. AG and DDAG Solubility
2.3. Preparation of Physical Mixture and Liqui-Mass
2.4. Content Determination
2.5. Solid-State Investigation
2.6. In Vitro Release
2.7. Ex Vivo Intestinal Permeation
2.7.1. Isolation of Intestinal Segments
2.7.2. Permeability Study
2.7.3. Data Assessment
2.8. HPLC Method for AG Determination
2.9. Statistical Evaluation
3. Results
3.1. Solubility of AG and DDAG
3.2. Liqui-Mass and Physical Mixture Powder of AG and DDAG
3.2.1. Physical Appearance and AG Content
3.2.2. Solid State Analysis
3.2.3. In Vitro Release Behaviors and Parameters
3.2.4. Intestinal Permeation Profiles and Parameters
- AG-LM vs. AG-PM
- 2.
- APE-LM vs. APE-PM
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| A. paniculata | Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees |
| AG | Andrographolide |
| APE | Andrographis paniculata extract |
| APN | Andrograpanin |
| C0 | Initial concentration |
| CI | Crystallinity index |
| CO2 | Carbon dioxide |
| CSD | Colloidal silicon dioxide |
| DDAG | 14-Deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrographolide |
| DG | Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether |
| ER | Permeability enhancement ratio |
| EtOH | Absolute ethanol |
| HCl | Hydrochloric acid |
| HPLC | High-performance liquid chromatography |
| IACUC KKU | Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Khon Kaen University |
| Jss | Permeation flux |
| LM | Liqui-mass |
| Log Po/w | Log octanol-water partition coefficients |
| M⟶S | Mucosal-to-serosal |
| NAG | Neoandrographolide |
| Neusilin | Neusilin® US2 |
| NMP | N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone |
| O2 | Oxygen |
| Papp | Apparent permeability |
| PBS | Phosphate-buffered saline |
| P-gp | P-glycoprotein |
| PM | Physical mixture |
| PXRD | Powder X-ray diffraction |
| QP-120min | Cumulative permeating amount per area at 120 min |
| QR-5min | Percentage cumulative release at 5 min |
| RE120min | Release efficiency within a 120 min timeframe |
| RH | Relative humidity |
| S⟶M | Serosal-to-Mucosal |
| SD | Standard deviation |
| TLC | Thin-layer chromatographic |
References
- Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, Q.; Yang, S.; Wang, C. Advancing Herbal Medicine: Enhancing Product Quality and Safety through Robust Quality Control Practices. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1265178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaipakdee, N.; Limpongsa, E.; Sripanidkulchai, B.; Piyachaturawat, P. Preparation of Curcuma Comosa Tablets Using Liquisolid Techniques: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 553, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaipakdee, N.; Tabboon, P.; Limpongsa, E. Application of a Liquisolid Technique to Cannabis Sativa Extract Compacts: Effect of Liquid Vehicles on the Dissolution Enhancement and Stability of Cannabinoids. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 612, 121277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tan, O.J.; Loo, H.L.; Thiagarajah, G.; Palanisamy, U.D.; Sundralingam, U. Improving Oral Bioavailability of Medicinal Herbal Compounds through Lipid-Based Formulations—A Scoping Review. Phytomedicine 2021, 90, 153651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wani, S.U.D.; Kakkar, V.; Gautam, S.P.; Hv, G.; Ali, M.; Masoodi, M.H.; Moin, A. Enhancing Therapeutic Potential of Poor Aqueous Soluble Herbal Drugs through Solid Dispersion-An Overview. Phytomed. Plus 2021, 1, 100069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabboon, P.; Pongjanyakul, T.; Limpongsa, E.; Jaipakdee, N. In Vitro Release, Mucosal Permeation and Deposition of Cannabidiol from Liquisolid Systems: The Influence of Liquid Vehicles. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pornpitchanarong, C.; Akkaramongkolporn, P.; Nattapulwat, N.; Opanasopit, P.; Patrojanasophon, P. Development and Optimization of Andrographis paniculata Extract-Loaded Self-Microemulsifying Drug Delivery System Using Experimental Design Model. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M.S.; Urbi, Z.; Sule, A.; Hafizur Rahman, K.M. Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall. Ex Nees: A Review of Ethnobotany, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacology. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 274905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, Y.; Chen, S.-R.; Chai, L.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Overview of Pharmacological Activities of Andrographis paniculata and Its Major Compound Andrographolide. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, S17–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Singh, B.; Bajpai, V. Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees: Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, Pharmacological Properties and Quality Control/Quality Assurance. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 275, 114054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adiguna, S.P.; Panggabean, J.A.; Atikana, A.; Untari, F.; Izzati, F.; Bayu, A.; Rosyidah, A.; Rahmawati, S.I.; Putra, M.Y. Antiviral Activities of Andrographolide and Its Derivatives: Mechanism of Action and Delivery System. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Intharuksa, A.; Arunotayanun, W.; Yooin, W.; Sirisa-ard, P. A Comprehensive Review of Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees and Its Constituents as Potential Lead Compounds for COVID-19 Drug Discovery. Molecules 2022, 27, 4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, B.; Wei, A.; Zhou, Q.; Yuan, M.; Lei, K.; Liu, Y.; Song, J.; Guo, L.; Ye, Q. Andrographolide: A Review of Its Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Toxicity and Clinical Trials and Pharmaceutical Researches. Phytother. Res. PTR 2022, 36, 336–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loureiro Damasceno, J.P.; Silva da Rosa, H.; Silva de Araújo, L.; Jacometti Cardoso Furtado, N.A. Andrographis paniculata Formulations: Impact on Diterpene Lactone Oral Bioavailability. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2022, 47, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sareer, O.; Ahmad, S.; Umar, S. Andrographis paniculata: A Critical Appraisal of Extraction, Isolation and Quantification of Andrographolide and Other Active Constituents. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 2081–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pholphana, N.; Rangkadilok, N.; Thongnest, S.; Ruchirawat, S.; Ruchirawat, M.; Satayavivad, J. Determination and Variation of Three Active Diterpenoids in Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees. Phytochem. Anal. 2004, 15, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawar, A.; Rajalakshmi, S.; Mehta, P.; Shaikh, K.; Bothiraja, C. Strategies for Formulation Development of Andrographolide. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 69282–69300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, L.; Wang, T.; Tang, L.; Liu, W.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, Z.; Cai, Z.; Hu, M.; Liu, Z. Poor Oral Bioavailability of a Promising Anticancer Agent Andrographolide Is Due to Extensive Metabolism and Efflux by P-glycoprotein. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 100, 5007–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, C.-C.; Liu, Y.-T.; Lin, Y.-J.; Yang, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-C.; Yao, H.-T.; Chen, H.-W.; Li, C.-K. Bioavailability of the Diterpenoid 14-Deoxy-11,12-Didehydroandrographolide in Rats and up-Regulation of Hepatic Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme and Drug Transporter Expression. Phytomedicine 2019, 61, 152841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehtani, D.; Seth, A.; Sharma, P.; Maheshwari, R.; Abed, S.N.; Deb, P.K.; Chougule, M.B.; Tekade, R.K. Chapter 9—Dissolution Profile Consideration in Pharmaceutical Product Development. In Dosage Form Design Considerations; Tekade, R.K., Ed.; Advances in Pharmaceutical Product Development and Research; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 287–336. ISBN 978-0-12-814423-7. [Google Scholar]
- Rangkadilok, N.; Pholphana, N.; Akanimanee, J.; Panomvana, D.; Puranajoti, P.; Songvut, P.; Satayavivad, J. Comparison of Diterpenoid Contents and Dissolution Profiles of Selected Andrographis paniculata Crude and Extract Capsules. Phytochem. Anal. PCA 2024, 35, 1309–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.K.; Chen, H.L.; Chen, L.L.; Jiang, H.; Liu, R.; Pei, Z.C.; Li, K.; Wei, Z.P.; Xu, H. Andrographolide Liquisolid Using Porous-Starch as the Adsorbent with Enhanced Oral Bioavailability in Rats. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 112, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tabboon, P.; Limpongsa, E.; Samrid, R.; Wechprakhon, S.; Niyommoh, J.; Jaipakdee, N. Liquisolid Powders of Andrographis paniculata Extract: Physicochemical Attributes, Dissolution, Oral Bioavailability, Stability, and Acute Toxicity. J. Pharm. Investig. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parveen, R.; Ahmad, F.J.; Iqbal, Z.; Samim, M.; Ahmad, S. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles of Anticancer Drug Andrographolide: Formulation, in Vitro and in Vivo Studies. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2014, 40, 1206–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shrivastava, S.; Kaur, C.D. Development of Andrographolide-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Lymphatic Targeting: Formulation, Optimization, Characterization, in Vitro, and in Vivo Evaluation. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2023, 13, 658–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syukri, Y.; Martien, R.; Lukitaningsih, E.; Nugroho, A.E. Novel Self-Nano Emulsifying Drug Delivery System (SNEDDS) of Andrographolide Isolated from Andrographis paniculata Nees: Characterization, in-Vitro and in-Vivo Assessment. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2018, 47, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Sheng, H.-H.; Feng, N.-P.; Wei, H.; Wang, Z.-T.; Wang, C.-H. Preparation of Andrographolide-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Their in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluations: Characteristics, Release, Absorption, Transports, Pharmacokinetics, and Antihyperlipidemic Activity. J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 102, 4414–4425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komala, D.R.; Janga, K.Y.; Jukanti, R.; Bandari, S.; Vijayagopal, M. Competence of Raloxifene Hydrochloride Loaded Liquisolid Compacts for Improved Dissolution and Intestinal Permeation. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2015, 30, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mohizea, A.M.; Zawaneh, F.; Alam, M.A.; Al-Jenoobi, F.I.; El-Maghraby, G.M. Effect of Pharmaceutical Excipients on the Permeability of P-Glycoprotein Substrate. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2014, 24, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mady, O.Y.; Thabit, S.M.; Abo Elnasr, S.E.; Hedaya, A.A. An Industrial Procedure for the Intestinal Permeability Enhancement of Acyclovir: In-Vitro and Histological Evidence. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, M.; Ghafourian, T.; Nokhodchi, A. Liqui-Pellet: The Emerging Next-Generation Oral Dosage Form Which Stems from Liquisolid Concept in Combination with Pelletization Technology. AAPS PharmSciTech 2019, 20, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.; Devani, P.; Dudhat, K.; Dudhrejiya, A.; Pashavan, C.; Mori, D. Application of Liquisolid Pellets Technology for Improving Dissolution of Posaconazole: A DoE Based Process Optimization. J. Pharm. Innov. 2024, 19, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabboon, P.; Limpongsa, E.; Tuntiyasawasdikul, S.; Jarungsirawat, R.; Pongjanyakul, T.; Jaipakdee, N. Screening the Potential of Pharmaceutical Liquids on Enhancing Dissolution, Intestinal Permeation, and Stability of Mitragyna Speciosa Bioactive for Peroral Delivery Systems. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 225, 120525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United States Pharmacopeia. Powdered Andrographis; United States Pharmacopeia: Rockville, MD, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaipakdee, N.; Tabboon, P.; Pongjanyakul, T.; Limpongsa, E. Skin Deposition and Permeation Kinetics of Cannabidiol and Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol from Cannabis Extract Containing Gels. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2024, 101, 106160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaipakdee, N.; Tabboon, P.; Jarungsirawat, R.; Khetklang, K.; Phumart, P.; Pongjanyakul, T.; Sakloetsakun, D. Synergistic Impact of Pretreatment by Planetary Ball Milling on the Efficiency of Chemical Modifications of Glutinous Starch through Thiolation: Synthesis and Characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 314, 144332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maiti, K.; Mukherjee, K.; Murugan, V.; Saha, B.P.; Mukherjee, P.K. Enhancing Bioavailability and Hepatoprotective Activity of Andrographolide from Andrographis paniculata, a Well-Known Medicinal Food, through Its Herbosome. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabboon, P.; Limpongsa, E.; Jarungsirawat, R.; Wechprakhon, S.; Niyommoh, J.; Wantong, A.; Jaipakdee, N. Development of Salt-Assisted Liquid–Liquid Extraction for Simultaneous Quantification of Andrographolide and 14-Deoxy-11,12-Didehydroandrographolide in Plasma Using HPLC-DAD: Method Validation and Pharmacokinetic Assessment Application. Analytica 2025, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Cheng, M.; Yuan, F.; He, J.; Feng, Y.; Jin, Y.; Feng, J.; Yang, S.; Tu, L. Enhancing Oral Bioavailability of Andrographolide via Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and D-α-Tocopherol Polyethylene Glycol 1000 Succinate Copolymer Modified Nanocrystals. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 79, 104006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, A.N.; Sinko, P.J.; Singh, Y. (Eds.) Martin’s Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences: Physical Chemical and Biopharmaceutical Principles in the Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6th ed.; 50th Anniversary ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-0-7817-9766-5. [Google Scholar]
- Murdande, S.B.; Pikal, M.J.; Shanker, R.M.; Bogner, R.H. Aqueous Solubility of Crystalline and Amorphous Drugs: Challenges in Measurement. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2011, 16, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.Y.; Abdullah, L.C.; Rahman, R.A.; Abas, F.; Chong, G.H. Role of Polymers as Crystal Growth Inhibitors in Coprecipitation via Solution-Enhanced Dispersion by Supercritical Fluids (SEDS) to Improve Andrographolide Dissolution from Standardized Andrographis paniculata Extract. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 50, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Ma, Y.; Xie, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yue, P.; Yang, M. Design and Evaluation of Novel Solid Self-Nanodispersion Delivery System for Andrographolide. AAPS PharmSciTech 2017, 18, 1572–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shalaev, E.; Wu, K.; Shamblin, S.; Krzyzaniak, J.F.; Descamps, M. Crystalline Mesophases: Structure, Mobility, and Pharmaceutical Properties. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 100, 194–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, P.; De Wulf, O.; Laru, J.; Heikkilä, T.; van Veen, B.; Kiesvaara, J.; Hirvonen, J.; Peltonen, L.; Laaksonen, T. Dissolution Studies of Poorly Soluble Drug Nanosuspensions in Non-Sink Conditions. AAPS PharmSciTech 2013, 14, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, D.D.; Wen, H.; Taylor, L.S. Non-Sink Dissolution Conditions for Predicting Product Quality and In Vivo Performance of Supersaturating Drug Delivery Systems. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105, 2477–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, H.; Su, Y.; Wang, W.; Xiong, W.; Sun, X.; Ji, Y.; Yu, H.; Li, H.; Ouyang, D. Integrated Computer-Aided Formulation Design: A Case Study of Andrographolide/ Cyclodextrin Ternary Formulation. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 16, 494–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasiljević, I.; Turković, E.; Parojčić, J. Data-Driven Insights into the Properties of Liquisolid Systems Based on Machine Learning Algorithms. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. Off. J. Eur. Fed. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 203, 106927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.-T.-L.; Duong, V.-A.; Maeng, H.-J. Pharmaceutical Formulations with P-Glycoprotein Inhibitory Effect as Promising Approaches for Enhancing Oral Drug Absorption and Bioavailability. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, L.-P.; Chen, S.; Yu, B.-Y.; Zhu, D.-N.; Cordell, G.A.; Qiu, S.X. Prediction of Human Absorption of Natural Compounds by the Non-Everted Rat Intestinal Sac Model. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Twarog, C.; McCartney, F.; Harrison, S.M.; Illel, B.; Fattal, E.; Brayden, D.J. Comparison of the Effects of the Intestinal Permeation Enhancers, SNAC and Sodium Caprate (C10): Isolated Rat Intestinal Mucosae and Sacs. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 158, 105685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Pan, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, R.; Zhu, Y.; Pan, W. Developments in Methods for Measuring the Intestinal Absorption of Nanoparticle-Bound Drugs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balimane, P.V.; Chong, S.; Morrison, R.A. Current Methodologies Used for Evaluation of Intestinal Permeability and Absorption. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2000, 44, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagabalan, J.D.Y.; Murugaiyah, V.; Zainal, H.; Mansor, S.M.; Ramanathan, S. Intestinal Permeability of Mitragynine in Rats Using in Situ Absorption Model. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 21, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaidee, W.; Rujanapun, N.; Malee, K.; Chaisawadi, S.; Puttarak, P.; Hiransai, P.; Cordell, G.A.; Sarker, S.D.; Nahar, L.; Charoensup, R. Degradation Kinetics of Andrographolide in Aqueous Solution, Product Identification and Biological Activity Evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 28856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mai, Y.; Dou, L.; Yao, Z.; Madla, C.M.; Gavins, F.K.H.; Taherali, F.; Yin, H.; Orlu, M.; Murdan, S.; Basit, A.W. Quantification of P-Glycoprotein in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Humans and Rodents: Methodology, Gut Region, Sex, and Species Matter. Mol. Pharm. 2021, 18, 1895–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tissue-Based in Vitro and Ex Vivo Models for Intestinal Permeability Studies. In Concepts and Models for Drug Permeability Studies; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 203–236.
- Sanka, K.; Poienti, S.; Mohd, A.B.; Diwan, P.V. Improved Oral Delivery of Clonazepam through Liquisolid Powder Compact Formulations: In-Vitro and Ex-Vivo Characterization. Powder Technol. 2014, 256, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daodee, S.; Wangboonskul, J.; Jarukamjorn, K.; Sripanidkulchai, B.; Murakami, T. Membrane Transport of Andrographolide in Artificial Membrane and Rat Small Intestine. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. PJBS 2007, 10, 2078–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, D.; Paruchury, S.; Matta, M.; Chowan, G.; Subramanian, M.; Saxena, A.; Soars, M.G.; Herbst, J.; Haskell, R.; Marathe, P.; et al. A Systematic Evaluation of Solubility Enhancing Excipients to Enable the Generation of Permeability Data for Poorly Soluble Compounds in Caco-2 Model. Drug Metab. Lett. 2014, 8, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvi, M.M.; Chatterjee, P. A Prospective Analysis of Co-Processed Non-Ionic Surfactants in Enhancing Permeability of a Model Hydrophilic Drug. AAPS PharmSciTech 2013, 15, 339–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, A.G.; Kumar, A.; Gide, P.S. Formulation of Solid Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems Using N-Methyl Pyrrolidone as Cosolvent. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2015, 41, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uch, A.S.; Hesse, U.; Dressman, J.B. Use of 1-Methyl-Pyrrolidone as a Solubilizing Agent for Determining the Uptake of Poorly Soluble Drugs. Pharm. Res. 1999, 16, 968–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takahashi, Y.; Kondo, H.; Yasuda, T.; Watanabe, T.; Kobayashi, S.-I.; Yokohama, S. Common Solubilizers to Estimate the Caco-2 Transport of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 246, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phattanawasin, P.; Sotanaphun, U.; Burana-Osot, J.; Piyapolrungroj, N. Isolation and Characterization of the Acid and Base Degradation Products of Andrographolide. Pharmazie 2018, 73, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rattanaya, T.; Chuangrattanawan, C.; Chootip, K.; Pekthong, D.; Plubrukarn, A. Fates of Diterpene Lactones in Storage Andrographis paniculata Extracts. Phytochem. Anal. PCA 2025, 36, 1367–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Juge, N. Relationship between Mucosa-Associated Gut Microbiota and Human Diseases. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2022, 50, 1225–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, D.; Hu, W.; Fu, B.; Zhao, X.; You, G.; Xie, C.; Wang, H.Y.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Z.; et al. Gut Microbiota-Mediated C-Sulfonate Metabolism Impairs the Bioavailability and Anti-Cholestatic Efficacy of Andrographolide. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2387402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catalkaya, G.; Venema, K.; Lucini, L.; Rocchetti, G.; Delmas, D.; Daglia, M.; De Filippis, A.; Xiao, H.; Quiles, J.L.; Xiao, J.; et al. Interaction of Dietary Polyphenols and Gut Microbiota: Microbial Metabolism of Polyphenols, Influence on the Gut Microbiota, and Implications on Host Health. Food Front. 2020, 1, 109–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, L.; Liang, F.; Yang, X.; Shi, J.; Wang, F.; Liu, W.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Z. Oral bioavailability and intestinal disposition of dehydroandrographolide in rats. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2012, 32, 1074–1081. [Google Scholar]
- Bélair, V.; Orsat, V.; Maheux, M.; Lafrance, C.-P.; Brochu, M.; Lightburn, B.; Moss, R. Permeability of Native and Digested Polyphenols from Apple, Blueberry and Cranberry Extracts Using PAMPA Membrane Permeability Assays. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021, 101, 103945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermaak, I.; Viljoen, A.M.; Chen, W.; Hamman, J.H. In Vitro Transport of the Steroidal Glycoside P57 from Hoodia Gordonii across Excised Porcine Intestinal and Buccal Tissue. Phytomed. Int. J. Phytother. Phytopharm. 2011, 18, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woottisin, N.; Sukprasert, S.; Kulsirirat, T.; Tharavanij, T.; Sathirakul, K. Evaluation of the Intestinal Permeability of Rosmarinic Acid from Thunbergia Laurifolia Leaf Water Extract in a Caco-2 Cell Model. Molecules 2022, 27, 3884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, J.; Schiborr, C.; Kocher, A.; Meins, J.; Behnam, D.; Schubert-Zsilavecz, M.; Abdel-Tawab, M. Transepithelial Transport of Curcumin in Caco-2 Cells Is Significantly Enhanced by Micellar Solubilisation. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2017, 72, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Shi, Y.; Han, Y.; Tang, X.; Bi, R.; Pan, L.; Lai, X. One-Way Intestinal Perfusion of PVP/VA–Poloxamer 188–Curcuma Longa L. Extract Solid Dispersion in Rats In Vivo and Its Effect on HSC–T6 Cell Proliferation. AAPS PharmSciTech 2022, 23, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Q.; Luan, X.; Zheng, M.; Tian, X.-H.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.-D.; Ma, B.-L. Synergistic Mechanisms of Constituents in Herbal Extracts during Intestinal Absorption: Focus on Natural Occurring Nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Hu, J.; Wang, B.; Sheng, L.; Liu, Z.; Yang, S.; Li, Y. Inhibitory Effects of Herbal Constituents on P-Glycoprotein in Vitro and in Vivo: Herb-Drug Interactions Mediated via P-Gp. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2014, 275, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, C.Y.; Tan, B.K. Hypotensive Activity of Aqueous Extract of Andrographis paniculata in Rats. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 1996, 23, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoopan, N.; Thisoda, P.; Rangkadilok, N.; Sahasitiwat, S.; Pholphana, N.; Ruchirawat, S.; Satayavivad, J. Cardiovascular Effects of 14-Deoxy-11,12-Didehydroandrographolide and Andrographis paniculata Extracts. Planta Medica 2007, 73, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United States Pharmacopeia. Powdered Andrographis Extract; United States Pharmacopeia: Rockville, MD, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eddy, N.O.; Awe, F.E.; Siaka, A.A.; Magaji, L.; Ebenso, E.E. Chemical Information From GC-MS Studies of Ethanol Extract of Andrographis paniculata and Their Corrosion Inhibition Potentials on Mild Steel in HCl Solution. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2011, 6, 4316–4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalaivani, C.; Sathish, S.; Janakiraman, N.; Johnson, M. GC-MS Studies on Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Wall. Ex Nees—A Medicinally Important Plant. Int. J. Med. Aromat. Plants 2012, 2, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
- Shrivastava, P.; Nayak, K.K.; Jha, Z.; Kolla, V. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Chloroform Extracts Of Andrographis Paniculata: Identification of Phytochemicals and Discovery of Novel Bioactive Compounds. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2025, 11, 8415–8422. [Google Scholar]
- Dulara, B.K.; Godara, P.; Barwer, N. In-Vivo and In-Vitro Phytochemical GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Constituents of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees. Pharma Innov. J. 2019, 8, 255–261. [Google Scholar]
- Kurzawa, M.; Filipiak-Szok, A.; Kłodzińska, E.; Szłyk, E. Determination of Phytochemicals, Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content in Andrographis paniculata Using Chromatographic Methods. J. Chromatogr. B 2015, 995–996, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.; Rao, K.; Bhuvaneswari, C.; Giri, A.; Mangamoori, L.N. Phytochemical Analysis of Andrographis paniculata Extract and Its Antimicrobial Activity. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fox, L.T.; Gerber, M.; Plessis, J.D.; Hamman, J.H. Transdermal Drug Delivery Enhancement by Compounds of Natural Origin. Molecules 2011, 16, 10507–10540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthusamy, G.; Gunaseelan, S.; Prasad, N.R. Ferulic Acid Reverses P-Glycoprotein-Mediated Multidrug Resistance via Inhibition of PI3K/Akt/NF-κB Signaling Pathway. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2019, 63, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muthusamy, G.; Balupillai, A.; Ramasamy, K.; Shanmugam, M.; Gunaseelan, S.; Mary, B.; Prasad, N.R. Ferulic Acid Reverses ABCB1-Mediated Paclitaxel Resistance in MDR Cell Lines. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 786, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Liu, F.; Xiang, J.; He, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, W.; Tan, S. A Critical Review of Spray-Dried Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Synthesis, Analysis and Application. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 594, 120165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahan, A.; Beig, A.; Ioffe-Dahan, V.; Agbaria, R.; Miller, J.M. The Twofold Advantage of the Amorphous Form as an Oral Drug Delivery Practice for Lipophilic Compounds: Increased Apparent Solubility and Drug Flux Through the Intestinal Membrane. AAPS J. 2012, 15, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hancock, B.C.; Zografi, G. Characteristics and Significance of the Amorphous State in Pharmaceutical Systems. J. Pharm. Sci. 1997, 86, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Lansley, A.B.; Duong, T.N.; Smart, J.D.; Pannala, A.S. Increasing Cellular Uptake and Permeation of Curcumin Using a Novel Polymer-Surfactant Formulation. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, H.; Chen, L.; Rui, T.; Wang, J.; Chen, T.; Fu, T.; Li, J.; Di, L. Fabrication and in Vitro/in Vivo Evaluation of Amorphous Andrographolide Nanosuspensions Stabilized by D-α-Tocopheryl Polyethylene Glycol 1000 Succinate/Sodium Lauryl Sulfate. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1033–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhaojie, M.; Ming, Z.; Shengnan, W.; Xiaojia, B.; Hatch, G.M.; Jingkai, G.; Li, C. Amorphous Solid Dispersion of Berberine with Absorption Enhancer Demonstrates a Remarkable Hypoglycemic Effect via Improving Its Bioavailability. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 467, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Dong, W.; Ye, J.; Hao, H.; Zhou, J.; Wang, R.; Liu, Y. A Novel Matrix Dispersion Based on Phospholipid Complex for Improving Oral Bioavailability of Baicalein: Preparation, in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluations. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 720–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maloka, I.E.; Ibrahim, S.Y. Physical Properties of Aqueous N-Methyl Pyrrolidone at Different Temperatures. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2004, 22, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, C. Advanced Pharmaceutics: Physiochemical Principles; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-0-8493-1729-3. [Google Scholar]
- Osborne, D.W.; Musakhanian, J. Skin Penetration and Permeation Properties of Transcutol®—Neat or Diluted Mixtures. AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 3512–3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheskey, P.J.; Cook, W.G.; Cable, C.G. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, 8th ed.; Pharmaceutical Press American Pharmacists Association: London, UK; Washington, DC, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-0-85711-271-2. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W.; Lamey, K.A.; Oh, C. Carvedilol Pharmasolve Solvate. Australia AU2003231307A1, 2 May 2003. [Google Scholar]
- SCOEL/REC/119 N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidone: Recommendation from the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits; Bolt, H.M., Greim, H., Cocker, J., Hartwig, A., Hoffmann, S., Johanson, G., Levy, L., Manno, M., Santonen, T., Papameletiou, D., et al., Eds.; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2016; ISBN 978-92-79-53351-8. [Google Scholar]
- Sitarek, K.; Stetkiewicz, J. Assessment of Reproductive Toxicity and Gonadotoxic Potential of N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidone in Male Rats. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2008, 21, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| AG and APEs | AG and APE Formulations | Liquid Solvent Type | AG or APE Percentage in AG-Solvent or APE-Solvent Mixture (%w/w) | Composition (%w/w) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG or APE | Liquid Solvent | Neusilin-CSD | ||||
| Pure AG | AG-PM | - | n/a | 5 | 0 | 95 |
| AG-NMP | NMP | 10 | 5 | 45 | 50 | |
| AG-DG | DG | 10 | 5 | 45 | 50 | |
| AG-1/1 NMP/DG | 1/1 NMP/DG | 10 | 5 | 45 | 50 | |
| AG-1/2 NMP/DG | 1/2 NMP/DG | 10 | 5 | 45 | 50 | |
| APE-1 | APE-1-PM | - | n/a | 10 | 0 | 90 |
| APE-1-NMP | NMP | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| APE-1-DG | DG | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| APE-1-1/1 NMP/DG | 1/1 NMP/DG | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| APE-1-1/2 NMP/DG | 1/2 NMP/DG | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| APE-2 | APE-2-PM | - | n/a | 10 | 0 | 90 |
| APE-2-NMP | NMP | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| APE-2-DG | DG | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| APE-2-1/1 NMP/DG | 1/1 NMP/DG | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| APE-3 | APE-3-PM | - | n/a | 10 | 0 | 90 |
| APE-3-NMP | NMP | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| APE-3-DG | DG | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| APE-3-1/1 NMP/DG | 1/1 NMP/DG | 20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | |
| Solvents and Medium | Solubility Values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AG | DDAG | ||
| Solvents (30 °C) | NMP * | >9.65 %w/w | 5.30 ± 0.21%w/w |
| DG | 5.13 ± 0.18 %w/w | 4.71 ± 0.15 %w/w | |
| 1:1 NMP/DG * | >9.09 %w/w | 5.28 ± 0.32 %w/w | |
| 1:2 NMP/DG | 7.84 ± 0.31 %w/w | 4.52 ± 0.22 %w/w | |
| Aqueous media (37 °C) | DI water | 0.24 ± 0.01 mg/mL | 0.04 ± 0.01 mg/mL |
| 0.1 M HCl | 0.25 ± 0.05 mg/mL | 0.02 ± 0.01 mg/mL | |
| pH 6.8 phosphate buffer | 0.30 ± 0.02 mg/mL | 0.05 ± 0.01 mg/mL | |
| AG and APE | AG and APE Formulations | AG Content in Powder | DDAG Content in Powder | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Loading (%) * | Actual Loading (%) ** | Theoretical Loading (%) * | Actual Loading (%) ** | ||
| Pure AG | AG-PM | 5.0 | 94.8 ± 4.5 | N/A | N/A |
| AG-NMP | 5.0 | 98.9 ± 2.4 | N/A | N/A | |
| AG-DG | 5.0 | 101.5 ± 2.7 | N/A | N/A | |
| AG-1/1 NMP/DG | 5.0 | 101.9 ± 0.9 | N/A | N/A | |
| AG-1/2 NMP/DG | 5.0 | 100.1 ± 0.5 | N/A | N/A | |
| APE-1 | APE-1-PM | 2.41 | 87.6 ± 9.5 | 0.41 | 80.5 ± 13.4 |
| APE-1-NMP | 2.41 | 96.8 ± 0.5 | 0.41 | 98.0 ± 0.6 | |
| APE-1-DG | 2.41 | 101.5 ± 0.2 | 0.41 | 101.7 ± 0.2 | |
| APE-1-1/1 NMP/DG | 2.41 | 101.3 ± 0.2 | 0.41 | 100.3 ± 0.4 | |
| APE-1-1/2 NMP/DG | 2.41 | 98.5 ± 0.3 | 0.41 | 98.5 ± 0.2 | |
| APE-2 | APE-2-PM | 1.71 | 88.8 ± 10.3 | 0.58 | 82.3 ± 10.8 |
| APE-2-NMP | 1.71 | 99.2 ± 1.6 | 0.58 | 101.5 ± 1.6 | |
| APE-2-DG | 1.71 | 99.9 ± 0.6 | 0.58 | 96.5 ± 1.3 | |
| APE-2-1/1 NMP/DG | 1.71 | 100.2 ± 0.6 | 0.58 | 103.2 ±1.4 | |
| APE-3 | APE-3-PM | 1.49 | 98.3 ± 11.2 | 1.38 | 93.7 ± 13.8 |
| APE-3-NMP | 1.49 | 101.1 ± 2.5 | 1.38 | 96.7 ± 1.3 | |
| APE-3-DG | 1.49 | 101.9 ± 1.2 | 1.38 | 97.2 ± 0.1 | |
| APE-3-1/1 NMP/DG | 1.49 | 101.1 ± 2.8 | 1.38 | 97.4 ± 1.6 | |
| AG and APE | AG and APE Formulations | AG | DDAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QR-5min-AG (%) | RE120min-AG (%) | QR-5min-DDAG (%) | RE120min-DDAG (%) | ||
| Pure AG | AG-PM | 9.0 ± 0.6 a | 31.0 ± 2.3 a | N/A | N/A |
| AG-NMP | 87.1 ± 2.4 b,* | 87.0 ± 2.6 b,* | N/A | N/A | |
| AG-DG | 24.8 ± 2.3 c,* | 46.1 ± 0.8 c,* | N/A | N/A | |
| AG-1/1 NMP/DG | 33.9 ± 4.5 d,* | 58.4 ± 0.4 d,* | N/A | N/A | |
| AG-1/2 NMP/DG | 29.4 ± 0.8 c,* | 49.8 ± 0.7 c,* | N/A | N/A | |
| APE-1 | APE-1-PM | 13.1 ± 1.9 a | 23.7 ± 2.2 e | 23.9 ± 4.4 a | 57.3 ± 5.5 a |
| APE-1-NMP | 90.8 ± 1.3 b,* | 95.9 ± 0.9 f,* | 60.1 ± 1.9 b,* | 83.9 ± 0.5 b,* | |
| APE-1-DG | 40.6 ± 1.0 e,* | 49.6 ± 0.2 c,* | 59.6 ± 0.4 b,* | 83.7 ± 0.7 b,* | |
| APE-1-1/1 NMP/DG | 87.81 ± 1.5 b,* | 91.7 ± 0.8 f,* | 58.8 ± 2.3 b,* | 81.9 ± 0.5 b,* | |
| APE-1-1/2 NMP/DG | 91.3 ± 0.3 b,* | 93.4 ± 0.4 f,* | 60.5 ± 0.7 b,* | 83.8 ± 0.5 b,* | |
| APE-2 | APE-2-PM | 67.7 ± 3.4 f | 96.0 ± 7.7 f | 37.7 ± 2.0 c | 72.3 ± 3.7 c |
| APE-2-NMP | 99.8 ± 1.7 g,* | 100.5 ± 0.7 g | 76.0 ± 2.4 d,* | 89.0 ± 0.3 d,* | |
| APE-2-DG | 89.3 ± 2.6 b,* | 92.1 ± 1.1 f | 65.2 ± 4.0 b,* | 79.6 ± 0.6 b,* | |
| APE-2-1/1 NMP/DG | 94.7 ± 2.3 g,* | 97.8 ± 0.6 f | 69.7 ± 1.7 e,* | 85.3 ± 0.7 b,* | |
| APE-3 | APE-3-PM | 43.9 ± 2.2 e | 83.7 ± 1.8 b | 18.3 ± 1.5 a | 50.5 ± 0.4 e |
| APE-3-NMP | 96.1 ± 2.3 g,* | 98.2 ± 0.9 f,* | 67.6 ± 3.6 e,* | 82.8 ± 0.7 b,* | |
| APE-3-DG | 91.5 ± 2.9 b,* | 94.5 ± 1.9 f,* | 67.9 ± 3.2 e,* | 81.7 ± 2.0 b,* | |
| APE-3-1/1 NMP/DG | 94.6 ± 1.1 g,* | 98.0 ± 0.3 f,* | 65.4 ± 1.9 b,* | 82.0 ± 0.5 b,* | |
| AG and APE | AG and APE Formulations | Jss-AG (ng·cm−2·min−1) | QP-120min-AG (µg·cm−2) | Papp-AG (×10−5 cm·s−1) | ERAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pure AG | AG-PM | 19.3 ± 8.4 a | 2.5 ± 1.0 a | 0.11 ± 0.05 a | 1.0 ± 0.4 a |
| AG-NMP | 49.1 ± 16.3 a,* | 6.8 ± 2.0 a,* | 0.27 ± 0.09 a,* | 2.5 ± 0.8 b,* | |
| AG-DG | 28.3 ± 13.3 a | 4.0 ± 1.9 a | 0.16 ± 0.07 a | 1.5 ± 0.7 a | |
| AG-1/1 NMP/DG | 48.8 ± 6.0 a,* | 7.4 ± 0.7 a,* | 0.27 ± 0.03 a,* | 2.5 ± 0.3 b,* | |
| AG-1/2 NMP/DG | 44.5 ± 6.9 a,* | 5.8 ± 0.8 a,* | 0.25 ± 0.04 a,* | 2.3 ± 0.4 b,* | |
| APE-1 | APE-1-PM | 221.4 ± 59.1 b | 26.5 ± 7.3 b | 1.22 ± 0.33 b | 1.0 ± 0.3 a |
| APE-1-NMP | 360.7 ± 52.9 c,* | 37.8 ± 5.6 b | 1.99 ± 0.29 c,* | 1.6 ± 0.2 a,* | |
| APE-1-DG | 285.5 ± 43.5 b | 31.9 ± 6.1 b | 1.58 ± 0.24 b | 1.3 ± 0.2 a | |
| APE-1-1/1 NMP/DG | 361.9 ± 63.7 c,* | 42.4 ± 9.9 c,* | 2.00 ± 0.35 c,* | 1.6 ± 0.3 a,* | |
| APE-1-1/2 NMP/DG | 372.6 ± 44.7 c,* | 43.3 ± 6.0 c,* | 2.06 ± 0.25 c,* | 1.7 ± 0.2 a,* | |
| APE-2 | APE-2-PM | 504.4 ± 88.8 d | 57.1 ± 8.0 c | 2.78 ± 0.49 c | 1.0 ± 0.2 a |
| APE-2-NMP | 543.0 ± 82.4 d | 65.5 ± 13.3 d | 3.00 ± 0.45 d | 1.1 ± 0.2 a | |
| APE-2-DG | 486.4 ± 62.0 c | 58.0 ± 8.0 c | 2.68 ± 0.34 c | 1.0 ± 0.1 a | |
| APE-2-1/1 NMP/DG | 521.3 ± 73.2 d | 61.2 ± 8.4 d | 2.88 ± 0.40 d | 1.0 ± 0.2 a | |
| APE-3 | APE-3-PM | 440.0 ± 93.4 c | 47.6 ± 7.1 c | 2.43 ± 0.52 c | 1.0 ± 0.2 a |
| APE-3-NMP | 779.4 ± 80.4 e,* | 94.1 ± 10.2 e,* | 4.30 ± 0.44 e,* | 1.8 ± 0.2 b,* | |
| APE-3-DG | 650.5 ± 119.3 d,* | 74.4 ± 13.2 d,* | 3.59 ± 0.66 d,* | 1.5 ± 0.3 a,* | |
| APE-3-1/1 NMP/DG | 900.8 ± 154.4 e,* | 104.8 ± 13.4 e,* | 4.97 ± 0.85 e,* | 2.1 ± 0.4 b,* |
| APEs | APE Formulations | Jss-DDAG (ng·cm−2·min−1) | QP-120min-DDAG (µg·cm−2) | Papp-DDAG (×10−5 cm·s−1) | ERDDAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APE-1 | APE-1-PM | 171.3 ± 31.6 a | 20.3 ± 4.0 b | 5.95 ± 1.10 a | 1.0 ± 0.2 a |
| APE-1-NMP | 183.4 ± 18.2 a | 21.8 ± 1.9 b | 6.37 ± 0.63 a | 1.1 ± 0.1 a | |
| APE-1-DG | 168.4 ± 28.6 a | 19.8 ± 3.6 b | 5.85 ± 0.99 a | 1.0 ± 0.2 a | |
| APE-1-1/1 NMP/DG | 188.5 ± 26.7 a | 22.8 ± 4.6 b | 6.55 ± 0.93 a | 1.1 ± 0.2 a | |
| APE-1-1/2 NMP/DG | 203.5 ± 22.4 a | 24.3 ± 3.0 b | 7.07 ± 0.78 a | 1.2 ± 0.1 a | |
| APE-2 | APE-2-PM | 212.4 ± 16.8 a | 25.5 ± 1.9 b | 7.37 ± 0.58 a | 1.0 ± 0.1 a |
| APE-2-NMP | 303.0 ± 18.7 b,* | 35.7 ± 4.4 c,* | 10.52 ± 0.65 b,* | 1.4 ± 0.1 b,* | |
| APE-2-DG | 285.7 ± 45.7 b,* | 34.1 ± 5.8 c,* | 9.92 ± 1.59 b,* | 1.3 ± 0.2 a,* | |
| APE-2-1/1 NMP/DG | 272.6 ± 31.1 b,* | 32.8 ± 3.6 c,* | 9.47 ± 1.08 b,* | 1.3 ± 0.1 a,* | |
| APE-3 | APE-3-PM | 208.4 ± 20.7 a | 24.4 ± 4.0 b | 7.24 ± 0.72 a | 1.0 ± 0.1 a |
| APE-3-NMP | 551.8 ± 67.6 c,* | 68.1 ± 8.1 d,* | 19.16 ± 2.35 c,* | 2.6 ± 0.3 c,* | |
| APE-3-DG | 455.9 ± 51.0 d,* | 54.5 ± 7.0 e,* | 15.83 ± 1.77 d,* | 2.2 ± 0.2 d,* | |
| APE-3-1/1 NMP/DG | 570.6 ± 73.5 c,* | 71.0 ± 8.2 d,* | 19.81 ± 2.55 c,* | 2.7 ± 0.4 c,* |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Tabboon, P.; Limpongsa, E.; Rongthong, T.; Pongjanyakul, T.; Jaipakdee, N. Intestinal Permeation Characteristics via Non-Everted Gut Sac of Diterpene Lactones from Pure Andrographolide and Three Different Andrographis Extracts: An Investigation into Liqui-Mass with Different Solvents. Pharmaceutics 2026, 18, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010090
Tabboon P, Limpongsa E, Rongthong T, Pongjanyakul T, Jaipakdee N. Intestinal Permeation Characteristics via Non-Everted Gut Sac of Diterpene Lactones from Pure Andrographolide and Three Different Andrographis Extracts: An Investigation into Liqui-Mass with Different Solvents. Pharmaceutics. 2026; 18(1):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010090
Chicago/Turabian StyleTabboon, Peera, Ekapol Limpongsa, Thitiphorn Rongthong, Thaned Pongjanyakul, and Napaphak Jaipakdee. 2026. "Intestinal Permeation Characteristics via Non-Everted Gut Sac of Diterpene Lactones from Pure Andrographolide and Three Different Andrographis Extracts: An Investigation into Liqui-Mass with Different Solvents" Pharmaceutics 18, no. 1: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010090
APA StyleTabboon, P., Limpongsa, E., Rongthong, T., Pongjanyakul, T., & Jaipakdee, N. (2026). Intestinal Permeation Characteristics via Non-Everted Gut Sac of Diterpene Lactones from Pure Andrographolide and Three Different Andrographis Extracts: An Investigation into Liqui-Mass with Different Solvents. Pharmaceutics, 18(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010090

