Next Article in Journal
Current View on Genetic Relationships within the Bunyamwera Serological Group
Next Article in Special Issue
Drug Discovery Study Aimed at a Functional Cure for HBV
Previous Article in Journal
In Silico Screening and Testing of FDA-Approved Small Molecules to Block SARS-CoV-2 Entry to the Host Cell by Inhibiting Spike Protein Cleavage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hepatitis B Co-Infection Has Limited Impact on Liver Stiffness Regression in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antivirals
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 14
Issue 6
10.3390/v14061128
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Novel Pegylated Interferon for the Treatment of Chronic Viral Hepatitis

by
Yi-Wen Huang
1,2,3,
Albert Qin
4,
Chan-Yen Tsai
4 and
Pei-Jer Chen
5,6,*
1
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan
2
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
3
School of Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan
4
PharmaEssentia Corporation, Taipei 115, Taiwan
5
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan
6
Hepatitis Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2022, 14(6), 1128; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14061128
Submission received: 22 April 2022 / Revised: 12 May 2022 / Accepted: 20 May 2022 / Published: 25 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Chronic Hepatitis Viruses Research in Asia)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel mono-pegylated and extra-long-acting interferon, being developed for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and chronic viral hepatitis. It has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and less frequent dosing schedule, i.e., once every two to four weeks, compared to conventional pegylated interferon products, which have multiple isomers and are administered weekly. It was approved for the long-term treatment of polycythemia vera, an MPN, and has been included in the NCCN clinical practice guidelines for this indication. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b has demonstrated efficacy and showed a favorable safety profile for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis in several clinical studies. In this article, we review its pharmacokinetics and available clinical data and suggest that ropeginterferon alfa-2b administered once every two weeks can serve as a new treatment option for patients with chronic viral hepatitis, including chronic hepatitis B, C, and D.

1. Introduction

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel mono-pegylated proline-interferon (pro-IFN) alfa-2b. It is predominantly a single and chemically homogenous isomer, as compared to the conventional pegylated interferon (IFN) products, which contain multiple isomers that may contribute to the development of adverse effects [1,2]. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b has favorable pharmacokinetic properties that allow it to be dosed on a much less frequent schedule, i.e., once every 2 weeks or every 3 to 4 weeks [3,4,5]. The drug has been shown to be well tolerated and efficacious in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and has been approved as the first IFN-based therapy for the PV treatment in Europe, Switzerland, Israel, Taiwan, Korea, and the USA [6,7,8]. It has recently been included in the NCCN clinical practice guidelines [9].
Another major application of IFN alfa (alpha) is for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis, such as hepatitis B, C, and D. To identify the clinical values of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in these clinical indications, ropeginterferon alfa-2b has been evaluated in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and chronic hepatitis C (CHC) [10,11,12]. We summarized the relevant clinical results to show that ropeginterferon alfa-2b as a novel IFN alfa-based therapy was well tolerated and effective in these clinical studies and discuss the future perspectives in using ropeginterferon alfa-2b for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis.

2. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of Ropeginterferon alfa-2b in Healthy Volunteers

The PK/PD profiles of ropeginterferon alfa-2b were evaluated in three clinical studies of healthy volunteers, including one first-in-human study conducted in Canada, one in China, and another in Australia with Japanese and Caucasian subjects [3,4,5]. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b was subcutaneously (SC) administered as a single injection at doses ranging from 24 to 300 μg in these studies (Table 1). The Tmax of ropeginterferon alfa-2b was found to be 75 to 142 h, and the elimination half-life was 52 to 129 h. The non-dose proportionality of ropeginterferon alfa-2b was observed in all three studies. The slope of the relationship between the dose and the exposure variables, i.e., AUC0-inf, AUC0-t, and Cmax, were greater than one, suggesting that the increase in ropeginterferon alfa-2b exposure was greater than dose proportional under 300 μg in healthy subjects. 2′,5′-Oligoadenylate synthetase (OAS), neopterin, and β2-microglobulin were evaluated as PD markers in these studies. Overall, a dose-dependent increase for the serum concentration of the PD markers was observed.
Compared to the conventional pegylated interferon products, e.g., peginterferon alfa-2a, ropeginterferon alfa-2b had a higher drug exposure at the same dose level, i.e., 180 μg [3,4]. At the same 180 µg dose level, ropeginterferon alfa-2b showed higher Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf than peginterferon alfa-2a [3,4]. The geometric mean ratios of AUC0-inf, AUC0-t, and Cmax were 1.66, 1.82, and 1.76, respectively, for ropeginterferon alfa-2b when compared to peginterferon alfa-2a [3]. The Cmax of ropeginterferon alfa-2b was 20.7 ng/mL as compared to 12.95 ng/mL of peginterferon alfa-2a [3]. The Cmax was reached in a shorter time (Tmax) in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b than in the peginterferon alfa-2a group: 79.22 h vs. 84.25 h [3]. The half-lives (T½) of ropeginterferon alfa-2b and peginterferon alfa-2a were 66.53 and 89.32 h, respectively [3].
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b at a single administration showed similar PD profiles in the OAS and neopterin bioactivity as peginterferon alfa-2a [3]. At the single dose, the safety profile of the ropeginterferon alfa-2b did not show a significant difference from that of peginterferon alfa-2a. Most of the adverse events were mild or moderate [3,4,5]. The phase 1 data indicated higher PK exposures and similar safety profiles of ropeginterferon alfa-2b at a single dose when compared to peginterferon alfa-2a in healthy volunteers and suggested that ropeginterferon alfa-2b could potentially be administered with less frequent injections in clinical use. The PK and PD parameters of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in these studies are summarized in Table 1.

3. Clinical Studies in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis

3.1. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b in Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC)

CHC infection causes inflammation of the liver, leading to a high risk of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [13,14]. CHC affects an estimated 71 million people worldwide and elimination of CHC has been advocated by the WHO as a continuous development goal till 2030 [15]. There are seven major genotypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Genotype 1 is the predominant (46%) followed by genotype 3 (22%) and genotype 2 (13%), and the prevalence of HCV genotypes 4, 5, 6, and 7 varies greatly with geographic locations [16,17]. In Asia, the prevalence of genotype 2 can be as high as 60% in certain areas [15,17].
IFN alfa therapy has been shown to be effective for the CHC and was widely used for the CHC treatment in the pre-direct acting antiviral agent (DAA) era [18]. IFN alfa binds to a heterodimeric transmembrane receptor termed IFN-α/β receptor (IFNAR) to activate the JAK-STAT signal transduction pathways and elicit their biological activities, including the inhibition of virus replication and activation of the immune responses [19,20].
Pegylated IFN alfa therapies have been shown to induce clinically appreciable sustained virologic responses (SVRs) in CHC patients, e.g., a 70–90% SVR rate in patients with the genotype 2 infection [21,22,23]. In addition, they also alleviate fibrosis and reduce the risk of HCC development in CHC patients [24,25,26]. To date, two pegylated IFNs, i.e., peginterferon alfa-2a and peginterferon alfa-2b, have been approved and clinically used for the CHC treatment [27,28]. However, their relatively frequent dosing schedule, i.e., once every week, and notable side effects such as flu-like symptoms, injection site reactions, and depression have limited their use in CHC treatment. By contrast, ropeginterferon alfa-2b showed a favorable dosing schedule and safety profile in the treatment of chronic hepatitis including CHC and CHB. Two phase 2 clinical studies have been conducted to explore and validate the safety and efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin in the CHC treatment, including one in CHC genotype 1 and the other in CHC genotype 2 (Table 2) [10,11].
In the phase 2 CHC genotype 1 study [10], 106 treatment naive patients were enrolled and randomized into four treatment groups including peginterferon alfa-2a once every week SC at the dose of 180 µg (Group 1) as a control, ropeginterferon alfa-2b SC once every week at 180 or 270 µg (Group 2 and Group 3, respectively) or once every two weeks at 450 µg (Group 4), plus daily oral ribavirin for a treatment of 48 weeks [10]. Patients who were treated with ropeginterferon alfa-2b at 180 µg showed a notably higher serum exposure (AUC0-τ), which was 1.4-fold greater than those treated with peginterferon alfa-2a at the same dose. The accumulation ratio of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in its 180 µg group was twofold greater than that of peginterferon alfa-2a at the same dose. The ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups had the SVR24 rates ranging from 66% to 80%, which were similar to that of the 180 µg peginterferon alfa-2a group (Table 2). Moreover, the ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups showed a favorable safety profile regarding flu-like symptoms, anxiety, and depression, when compared to the peginterferon alfa-2a group. The incidence of flu-like symptoms was 66.7%, 53.3%, 55.0%, and 48.3%; anxiety was 14.8%, 6.7%, 0% and 0%; and depression was 25.9%, 13.3%, 0%, 3.4% for the 180 µg peginterferon alfa-2a, and 180, 270, 450 µg ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups, respectively. Grade 2 or 3 depression was reported in the peginterferon alfa-2a group, but none in the ropeginterferon groups. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b administered once every two weeks at the dose of 450 µg showed a favorable safety profile regarding key adverse effects reported with previous IFN therapies compared to the weekly given, conventional pegylated IFN alfa-2a.
In another phase 2 study [11], 86 treatment-naive patients with CHC genotype 2 were randomized to receive daily oral ribavirin plus peginterferon alfa-2a weekly at 180 µg, or ropeginterferon alfa-2b once every two weeks at 270, 360, or 450 μg [11]. In this study, patients who achieved the rapid virologic response (RVR, undetectable HCV RNA at 4 weeks of treatment) received a total treatment of 16 weeks, while those without RVR received a total treatment of 24 weeks. At 12 weeks of treatment, the rate of 100% in the complete early virologic response (cEVR) was achieved in all groups. The end of treatment virologic response (ETVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment per protocol (i.e., 16 weeks or 24 weeks), was also achieved in 100% in all groups, except one patient who discontinued treatment early due to an AE at week 13 in the 360 μg ropeginterferon alfa-2b group (ETVR: 95.2%; 20/21; 95% CI: 76.2–99.9%). In this study, the SVR12 rates at 12 weeks of follow-up were observed to be 95.5%, 82.6%, 85.7%, and 70.0% and the SVR24 rates were observed to be 95.5%, 78.3%, 85.7%, and 60% in the 180 µg peginterferon alfa-2a weekly, 270, 360, and 450 µg ropeginterferon alfa-2b bi-weekly groups, respectively. The relapse rate was higher in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups when compared to the peginterferon alfa-2a group. Further analysis of the relapse rates in patients receiving 16- or 24-week regimens indicated that the 16-week treatment regimen, despite having impressive RVR and ETVR, may not be sufficient in achieving a high SVR24 rate and may have contributed to the higher relapse rate in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups. Consistently, the relapse rate in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups was lower than the peginterferon alfa-2a group in patients who received the 24 weeks of treatment (25% vs. 33%). Therefore, the completion of the 24-week treatment appears to be required for higher SVR rates. For safety, the injection site reactions were only noted in the peginterferon alfa-2a group but not in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups, which may be due to the less frequent dosing regimen of ropeginterferon alfa-2b, i.e., once every two weeks.

3.2. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)

CHB is another public health problem worldwide. The WHO estimates that CHB affects 296 million people worldwide in 2019, with 1.5 million new infections each year [29]. It resulted in an estimated 820,000 deaths, mostly due to cirrhosis and HCC. Although CHB could largely be prevented by vaccines, it is hardly cured completely once infection occurs. The persistent presence of the covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) of the hepatitis B virus (HBV), which has a long half-life, is a major reason [30,31]. Pegylated IFNs and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) including entecavir and tenofovir were approved and serve as the preferred first-line treatment for chronic HBV infection. For NAs, drug resistance can occur and is a critical factor in determining the success of the NA-based anti-HBV therapy. Entecavir and tenofovir are associated with high barriers to antiviral drug resistance compared to other NAs, but they achieve a relatively low HBeAg seroconversion rate of about 10–21%, and approximately 1–3% in the rate of HBsAg loss, which was regarded as a functional cure for the HBV infection [32]. The pegylated IFN alfa-based therapy showed higher seroconversion rates of hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) (~30%) and surface antigen (HBsAg) (~3%) [32] and has a minimal risk of drug resistance. By immune stimulations, it can potentially cause the clearance of the viral genome. However, the long duration of treatment with a frequent injection schedule, i.e., once every week, and side effects could hamper therapy compliance and limit its use in the CHB treatment.
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b, with a convenient, infrequent dosing scheme and favorable safety profile, may potentially serve as a new treatment option for CHB. In a phase 1/2 study, 31 HBeAg-positive and 31 HBeAg-negative CHB patients were randomized to receive ropeginterferon alfa-2b once every two weeks at 350 μg (Group 1) or 450 μg (Group 2), or the conventional pegylated IFN alfa-2a (peginterferon alfa-2a) once every week at 180 μg (Group 3) [12]. Patients received 48 weeks of treatment with a follow-up of 24 weeks. At the follow-up week 24 (FW24), both the 350 and 450 μg ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups showed a higher cumulative HBeAg seroconversion rate than the peginterferon alfa-2a group: 27.3%, 36.4%, and 11.1%, respectively. The time to achieve HBeAg seroconversion was also shorter in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups than in the peginterferon alfa-2a group. The HBeAg seroconversion started in TW24, TW16, and TW48 in the 350 and 450 μg ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups and the peginterferon alfa-2a group, respectively. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b was well tolerated in the study. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. Depression was not observed in the study. In addition, the ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups showed a lower incidence of rash (9.5% and 4.5%, respectively) as compared to the peginterferon alfa-2a group (36.8%). Other study drug-related adverse events were comparable among treatment groups. This study showed that ropeginterferon alfa-2b once every two weeks was well tolerated and effective for the CHB treatment, with a higher HBeAg seroconversion rate than peginterferon alfa-2a once every week.

4. Future Perspectives for Ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the Chronic Viral Hepatitis Treatment

The clinical use of pegylated IFNs for the chronic hepatitis treatment has been limited in the past due to the need of frequent dosing and obvious side effects including injection site reactions, flu-like syndromes, and depression [27,28]. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b as a novel site-selective, mono-pegylated IFN alfa-2b has improved PK properties, meaning that is can be given on a less frequent schedule. This advantage, together with its favorable safety profile and significant clinical response, supports its use and further development for chronic hepatitis treatment.
Flu-like symptoms, administration-site reactions, and depression are the major concerns for previous IFN-based therapies. These side effects have been observed notably less often with the ropeginterferon alfa-2b treatment in several studies. This is possibly due to the fact that ropeginterferon alfa-2b is predominantly a single isomer and is administered on a less frequent schedule. Consistent with the data in the chronic hepatitis studies, the rate of depression from the long-term ropeginterferon alfa-2b treatment up to 5 years in the phase 3 studies in PV patients was also minimal [6]. This reinforces the argument for using ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the chronic viral hepatitis treatment.
DAAs improved SVRs for CHC patients. Treatment failures due to drug resistance or side effects still occur in a small portion of treated patients [33,34]. The reasons for DAA failures are heterogeneous, including the resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) that lead to viral variants with reduced susceptibilities to DAAs [33]. A new generation of DAA regimens with high rates of viral eradication above 90% regardless of the presence of RASs has been developed, e.g., voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir. Their availability and the well-validated RVS testing may not be widely available, especially in the resource-limited area [35,36]. It was also reported that HCC could still recur in some patients who achieved the SVR after the treatment with DAAs [37,38,39,40]. Recent evidence with a larger number of patients shows that HCV clearance by the DAA treatment reduces the incidence of HCC [41]. Pegylated IFN alfa therapies could reduce the HCC risk by not only causing SVRs but also potentially eliciting IFN-associated intrinsic anti-cancer properties. Type I IFNs have known anti-cancer activities including the direct anti-proliferative effect consisting of cytotoxicity, cell cycle inhibition and induction of a senescence-like state, and the indirect anti-tumor effect induced by immune stimulation and anti-angiogenesis [20,42,43,44,45]. Type 1 IFNs alfa and beta bind a same receptor termed IFNAR to elicit their biological activities [19,20]. They selectively induce a cell-growth inhibitory effect such as cell-cycle inhibitions in human transformed or cancer cells, but not in normal cells [42]. Furthermore, low-copy gene delivery of IFN beta by a lentivirus vector or the extrachromosomal gene expression by an adenoviral vector led to the significant inhibition of tumor formation [44,46]. Recombinant IFN alfa was approved for the treatment of hairy cell leukemia, malignant melanoma, AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma, and follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and its pegylated products with extended half-lives were under development for the treatment of more cancer types, e.g., acute myeloid leukemia [47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. IFN-alfa therapies were also noted to significantly reduce the risk of CHC-associated HCC occurrence [26,54,55]. In the phase 3 studies in PV patients, there was no occurrence of secondary cancers in the patients who received ropeginterferon alfa-2b. In contrast, five events of cancer progression, including two cases of secondary acute leukemia, were observed in the control group [6,56]. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b was also found to be able to selectively inhibit the malignant JAK2 mutation-carrying progenitor cells in the bone marrow of patients [57]. Taken together, the data suggest that ropeginterferon alfa-2b is not only effective in chronic hepatitis treatment but also potentially inhibits cancer formation and growth. This further supports the use of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis.
For CHC infection, ropeginterferon alfa-2b can be a viable option when DAAs are not appropriate such as in patients who had treatment failures due to drug resistance or side effects. Since they have different modes of action, a combination treatment with ropeginterferon alfa-2b and DAAs may potentially induce a combinatorial or complementary clinical effect in patients, being effective in curing CHC and decreasing the HCC risk. Therefore, with a less frequent dosing scheme, improved PK and safety profiles, and potential as an anti-cancer agent, ropeginterferon alfa-2b provides new treatment options for CHC patients.
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b can be very useful in the treatment of CHB and chronic hepatitis D (CHD). Pegylated IFN alfa was approved for the CHB treatment [28] and serves as a backbone treatment in CHD patients as an off-label use [58]. Pegylated IFN treatment can lead to higher rates of HBeAg and HBsAg seroconversion in patients, compared to those receiving NAs, possibly due to its immune stimulation or ability to enhance the cccDNA degradation and exert epigenetic modifications of the cccDNA transcription [59]. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b therapy has been shown to cause higher HBeAg seroconversion rates than the conventional pegylated IFN alfa-2a given weekly in the phase 2 setting [12]. Therefore, ropeginterferon alfa-2b is expected to be effective in CHB and CHD. NA therapies, especially their long-term treatment, are also effective in depleting the cccDNA [60]. However, there is a potential for a combination-therapy approach with NAs and a novel and effective pegylated IFN alfa such as ropeginterferon alfa-2b in curing CHB. It is also possible that ropeginterferon alfa-2b therapy may help CHB patients off the long-term NA treatment during their disease management.
There have been rekindled enthusiasms for combining small molecules with IFN-based therapies for the CHB or CHD treatment [61,62]. A meta-analysis indicated that the combination of the pegylated IFN alfa treatment with lamivudine given orally could show a better virological (57% vs. 20% in HBeAg-positive patients and 85% vs. 65% in HBeAg-negative patients, respectively) and biochemical (48% vs. 37% in HBeAg-positive patients and 50% vs. 40% in HBeAg-negative patients, respectively) responses than pegylated IFN alfa monotherapy at the end of treatment [63]. The pegylated IFN alfa treatment plus adefovir also had a better seroconversion rate than the pegylated IFN alfa alone in the HBeAg-positive patients (51% vs. 34%). In addition, higher rates of HBsAg loss (10% vs. 0%) and HBeAg seroconversion (29.5% vs. 15.6%) were observed in the combination treatment with pegylated IFN alfa and tenofovir than the tenofovir therapy alone [64]. The combination of the pegylated IFN alfa therapy with entecavir or tenofovir also led to a higher rate of HBsAg loss when compared to the NA treatment alone (30% vs. 7%) [65]. Furthermore, a reversion of hepatic fibrosis could be observed in the CHB patients who received the entecavir add-on pegylated IFN alfa therapy [66]. Patients treated with the combined therapies had a larger improvement of liver histology in the mean liver stiffness value when compared to the monotherapy. Finally, early combination of entecavir and the pegylated IFN alfa-2a treatment improved the anti-HBV efficacy and long-term survival in HBV DNA-positive HCC patients as compared to the NA monotherapy [67]. Previous combination studies with IFN-based therapies and NAs are summarized in Table 3. These data show that the combination regimens that contain a pegylated IFN therapy as a backbone treatment may cause a functional cure of CHB and deliver a therapeutic effect on HCC. Therefore, the availability of ropeginterferon alfa-2b as a new-generation pegylated IFN alfa might facilitate the development of new combination regimens in the search for the cure of CHB or CHD infections.
Approximately 5% of patients with CHB are co-infected with HDV, leading to the most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis [68,69]. HDV is a defective virus that requires coinfection with HBV to replicate. Envelope proteins from HBV, i.e., small-HBsAg (S-HBsAg), medium-HBsAg (M-HBsAg), and large-HBsAg (L-HBsAg), are essential for HDV to enter and replicate in the liver cells [70]. Compared to the HBV infection alone, HBV/HDV co-infection results in a threefold increase in the risk of liver cirrhosis, with approximately 70% of cases developing cirrhosis within 5 to 10 years of diagnosis [71]. It could also cause a higher risk of HCC development with an odds ratio of 1.28–2.77 when compared to HBV infection alone [72]. Until now, no medication has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of CHD. IFN-based therapies have long been recommended for the off-label treatment of CHD by both the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) [73,74]. A 48-week treatment with pegylated IFN alfa given weekly showed an HDV RNA clearance rate of 20–30% in HDV patients [75]. Long-term follow-up studies indicated that the IFN alfa-based therapies led to a lower likelihood of liver-related complications in CHD patients [76,77,78]. However, late HDV RNA relapses may occur after the pegylated IFN alfa therapy [79]. New therapies such as inhibitors of viral cell entry or secretion and nucleic acid polymers (NAPs) were subsequently being developed for HDV treatment [69]. Bulevirtide is a synthetic lipopeptide which inhibits the entry of HDV and HBV into hepatocytes [69]. In 2020, bulevirtide at 2 mg SC once daily was conditionally approved in the EU for the CHD treatment [80]. A 24-week regimen with bulevirtide at 2 mg plus tenofovir showed a higher HDV RNA clearance rate at the end of treatment than tenofovir alone (53.6% vs. 3.6%) [81]. HDV viral RNA relapse was reported in approximately 40–70% of the HDV RNA responders who received bulevirtide plus tenofovir [82]. By contrast, a 48-week regimen containing 2 mg bulevirtide and pegylated IFN-alfa had a higher HDV RNA clearance rate (80%) than bulevirtide (13%) or pegylated IFN alfa alone (13%) at the end of treatment [81]. The proportion of patients with undetectable serum HDV RNA remained higher in the combination group than the pegylated IFN alfa treatment alone group (53% vs. 0%) [83]. Complementary effects for the HDV treatment were also reported in the combination of a pegylated IFN alfa therapy with other antiviral agents. Lonafarnib, an oral small-molecule drug which inhibits the prenylation of large hepatitis D antigen (L-HDAg), blocks the assembly and secretion of HDV [70]. A triple combination therapy of lonafarnib, pegylated IFN alfa, and ritonavir showed a significantly higher virological response rate than the dual combination therapy of lonafarnib plus ritonavir (89% vs. 46%) [84]. Combination therapy with pegylated IFN alfa and NAPs also showed great potential for clearing the HDV RNA. NAPs are phosphorothioated oligonucleotides and can inhibit HDV infection [85,86,87,88,89,90,91]. Adding NAPs to the pegylated IFN alfa-based backbone therapy showed greater HDV RNA clearance in patients with HBV/HDV co-infection [77,92]. These clinical data suggest that combination regimens containing a pegylated IFN alfa-based backbone therapy are effective for the treatment of HBV/HDV co-infection. As an improved site-selective pegylated IFN alfa product, ropeginterferon alfa-2b could potentially serve as a better backbone treatment in combination regimens for CHD patients.
Immunotherapy is an attractive area for developing effective CHB treatments. Functional dysregulation or exhaustion of CD8+ T cells occurs in patients with CHB [93]. PD-L1, the ligand of programmed cell death 1 (PD1), is present on liver cells but overexpressed during CHB infection [94]. Blockade of PD1/PD-L1 signaling, a targeted immune checkpoint inhibition, re-activated the specific T cell responses against HBV in animal models [95,96]. In a clinical study in patients with advanced HCC, CHB patients who received the anti-PD-1 antibody treatment once every two weeks at 3.0 mg/kg showed a one-log decline in the HBsAg level [97]. Significant HBsAg declines from baseline were also observed after a single dose of an anti-PD-1 blockade antibody [98]. These clinical studies suggest a potential of anti-PD-1 antibodies in the treatment of chronic HBV infection. It is worth noting that HBV reactivation was observed in HCC patients with HBV infection after immuno-checkpoint inhibition and that the reactivation resolved after anti-viral treatments [99,100,101]. Combination therapy with anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and pegylated IFNs may help clear the viral genome and be effective in preventing the HBV reactivation. Type 1 IFNs can stimulate the innate and acquired immunities, including the direct activation of the CD8+ T cells without the CD4+ T helper cells [102], and can potentially augment the effect of the targeted immune checkpoint inhibition by the anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies. Therefore, a clinical study is being conducted to explore the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b and an anti-PD1 antibody in CHB and CHD patients (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT04638439). The combination approach of anti-PD1/PD-L1 and ropeginterferon alfa-2b therapies might offer a more effective treatment for the CHB.

5. Conclusions

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b has shown a favorable tolerability, safety, and efficacy profile in chronic viral hepatitis patients. By reducing the hurdles of using an IFN alfa-based therapy for the chronic viral hepatitis, it provides new treatment options for chronic viral hepatitis patients, especially in combination therapies with other anti-viral agents for CHB or CHD treatment.

Author Contributions

Y.-W.H., A.Q., C.-Y.T. and P.-J.C. contributed to the writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Y.-W.H. worked for PharmaEssentia Corporation from July 2018 to May 2021 as Senior Director of Medical Research & Clinical Operations and Head of Pharmacovigilance. A.Q. and C.-Y.T. work for PharmaEssentia Corporation. P.-J.C. serves as a consultant of PharmaEssentia Corporation.

References

  1. Foser, S.; Schacher, A.; Weyer, K.A.; Brugger, D.; Dietel, E.; Marti, S.; Schreitmüller, T. Isolation, structural characterization, and antiviral activity of positional isomers of monopegylated interferon alpha-2a (PEGASYS). Protein Expr. Purif. 2003, 30, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Y.-S.; Youngster, S.; Grace, M.; Bausch, J.; Bordens, R.; Wyss, D.F. Structural and biological characterization of pegylated recombinant interferon alpha-2b and its therapeutic implications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002, 54, 547–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, Y.-W.; Qin, A.; Fang, J.; Wang, T.-F.; Tsai, C.-W.; Lin, K.-C.; Teng, C.-L.; Larouche, R. Novel long-acting ropeginterferon alfa-2b: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety in a phase 1 clinical trial. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 88, 2396–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, Y.-W.; Tsai, C.-Y.; Tsai, C.-W.; Wang, W.; Zhang, J.; Qin, A.; Teng, C.; Song, B.; Wang, M. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of novel long acting ropeginterferon alfa-2b in healthy Chinese subjects. Adv. Ther. 2021, 38, 4756–4770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miyachi, N.; Zagrijtschuk, O.; Kang, L.; Yonezu, K.; Qin, A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects after single subcutaneous administration. Clin. Drug Investig. 2021, 41, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gisslinger, H.; Klade, C.; Georgiev, P.; Krochmalczyk, D.; Gercheva-Kyuchukova, L.; Egyed, M.; Rossiev, V.; Dulicek, P.; Illes, A.; Pylypenko, H.; et al. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus standard therapy for polycythaemia vera (PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV): A randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial and its extension study. Lancet Haematol. 2020, 7, e196–e208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. US FDA. FDA Approves Treatment for Rare Blood Disease. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-treatment-rare-blood-disease (accessed on 12 November 2021).
  8. Červinek, L. Ropeginterferon alfa-2 b for the therapy of polycythemia vera. Vnitr. Lek. 2020, 66, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Guidelines Panel for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. 2022. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1477 (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  10. Lin, H.-H.; Hsu, S.-J.; Lu, S.-N.; Chuang, W.-L.; Hsu, C.-W.; Chien, R.-N.; Yang, S.-S.; Su, W.-W.; Wu, J.-C.; Lee, T.-H.; et al. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: Pharmacokinetics, safety, and preliminary efficacy. JGH Open 2021, 5, 929–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hsu, S.-J.; Yu, M.-L.; Su, C.-W.; Peng, C.-Y.; Chien, R.-N.; Lin, H.-H.; Lo, G.-H.; Su, W.-W.; Kuo, H.-T.; Hsu, C.-W.; et al. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b administered every two weeks for patients with genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2021, 120, 956–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, Y.-W.; Hsu, C.-W.; Lu, S.-N.; Yu, M.-L.; Su, C.-W.; Su, W.-W.; Chien, R.-N.; Hsu, C.-S.; Hsu, S.-J.; Lai, H.-C.; et al. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b every 2 weeks as a novel pegylated interferon for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatol. Int. 2020, 14, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sebastiani, G.; Gkouvatsos, K.; Pantopoulos, K. Chronic hepatitis C and liver fibrosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 11033–11053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. El-Serag, H.B.; Kanwal, F. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: Where are we? Where do we go? Hepatology 2014, 60, 1767–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. WHO. Hepatitis C Fact Sheets (Updated July 2021). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-c (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  16. Gower, E.; Estes, C.; Blach, S.; Razavi-Shearer, K.; Razavi, H. Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2014, 61, S45–S57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Smith, D.B.; Bukh, J.; Kuiken, C.; Muerhoff, A.S.; Rice, C.M.; Stapleton, J.T.; Simmonds, P. Expanded classification of hepatitis C virus into 7 genotypes and 67 subtypes: Updated criteria and genotype assignment web resource. Hepatology 2014, 59, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Chung, R.T.; Gale, M., Jr.; Polyak, S.J.; Lemon, S.M.; Liang, T.J.; Hoofnagle, J.H. Mechanisms of action of interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C: Summary of a workshop. Hepatology 2008, 47, 306–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zanin, N.; Viaris de Lesegno, C.; Lamaze, C.; Blouin, C.M. Interferon receptor trafficking and signaling: Journey to the cross roads. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aricò, E.; Castiello, L.; Capone, I.; Gabriele, L.; Belardelli, F. Type I interferons and cancer: An evolving story demanding novel clinical applications. Cancers 2019, 11, 1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lagging, M.; Langeland, N.; Pedersen, C.; Färkkilä, M.; Buhl, M.R.; Mørch, K.; Dhillon, A.P.; Alsiö, A.; Hellstrand, K.; Westin, J.; et al. Randomized comparison of 12 or 24 weeks of peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 2/3 infection. Hepatology 2008, 47, 1837–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tsubota, A.; Satoh, K.; Aizawa, M.; Takamatsu, S.; Namiki, Y.; Ohkusa, T.; Fujise, K.; Tajiri, H. Four-week pegylated interferon alpha-2a monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C with genotype 2 and low viral load: A pilot, randomized study. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 7220–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Toyoda, H.; Kumada, T.; Kiriyama, S.; Sone, Y.; Tanikawa, M.; Hisanaga, Y.; Kanamori, A.; Atsumi, H.; Nakano, S.; Arakawa, T. Eight-week regimen of antiviral combination therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 2 and a rapid virological response. Liver Int. 2009, 29, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hsu, C.-S.; Chao, Y.-C.; Lin, H.H.; Chen, D.-S.; Kao, J.-H. Systematic review: Impact of interferon-based therapy on HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hsu, C.-S.; Huang, C.-J.; Kao, J.-H.; Lin, H.H.; Chao, Y.-C.; Fan, Y.-C.; Tsai, P.-S. Interferon-based therapy decreases risks of hepatocellular carcinoma and complications of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C patients. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Shen, Y.-C.; Hsu, C.; Cheng, C.-C.; Hu, F.-C.; Cheng, A.-L. A critical evaluation of the preventive effect of antiviral therapy on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C or B: A novel approach by using meta-regression. Oncology 2012, 82, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Package Insert: PEGINTRON® (Peginterferon alfa-2b); U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2019. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/103949s5313lbl.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  28. Roche. Package Insert: PEGASYS® (Peginterferon alfa-2a); U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2002. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/103964s5204lbl.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  29. WHO. Hepatitis B Fact Sheets (Updated July 2021). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  30. Tseng, T.-C.; Kao, J.-H. Elimination of hepatitis B: Is it a mission possible? BMC Med. 2017, 15, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Alexopoulou, A.; Vasilieva, L.; Karayiannis, P. New approaches to the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Suk-Fong Lok, A. Hepatitis B treatment: What we know now and what remains to be researched. Hepatol. Commun. 2019, 3, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Di Stefano, M.; Faleo, G.; Farhan Mohamed, A.M.; Morella, S.; Bruno, S.R.; Tundo, P.; Fiore, J.R.; Santantonio, T.A. Resistance associated mutations in HCV patients failing DAA treatment. New Microbiol. 2021, 44, 12–18. [Google Scholar]
  34. Starace, M.; Minichini, C.; De Pascalis, S.; Macera, M.; Occhiello, L.; Messina, V.; Sangiovanni, V.; Adinolfi, L.E.; Claar, E.; Precone, D.; et al. Virological patterns of HCV patients with failure to interferon-free regimens. J. Med. Virol. 2018, 90, 942–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sarrazin, C. Treatment failure with DAA therapy: Importance of resistance. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 1472–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Malandris, K.; Kalopitas, G.; Theocharidou, E.; Germanidis, G. The role of RASs/RVs in the current management of HCV. Viruses 2021, 13, 2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reig, M.; Mariño, Z.; Perelló, C.; Iñarrairaegui, M.; Ribeiro, A.; Lens, S.; Díaz, A.; Vilana, R.; Darnell, A.; Varela, M.; et al. Unexpected high rate of early tumor recurrence in patients with HCV-related HCC undergoing interferon-free therapy. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Conti, F.; Buonfiglioli, F.; Scuteri, A.; Crespi, C.; Bolondi, L.; Caraceni, P.; Foschi, F.G.; Lenzi, M.; Mazzella, G.; Verucchi, G.; et al. Early occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-related cirrhosis treated with direct-acting antivirals. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cardoso, H.; Vale, A.M.; Rodrigues, S.; Gonçalves, R.; Albuquerque, A.; Pereira, P.; Lopes, S.; Silva, M.; Andrade, P.; Morais, R.; et al. High incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma following successful interferon-free antiviral therapy for hepatitis C associated cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 1070–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Urbanowicz, A.; Zagożdżon, R.; Ciszek, M. Modulation of the immune system in chronic hepatitis C and during antiviral interferon-free therapy. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2019, 67, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Oe, N.; Takeda, H.; Eso, Y.; Takai, A.; Marusawa, H. Clinical and molecular basis of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis C virus eradication. Pathogens 2022, 11, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qin, X.-Q.; Runkel, L.; Deck, C.; DeDios, C.; Barsoum, J. Interferon-beta induces S phase accumulation selectively in human transformed cells. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 1997, 17, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qin, X.-Q.; Beckham, C.; Brown, J.L.; Lukashev, M.; Barsoum, J. Human and mouse IFN-β gene therapy exhibits different anti-tumor mechanisms in mouse models. Mol. Ther. 2001, 4, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kaynor, C.; Xin, M.; Wakefield, J.; Barsoum, J.; Qin, X.-Q. Direct evidence that IFN-beta functions as a tumor-suppressor protein. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2002, 22, 1089–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brickelmaier, M.; Carmillo, A.; Goelz, S.; Barsoum, J.; Qin, X.-Q. Cytotoxicity of combinations of IFN-beta and chemotherapeutic drugs. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2002, 22, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Qin, X.-Q.; Tao, N.; Dergay, A.; Moy, P.; Fawell, S.; Davis, A.; Wilson, J.M.; Barsoum, J. Interferon-beta gene therapy inhibits tumor formation and causes regression of established tumors in immune-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 14411–14416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. Package Insert: ROFERON®—A (Interferon alfa-2a, Recombinant); U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2008. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2006/103145s5060LBL.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  48. Sondak, V.K.; Kudchadkar, R. Pegylated interferon for the adjuvant treatment of melanoma: FDA approved, but what is its role? Oncologist 2012, 17, 1223–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. MERCK & Co., Inc. Package Insert: SYLATRONTM (Peginterferon alfa-2b); U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2021. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/103949Orig1s5310lbl.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  50. Magenau, J.M.; Pawarode, A.; Riwes, M.M.; Parkin, B.; Anand, S.; Ghosh, M.; Bixby, D.L.; Choi, S.; Bischoff, L.; Yanik, G.A.; et al. A Phase I/II clinical trial of type 1 interferon for reduction of relapse after HCT in high risk AML. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019, 25, S12–S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mishra, P.; Nayak, B.; Dey, R.K. PEGylation in anti-cancer therapy: An overview. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 11, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hjorth-Hansen, H.; Stentoft, J.; Richter, J.; Koskenvesa, P.; Höglund, M.; Dreimane, A.; Porkka, K.; Gedde-Dahl, T.; Gjertsen, B.T.; Gruber, F.X.; et al. Safety and efficacy of the combination of pegylated interferon-α2b and dasatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Leukemia 2016, 30, 1853–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Healy, F.M.; Dahal, L.N.; Jones, J.R.E.; Floisand, Y.; Woolley, J.F. Recent progress in interferon therapy for myeloid malignancies. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 769628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hung, H.-C.; Liao, H.-H.; Chen, S.-C.; Tsao, S.-M.; Lee, Y.-T. Maintenance interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients who failed initial antiviral therapy: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2019, 98, e15563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Yang, F.; Li, P.; Cai, S.; Zhou, X.; Chen, X.; Zhuang, X.; Zhang, H.; et al. Direct-acting antivirals and interferon-based therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis-C patients. Future Oncol. 2020, 16, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gisslinger, H.; Zagrijtschuk, O.; Buxhofer-Ausch, V.; Thaler, J.; Schloegl, E.; Gastl, G.A.; Wolf, D.; Kralovics, R.; Gisslinger, B.; Strecker, K.; et al. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b, a novel IFNα-2b, induces high response rates with low toxicity in patients with polycythemia vera. Blood 2015, 126, 1762–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Verger, E.; Soret-Dulphy, J.; Maslah, N.; Roy, L.; Rey, J.; Ghrieb, Z.; Kralovics, R.; Gisslinger, H.; Grohmann-Izay, B.; Klade, C.; et al. Ropeginterferon alpha-2b targets JAK2V617F-positive polycythemia vera cells in vitro and in vivo. Blood Cancer J. 2018, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Alavian, S.-M.; Tabatabaei, S.V.; Behnava, B.; Rizzetto, M. Standard and pegylated interferon therapy of HDV infection: A systematic review and meta- analysis. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2012, 17, 967–974. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, G.; Guan, J.; Khan, N.U.; Li, G.; Shao, J.; Zhou, Q.; Xu, L.; Huang, C.; Deng, J.; Zhu, H.; et al. Potential capacity of interferon-α to eliminate covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in hepatocytes infected with hepatitis B virus. Gut Pathog. 2021, 13, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lai, C.-L.; Wong, D.; Ip, P.; Kopaniszen, M.; Seto, W.-K.; Fung, J.; Huang, F.-Y.; Lee, B.; Cullaro, G.; Chong, C.K.; et al. Reduction of covalently closed circular DNA with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment in chronic hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Tamai, H.; Ida, Y.; Shingaki, N.; Shimizu, R.; Fukatsu, K.; Itonaga, M.; Yoshida, T.; Maeda, Y.; Moribata, K.; Maekita, T.; et al. Add-on pegylated interferon alpha-2a therapy in chronic hepatitis B Japanese patients treated with entecavir. Hepat. Res. Treat. 2017, 2017, 2093847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Chen, G.-Y.; Su, T.-H.; Kao, J.-H. Successful treatment of chronic hepatitis B and D with pegylated-interferon plus entecavir. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2015, 114, 1140–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kim, V.; Abreu, R.M.; Nakagawa, D.M.; Baldassare, R.M.; Carrilho, F.J.; Ono, S.K. Pegylated interferon alfa for chronic hepatitis B: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Viral Hepat. 2016, 23, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ahn, S.H.; Marcellin, P.; Ma, X.; Caruntu, F.A.; Tak, W.Y.; Elkhashab, M.; Chuang, W.-L.; Tabak, F.; Mehta, R.; Petersen, J.; et al. Hepatitis B surface antigen loss with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus peginterferon alfa-2a: Week 120 analysis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2018, 63, 3487–3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Chi, H.; Hansen, B.E.; Guo, S.; Zhang, N.P.; Qi, X.; Chen, L.; Guo, Q.; Arends, P.; Wang, J.-Y.; Verhey, E.; et al. Pegylated interferon alfa-2b add-on treatment in hepatitis B virus envelope antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogue: A randomized, controlled trial (PEGON). J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yang, J.-M.; Chen, L.-P.; Wang, Y.-J.; Lyu, B.; Zhao, H.; Shang, Z.-Y.; Li, J.; Fan, Z.-Y.; Wu, S.-D.; Ming, X.; et al. Entecavir add-on Peg-interferon therapy plays a positive role in reversing hepatic fibrosis in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients: A prospective and randomized controlled trial. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 133, 1639–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Qi, W.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Guo, H.; Zhou, C.; Wang, Z.; et al. Peg-interferon and nucleos(t)ide analogue combination at inception of antiviral therapy improves both anti-HBV efficacy and long-term survival among HBV DNA-positive hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy/ablation. J. Viral Hepat. 2020, 27, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. WHO. Hepatitis D Fact Sheets (Updated July 2021). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-d (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  69. Papatheodoridi, M.; Papatheodoridis, G.V. Current status of hepatitis delta. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2021, 58, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Urban, S.; Neumann-Haefelin, C.; Lampertico, P. Hepatitis D virus in 2021: Virology, immunology and new treatment approaches for a difficult-to-treat disease. Gut 2021, 70, 1782–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rizzetto, M.; Hamid, S.; Negro, F. The changing context of hepatitis D. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 1200–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Alfaiate, D.; Clément, S.; Gomes, D.; Goossens, N.; Negro, F. Chronic hepatitis D and hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Terrault, N.A.; Lok, A.S.F.; McMahon, B.J.; Chang, K.-M.; Hwang, J.P.; Jonas, M.M.; Brown, R.S., Jr.; Bzowej, N.H.; Wong, J.B. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology 2018, 67, 1560–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sagnelli, C.; Sagnelli, E.; Russo, A.; Pisaturo, M.; Occhiello, L.; Coppola, N. HBV/HDV co-Infection: Epidemiological and clinical changes, recent knowledge and future challenges. Life 2021, 11, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wedemeyer, H.; Yurdaydìn, C.; Dalekos, G.N.; Erhardt, A.; Çakaloğlu, Y.; Değertekin, H.; Gürel, S.; Zeuzem, S.; Zachou, K.; Bozkaya, H.; et al. Peginterferon plus adefovir versus either drug alone for hepatitis delta. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Farci, P.; Roskams, T.; Chessa, L.; Peddis, G.; Mazzoleni, A.P.; Scioscia, R.; Serra, G.; Lai, M.E.; Loy, M.; Caruso, L.; et al. Long-term benefit of interferon alpha therapy of chronic hepatitis D: Regression of advanced hepatic fibrosis. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, 1740–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Bazinet, M.; Pântea, V.; Cebotarescu, V.; Cojuhari, L.; Jimbei, P.; Anderson, M.; Gersch, J.; Holzmayer, V.; Elsner, C.; Krawczyk, A.; et al. Persistent control of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis delta virus infection following REP 2139-Ca and pegylated interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis B virus/hepatitis delta virus coinfection. Hepatol. Commun. 2021, 5, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wranke, A.; Hardtke, S.; Heidrich, B.; Dalekos, G.; Yalçin, K.; Tabak, F.; Gürel, S.; Çakaloğlu, Y.; Akarca, U.S.; Lammert, F.; et al. Ten-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial in chronic hepatitis delta. J. Viral Hepat. 2020, 27, 1359–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Heidrich, B.; Yurdaydın, C.; Kabaçam, G.; Ratsch, B.A.; Zachou, K.; Bremer, B.; Dalekos, G.N.; Erhardt, A.; Tabak, F.; Yalcin, K.; et al. Late HDV RNA relapse after peginterferon alpha-based therapy of chronic hepatitis delta. Hepatology 2014, 60, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kang, C.; Syed, Y.Y. Bulevirtide: First approval. Drugs 2020, 80, 1601–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. European Medicines Agency. Hepcludex-EPAR-Assessment-Report_en. 2020. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/hepcludex (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  82. Hepatera Ltd. Study Results of ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03546621, Last Updated 10 May 2021. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT03546621 (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  83. Hepatera Ltd. Study Results of ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02888106, Last Updated 30 April 2021. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02888106 (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  84. Yurdaydin, C.; Keskin, O.; Yurdcu, E.; Çalişkan, A.; Önem, S.; Karakaya, F.; Kalkan, Ç.; Karatayli, E.; Karatayli, S.; Choong, I.; et al. A phase 2 dose-finding study of lonafarnib and ritonavir with or without interferon alpha for chronic delta hepatitis. Hepatology 2021. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Matsumura, T.; Hu, Z.; Kato, T.; Dreux, M.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Imamura, M.; Hiraga, N.; Juteau, J.-M.; Cosset, F.-L.; Chayama, K.; et al. Amphipathic DNA polymers inhibit hepatitis C virus infection by blocking viral entry. Gastroenterology 2009, 137, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Vaillant, A.; Juteau, J.-M.; Lu, H.; Liu, S.; Lackman-Smith, C.; Ptak, R.; Jiang, S. Phosphorothioate oligonucleotides inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 fusion by blocking gp41 core formation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1393–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Cardin, R.D.; Bravo, F.J.; Sewell, A.P.; Cummins, J.; Flamand, L.; Juteau, J.-M.; Bernstein, D.I.; Vaillant, A. Amphipathic DNA polymers exhibit antiviral activity against systemic murine cytomegalovirus infection. Virol. J. 2009, 6, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Guzman, E.M.; Cheshenko, N.; Shende, V.; Keller, M.J.; Goyette, N.; Juteau, J.-M.; Boivin, G.; Vaillant, A.; Herold, B.C. Amphipathic DNA polymers are candidate vaginal microbicides and block herpes simplex virus binding, entry and viral gene expression. Antivir. Ther. 2007, 12, 1147–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Beilstein, F.; Blanchet, M.; Vaillant, A.; Sureau, C. Nucleic acid polymers are active against hepatitis delta virus infection in vitro. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e01416–e01417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Noordeen, F.; Vaillant, A.; Jilbert, A.R. Nucleic acid polymers prevent the establishment of duck hepatitis B virus infection in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 5299–5306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Al-Mahtab, M.; Bazinet, M.; Vaillant, A. Safety and efficacy of nucleic acid polymers in monotherapy and combined with immunotherapy in treatment-naive bangladeshi patients with HBeAg+ chronic hepatitis B infection. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Bazinet, M.; Pântea, V.; Cebotarescu, V.; Cojuhari, L.; Jimbei, P.; Albrecht, J.; Schmid, P.; LeGal, F.; Gordien, E.; Krawczyk, A.; et al. Safety and efficacy of REP 2139 and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis D virus co-infection (REP 301 and REP 301-LTF): A non-randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 2, 877–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Carolina, B.; Paola, F.; Caterina, V.; Barbara, A.; Paola, D.V.; Tiziana, G.; Diletta, L.; Alessandro, Z.; Albertina, C.; Gabriele, M.; et al. Characterization of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific T-cell dysfunction in chronic HBV infection. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 4215–4225. [Google Scholar]
  94. Feng, C.; Cao, L.-J.; Song, H.-F.; Xu, P.; Chen, H.; Xu, J.-C.; Zhu, X.-Y.; Zhang, X.-G.; Wang, X.-F. Expression of PD-L1 on CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T Cells of patients with chronic HBV infection and its correlation with clinical parameters. Viral Immunol. 2015, 28, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Tzeng, H.-T.; Tsai, H.-F.; Liao, H.-J.; Lin, Y.-J.; Chen, L.; Chen, P.-J.; Hsu, P.-N. PD-1 blockage reverses immune dysfunction and hepatitis B viral persistence in a mouse animal model. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Liu, J.; Zhang, E.; Ma, Z.; Wu, W.; Kosinska, A.; Zhang, X.; Möller, I.; Seiz, P.; Glebe, D.; Wang, B.; et al. Enhancing virus-specific immunity in vivo by combining therapeutic vaccination and PD-L1 blockade in chronic hepadnaviral infection. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1003856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. El-Khoueiry, A.B.; Sangro, B.; Yau, T.; Crocenzi, T.S.; Kudo, M.; Hsu, C.; Kim, T.-Y.; Choo, S.-P.; Trojan, J.; Welling, T.H.R.; et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): An open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet 2017, 389, 2492–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gane, E.; Verdon, D.J.; Brooks, A.E.; Gaggar, A.; Nguyen, A.H.; Subramanian, G.M.; Schwabe, C.; Dunbar, P.R. Anti-PD-1 blockade with nivolumab with and without therapeutic vaccination for virally suppressed chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 900–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Pu, D.; Yin, L.; Zhou, Y.; Li, W.; Huang, L.; Cai, L.; Zhou, Q. Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with HBV/HCV infection and advanced-stage cancer: A systematic review. Medicine 2020, 99, e19013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Burns, E.A.; Muhsen, I.N.; Anand, K.; Xu, J.; Umoru, G.; Arain, A.N.; Abdelrahim, M. Hepatitis B virus reactivation in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Immunother. 2021, 44, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Féray, C.; López-Labrador, F.X. Is PD-1 blockade a potential therapy for HBV? JHEP Rep. 2019, 1, 142–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Brown, J.L.; Barsoum, J.; Qin, X.-Q. CD4+ T helper cell-independent antitumor response mediated by murine IFN-beta gene delivery in immunocompetent mice. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2002, 22, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. PK/PD parameters of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in clinical studies of healthy volunteers.
Table 1. PK/PD parameters of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in clinical studies of healthy volunteers.
ParameterHealthy Subjects
A09-102 Study [3]A17-101 Study [4]A17-102 Study [5]
Study populationCanadianChineseJapaneseCaucasian
SC dosingSingle dose
Dose range (µg)24 to 27090 to 270100 to 300
Sampling time (h) range0 to 6720 to 6720 to 672
PK parameters
Tmax (h) range *75 to 11692 to 142108 to 11184 to 108
t1/2 (h) range61 to 11878 to 12967 to 6952 to 112
Cmax (ng/mL) range1.8 to 24.84.2 to 24.18.4 to 41.44.5 to 19.2
AUC0-t (ng·h/mL) range273 to 6068957 to 69831445 to 7658945 to 3933
AUC0-inf (ng·h/mL) range372 to 62581287 to 79981927 to 78431510 to 5433
Dose proportionality analysis
ln (AUC0-inf)
Slope (95% CI)1.22 (1.00–1.44)1.84 (1.13–2.55)1.35 (0.93–1.76)1.11 (0.06–2.16)
ln (AUC0-t)
Slope (95% CI)1.36 (1.11–1.61)2.52 (0.69–4.35)1.73 (1.30–2.16)1.52 (0.31–2.72)
ln (Cmax)
Slope (95% CI)1.19 (0.99–1.39)1.87 (0.79–2.95)1.52 (1.11–1.94)1.49 (0.59–2.40)
PD parameters
2′,5′-Oligoadenylate synthetase
Emax (pmol/dL) range266–568NANANA
ETmax (h) range160–222NANANA
AUEC0-t (h·pmol/dL) range51,970–175,233NANANA
Neopterin
Emax (nmol/L) range14–20NA19.70–42.8726.06–40.50
ETmax (h) range *48–104NA36–48 48
AUEC0-t (h·nmol/L) range1213–3328NA6298–11,6908897–12,510
β2-microglobulin
Emax (µg/mL) rangeNA3.126–3.3412.356–3.252 2.681–3.644
ETmax (h) range *NA118–13284–12072–84
AUEC0-t (h·µg/mL) rangeNA1608–17751207–16491341–1856
Abbreviation: AUC0-inf: area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity; AUC0-t: area under the serum concentration–time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration; AUEC0-t: area under the serum concentration–time curve PD biomarker from time zero to the last measurable concentration; CI: confidence interval; Cmax: Maximum serum concentration; Emax: maximum serum PD biomarker response; ETmax: the time that Emax was observed; ln: natural logarithm; SC: subcutaneous; t½: elimination half-life; Tmax: time at which Cmax was observed. * For Tmax and ETmax, the data are expressed as mean value in A09-102 and A17-101 studies while expressed as median in A17-102 study. For the other PK and PD parrameters, i.e., t½, Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, Emax, and AUEC0-t, the data are expressed as mean value in A09-102, A17-101 and A17-102 studies.
Table
Table 2. Efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in CHC treatment.
Table 2. Efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in CHC treatment.
ParametersCHC Genotype 1CHC Genotype 2
A11-201 Study [10]A11-203 Study [11]
Peginterferon alfa-2aRopeginterferon alfa-2b Peginterferon alfa-2aRopeginterferon alfa-2b
180 µg
(Group 1)
n = 27		180 µg
(Group 2)
n = 30		270 µg
(Group 3)
n = 20		450 µg
(Group 4)
n = 29		180 µg
(Group 1)
n = 22		270 µg
(Group 2)
n = 23		360 µg
(Group 3)
n = 21		450 µg
(Group 4)
n = 20
SVR1274.1%70.0%80.0%69.0%95.5%82.6%85.7%70.0%
SVR2477.8%66.7%80.0%69.0%95.5%78.3%85.7%60.0%
Abbreviation: CHC: chronic hepatitis C; SVR12: sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment; SVR12: sustained virologic response at 24 weeks post-treatment.
Table
Table 3. Combinations of PEG-IFN alfa and NA therapies in the CHB treatment.
Table 3. Combinations of PEG-IFN alfa and NA therapies in the CHB treatment.
Treatment
Regimens		Study TypeStudy
Populations		Clinical Efficacy References
PEG-IFN alfa + Lam
vs.
PEG-IFN alfa alone		MAHBeAg-positive CHB
  • Virology response a: 57% vs. 20%
  • Biochemical response b: 48% vs. 37%
[63]
HBeAg-negative CHB
  • Virology response a: 85% vs. 65%
  • Biochemical response b: 50% vs. 40%
PEG-IFN alfa + ADV
vs.
PEG-IFN alfa alone		MAHBeAg-positive CHBHBeAg seroconversion c: 51% vs. 34%[63]
PEG-IFN alfa 2a + TDF
vs.
TDF alone
vs.
PEG-IFN alfa 2a alone 		RCTCHB
  • HBsAg loss d: 10.4% vs. 0% vs. 3.5%
  • HBeAg seroconversion e: 29.5% vs. 15.6% vs. 25.0%
[64]
HBeAg-positive CHBHBsAg loss d: 9.7% vs. 0% vs. 5.2%
HBeAg-negative CHBHBsAg loss d: 11.0% vs. 0% vs. 1.3%
PEG-IFN alfa 2b + NA f
vs.
NA f alone 		RCTHBeAg-positive CHBHBeAg seroconversion g: 30% vs. 7%[65]
PEG-IFN alfa 2a + ETV
vs.
ETV alone		RCTHBeAg-positive CHBLiver cirrhosis evaluation by transient elastography value: 6.6 [4.9, 9.8] vs. 7.8 [5.4, 11.1] kPa, p = 0.028[66]
Early combination of PEG-IFN alfa 2a + NA h
vs.
NA h		RCTHBV DNA (+) HCC
  • 8 years OS rate: 79.2% vs. 59.1%
  • 8 years RFS rate: 68.4% vs. 32.3%
  • HBsAg reduced by >1500 IU/mL: 56.5% vs. 41.7%
[67]
Abbreviation: ADV: adefovir dipivoxil; CHB: chronic hepatitis B; ETV: entecavir; HBeAg: hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; LAM: lamivudine; MA: meta-analysis; NA: nucleos(t)ide analogues; OS: overall survival; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RFS: recurrence-free survival; TDF: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Note: a Virology response: percentage of patients with HBV DNA levels < 2000 IU/mL at the end of treatment. b Biochemical response: normalization of ALT levels at the end of treatment. c Percentage of patients with HBeAg seroconversion at the end of treatment. d Percentage of patients with HbsAg loss at study week 120. e Percentage of patients with HBeAg seroconversion at study week 120. f NA: ETV or TDF. g Percentage of patients with HBeAg seroconversion at study week 96. h NA: ETV alone or ETV + ADV.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Y.-W.; Qin, A.; Tsai, C.-Y.; Chen, P.-J. Novel Pegylated Interferon for the Treatment of Chronic Viral Hepatitis. Viruses 2022, 14, 1128. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14061128

AMA Style

Huang Y-W, Qin A, Tsai C-Y, Chen P-J. Novel Pegylated Interferon for the Treatment of Chronic Viral Hepatitis. Viruses. 2022; 14(6):1128. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14061128

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Yi-Wen, Albert Qin, Chan-Yen Tsai, and Pei-Jer Chen. 2022. "Novel Pegylated Interferon for the Treatment of Chronic Viral Hepatitis" Viruses 14, no. 6: 1128. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14061128

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop