You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Materials
  • Communication
  • Open Access

2 January 2026

Structure and Magnetic Properties of Iron Thin Films Prepared at Different Deposition Times

,
,
and
1
School of Materials, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
School of Intelligent Manufacturing and Control Engineering, Shanghai Polytechnic University, Shanghai 201209, China
3
School of Material Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Thin Films and 2D Materials: Mechanism, Fabrication, Characterization and Application (2nd Edition)

Abstract

In this paper, a series of iron thin films were prepared using the direct current magnetron sputtering method at different deposition times. By means of characterization techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), the structure, surface morphology, and magnetic properties of the iron thin films prepared at different deposition times were systematically investigated. The XRD results indicate that all the iron thin films exhibit a polycrystalline body-centered cubic structure, with an obvious preferred orientation in the (110) direction. As the deposition time increases, the average grain size of the iron thin films gradually increases. This is mainly because the post-sputtered atoms can provide the energy required for the formation, movement, and growth of the already deposited grains or clusters. When the deposition time is too long, factors such as elastic effects and size constraints will limit the growth of grains and clusters. Therefore, for the thin films deposited after 120 s, the average grain size gradually stabilizes. When the deposition time is short, the thin films usually grow in the form of island-like accumulation. Grains and clusters of uneven sizes accumulate on the substrate, so the roughness gradually increases. This also implies an increase in the density of defects such as internal stress and vacancies within the thin film. As the deposition time increases, the thin films gradually transform to grow in a layered and flat manner, and the grain size gradually stabilizes and becomes relatively uniform. Therefore, the roughness of the thin film samples decreases and tends to be stable. The magnetic property test results show that all the iron thin films exhibit ferromagnetism. The iron thin film prepared at a deposition time of 120 s has the best comprehensive performance, with a saturation magnetization Ms of 1567 emu/cm3, a coercivity of 92 Oe, and a remanence ratio of 0.86.

1. Introduction

Iron thin films, fundamental to ferromagnetic thin-film materials, are extensively utilized in electrical and electronic devices. Their applications include magnetic recording, magnetoresistive sensing, electromagnetic switches, magnetic shielding, and spin semiconductors. This widespread use is attributed to their exceptional properties, such as high saturation magnetic induction and low coercivity [1].
Common methods for preparing ferromagnetic thin films include molecular beam vapor deposition [2], magnetron sputtering [3], cold spray technology [4], and ultrasonic-assisted electrodeposition [5]. Among these, magnetron sputtering is widely used due to its high film-forming speed, uniform and controllable film thickness, and excellent process repeatability. Researchers have extensively studied ferromagnetic thin films prepared using this technique. By incorporating elements like N and Co, the saturation magnetization, resistivity, and high-frequency magnetic permeability of the film can be enhanced [6]. Iron ion irradiation increases the lattice constant and grain size, resulting in higher magnetic moments at the top and bottom of the film compared to the bottom layer, effectively modifying the structure and magnetic properties of the film [7]. Annealing can alter the texture of the film [8] and reduce coercivity. Heat treatment in a hydrogen atmosphere can create an oxygen-free and silicon-free interface, further modifying the structure and magnetic properties of the film [9]. Serizawa et al. [10] used various substrates to grow iron films with different crystal orientations to adjust magnetostrictive behavior. While these methods can optimize or adjust the magnetic properties of the film, they may also introduce challenges. For instance, ion irradiation can damage the film surface, complicating the process and preparation, while doping with non-magnetic elements might reduce the film magnetization.
Optimizing growth parameters is a fundamental and effective method for enhancing thin-film properties. During thin-film preparation, sputtering parameters significantly impact the morphology, structure, and magnetic characteristics of the films. For instance, sputtering power influences the magnetic anisotropy of BiFeO3-CoFe2O4 nanocomposite thin films [11] and affects the surface morphology, grain size, and growth of Co2FeSi thin films, thereby altering their soft magnetic properties [12]. In TbFeCo thin films, coercivity can be adjusted by sputtering power [13], and increasing this power can change Tb-Fe thin films from superparamagnetic to ferromagnetic [14]. Under zero-field or field cooling, sputtering power also affects the composition and magnetization behavior of Co2FeSi thin films [15]. Numerous studies highlight the significant impact of working gas pressure on growth mode, structure, and properties. Ramírez et al. [16] demonstrated that altering working gas pressure allows Fe1-xGax thin films to achieve a high magnetoelastic coefficient. Li et al. [17] showed that the magnetic anisotropy of FeCoB thin films can be rotated by 90° with changes in working pressure. Srinivas et al. [15] found that low working gas pressure enhances the surface morphology and magnetic properties of Co2FeSi thin films. Tiwari et al. [18] noted that reducing working gas pressure significantly increases the magnetoresistance of Fe-Cu-Ni. Mishra et al. [19] observed that increasing the thickness of Fe-Co-Al thin films enhances magnetostatic interactions between magnetic particles. Yang et al. [20] found that as thin film thickness increases, coercivity decreases significantly, and higher substrate temperatures improve the saturation magnetization of thicker films. Kumar et al. [21] studied the effect of ferromagnetic layer thickness on CoFeB thin films, finding that increased thickness enhances saturation magnetization and remanence ratio while reducing coercivity. Cao et al. [22] noted that as thin film thickness increases, film roughness rises, and both coercivity and remanence decrease. Despite these findings, few studies have explored the influence of sputtering parameters on the structure and magnetic properties of iron thin films prepared by magnetron sputtering. Thus, investigating how different sputtering parameters affect the growth mode, crystal structure, and magnetic properties of iron thin films holds significant theoretical and practical value. In our previous work, we examined the effects of sputtering power and working gas pressure on the structure and magnetic properties of iron thin films prepared by direct current magnetron sputtering.
This paper presents the preparation of a series of pure iron thin films using direct current magnetron sputtering. The study investigates how deposition time influences the crystal structure, surface morphology, and magnetic properties of these films. The goal is to determine the optimal preparation method and process parameters, offering theoretical guidance for regulating thin film properties.

2. Materials and Methods

Iron thin film samples were deposited on single-crystal silicon substrates using direct-current magnetron sputtering. The target material, a high-purity patch (Ø60 mm, 99.99%), was supplied by Zhongnuo New Materials (Beijing, China) Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), while the single-crystal silicon (100) substrate came from Zhejiang Lijing Silicon Materials Co., Ltd. (Quzhou, China). The silicon was ultrasonically cleaned in absolute ethanol and acetone for 5 min each to remove surface grease before being placed on the rotating disk in the vacuum chamber. To ensure film purity and stable glow discharge, the chamber was evacuated to 10−5 Pa. The argon flow rate and working pressure were then adjusted for stable glow discharge of the target material, initiating the thin-film deposition. Based on previous research, the sputtering power was set at 63 W, as shown in Figure 1. The working pressure was set at 0.6 Pa, with deposition times ranging from 30 to 300 s, and the substrate remained unheated.
Figure 1. Magnetic properties of Fe films prepared at different deposition time: (a) hysteresis loop, (b) Ms.
The composition and crystal structure of the thin-film samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) (DX-2007, Dandong Fangyuan Co., Ltd., Dandong, China) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEM-2100F, JEOL Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Their magnetic properties were assessed with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) (Model 7407, Lakeshore, Carson, CA, USA). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Dimension Icon, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was employed to observe and analyze the microscopic morphology, surface roughness, and grain size of the samples. The thickness of the thin-film samples was tested and analyzed by X-ray reflectivity (XRR) (D8 ADVANCE, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). All tests were performed at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Structure

Figure 2a presents the XRD patterns of iron thin films prepared at various deposition times. The results reveal that thinner films lack distinct diffraction peaks, primarily due to their high signal-to-noise ratio and the equipment limited measurement accuracy. As the deposition time increases, the thickness of the thin film shows a linear growth, as shown in Figure 3. Diffraction peaks in the (110) direction gradually appear in the iron thin film, and their intensities gradually increase. Given the small thickness of the film, all samples exhibit a pronounced preferred orientation in the (110) direction. To further confirm the crystal structure, TEM observations were conducted on selected samples, as depicted in Figure 2b. The figure clearly shows that the films possess evident polycrystalline characteristics.
Figure 2. XRD patterns (a) of Fe film prepared at different deposition time and TEM (b) of Fe film at 120 s.
Figure 3. Line charts of the thickness of Fe films as a function of the deposition time.

3.2. Surface Morphology

Figure 4a–f illustrate the surface morphology maps and their three-dimensional views of iron thin-film samples prepared at varying deposition times. The morphology maps reveal significant changes in the surface morphology of the iron thin film as deposition time increases. At a deposition time of 30 s, fine grains stack and grow on the substrate, with gullies, or darker-colored holes, visible despite the absence of an obvious island-like structure. This suggests that with shorter deposition times, the thin film grows in an island-like manner, gradually covering the substrate. At 60 s, the grains grow similarly, but both grain size and clusters become larger. This occurs because the sputtered iron atoms possess heat, providing energy for the growth of already-deposited iron atoms, thereby promoting grain growth. The figure also shows numerous defects, such as holes, on the thin-film surface. As deposition time increases, the sputtered atoms continuously supply kinetic energy for the formation, movement, and growth of previously deposited atoms. Consequently, the iron thin film prepared at 120 s exhibits larger grain size and a denser structure. However, as deposition time further increases (180 s, 240 s, 300 s), grain size does not increase indefinitely. This is primarily due to elastic effects and size constraints, causing grain size to stabilize under high deposition amounts. If deposition time continues to increase while maintaining this growth mode and particle size, the thin film grows stably, but defects like internal stress and holes accumulate exponentially.
Figure 4. AFM micrographs of Fe films at different deposition time: (a) 30 s, (b) 60 s, (c) 120 s, (d) 180 s, (e) 240 s, (f) 300 s.
Figure 5 illustrates the average particle size and roughness of the iron thin film. As shown in Figure 5a, the average particle size increases with deposition time and eventually stabilizes. This trend aligns with the changes observed in surface morphology. As previously mentioned, increased deposition time allows incident particles to supply energy for the formation, movement, and growth of the atomic layer. Thus, within a certain time frame, the average particle size exhibits a linear growth trend with deposition time. However, factors such as elastic effects and size constraints cause the average particle size to stabilize. For instance, the average particle sizes for samples deposited at 180 s, 240 s, and 300 s are quite similar. This stabilization also explains why, in the later stages of deposition, the roughness fluctuations decrease and stabilize, as depicted in Figure 5b. Initially, the thin film grows primarily in an island-stacking mode. As deposition time increases, the average particle size and surface roughness both increase. In the later stages, the film grows in a layered mode, leading to stabilization in both particle size and roughness.
Figure 5. The particle size (a) and the surface roughness (b) of iron films at different deposition time. (Ra: Arithmetic Average Roughness; Rq: Root Mean Square Roughness).

3.3. Magnetic Properties

In this study, we measured the in-plane magnetic hysteresis loops of iron thin films prepared under varying deposition times, as illustrated in Figure 6a. The figure clearly demonstrates that all thin-film samples exhibit strong ferromagnetic properties. From the magnetic hysteresis loops, we derived the trends in saturation magnetization (Ms), coercivity (Hc), and remanence ratio (Mr/Ms) as functions of deposition time, as depicted in Figure 6b–d. The magnetic property parameters of the iron thin films in this study and previous studies are presented in Table 1.
Figure 6. Magnetic hysteresis loops of Fe films at different deposition time (a); saturation magnetization (Ms) (b), coercivity (Hc) (c) and squareness ratio Mr/Ms (d) of Fe films prepared at different deposition time.
Table 1. Magnetic properties of Fe thin films under different preparation conditions.
Figure 6b shows that the Ms values of all iron thin film samples exceed 1300 emu/cm3, highlighting their excellent soft magnetic properties. Although the Ms values do not vary significantly with increased deposition time, there is a noticeable trend: they initially rise and then fall. Notably, the iron thin film deposited for 120 s achieves the highest Ms value, reaching 92% of bulk iron. Initially, the thin film grows in an island-like mode with low thickness and density. As deposition time increases, iron atoms gradually cover the substrate, transitioning the growth to a more compact layer-by-layer mode. Concurrently, the grain size increases as the layers accumulate. However, at higher deposition amounts, grain size stabilizes due to elastic effects and size constraints, as observed in the AFM analysis. The film deposited for 210 s exhibits optimal Ms. Yet, prolonged deposition times and high energy accumulation introduce defects and inhomogeneities, increasing grain size variability and defect density, which degrade performance. Thus, deposition time significantly influences the saturation magnetization of thin films.
Figure 6c illustrates the coercivity of iron thin films at varying deposition times. The data reveal that Hc progressively rises with longer deposition times, indicating a corresponding increase in internal stress and defect density within the film. As deposition time extends, the film thickens, resulting in a greater number of stacked iron atomic layers. This stacking, along with the layer-by-layer growth of grain size, contributes to accumulating internal stress and a higher density of defects such as vacancies and dislocations. These defects create a pinning effect during the magnetization process, impeding the rotation of magnetic domains and consequently raising coercivity. Thus, deposition time significantly influences the coercivity of thin films.
As deposition time increases, the Mr/Ms of thin film samples gradually decreases, as illustrated in Figure 6d. With longer deposition times, the thickness of the thin film also increases. This increase in thickness leads to a rise in both the saturation field and the switching field of the iron thin film, while the remanence ratio decreases. The remanence ratio is influenced by factors such as the demagnetizing field and stress. As thickness grows, the demagnetizing field ratio of the thin film samples decreases, while internal stress and defect density rise, contributing to a reduction in the remanence ratio. Consequently, the remanence ratio of the thin film exhibits a downward trend.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we successfully prepared a series of iron thin films using the direct current magnetron sputtering method. We investigated the crystal structures, surface morphologies, and magnetic properties of these thin-film samples for various deposition times. XRD results reveal that all iron thin films possess a polycrystalline body-centered cubic structure with a pronounced preferred orientation in the (110) direction, which directly contributes to their ferromagnetism. As deposition time increases, the average grain size of the iron thin films also increases. This occurs because post-sputtered atoms provide the necessary energy for the formation, movement, and growth of already deposited grains or clusters. However, when deposition time is excessive, factors such as elastic effects and size constraints restrict further growth of grains and clusters. Consequently, for films deposited beyond 120 s, the average grain size stabilizes. With shorter deposition times, thin films typically grow in an island-like accumulation, leading to unevenly sized grains and clusters on the substrate, which increases roughness. This roughness implies a higher density of defects, such as internal stress and vacancies, within the thin film. As deposition time extends, the films gradually transition to a layered and flat growth pattern, resulting in more uniform grain sizes and reduced roughness. Magnetic property analysis indicates that the iron thin film deposited at 120 s exhibits the best overall performance, featuring the highest saturation magnetization (Ms), along with moderate coercivity and remanence ratio.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z. and B.Y.; methodology, C.Z.; software, B.Y.; validation, C.Z. and L.Y.; formal analysis, C.Z. and Z.H.; investigation, C.Z. and B.Y.; resources, B.Y.; data curation, C.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Z.; writing—review and editing, C.Z. and Z.H.; visualization, C.Z. and L.Y.; supervision, C.Z. and L.Y.; project administration, C.Z.; funding acquisition, B.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Key R&D Program: Research on Simulation Verification and Design Optimization of Key Technologies for High Speed Maglev Transportation System. The project number is: 2016YFB1200602-02.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Du, J.; Li, G.; Liu, S.; Liu, T.; Wu, C.; Wang, Q. Enhancement of Magnetic Properties by Adjusted Structure in Fe Nanocrystalline Films via Annealing and Applying High Magnetic Field at Different Film-Formation Stages. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 495, 165857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, S.; Ma, Y.; Chang, L.; Li, G.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q. Effect of Doping SiO2 and Applying High Magnetic Field during the Film Growth on Structure and Magnetic Properties of Evaporated Fe Films. Thin Solid Film. 2018, 651, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, C.; Li, T.; Wei, X.; Yan, B. Effect of the Sputtering Power on the Structure, Morphology and Magnetic Properties of Fe Films. Metals 2020, 10, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Watanabe, E.; Kura, H.; Ogawa, T.; Ichikawa, Y.; Ogawa, K. Fabrication of Soft Magnetic Fe-Ni Films by Direct Deposition of Nanoparticle Agglomerates Using Cold-Spray Technique. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2023, 32, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, M.; Guo, Z. Ultrasound-Assisted Electrodeposition of Fe-Ni-Co Ternary Alloy Film: Microstructure, Corrosion Resistance, and Soft Magnetic Property. JOM 2024, 76, 4987–4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fan, J.; Sun, J.; Yang, Y.; Liang, R.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, X. Effect of Nitrogen and Cobalt Additions on Surface Morphology and Magnetic Properties of Fe Thin Films. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 662, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Papamihail, K.; Mergia, K.; Ott, F.; Serruys, Y.; Speliotis, T.; Apostolopoulos, G.; Messoloras, S. Fe+ Ion Irradiation Induced Changes in Structural and Magnetic Properties of Iron Films. Nucl. Mater. Energy 2016, 9, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, S.H.; Zha, C.L.; Ma, B.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Jin, Q.Y. Formation of (002) Texture in Fe Films Prepared by Thermal Treatment. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 310, 2656–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sandu, S.G.; Palade, P.; Schinteie, G.; Birsan, A.; Trupina, L.; Kuncser, V. Tuning Structural and Magnetic Properties of Fe Films on Si Substrates by Hydrogenation Processing. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2014, 181, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Serizawa, K.; Ohtake, M.; Kawai, T.; Futamoto, M.; Kirino, F.; Inaba, N. Influence of Crystal Orientation on the Magnetostriction Behavior of Fe Films Formed on MgO Single-Crystal Substrates. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 477, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, T.C.; Lee, S.H.; Jung, H.K.; Kim, Y.E.; Choi, J.W.; Yang, D.; Kim, D.H. Effect of Sputtering Conditions on the Structure and Magnetic Properties of Self-Assembled BiFeO3-CoFe2O4 Nanocomposite Thin Films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 471, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saravanan, L.; Raja, M.M.; Prabhu, D.; Therese, H.A. Influence of Sputtering Power on Structural and Magnetic Properties of As-Deposited, Annealed and ERTA Co2FeSi Films: A Comparative Study. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2018, 531, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Ge, H. Enhanced Coercivity in C/Fe/Pt Thick-Film Magnets. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 441, 562–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Basumatary, H.; Arout Chelvane, J.; Sridhara Rao, D.V.; Kamat, S.V.; Ranjan, R. Effect of Sputtering Parameters on the Structure, Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of Tb-Fe Films. Thin Solid Film. 2015, 583, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Srinivas, K.; Manivel Raja, M.; Sridhara Rao, D.V.; Kamat, S.V. Effect of Sputtering Pressure and Power on Composition, Surface Roughness, Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of as-Deposited Co2FeSi Thin Films. Thin Solid Film. 2014, 558, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ramírez, G.A.; Moya-Riffo, A.; Gómez, J.E.; Malamud, F.; Rodríguez, L.M.; Fregenal, D.; Bernardi, G.; Butera, A.; Milano, J. Influence of Argon Pressure on the Structural Properties of Polycrystalline Sputtered Fe0.89Ga0.11 Thin Films. Mater. Charact. 2021, 171, 110790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, X.; Du, H.; Wu, D.; Yue, M.; Chu, X.-M.; Zhao, G.; Li, S. Controllable Rotation of Magnetic Anisotropy in FeCoB Films by Sputtering Pressure. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 443, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tiwari, A.; Senthil Kumar, M. Influence of Sputtering Pressure on the Giant Magnetoresistance and Structure in Fe–Cu–Ni Granular Thin Films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2006, 303, e165–e168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mishra, S.K.; Sahoo, A.K.; Poddar, N.P.; Chelvane, J.A.; Mohanty, J. Investigation of Magnetic Domain Interactions and Switching Mechanism in Sputter Deposited Fe–Co–Al Thin Film. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2024, 610, 172535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, W.; Liu, J.; Yu, X.; Wang, G.; Zheng, Z.; Guo, J.; Chen, D.; Qiu, Z.; Zeng, D. The Preparation of High Saturation Magnetization and Low Coercivity FeCo Soft Magnetic Thin Films via Controlling the Thickness and Deposition Temperature. Materials 2022, 15, 7191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kumar, P.; Sharma, V.; Khanna, M.K.; Kuanr, B.K. Effect of Ferromagnetic Layer Thickness on the Static and Dynamic Magnetic Properties of Sputter Grown Thin CoFeB Films. Phys. Lett. A 2025, 553, 130722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cao, H.M.; Brown, B.J.; Bheemarasetty, V.S.; Xiao, G. Annealing and Thickness Optimisation in CoZrNb and FeSiBNbCu Thin Films for Low-Frequency Magnetic Flux Concentrators. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2025, 635, 173621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Du, J.; Li, G.; Wang, Q.; Ma, Y.; Cao, Y.; He, J. Microstructural Evolution and Magnetic Properties of Nanocrystalline Fe Films Prepared in a High Magnetic Field. Vacuum 2015, 121, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.