Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Spatial Order Characterization of Controlled Silica Particle Sizes Organized as Photonic Crystals Arrays
Previous Article in Journal
Crushing Characteristics of Coarse Aggregates for Asphalt Mixtures under Simulated Laboratory Compaction Loads and Repeated Traffic Loads
Previous Article in Special Issue
Surface Modification of Ammonium Polyphosphate for Enhancing Flame-Retardant Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 17
10.3390/ma15175867
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Effect of Cerium Oxide for Improving the Fire-Retardant, Mechanical and Ultraviolet-Blocking Properties of EVA/Magnesium Hydroxide Composites

by
Jose Hobson
1,†,
Guang-Zhong Yin
2,*,†,
Xiaoli Yu
3,
Xiaodong Zhou
3,
Silvia Gonzalez Prolongo
4,
Xiang Ao
1 and
De-Yi Wang
1,2,*
1
IMDEA Materials Institute, C/Eric Kandel, 2, 28906 Getafe, Spain
2
Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Ctra. Pozuelo-Majadahonda Km 1,800, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain
3
State Key Laboratory of Baiyunobo Rare Earth Resource Researches and Comprehensive Utilization, Baotou Research Institute of Rare Earths, Baotou 014030, China
4
Materials Science and Engineering Area, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Tulipán s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
The authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2022, 15(17), 5867; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175867
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 22 August 2022 / Published: 25 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fire Safe, Sustainable and Smart Polymer-Based Materials: Frontiers in Science and Technology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rare earth oxide particles have received important attention in recent years, and due to the wide diversity of promising applications, the need for this kind of material is predicted to expand as the requirements to use the current resources become more demanding. In this work, cerium oxide (CeO2) was introduced into ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA)/magnesium hydroxide (MDH) composites for enhancing the flame retardancy, mechanical properties and anti-ultraviolet aging performance. The target EVA/MDH/CeO2 composites were prepared by extrusion and injection molding, and the effects of the addition of the CeO2 were explored by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), limiting oxygen index (LOI), UL-94, cone calorimetry test, and anti-ultraviolet aging test. Typically, the incorporation of the CeO2 allows a significant increase of the elongation at break and Young’s modulus compared with EVA/MDH by 52.25% and 6.85%, respectively. The pHRR remarkably decreased from 490.6 kW/m2 for EVA/MDH to 354.4 kW/m2 for EVA/MDH/CeO2 composite. It was found that the CeO2 presents excellent synergism with MDH in the composites for the anti-UV properties in terms of mechanical properties preservation. Notably, the combination of CeO2 with MDH is a novel and simple method to improve the filler–polymer interaction and dispersion, which resulted in the improvement of the mechanical properties, flame retardancy and the anti-ultraviolet aging performance of the composites.

1. Introduction

Ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers are widely used in the industrial field, due to their physical and chemical properties. The EVA thermoplastics containing different vinyl acetate contents can be selected in different areas such as transport, electrical, building and electronics, where the flexibility and processing characteristics of these materials are extensively applied to produce hot-melt adhesive, flexible pipes, battery adhesive film or toys, and especially in the cable industry as an excellent insulating material with good physical and mechanical properties [1,2,3]. The typical disadvantage of these polymers is their high flammability; owing to their chemical structure and composition, they can burn easily, and this issue is a major restriction for their application. The most effective way to overcome this drawback is to add flame retardants to the EVA, and recently much research work is focused on the use of environmentally friendly halogen-free flame retardant additives [4,5]. The flame-retardant polymeric materials with low emissions of heat and smoke-suppression effects have become a potential trend. To achieve the required fire resistance grade, aluminum hydroxide or magnesium hydroxide are added into the EVA polymer matrix. These materials have the ability to act in the gas phase, following an endothermic decomposition reaction and causing the dilution of the combustible gases by releasing water during the combustion stage. They also generate a metal oxide coating in the condensed phase, which acts as an insulating layer during combustion [6,7]. Because of its simple, cost-effective, and straightforward fabrication method, as well as its exhibited aptitude for surface functionalization, magnesium hydroxide is selected as candidate in many different research explorations [8]. However, the disadvantage of low efficiency, requiring more than 50 wt.% to reach the flame-retardancy requirements, often leads to the deterioration of physical and mechanical properties of the polymer composites.
In addition to flame-retardant safety, anti-ultraviolet and other thermal-oxidative aging properties are also crucial to improving the comprehensive performance and life of materials. According to reports, CeO2 is one of the most attractive rare earth metal oxides. It has several applications in the field of corrosion prevention, electrochemical cells, electromagnetic shielding, thermal coatings, optical and photoelectrical properties [9]. Also, CeO2 has great attention because of its unique features like nontoxicity, biocompatibility, oxygen storage capability, optical, and thermal properties, which have significant applications in solar cells, gas sensors, biosensors [10,11], UV shielding [12,13] and flame-retardant additives in polymers [14,15,16]. For typical examples, CeO2 was investigated as an additive for in-situ preparation of TiB2/Al composite using an exothermic reaction process via K2TiF6 and KBF4 salts [17]. It is reported that by introducing a rare earth oxide material CeO2 into the lamella structure of g-C3N4, the carbonizing level and the chemical flame-retardant inhibition of g-C3N4 could be enhanced [18]. The growth of rare earth elements into technology advancement, ecology, and economic domains has resulted in a major increase in global demands. Over the next decade, global demand for cars, electronic goods, energy-efficient lighting, and catalysts is predicted to surge. In order to encourage future advances in this field it is necessary to perform further studies for its applications, and flame-retardant synergistic effect is one of them [19]. Cerium oxide serves as an excellent catalyst for organic reaction, oxidant, and so on, and it is expected to have excellent synergistic effects. Furthermore, the mechanism of adding catalysis is complicated and needs further research [9]. CeO2 has been also widely used as the reinforcement filler in polishing solution, glass and catalytic converters [20].
Improving the mechanical properties of metal matrix composites by the addition of a ceramic phase is one of the present’s studying hotspots. Understanding the morphology evolution rule of the ceramic phase during laser cladding is a critical issue to its wider industrial applications. The compatibility effects of flame-retardant fillers for producing uniform dispersed polymer composites have been previously studied, and by using phosphorous-based polypyrrole nanoparticles it was possible to obtain significant improvements in the thermal stability and flame resistance of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene composites. The synergistic flame-retardancy effect of polypyrrole nanoparticles and their dopant on charring ability was investigated. The rate of burning of the new polymer nanocomposites was significantly reduced to 7.6 mm/min compared to 42.5 mm/min for virgin polymer. Also, peak heat release rate (pHRR), total heat release (THR) and other combustion properties were greatly reduced. This is in conjunction with the suppression of toxic gases emission [21]. Recently, some spherical inorganic nanoparticles and nanotubes have been used in textile treatment. This is to achieve comfortable properties in textile materials. Graphite platelets, ammonium phosphate and N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl]-ethylene diamine were uniformly dispersed in a commercial binder. The mass ratio of ammonium phosphate was optimized. TiO2 nanoparticles of an average size of 20 nm were dispersed in the coating layer and their effect was investigated. Thermal stability for developed textile fabrics was enhanced. The flame retardancy of coated samples was significantly improved with maintaining good mechanical properties [22].
Considering the low overall efficiency of MDH, the catalytic carbon-forming properties of CeO2 itself and its excellent UV-shielding properties, together with a lack of systematic studies on MDH-reinforced EVA with rare earth CeO2 addition, in this study, varied amounts of the rare earth oxide CeO2 were used to modify the EVA/MDH composites. The characteristic changes in microstructure, flame-retardant performance, mechanical properties and UV-aging properties were explored as a function of the CeO2 content.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) polymer, (containing 28 wt.% vinyl acetate) with a density of 0.951 g/cm3 (25 °C), melt flow index of 4 g/10min (190 °C/2.16 kg) was purchased from DuPont Company (Wilmington, DE, USA), with the commercial name of Elvax 265. Magnesium hydroxide (99.8% purity) with average diameter of about 1 μm was supplied by Liaoning Jinghua New Material company (China). Cerium oxide (CeO2, 0.82 μm) was supplied by Baotou research institute of rare earths.

2.2. Mixing of Magnesium Hydroxide with CeO2

To obtain the modified magnesium hydroxide powder, first, 1000 g of magnesium hydroxide were dried at 110 °C for 6 h to eliminate absorbed water, then the MDH and the cerium oxide powders were added into a high-speed mixer (SHR-10A, Zhangjiagang, China). The temperature and stirring rate of the mixer were set to 100 °C and 2800 rpm. When the set-up temperature was reached, the mixing was kept continuously for 10 min.

2.3. Processing of the EVA Composites

All the EVA composites were processed under the same conditions, by hot-melt extrusion of the modified filler into the polymer matrix using a twin screw extruder (Brabender KETSE 20/40) to make the composite polymer granules at 180 °C. In this case the polymer extrusion was made using a 55 wt.% of fillers. The samples for the fire tests and mechanical properties test were obtained by using an injection machine (Arburg Allrounder). The formulations of the samples are given in Table 1.

2.4. Characterizations

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed with a TA thermogravimetric analyzer (Q50, New Castle, PA, USA) from 0 to 800 °C, with a heating rate of 10 °C/min in nitrogen atmosphere. Particle size analysis was performed in a Bettersizer ST, Laser Particle size analyzer (BT-9300 ST). X-ray diffraction (XRD Malvern Panalytical B.V, Almelo, EA, The Netherlands) was carried out on a Panalytical Empyrean diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical B.V, Almelo, EA, The Netherlands) with Cu Kα radiation resource (λ = 0.154 nm) and Cu filter. Limiting oxygen index (LOI) was obtained using an oxygen index meter (FTT, East Grinstead, UK) according to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D2863-77 standard. The size of the samples was 130 × 6.5 × 3 mm3. The vertical burning test was determined with the UL-94 vertical flame chamber (FTT, East Grinstead, UK) according to ASTM D3801 standard. The size of the samples was 130 × 13 × 3 mm3. The fire behavior of the samples was determined on a cone calorimeter (FTT, East Grinstead, UK) according to the ISO5660 standard, under a heat flux of 50 kW/m2, using a sample size of 100 × 100 × 3 mm3. The scanning electron microscope (Helios NanoLab 600i, FEI, Portland, OR, USA) was used for the cross-section and char residue inspections at a voltage of 5.0 kV and 0.69 nA of current. The samples were coated with a conductive layer of gold before SEM observation, and the fractured surface samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen before the gold sputtering.
Tensile testing was performed on a universal electromechanical testing machine (INSTRON 3384, Norwood, MA, USA) according to ASTM D 638 standard at a test speed of 50 mm/min, and with a load cell of 2000 N. UV radiation was performed in a Dycometal cck-125 climatic chamber irradiance at 40 °C and 35% RH for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. The optical microscope Olympus BX51 was used for the surface morphology inspection of the samples after the UV exposure.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Samples Preparation and Filler Dispersion

3.1.1. TGA and Particle Size of the Fillers

The TGA test was performed for the pure MDH, CeO2 and for the modified MDH fillers with 3 wt.% and 5 wt.% of CeO2; the obtained results are presented in Table 2 and the corresponding curves were plotted in Figure 1a,b. There was no decomposition observed for the CeO2 until 800 °C in the TGA test, while the pure MDH showed an initial decomposition temperature of 312.4 °C with a yield of decomposition products of 68.4% at 700 °C, corresponding to the formation of stable MgO [23,24]. After the addition of the CeO2, the initial decomposition temperature of the flame-retardant system was increased until 317.5 °C and 324.3 °C for the fillers with a CeO2 content of 3 wt.% and 5 wt.%, respectively, and the charring capacity was also improved by promoting the formation of a more continuous and more compact barrier layer, obtaining an increase until 71.9% in the residue. Therefore, a suitable amount of CeO2 can provide higher thermal stability and char-forming behavior to the MDH. This decomposition behavior is in agreement with the TGA results discussed elsewhere [9].
The particle size analysis was performed to obtain the standard dimensions of the flame-retardant fillers; the results are revealed in Table 3; the corresponding curves were plotted in Figure 1c. The additive dispersion through the EVA polymer matrix is a fundamental property for this research work, due to the existence of a high proportion of inorganic particles. The results indicate that the pure MDH has a standard size of 0.98 μm, while the CeO2 was sized at 0.82 μm; the influence of the rare earth on the MDH flame retardant indicates that for the fillers containing 3 wt.% of the CeO2 the particle size obtained was of 0.96 μm, and for the fillers containing 5 wt.% of CeO2 there was a 0.94 μm particle size obtained (Figure 1d).

3.1.2. Morphology Analysis by SEM

In order to compare the influence of CeO2 on the comprehensive properties of EVA/MDH composites, we designed four samples as shown in Table 1. The composites are obtained by twin-screw extrusion, and then all test specimens required to be tested are obtained by injection molding. The preparation process is shown in Figure 2a. The SEM cross-section was performed to study the additive dispersion within the polymer matrix, and the evaluation indicates that the pure EVA sample has a smooth and continuous fracture surface (Figure 2b). After the 55 wt.% of pure MDH was added into the EVA, the fracture surface of the composite shows the good dispersion of the filler through the EVA matrix (Figure 2c). While due to the existence of a high proportion of inorganic particles, samples EM, EMC3 and EMC5 all show irregular and rough cross-section morphology. In particular, we found a significant crack in Figure 2c, which will lead to the low mechanical properties of the sample to a certain extent. The further addition of the 3 wt.% and 5 wt.% CeO2 with a particle size of 0.82 µm can help to form a more uniform surface (Figure 2d,e) with smaller gaps between the fillers and the polymer matrix, and finally improve the performance of the mechanical and flame-retardant properties of the composites, which will be provided in Section 3.4.

3.1.3. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD analysis was performed to reveal the diffraction peaks of the pure and modified EVA composites; the XRD curves are plotted in Figure 3. The pure EVA sample has two diffraction peaks at 21.2° and 23.5°, corresponding to the (110) and (002) atomic crystal planes of EVA. The sample containing EVA and the unmodified MDH also has peaks at 18.7°, 38.1°, 50.9°, 58.8°, 62.2° and 68.3°, which fit exactly into the diffraction of the MDH crystals at (001), (101), (102), (110), (111), and (103), in accordance with the literature. [25] In this case, the samples containing cerium oxide exhibited additional peaks at 28.80°, 33.10°, 48.10° and 56.80° that correspond to the (111), (200), (220) and (311) crystal planes of the rare earth oxide [26,27].

3.2. The Thermal Performance of the Composites

3.2.1. DSC Analysis

The DSC results are shown in Table 4 and the corresponding curves are presented in Figure 4a. All the samples presented the traditional endothermic and exothermic peaks and the thermal properties were recorded from the second heating run. The glass transition of −28.2 °C was observed for pure EVA with a melting temperature of 75.1 °C and a melting enthalpy of 23.2 J/g related to the slightly crystalline phase of the EVA, as previously reported in the literature [28]. No significant changes were observed in the glass transition and melting temperatures after the addition of the pure MDH and modified MDH with CeO2 filler, however, a decrease on the melting enthalpy was obtained for the EVA composites; the pure MDH composites showed a melting enthalpy of 13.9 J/g and the samples containing cerium oxide have a lower enthalpy of 11.2 and 11.1 J/g, indicating that the addition of the rare earth is leading to the absorption of lower amounts of heat during the melting cycle of the composites. We can understand that the possible crystallization of EVA is inhibited for pure MDH modified composites due to the introduction of impurities in MDH. Therefore, the enthalpy decreased significantly. With the introduction of CeO2, it shows that the good dispersion of CeO2 can inhibit EVA crystallization to a greater extent.

3.2.2. TGA Analysis of the EVA Composites

The thermal stability of the EVA composites was measured by the TGA in a nitrogen atmosphere, the summarized data is presented in Table 5, and the related curves are plotted in Figure 4b. The EVA composites exhibited a two-step decomposition process. The first step involves the dehydration of MDH and the loss of acetic acid in EVA at the range of 300–400 °C [23], whereas the second degradation step at the temperature range of 400–550 °C is due to the degradation of ethylene-based chains and to the volatilization of residual polymer [29]. Compared with the pure MDH samples, there is a small shift observed in the T-5% for the samples with cerium oxide; it can be seen that the T-5% of the EM was 327.4 °C, while the EMC3 and EMC5 samples have a lower T-5% of 324.4 °C and 319.1 °C, respectively. In contrast, the char residue at 700 °C was significantly improved; the EM sample has a final weight of 32.5%, while the EMC3 sample with 39.8% and the EMC5 sample had a final char weight of 39.2%.
In addition, as shown in Figure 4c,d, the decomposition in the first stage is advanced, and the maximum thermal decomposition rate in the second stage decreased (Figure 4d). All these show that the introduction of CeO2 can significantly change the thermal decomposition path of the composite, so it has more significant char-forming ability. Specifically, as listed in Figure 4b and Table 5, when CeO2 is present, it has significantly higher char residue than that of the EM sample.

3.3. Fire Safety Performance

The effect of MDH, MDH/cerium oxide on the flammability of EVA was studied by limiting oxygen index (LOI) and UL-94 vertical burning test (Table 6). The LOI value of pure EVA was only 18.2% and it failed to pass UL-94 rating. When 55 wt.% MDH was added, the LOI value increased to 40.9% and the composites passed the UL-94 V-0 rating. After 3 wt.% of the CeO2 was added to the EVA system, the LOI value slightly decreased to 38.5% while keeping the UL-94 V-0 rating. After the addition of 5 wt.% of the CeO2 the LOI result was 39.9% and the UL-94 rating was V-0. The addition of the CeO2 caused a slight decrease in the LOI value; however, the CeO2 functionalized flame-retardant composites both presented high efficiency and at this loading of fillers the composites were still able to reach the V-0 rating according to the UL-94 standard.
To investigate the flame-retardant effect of the modified MDH on the EVA composites, cone calorimeter tests were performed at an external heat flux of 50 kW/m2. The combustion data, including heat release rate (HRR), total heat release (THR), total smoke production (TSP), and residue, are summarized in Table 7, and the curves of HRR, TSP and char residue versus time for the EVA composites are presented in Figure 5.
From Figure 5a, it can be seen that the heat release rate (HRR) curve of pure EVA has a sharp peak, which indicates the furious burning and heat release. This result is caused by the free combustion of hydrocarbon chains. [4] When the 55 wt.% of MDH was introduced, peak heat release rate (pHRR) values of the resulting composites were considerably reduced. The decomposition of the modified MDH can limit the access of oxygen to the internal layer of material, causing a heat dissipation effect known as “heat sink” during the first stage of decomposition; MDH can also release water molecules while the metal oxide barrier is formed [30].
The most interesting effect of the incorporation of the CeO2 is the decrease of the heat release. In fact, the incorporation of even a relatively low amount (3 wt.%) results in the reduction of the pHRR of about 14% (from 491 kW/m2 for EM to 425 kW/m2 for EMC3). Moreover, with the addition of 5 wt.% of the CeO2, the pHRR reduction is higher (28%).
The interesting synergy between the rare earth filler and the MDH has also produced the smoke suppression effect in the EVA system; the composites containing the modified fillers have reduced the smoke production of the EVA composites from 8.6 m2 until 7.9 m2 (Figure 5b). As shown in Figure 5c, we can find that with the addition of CeO2, the char residue increased, which is in good agreement with the results of TGA tests. Furthermore, the modified EVA composites present significant increased TTI as shown in Figure 5d. Both the HRR and THR, of all of flame-retardant samples containing MDH/CeO2, showed an evident decrease during burning (Figure 5e,f). All the above indicate that the MDH/CeO2 fillers can improve the fire safety of the composites, and the samples with incorporation of CeO2 performed much better than those with MDH only.
The fundamental role of CeO2 in the flame-retardancy enhancements is assigned to the yielding of a larger amount of solid inorganic residues that serve as a barrier to heat and mass transfer between the pyrolysis zone and the underlying polymer [31]. Typically, as shown in Figure 6, the char residue of the composite increased significantly. In addition, we can clearly see that the introduction of CeO2 makes the residual char denser and continuous. Neither EMC3 nor EMC5 have significant micro-cracks compared to sample EM (Figure 6c). Thus, a suitable amount of CeO2 plays a critical role in the flame-retardancy and char-forming behavior of EVA/MDH and promotes the formation of more compact char structures in the EVA/MDH composites, which is in good agreement with the literature elsewhere [9].
The effective heat of combustion (EHC), defined as the ratio of heat release to mass loss at a certain time during combustion, can exactly reveal the burning degree of volatiles in gas phase [32,33,34,35]. As shown in Table 7, average EHC (AEHC) was decreased from 35.9 MJ/kg for EVA to 28.6 MJ/kg for EM, and further decreased to 26.3 and 21.8 MJ/kg with the addition of 3 and 5 wt.% of cerium oxide, respectively; the enhanced EHC performance was attributed to the increase of concentration of noncombustible compounds in the gas phase and the higher char residue formed by the inorganic filler’s action. As a result, the heat and mass transfer between the combustion phases was delayed by the imparted flame retardancy. By using these enhanced composites with lower heat release and smoke production and with enhanced charring ability, it is possible to increase the fire safety in the final appliances.

3.4. Mechanical Properties

In the context of the inorganic filler composites, mechanical properties are inevitably concerned besides their flammable characteristics. The high weight fraction of MDH filler additive in polymers can adversely affect some mechanical properties, and often decrease their failure properties [36]. It can be seen from Table 8 that the value of tensile strength decreased from 18.6 to 9.6 MPa when using the MDH to modify the EVA. This reduction in the mechanical properties accounts for the agglomeration of the flame-retardant particles and the interface gaps leading to non-uniform stress distribution in the composites [37]. However, the CeO2-containing system shows an improved value of TS (10.1 MPa), and the elongation at break of 202.9%, indicating that the influence of the CeO2 structure and particle size can lead to a more uniform dispersion due to an enhanced interfacial interaction (Figure 1d,e) [38]. With the same filler mass ratio, good dispersion will contribute to the significant improvement of Young’s modulus. In this case, Young’s modulus increased significantly from 69 MPa for EM to 76 MPa for EMC3. Its specific tensile curves and the key parameters tendency are all shown in Figure 7. Usually, the tensile strength of the polymeric materials is severely affected when MDH is added as a major flame retardant [39], therefore the ability to reverse this effect by generating an increased tensile strength up to 5% of CeO2 represents a very high functionality in this type of material, and this is because the CeO2 promotes the mechanical stability of the material by generating better dispersion and combination with the polymer matrix.

3.5. UV Aging Performance

3.5.1. Surface Morphology of the Samples after the UV Irradiation

CeO2, being one of the most chemically active rare earth oxides, is resistant to ultraviolet light [26]. Along with the incorporation of the rare earth into the formulation of the EVA-MDH composites, we expect to additionally increase the performance of this material as a result of the anti-UV functionalities that the CeO2 has inherently. Figure 8 shows the optical microscope images of the pure EVA and EVA/MDH/CeO2 composites before and after the UV treatment at different times; for the pure EVA samples, the formation of micro-cracks due to the excessive swelling has led to the displacement of layers in the surface of the polymer after 72 h of UV exposure; the samples containing the pure MDH also showed large cracks (see the red circle area), although the polymer layers were more uniform and the degradation was consistently smaller. In contrast, no significant degradation was observed for the samples containing the CeO2 after 72 h of UV irradiation, indicating that the CeO2 can effectively delay the diffusion of the UV radiation.

3.5.2. Tensile Test after the UV Exposure

The mechanical test results for the non-exposed and UV-exposed samples are shown in Figure 9. The 72 h of UV exposure had a remarkable deteriorative effect on the mechanical properties of the pure EVA samples, the elongation decreased from 722% until 401% while the tensile strength was also decreased from 18.6 MPa until 8.4 MPa (with a reduction of 54.84%). In the case of the EM samples, a lower decay but significant decrease of the mechanical properties was observed. Namely, the elongation was reduced from 167% until 71.2%, and the tensile strength from 9.6 MPa until 4.9 MPa (with a reduction of 48.96%). As for the EMC3 samples the elongation was reduced from 202% to 94% and the tensile strength slightly decreased from 10.1 MPa to 7.6 MPa (with a reduction of 24.75%). The EMC5 samples showed a more reduced trend, the elongation was reduced slowly from 254% to 192%, and the tensile strength from 9.1 to 7.6 MPa (with a reduction of 16.48%), indicating that the effects of the UV irradiation were significantly decreased with the addition of the CeO2. Therefore, it is valuable to note that CeO2 could be used effectively as the reinforcement filler to improve the UV-aging resistance of EVA-MDH polymer composites by forming physical barriers that can improve the shielding of the polymer matrix against the UV exposure—the mid-term and long-term degradation of EVA during its effective service usually involves the ultraviolet radiation from sunlight [40], and the systematical enhancement of this functional property is a key solution for improving the EVA polymer composites’ durability.

4. Conclusions

EVA composites with MDH and CeO2 additives were prepared by hot-melt extrusion and injection molding. The initial flammability tests show the improvement in the LOI values from 18.2% (unmodified EVA) to 40.9% (EM), and after the addition of the rare earth a slight reduction in LOI values was observed—the LOI for EMC3 and EMC5 were 38. 5% and 39.9%, respectively. However, all the modified EVA composites can pass the V-0 rating in the UL-94 vertical burning test. The introduction of the CeO2 has created different improvements in the fire properties of the composites measured in the cone calorimetry—a decrease of 59% in the pHRR was obtained for the EM system, while the EMC3 and EMC5 showed a pHRR reduction of 64% and 70%, respectively, and the smoke production was also decreased from 13.9 m2 to 7.9 m2 (EMC5) and the charring capacity of the samples was enhanced up to 40% (EMC5). The improvements obtained in the flame retardancy of the composites can be related to enhanced activity against the fire in both the condensed and gas phases. The cerium oxide system has presented an interesting advantage in terms of mechanical strength and elongation at break; the tensile strength was improved from 9.6 MPa (EM) to 10.1 MPa (EMC) and the elongation at break was also enhanced from 166% to 254%. The obtained results can reveal that by including non-toxic halogen-free flame retardants in the EVA system, it is possible to improve the functional properties of the EVA composites, and in this case the UV-blocking properties of the CeO2 have also led to a higher preservation of the mechanical properties after 72 h of ultraviolet light irradiation. Notably, the multifunctional fillers used in this research work can offer a promising solution in the future developments of high-performance EVA polymer composites.

Author Contributions

Data curation, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, J.H.; Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Project administration, G.-Z.Y.; Data curation, Writing—review & editing, X.Y.; Data curation, Writing—review & editing, X.Z.; Data curation, Writing—review & editing, S.G.P.; Data curation, Writing—review & editing, X.A.; Project administration, Methodology, Writing—review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, D.-Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Program, China, with Project number: 2020CG0069.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Sanchez-Olivares, G.; Sanchez-Solis, A.; Manero, O.; Pérez-Chávez, R.; Jaramillo, M.; Alongi, J.; Carosio, F. Improving Mechanical Properties and Reaction to Fire of EVA/LLDPE Blends for Cable Applications with Melamine Triazine and Bentonite Clay. Materials 2019, 12, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Matta, S.; Bartoli, M.; Arrigo, R.; Frache, A.; Malucelli, G. Flame Retardant Potencial of Tetra-Pak-derived biochar for ethylene-vinyl-acetate copolymers. Compos. Part C Open Access 2022, 8, 100252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yan, K.; Li, G.; Li, Q.; Diab, A.; You, L.; Wang, M. Compound modification of asphalt mixture using ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer and amorphous poly alpha olefin. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 341, 127705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yao, D.; Yin, G.; Bi, Q.; Yin, X.; Wang, N.; Wang, D.-Y. Basalt Fiber Modified Ethylene Vinyl Acetate/Magnesium Hydroxide Composites with Balanced Flame Retardancy and Improved Mechanical Properties. Polymers 2020, 12, 2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.; Li, B.; Xu, M.; Wang, L. Highly Efficient Composite Flame Retardants for Improving the Flame Retardancy, Thermal Stability, Smoke Suppression, and Mechanical Properties of EVA. Materials 2020, 13, 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Girardin, B.; Fontaine, G.; Duquesne, S.; Försth, M.; Bourbigot, S. Characterization of Thermo-Physical Properties of EVA/ATH: Application to Gasification Experiments and Pyrolysis Modeling. Materials 2015, 8, 7837–7863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Han, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, A.; Cheng, P.; Li, J.; Shen, L.; Liu, H. Remarkable effects of silicone rubber on flame retardant property of high-density polyethylene/magnesium hydroxide composites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2022, 203, 110061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Echeverry-Rendón, M.; Stančič, B.; Muizer, K.; Duque, V.; Calderon, D.J.; Echeverria, F.; Harmsen, M.C. Cytotoxicity Assessment of Surface-Modified Magnesium Hydroxide Nanoparticles. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 17528–17537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feng, C.; Liang, M.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Liu, H. Synergism effect of CeO2 on the flame retardant performance of intumescent flame retardant polypropylene composites and its mechanism. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2016, 122, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohanapriya, M.K.; Deshmukh, K.; Ahamed, M.B.; Chidambaram, K.; Pasha, S.K.K. Influence of Cerium Oxide (CeO2) Nanoparticles on the Structural, Morphological, Mechanical and Dielectric Properties of PVA/PPy Blend Nanocomposites. Mater. Today Proc. 2016, 3, 1864–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shang, Z.; Lü, C.; Lü, X.; Gao, L. Studies on syntheses and properties of novel CeO2/polyimide nanocomposite films from Ce(Phen)3 complex. Polymer 2007, 48, 4041–4046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, W.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, S.; Bai, H.; Zhang, S. Use of CeO2 Nanoparticles to Enhance UV-Shielding of Transparent Regenerated Cellulose Films. Polymers 2019, 11, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qingna, Z.; Yuhong, D.; Peng, W.; Xiujian, Z. CeO2-TiO2/NO2 Anti-Reflecting and UV-Shielding Double-Functional Films Coated on Glass Substrates Using Sol-Gel Method. J. Rare Earths 2007, 25, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Z.; Pan, H.; Ma, W.; Liang, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhu, Q.; Yang, X. Synthesis of CeO2-loaded titania nanotubes and its effect on the flame retardant property of epoxy resin. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019, 30, 2136–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiao, C.-M.; Chen, X.-L. Synergistic Flame Retardant Effect of Cerium Oxide in Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate/Aluminum Hydroxide Blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 116, 1889–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, Y.; Dong, X.; Li, Y. Synthesis of novel unsaturated polyester/g-C3N4-CeO2 composites with enhanced fire safety properties. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xue, J.; Wang, J.; Han, Y.; Li, P.; Sun, B. Effects of CeO2 additive on the microstructure and mechanical properties of in situ TiB2/Al composite. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 1573–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Patil, A.S.; Patil, A.V.; Dighavkar, C.G.; Adole, V.A.; Tupe, U.J. Synthesis techniques and applications of rare earth metal oxides semiconductors: A review. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2022, 796, 139555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Chi, Z.; Xu, J. Synergistic effect of La2O3 on the flame retardant properties and the degradation mechanism of a novel PP/IFR system. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.; Shi, S.; Chen, X. Mechanical properties of cerium oxide-modified vulcanised natural rubber at elevated temperature. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2017, 46, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Attia, N.F. Organic nanoparticles as promising flame retardant materials for thermoplastic polymers. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 127, 2273–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Attia, N.F.; Mousa, M. Synthesis of smart coating for furniture textile and their flammability and hydrophobic properties. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 110, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, H. Flame retardant mechanism and surface modification of magnesium hydroxide flame retardant. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 170, 032028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pilarska, A.A.; Klapiszewski, L.; Jesionowski, T. Recent development in the synthesis, modification and application of Mg(OH)2 and MgO: A review. Powder Technol. 2017, 319, 373–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shen, L.; Shao, C.; Li, R.; Xu, Y.; Li, J.; Lin, H. Preparation and characterization of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)–magnesium hydroxide (MH)–hexaphenoxycyclotriphosphazene (HPCTP) composite flame-retardant materials. Polym. Bull. 2019, 76, 2399–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, L.; Dai, G.; Yan, L.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Wei, K. In-situ low-temperature sol-gel growth of nano-cerium oxide ternary composite films for ultraviolet blocking. Opt. Mater. 2020, 101, 109724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fudala, A.S.; Salih, W.M.; Alkazaz, F.F. Synthesis different sizes of cerium oxide CeO2 nanoparticles by using different concentrations of precursor via sol–gel method. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 49, 2786–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nöchel, U.; Kumar, U.N.; Wang, K.; Kratz, K.; Behl, M.; Lendlein, A. Triple-shape effect with adjustable switching temperatures in crosslinked poly[ethylene-co-(vinyl acetate). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2014, 215, 2446–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ye, L.; Miao, Y.; Yan, H.; Li, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, H. The synergistic effects of boroxo siloxanes with magnesium hydroxide in halogen-free flame retardant EVA/MH blends. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 868–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Witkowski, A.; Stec, A.A.; Hull, T.R. The influence of metal hydroxide fire retardants and nanoclay on the thermal decomposition of EVA. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 2231–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, Y.; Wu, C.; Xu, S. Mechanical, thermal and flame retardant properties of magnesium hydroxide filled poly(vinyl chloride) composites: The effect of filler shape. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 113, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Duan, H.; Chen, Y.; Ji, S.; Hu, R.; Ma, H. A novel phosphorus/nitrogen-containing polycarboxylic acid endowing epoxy resin with excellent flame retardance and mechanical properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 375, 121916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El Hage, R.; Viretto, A.; Sonnier, R.; Ferry, L.; Lopez-Cuesta, J.M. Flame retardancy of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) using new aluminum-based fillers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 108, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ngohang, F.E.; Fontaine, G.; Gay, L.; Bourbigot, S. Smoke composition using MLC/FTIR/ELPI: Application to flame retarded ethylene vinyl acetate. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 115, 89–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Z.; Qu, B. Flammability characterization and synergistic effects of expandable graphite with magnesium hydroxide in halogen-free flame-retardant EVA blends. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2003, 81, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cárdenas, M.A.; García-López, D.; Gobernado-Mitre, I.; Merino, J.C.; Pastor, J.M.; Martínez, J.d.D.; Barbeta, J.; Calveras, D. Mechanical and fire retardant properties of EVA/clay/ATH nanocomposites—Effect of particle size and surface treatment of ATH filler. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2008, 93, 2032–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lv, J.-p.; Liu, W.-h. Flame Retardancy and Mechanical properties of EVA Nanocomposites Based on Magnesium Hydroxide Nanoparticles/Microcapsulated Red Phosphorus. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 105, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. George, G.; Manikandan, H.; Kumar, T.M.A.; Joshy, S.; Sanju, A.C.; Anandhan, S. Effect of nanofillers on the crystalline and mechanical properties of EVACO polymer nanocomposites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 47, 5024–5028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Z.-Q.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y.-X.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Wen, X.; Li, N.; Fu, C.; Jian, R.-K.; Li, L.-J.; Wang, D.-Y. A Geometry Effect of Carbon Nanomaterials on Flame Retardancy and Mechanical Properties of Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate/Magnesium Hydroxide Composites. Polymers 2018, 10, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jin, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, J. UV aging behaviour of ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA) with different vinyl acetate contents. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 05867 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) TGA (b) DTGA (c) PSA (d) D50 of the flame-retardant fillers.
Figure 1. (a) TGA (b) DTGA (c) PSA (d) D50 of the flame-retardant fillers.
Materials 15 05867 g001
Materials 15 05867 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Scheme of the samples preparation sequence, and SEM images of the composites cross-section: (b) EVA, (c) EM, (d) EMC3 and (e) EMC5.
Figure 2. (a) Scheme of the samples preparation sequence, and SEM images of the composites cross-section: (b) EVA, (c) EM, (d) EMC3 and (e) EMC5.
Materials 15 05867 g002
Materials 15 05867 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD spectra of the EVA-MDH-CeO2 composite materials.
Figure 3. XRD spectra of the EVA-MDH-CeO2 composite materials.
Materials 15 05867 g003
Materials 15 05867 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) DSC curves of the pure EVA, EM, EMC3, and EMC5 composites, (b) TGA curves, (c) DTGA curves and (d) the maximum thermal decomposition rate of the pure EVA, EM, EMC3, and EMC5 composites.
Figure 4. (a) DSC curves of the pure EVA, EM, EMC3, and EMC5 composites, (b) TGA curves, (c) DTGA curves and (d) the maximum thermal decomposition rate of the pure EVA, EM, EMC3, and EMC5 composites.
Materials 15 05867 g004
Materials 15 05867 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) HRR curves, (b) TSP curves, (c) char residue curves, (d) TTI, (e) pHRR and (f) THR of the pure EVA, EM, EMC3, and EMC5 composites.
Figure 5. (a) HRR curves, (b) TSP curves, (c) char residue curves, (d) TTI, (e) pHRR and (f) THR of the pure EVA, EM, EMC3, and EMC5 composites.
Materials 15 05867 g005
Materials 15 05867 g006 550
Figure 6. Char residue of (a) pure EVA, (b) EM, (c) EMC3, and (d) EMC5 composites after Cone test; SEM images of: (e) EM, (f) EMC3, and (g) EMC5 char residue.
Figure 6. Char residue of (a) pure EVA, (b) EM, (c) EMC3, and (d) EMC5 composites after Cone test; SEM images of: (e) EM, (f) EMC3, and (g) EMC5 char residue.
Materials 15 05867 g006
Materials 15 05867 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Stress-strain curves of the pure EVA, EM, EMC3, and EMC5 composites, (b) Tensile strength, (c) Young’s Modulus and (d) Elongation at break (%) based on the stress strain curves.
Figure 7. (a) Stress-strain curves of the pure EVA, EM, EMC3, and EMC5 composites, (b) Tensile strength, (c) Young’s Modulus and (d) Elongation at break (%) based on the stress strain curves.
Materials 15 05867 g007
Materials 15 05867 g008 550
Figure 8. Optical microscope images of the pure EVA and its composites’ surface morphologies before and after exposure to UV, by different times.
Figure 8. Optical microscope images of the pure EVA and its composites’ surface morphologies before and after exposure to UV, by different times.
Materials 15 05867 g008
Materials 15 05867 g009 550
Figure 9. The tensile properties of the samples before and after exposure under UV by different times: (a) Elongation at break and (b) Tensile strength.
Figure 9. The tensile properties of the samples before and after exposure under UV by different times: (a) Elongation at break and (b) Tensile strength.
Materials 15 05867 g009
Table
Table 1. Formulations of EVA Composites (in wt.%).
Table 1. Formulations of EVA Composites (in wt.%).
Sample NameEVAMDHCeO2
EVA100--
EM4555-
EMC345523
EMC545505
Note: MDH is magnesium hydroxide; CeO2 is cerium oxide. EM is magnesium hydroxide-filled EVA; EMC is magnesium hydroxide/cerium oxide-filled EVA.
Table
Table 2. TGA Results of the Pure and Modified Fillers.
Table 2. TGA Results of the Pure and Modified Fillers.
SamplesT-5% (°C)T-Max (°C)Der. Weight (%/°C)Residue @ 700 °C (%)
CeO2----
MDH312.4353.10.568.4
MDH + CeO2 3%317.5365.80.469.5
MDH + CeO2 5%324.3367.60.471.9
Table
Table 3. PSA Results of the Pure and Modified Fillers.
Table 3. PSA Results of the Pure and Modified Fillers.
Sample FormulationD50 (μm)
MDH0.98
CeO20.82
MDH + CeO2 3%0.96
MDH + CeO2 5%0.94
Table
Table 4. DSC Results of the composites.
Table 4. DSC Results of the composites.
SamplesTg (°C)Tm (°C)Melting Enthalpy (J·g−1)
EVA−28.275.123.2
EM−29.576.813.9
EMC3−28.975.711.2
EMC5−27.577.111.1
Table
Table 5. TGA results of the composites.
Table 5. TGA results of the composites.
SamplesT-5% (°C)T-Max (°C)Der. Weight (%/°C)Residue @ 700 °C (in wt.%)
EVA325.8460.42.10.5
EM327.4460.51.232.5
EMC3324.4457.80.939.8
EMC5319.1458.40.939.2
Table
Table 6. LOI and UL-94 Results of the composites.
Table 6. LOI and UL-94 Results of the composites.
SamplesLOIUL-94
(%)t1 (s)t2 (s)DrippingIgnition
EVA18.2>10-YesYes
EM40.915NoNo
EMC338.526NoNo
EMC539.924NoNo
Table
Table 7. Cone calorimetry results of the composites.
Table 7. Cone calorimetry results of the composites.
Sample NameTTI (s)pHRR (kW/m2)pHRR (Red. %)THR (MJ/m2)AEHC (MJ/kg)TSP
(m2)		Char Residue (wt.%)
EVA48 ± 81195 ± 18-152 ± 235.9 ± 0.113.9 ± 3.00.6 ± 0.3
EM73 ± 6491 ± 1358.9111 ± 128.6 ± 0.28.6 ± 0.636.7 ± 0.6
EMC375 ± 4425 ± 764.4108 ± 126.3 ± 0.18.7 ± 0.5 39.5 ± 0.7
EMC577 ± 1354 ± 670.488 ± 921.8 ± 0.27.9 ± 0.441.2 ± 0.4
Table
Table 8. Tensile test results of the composites.
Table 8. Tensile test results of the composites.
SamplesElongation at Break (%)Tensile Strength (MPa)Young’s Modulus
(MPa)
EVA722 ± 2118.6 ± 0.417 ± 1
EM167 ± 109.6 ± 0.569 ± 2
EMC3203 ± 1310.1 ± 0.676 ± 3
EMC5254 ± 239.1 ± 0.273 ± 3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hobson, J.; Yin, G.-Z.; Yu, X.; Zhou, X.; Prolongo, S.G.; Ao, X.; Wang, D.-Y. Synergistic Effect of Cerium Oxide for Improving the Fire-Retardant, Mechanical and Ultraviolet-Blocking Properties of EVA/Magnesium Hydroxide Composites. Materials 2022, 15, 5867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175867

AMA Style

Hobson J, Yin G-Z, Yu X, Zhou X, Prolongo SG, Ao X, Wang D-Y. Synergistic Effect of Cerium Oxide for Improving the Fire-Retardant, Mechanical and Ultraviolet-Blocking Properties of EVA/Magnesium Hydroxide Composites. Materials. 2022; 15(17):5867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175867

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hobson, Jose, Guang-Zhong Yin, Xiaoli Yu, Xiaodong Zhou, Silvia Gonzalez Prolongo, Xiang Ao, and De-Yi Wang. 2022. "Synergistic Effect of Cerium Oxide for Improving the Fire-Retardant, Mechanical and Ultraviolet-Blocking Properties of EVA/Magnesium Hydroxide Composites" Materials 15, no. 17: 5867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175867

APA Style

Hobson, J., Yin, G.-Z., Yu, X., Zhou, X., Prolongo, S. G., Ao, X., & Wang, D.-Y. (2022). Synergistic Effect of Cerium Oxide for Improving the Fire-Retardant, Mechanical and Ultraviolet-Blocking Properties of EVA/Magnesium Hydroxide Composites. Materials, 15(17), 5867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175867

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop