1. Introduction
Photonic biosensors are simple, portable, robust, and cost-effective analytical devices for the rapid and specific screening and sensitive monitoring of environmental pollutants, water, foods and beverages contaminants. Photonic biosensors combine molecular recognition elements (MREs) with optical transducer systems, which convert light rays into electronic signals, so that the specific binding of a target molecule to the MRE to be finally translated into a measurable electrical signal [
1,
2,
3]. Aptamers are among the quite frequently used MREs in such devices for the quantification of environmental pollutants. Aptamers are short, target specific, single-stranded synthetic oligonucleotides (ssDNA, RNA) or peptide sequences, which fold into three-dimensional shapes capable of binding non-covalently and with high affinity to a target molecule. They are readily generated through an in vitro process called Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential Enrichment (SELEX). A core classical SELEX technique for aptamer selection is the “Magnetic bead-based SELEX” [
4], in which the target molecule is covalently attached on, e.g., carboxylic acid functionalized magnetic beads through an amide bond [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10]. Although aptamers for a variety of environmental pollutants with serious implications in human health, including the dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), have been already developed, aptamers for polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dibenzo-
p-dioxins (PCDDs), a group of small organic molecules collectively known as “dioxins”, schematically shown in
Figure 1, are missing [
11,
12]. In particular, aptamers for PCBs have been either obtained through anchoring hydroxyl-substituted PCBs, such as compound
1, on carboxy-substituted magnetic beads through an ester bond [
13], or amino-substituted PCBs, such as
2, on an epoxy-activated agarose matrix through a N-C bond [
14]. On the other hand, attempted anchoring of an amino-substituted PCDD, such as
3 (
Figure 1) on a Sepharose resin was problematic due to the low nucleophilicity of the aromatic amino function [
12].
Accordingly, we decided initially to study the feasibility of synthesizing amino-substituted PCDDs of the general type
4 (
Figure 1) from commercially available PCDDs and using reactions, e.g., Heck reaction or formylation followed by Wittig reaction, we have previously successfully applied in the psoralen nucleus [
15]. In compounds
4, the required amino functionality was designed to be attached on the dioxin nucleus through a suitable hydrocarbon linker. However, due to the high toxicity, the low availability and cost problems associated with the appropriate PCDDs (also PCDFs) as starting materials, we had to change our strategy and attempt the total synthesis of amino-substituted tetrachlorodibenzodioxins of the general type
5 using readily available and cost-affordable starting materials, such as chlorinated anisoles or phenols and catechols. In compounds
5, the required amino group is connected to the dioxin nucleus through a propoxy-type linker which could be readily formed from the corresponding hydroxy-substituted PCDDs
6, through
O-alkylation with a suitable bromide, for example the 3-bromo-
N-1-(4,4-dimethyl-2,6-dioxocyclohexylidene)ethylpropan-1-amine [DdeNHCH
2)
3Br], which has been recently used by our research group to alkylate the
o-nitrophenylsulfonylated primary amino function of polyamines [
16]. Notably, the 1-(4,4-dimethyl-2,6-dioxocyclohexylidene)ethyl (Dde) group has been used to protect selectively primary amino functions and is stable to acids and bases but is readily removed by a 2% solution of hydrazine in
N,
N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at ambient temperature.
Similar methodology could be furthermore designed for the synthesis of amino-substituted tetrachlorodibenzofurans of the general type 7, which could arise from the corresponding hydroxy-substituted PCDFs, 8.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. General Information
Melting points were determined with an Electrothermal apparatus (Electrothermal, Essex, UK) and are uncorrected. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance III HD instrument (Bruker Daltonics GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany) operating at 600 MHz and 150 MHz for 1H and 13C nuclei, respectively. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported for CDCl3 solutions in parts per million (ppm) downfield from tetramethylsilane (TMS), used as internal standard; all homocoupling patterns (nJH,H values) are given in Hertz (Hz). Electron-spray ionization (ESI) mass spectra were recorded at 30 eV, on a Waters Micromass ZQ spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) grade MeOH as solvent. Ultraviolet (UV) spectra were recorded with a Thermo ScientificTM Multiscan Sky Microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu IRTracer-100 ATR-FTIR spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Elemental analyses for new compounds were determined on a Carlo Erba EA 1108 CHNS elemental analyzer (Carlo Erba, MI, Italy).
Flash column chromatography (FCC) was performed on Acros Organics silica gel 0.035–0.070 mm, 60 Å and Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) on Merck silica gel 60 F254 films (0.2 mm) precoated on aluminium foil. Spots were visualized with UV light at 254 nm and by spraying with a ninhydrine solution (0.3 g ninhydrin, 3 mL gl. acetic acid, 97 mL 1-butanol), only applicable to final product 17. The eluents or mixtures thereof (v/v) used for the development of TLC or FCC were: (A) Hexane/Toluene (9:1), (B) Hexane/Toluene (8:2), (C) Hexane/Toluene (7:3), (D) Hexane/Toluene (6:4), (E) Hexane/Toluene (1:1), (F) Hexane/Toluene (1:9), (G) 100% Toluene, (H) Hexane/Ethyl acetate (19:1), (I) Hexane/Ethyl acetate (8:2), (J) Hexane/Ethyl acetate (1:1), (K) Hexane/Dichloromethane (1:1), (L) Toluene/Ethyl acetate (95:5), (M) Toluene/Ethyl acetate (6:4), (N) Toluene/Ethyl acetate (3:7), (O) 100% Ethyl acetate, (P) 100% Chloroform, (Q) Chloroform/Methanol/conc. NH3 (9:1:0.1).
All solvents were dried and/or purified according to standard procedures prior to use. Solvents were routinely removed at ca. 40 °C under reduced pressure on Bücki Rotavapor RE 111. Air-sensitive reagents were handled under inert atmosphere (Ar). The starting materials for the syntheses, that is 3,4-dichloroanisole, 2,3,6-trichlorophenol, 4,5-dichlorocatechol and 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroanisole were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA), TCI (Tokyo, Japan), TRC (Tokyo, Japan) and CHEMSERVICE (West Chester, PA, USA), respectively. All reagents employed in the present work were purchased from either Alfa Aesar or Acros Organics (Ferrand, NJ, USA) and were used without further purification. Magnetic beads used for the immobilization of dioxin
17 were Merck Millipore PureProteome
TM 1.0 μM Carboxy FlexiBend Magnetic Bead System with a capacity of 97–114 μmole carboxylic acid/g beads. Compound
20 is commercially available but for the needs of the present work it was prepared from phenol
S2 (
Supplementary Materials). Compounds
S1 and
19 are described in ref. [
17] but herein they were prepared differently as described in the
Supplementary Materials. Compounds
S3–
S6 and
21–22 were synthesized (
Supplementary Materials) for the needs of this work according to ref. [
17].
2.2. 3,4-Dichloro-2,6-dinitroanisole (10)
A solution of 3,4-dichloroanisole (9) (0.40 mL, 3.0 mmol) in 96% H2SO4 (5 mL) was cooled to −10 °C and KNO3 (0.67 g, 6.6 mmol) was added portion-wise over 20 min. The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature. The completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC using system D. Crushed ice (20 g) was then added to the reaction mixture and neutralization followed to pH 6–7 with saturated aqueous NaOH solution. The resulting mixture was extracted twice with ethyl acetate. The organic phase was washed once with H2O and twice with brine and then dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness to give pure product 10. Brown solid. Yield 0.74 g (92%). M.p. 55.5–57.0 °C. Rf (D): 0.40. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δH 8.22 (s, 1H, H-5), 4.05 (s, 3H, OMe) ppm. 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δC 145.7, 130.6, 129.6, 127.4, 65.3 ppm. Elemental analysis for C7H4Cl2N2O5: calcd C 31.49, H 1.51, N 10.49; found C 31.62, H 1.38, N 10.29.
2.3. 4,7,8-Trichloro-1-methoxy-2-nitrodibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxine (12)
To a solution of 4,5-dichlorocatechol (11) (0.11 g, 0.60 mmol) in acetone (1.2 mL), K2CO3 (0.17 g, 1.2 mmol) was added under an inert atmosphere. The mixture was refluxed for 30 min, after which 3,4-dichloro-2,6-dinitroanisole (10) (0.16 g, 0.60 mmol) in acetone (1.2 mL) was added. The resulting mixture was refluxed for 2 h. The completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC using system L. The reaction mixture was then diluted with H2O and extracted with ethyl acetate. The aqueous phase was re-extracted twice with ethyl acetate and the combined organic phases were washed once with H2O, and once with brine, and then dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness. FCC of the residue, using system E for elution, gave pure product 12. Slightly yellow solid. Yield 0.15 g (70%). M.p. 203.5–205.5 °C. Rf (E): 0.36. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δH 7.62 (s, 1H, H-3), 7.16 (s, 1H, H-6/9), 7.13 (s, 1H, H-9/6), 4.02 (s, 3H, OMe) ppm. 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δC 142.6, 141.8, 139.6, 139.2, 139.2, 137.4, 128.7, 128.3, 120.7, 118.5, 118.2, 116.4, 62.8 ppm. Elemental analysis for C13H6Cl3NO5: calcd C 43.07, H 1.67, N 3.86; found C 42.91, H 1.84, N 3.99.
2.4. 4,7,8-Trichloro-1-methoxydibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin-2-amine (13)
A suspension of compound 12 (0.14 g, 0.39 mmol), FeCl3∙6H2O (3.0 mg) and activated C (3.0 mg) in MeOH (3.4 mL) and H2O (0.80 mL) was heated to 70 °C. Then H2NNH2∙H2O (90 μL, 1.90 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred under reflux for 3 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC using system E. Then, additional H2NNH2∙H2O (90 μL, 1.90 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was further refluxed for additional 2 h. Following confirmation of the completion of the reaction, the resulting reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and washed twice with 5% aq. NaHCO3 and twice with brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness. FCC of the residue, using system F for elution, gave pure product 13. Beige solid. Yield 91 mg (70%). M.p. 196–199 °C. Rf (F): 0.17. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δH 7.07 (s, 1H, H-6/9), 7.06 (s, 1H, H-9/6), 6.38 (s, 1H, H-3), 3.87 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δC 140.8, 140.0, 136.7, 136.2, 133.8, 130.5, 127.1, 126.6, 118.1, 117.8, 115.9, 109.7, 60.8 ppm. Elemental analysis for C13H8Cl3NO3: calcd C 46.95, H 2.42, N 4.21; found C 47.11, H 2.23, N 4.14.
2.5. 2,4,7,8-Tetrachloro-1-methoxydibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxine (14)
- a.
Preparation of the copper(I) chloride solution
Copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (80 mg, 0.32 mmol) were dissolved in H2O (0.30 mL) in a reaction tube placed in a steam bath and then NaCl (38 mg, 0.64 mmol) was added. A solution of Na2SO3 (16 mg, 0.13 mmol) in H2O (0.10 mL) was then added dropwise to the hot copper(II) sulfate solution. The reaction mixture was stirred well, and then allowed to cool in ice while diazotizing the amine. When the copper(I) chloride was ready for use, H2O above the solid was removed, the white solid was washed once with H2O, H2O was then removed again, and the solid was finally dissolved in 37% HCl (0.15 mL).
- b.
Diazotization of aryl amine 13
To an ice-cold solution of compound 13 (90 mg, 0.27 mmol) in 37% HCl (1.0 mL), an ice-cold solution of NaNO2 (20 mg, 0.28 mmol) in H2O (0.10 mL) was added. The yellow reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 30 min, whereby the completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC using system F.
- c.
Sandmeyer reaction
The cooled copper(I) chloride solution was added to the diazonium chloride solution dropwise with thorough mixing. The brownish reaction mixture was then let to reach the ambient temperature and bubbles of nitrogen gas were evolved. The reaction mixture was placed in a steam bath for 30 min. To the resulting yellow mixture H2O (2.0 mL) was added and further stirred at the refluxing temperature for 40 min whereby completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC, using eluent G.
The mixture was then diluted with H2O and extracted with dichloromethane (DCM). The aqueous phase was re-extracted twice with DCM and then the combined organic layers were washed once with H2O and once with brine. Drying over Na2SO4 and evaporation to dryness left a residue. Finally, FCC of the residue, using system A for elution, gave pure product 14. White solid. Yield 60 mg (63%). M.p. 164.5–165.5 °C. Rf (A): 0.21. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δH 7.11 (s, 1H, H-3), 7.09 (s, 1H, H-6/9), 7.05 (s, 1H, H-9/6), 3.91 (s, 3H, OMe) ppm. 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δC 143.3, 140.0, 139.8, 137.7, 137.0, 127.7, 127.6, 124.3, 123.3, 118.3, 118.0, 116.5, 61.5 ppm. Elemental analysis for C13H6Cl4O3: calcd C 44.36, H 1.72; found C 44.55, H 1.48.
2.6. 2,4,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin-1-ol (15)
A solution of compound 14 (60 mg, 0.17 mmol) in dry DCM (0.15 mL) was cooled to −10 °C under an inert atmosphere and then 1 M BBr3 in DCM (0.34 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at that temperature for 30 min and then at ambient temperature for 2 h. The completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC using system B. The reaction mixture was then diluted with DCM and washed carefully twice with 5% aqueous NaHCO3. The organic phase was subsequently washed once with 0.6 N aqueous HCl and twice with H2O. Drying over Na2SO4 and evaporation to dryness left pure product 15. White solid. Yield 50 mg (87%). M.p. 207.5–210 °C; Rf (G): 0.30. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δH 7.13 (s, 1H, H-6/9), 7.09 (s, 1H, H-9/6), 7.03 (s, 1H, H-3), 5.50 (br. s, 1H, OH) ppm. 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δC 139.9, 139.7, 139.4, 137.4, 131.1, 127.8, 127.7, 123.8, 118.4, 118.0, 115.7, 112.8 ppm. Elemental analysis for C12H4Cl4O3: calcd C 42.73, H 1.12; found C 42.45, H 1.38.
2.7. 5,5-Dimethyl-2-(1-((3-((2,4,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin-1-yl)oxy)propyl) amino)ethylidene)cyclohexane-1,3-dione (16)
A suspension of compound 15 (47 mg, 0.14 mmol), N-Dde-protected 3-bromo-propylamine (45 mg, 0.15 mmol) and K2CO3 (58 mg, 0.42 mmol) in dry DMF (1.0 mL) was stirred vigorously at ambient temperature for 2 h under an inert atmosphere. The completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC using the solvent system L. The reaction mixture was directly applied on the top of a chromatography column and subjected to FCC, using system M for elution, to give pure compound 16. Beige solid. Yield 67 mg (86%). M.p. 153–155 °C. Rf (M): 0.42. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δH 13.65 (br. s, 1H, NH), 7.11 (s, 1H, H-3), 7.10 (s, 1H, H-6/9), 7.05 (s, 1H, H-9/6), 4.15 (t, 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, OCH2)), 3.74 (q, 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 2.64 (s, 3H, =CCH3), 2.38 (s, 4H, two CH2CO), 2.17 (quint., 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, CH2CH2CH2) 1.03 (s, 6H, two CCH3) ppm. 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δC 173.8, 141.9, 139.9, 139.7, 137.7, 137.0, 127.8, 127.6, 124.4, 123.1, 118.2, 118.1, 116.8, 108.0, 70.3, 39.7, 30.1, 29.7, 28.3, 17.9 ppm. Elemental analysis for C25H23Cl4NO5: calcd C 53.69, H 4.15, N 2.50; found C 53.49, H 4.01, N 2.34.
Note: Ιn the 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 16, the two CO and the two CH2CO carbons of the Dde protecting group were not observed.
2.8. 3-((2,4,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin-1-yl)oxy)propan-1-amine (17)
To a solution of compound 16 (56 mg, 0.10 mmol) in DMF (1.3 mL), H2NNH2∙H2O (30 μL, 0.50 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 30 min. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC using solvent system M as eluant. The reaction mixture was then diluted with DCM and washed twice with H2O and once with brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness to give pure product 17, following FCC purification using system Q. Slightly yellow solid. Yield 32 mg (80%). M.p. 109–110.5 °C. Rf (Q): 0.46. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δH 7.10 (s, 1H, H-3), 7.06 (s, 1H, H-6/9), 7.04 (s, 1H, H-9/6), 4.12 (t, 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 3.00 (t, 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 1.95 (quint. 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, CH2CH2CH2) 1.70 (br. s, 2H, NH2) ppm. 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δC 142.4, 140.0, 139.8, 137.7, 137.0, 127.7, 127.6, 124.4, 123.4, 118.3, 118.0, 116.4, 72.5, 39.1, 33.7 ppm; MS (ESI, 30 eV): m/z 394.18, 396.20, 398.22 and 399.41 [M+H]+. Elemental analysis for C15H11Cl4NO3: calcd C 45.60, H 2.81, N 3.55; found C 45.35, H 3.02, N 3.65.
2.9. Conjugate 18-Attachment of Amino-Substituted Dioxin 17 on the Carboxy-Substituted Magnetic Beads
For the immobilization process [
13], 2.5 mg of carboxy-substituted magnetic beads (0.242–0.285 μmole carboxylic acid) were used and treated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the beads were washed twice in DMF (1.5 mL each) and re-suspended in 1.1 mL of the same solvent. Subsequently 0.6 mg (2.91 μmole) of
N,N’-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and 1 mg (2.53 μmole) of amino-substituted dioxin
17, each dissolved in 0.2 mL DMF, were added sequentially to the beads and the resulting reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h with gentle agitation to ensure complete dispersion of the beads. Following removal of the reaction medium, the unreacted carboxyl groups on the beads were then quenched with 1.5 mL of a 80 mM ethanolamine solution in DMF at ambient temperature for 1 h. Finally, the beads were washed twice with DMF, re-suspended in DMF and stored at 4 °C. As a negative control, 2.5 mg of magnetic beads were coated with ethanolamine only using 1.5 mL of a 80 mM ethanolamine solution in DMF, containing 0.6 mg DCC, for 1 h at ambient temperature.
To assess the amount of amino-substituted dioxin
17 immobilized on the magnetic beads, the UV spectra of amino-substituted dioxin
17 and of aliquots of the coupling solution were recorded immediately after the addition of DCC and amino-substituted dioxin
17 and after the 24 h incubation at 37 °C (see
Supplementary Materials, Figures S1 and S2). Taking into consideration the UV cutoff wavelength of DMF (268 nm), the measurement of the concentration of amino-substituted dioxin
17 before and after coupling was carried at λ
max 303 with ε
max 2173 mol
−1·cm
−1. The amount of amino-substituted dioxin
17 immobilized on the magnetic beads (2.5 mg) was then calculated indirectly and found to be 0.27 μmole (0.107 mg).
When the experiment was repeated at lower temperature (25 °C), using less excess of amino-substituted dioxin 17 (0.76 μmole, 0.3 mg) and shorter incubation time (12 h), significantly less loading (0.101 μmole, 0.04 mg) of amino-substituted dioxin 17 immobilized on the magnetic beads was affected.
Aliquots of uncoated magnetic beads, dioxin-coated magnetic beads and ethanolamine-coated magnetic beads were washed sequentially with DMF and diethyl ether and then, following removal of the solvents, dried overnight at ambient temperature over P
2O
5. For these samples and a sample of the amino-substituted dioxin
17 powder, ATR-FTIR spectra were recorded (see
Supplementary Materials, Figures S3–S6) in an effort to provide additional qualitative evidence for the immobilization of amino-substituted dioxin
17 and/or ethanolamine on the magnetic beads [
13]. The IR spectra were recorded at a resolution of 4 cm
−1 and were averaged over 100 scans. The anticipated C
aryl-Cl stretching frequencies in the area 1100–1035 cm
−1 of the IR spectrum of dioxin-coated magnetic beads could not be however identified with certainty. On the other hand, changes noticed in the IR spectrum of uncoated magnetic beads when coated with amino-substituted dioxin
17 and/or ethanolamine might be taken to indicate immobilization of amino-substituted dioxin
17 and/or ethanolamine on the beads.
2.10. 5,5-Dimethyl-2-(1-((3-((2,4,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo[b,d]furan-3-yl)oxy)propyl)ami-no)ethylidene)cyclohexane-1,3-dione (23)
A suspension of compound 21 (23 mg, 0.07 mmol), N-Dde-protected 3-bromopropan-1-amine (24 mg, 0.08 mmol) and K2CO3 (29 mg, 0.21 mmol) in dry DMF (0.40 mL) was stirred vigorously at ambient temperature for 2 h under an inert atmosphere (Ar). Additional N-Dde-protected 3-bromopropan-1-amine (8.0 mg) was added and the reaction mixture was further stirred for 48 h. The completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC using system E. The reaction mixture was directly applied on the top of a chromatography column and subjected to FCC, using system E initially and then eluent Q, to give compound 23. White solid. Yield 18 mg (48%). Rf (J) 0.34. NMR spectra for compound 23 are provided as supplementary material. From these spectra, compound 23 seemed to contain a small amount of its isomeric compound 24. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δH 13.64 (br.s, 1H, NH), 7.94 (s, 1H, H-1), 7.81 (s, 1H, H-9), 7.75 (s, 1H, H-6), 4.23 (t, 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 3.84 (q, 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 2.67 (s, 4H, two COCH2), 2.40 (s, 3H, =CCH3), 2.27 (quint., 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, CH2CH2CH2), 1.06 (s, 6H, two CCH3) ppm. 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δC 173.9, 155.0, 152.3, 151.0, 131.9, 128.2, 124.9, 123.2, 121.8, 120.3, 119.5, 114.1, 113.3, 108.1, 70.5, 52.9, 40.1 30.1, 29.8, 28.2, 18.0 ppm.
Note: Ιn the 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 23, the two CO carbons of the Dde protecting group were not observed
2.11. 5,5-Dimethyl-2-(1-((3-((2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo[b,d]furan-4-yl)oxy)propyl)ami-no)ethylidene)cyclohexane-1,3-dione (24)
A suspension of compound 22 (16 mg, 0.05 mmol), N-Dde-protected 3-bromo-propylamine (18 mg, 0.06 mmol) and K2CO3 (21 mg, 0.15 mmol) in dry DMF (0.30 mL) was stirred vigorously at ambient temperature for 24 h under an inert atmosphere (Ar). The completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC using system J. The reaction mixture was directly applied on the top of a chromatography column and subjected to FCC, using system J initially, then eluent O and finally eluent P, to give pure compound 24. Colorless oil. Yield 22 mg (82%). Rf (J) 0.35. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δH 13.66 (br.s, 1H, NH), 7.95 (s, 1H, H-1), 7.73 (s, 1H, H-9), 7.71 (s, 1H, H-6), 4.57 (t, 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 3.82 (q, 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 2.66 (s, 3H, =CCH3), 2.38 (br. s, 4H, two COCH2), 2.26 (quint., 3JH,H = 6 Hz, 2H, CH2CH2CH2), 1.05 (s, 6H, two CCH3) ppm. 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δC 173.9, 154.7, 146.8, 141.4, 132.2, 128.8, 128.1, 124.6, 123.5, 122.9, 121.8, 115.7, 114.2, 108.1, 70.2, 39.9, 30.1, 29.7, 28.3, 17.9 ppm.
Note: Ιn the 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 24, the two CO and the two CH2CO carbons of the Dde protecting group were not observed.
3. Results and Discussion
PCDDs have been synthesized through the condensation of chlorinated catechols or their corresponding dipotassium salts and chlorinated aromatics, bearing two chlorine atoms in adjacent positions, at the refluxing point (189 °C) of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) [
18,
19]. However, in our hands, the attempted direct condensation of the commercially available 4,5-dichlorocatechol and 2,4,5,6-anisole in the presence of KOH at refluxing DMSO failed to produce any detectable amount of the anticipated 1-methoxy-2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-
p-dioxin. It has been reported however that this reaction can take place under milder reaction conditions, e.g., using a weaker base (K
2CO
3) in hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA) at 190 °C [
20] or in refluxing acetone [
18], in case the polychlorinated aromatics contain a nitro group, which obviously serves to facilitate the initial nucleophilic aromatic substitution step [
18,
20], acting at the same time acts as a leaving group.
Taking into consideration that (a) the methoxy group is, in fact, a protected form of aromatic hydroxyl functions [
20], (b) nitro groups in the polychlorinated aromatics facilitate the afore mentioned reaction, and (c) a nitro group can be readily replaced at a later stage by a chlorine atom through reduction and Sandmeyer reaction [
21], we examined the condensation of 3,4-dichloro-2,6-dinitroanisole (
10) with 4,5-dichlorocatechol (
11) (
Scheme 1). The former was readily obtained in 92% yield from 3,4-dichloanisole (
9) upon nitration with the use of KNO
3/96% H
2SO
4 system for 12 h at ambient temperature [
22].
Next, anisole
10 and catechol
11 were condensed under mild conditions, that is using potassium carbonate as base in refluxing acetone for 2 h, yielding the anticipated substituted PCDD
12 in 70% yield. The reduction of nitro group of compound
12 was effected with hydrazine hydrate in the presence of ferric chloride trihydrate and activated C [
22] to give the corresponding amino-substituted PCDD
13 in 70% yield. Compound
13, was then subjected to a Sandmeyer chlorination reaction, using initially sodium nitrite and 37% aqueous HCl at 0 °C for 30 min and then Cu
2Cl
2 at 100 °C for 40 min, to give the methoxy-substituted tetrachlorodibenzo[
b,e][1,4]dioxin (TCDD)
14 in 63% yield. From the latter compound, the methyl protecting group was removed using 1 M BBr
3 in DCM at 0 °C for 30 min and then at ambient temperature for 4 h [
22] to yield the hydroxyl-substituted TCDD
15 in 87% yield. The free phenolic hydroxyl was then subjected to Williamson etherification using the Dde-protected 3-bromopropan-1-amine [
22] in DMF in the presence of potassium carbonate at ambient temperature for 2 h, affording the ether
16 in 86% yield. The resulting alkoxy-substituted TCDD
16 was then Dde-deprotected upon treatment with 2% hydrazine hydrate in DMF at ambient temperature for 30 min to provide, after purification with FCC, the targeted 3-(2,4,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo[
b,e][1,4]dioxin-1-yloxy)propan-1-amine (
17) in 80% yield. Finally, coupling of amino-substituted dioxin
17 with carboxy-substituted magnetic beads (MB) in the presence of DCC, followed by capping of the unreacted carboxyl functions on the MB with ethanolamine, proceeded readily producing the targeted conjugate
18 (dioxin-coated magnetic beads) with high loading of dioxin
17, as supported by means of UV spectroscopy measurements (see Materials and Methods and
Supplementary Materials). The amount of immobilized dioxin
17 on the beads was calculated to be 0.108 μmole/mg beads whereas the capacity of the beads used was 0.097–0.114 μmole carboxylic acid/mg beads.
In principle, the above described methodology could be easily adapted as well to the synthesis of the 3-aminoalkoxy-substituted tetrachlorodibenzo[
b,d]furans (TCDFs). Starting materials for theses syntheses would be the corresponding hydroxyl-substituted TCDFs, for example compounds
21 and
22. The synthesis of the regioisomeric 2,4,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo[
b,d]furan-3-ol (
21) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo[
b,d]furan-4-ol (
22), which was performed according to reported procedure [
17], is briefly depicted in
Scheme 2 and fully detailed in the Supporting Materials. It involves the electrophilic substitution of 2,3,6-trichloroanisole (
20) by the diazonium salt from 4,5-dichloro-
o-anisidine (
19), followed by deprotection of the phenolic hydroxyls and subsequent intramolecular nucleophilic aromatic substitution. For the needs of the present work, the required reactants
19 and
20 for the assembly of the tetrachlorodibenzo[
b,d]furan skeleton, were prepared from the commercially available 3,4-dichloroanisole (
9) and 2,3,6-trichlorophenol (
S2), respectively, as described in the
Supplementary Materials and depicted in
Scheme S1 therein.
The thus-obtained hydroxyl-substituted TCDFs
21 and
22 were then reacted separately with Dde-NH(CH
2)
3Br [
16] in DMF in the presence of potassium carbonate at ambient temperature for 48 h and 24 h, respectively, to afford the anticipated N-Dde-protected 3-aminopropoxy-substituted TCDFs
23 and
24 in 48% and 82% yield, respectively. The lower yield and slower reaction times for the former compound might, most likely, be attributed to the steric hindrance promoted by the two adjacent chlorine atoms during the alkylation reaction. Compounds
23 and
24 are convenient sources of the corresponding 3-aminopropoxy-substituted TCDFs, which could be also attached to carboxy-substituted magnetic beads for the development of aptamers specific for TCDFs. We are currently embarked on the application of the presently described methodology for the synthesis of other ω-aminoalkoxy-substituted PCDDs and PCDFs, as well as the development of ssDNA aptamers specific for 3-aminopropoxy-substituted dioxins for use as molecular recognition elements in photonic biosensors with environmental/alimentary interest.