Next Article in Journal
Effect of Hydration and Carbonation Progress on the Porosity and Permeability of Cement Pastes
Next Article in Special Issue
Optical Properties of Oxidized Plasma-Polymerized Organosilicones and Their Correlation with Mechanical and Chemical Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Minority Carrier Lifetime Measurements for Contactless Oxidation Process Characterization and Furnace Profiling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/ma12010191
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Perspective on Plasma Polymers for Applied Biomaterials Nanoengineering and the Recent Rise of Oxazolines

by
Melanie Macgregor
1,2 and
Krasimir Vasilev
1,2,*
1
School of Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
2
Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(1), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010191
Submission received: 3 December 2018 / Revised: 21 December 2018 / Accepted: 2 January 2019 / Published: 8 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plasma Polymerized Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Plasma polymers are unconventional organic thin films which only partially share the properties traditionally attributed to polymeric materials. For instance, they do not consist of repeating monomer units but rather present a highly crosslinked structure resembling the chemistry of the precursor used for deposition. Due to the complex nature of the deposition process, plasma polymers have historically been produced with little control over the chemistry of the plasma phase which is still poorly understood. Yet, plasma polymer research is thriving, in par with the commercialisation of innumerable products using this technology, in fields ranging from biomedical to green energy industries. Here, we briefly summarise the principles at the basis of plasma deposition and highlight recent progress made in understanding the unique chemistry and reactivity of these films. We then demonstrate how carefully designed plasma polymer films can serve the purpose of fundamental research and biomedical applications. We finish the review with a focus on a relatively new class of plasma polymers which are derived from oxazoline-based precursors. This type of coating has attracted significant attention recently due to its unique properties.

1. Introduction

Plasma in its natural state can be seen as the polar lights and lightning. Far from being rare, this high energy ionised gas phase, referred to as the fourth state of matter, represents more than 99% of the visible universe. Humans artificially induce plasmas using a variety of energy sources including strong magnetic fields, lasers, radiofrequency, electric fields and microwaves. Man-made plasmas are nowadays seen everywhere from commodities such as TV screens, toys and low energy lighting to nuclear reactors and aircraft propulsion turbines. What may be less obvious for some are all industrial uses of plasmas, not as a finished product, but as a manufacturing tool for material surface modification [1]. Plasmas are constituted of highly energetic molecules, molecular fragments, ions, radicals and free electrons. As a result, when plasmas come in contact with solid surfaces, may it be metal, plastic or any other material, they cause important changes to the material surface properties. In this way, it is possible to use plasma-assisted processes to modify a material surface energy, wettability, chemistry and even topography to suits a variety of applications with the added advantage that the properties of the bulk materials are preserved. Plasma-assisted surface modifications encompass a range of techniques which Chu et al. described in quite some detail for the specific case of biomaterials surface modification [2]. Yet, plasma-induced surface treatments processes are used to create novel materials with unique electronic, optical, mechanical and biological properties for many different fields of applications. When the excited species present in the plasma generated from inert (Ar, Ne, He …) or reactive (O2, N2, NH3, CO2 …) gases collide with the solid, enough energy may be acquired by the atoms on the surface layer of the solid for them to detach from the surface. When the physical degradation of the bulk material is limited to the outermost layer, the plasma process is called sputtering, Figure 1a [3]. This is the process used in plasma cleaners to remove impurities from contaminated surfaces. If further deeper loss of the exposed material occurs, however, the process is referred to as plasma etching, Figure 1b. Plasma etching is a process in which the adsorption of energetic species is followed by product formation, prior to product desorption [4]. Combination processes have also been reported where anisotropic chemical etching is accelerated by ion sputtering [5]. In biomaterials engineering, plasma is generally used for surface cleaning and sterilisation but at its extreme, plasma etching can also be used for surface roughening and nanopatterning, and even generating novel nanostructures [6,7,8,9]. It is also possible for excited species present in the plasma phase to directly react with the substrate and induce surface modification including the grafting of new chemical functions, such as amine or hydroxyl groups [10]. This process is often referred to as plasma ion implantation. The downside of modifying a surface via plasma sputtering or implantation is that the modification is short lived because reorientation of the surface functional group occurs overtime [11,12,13,14]. Surfaces with lasting properties that completely differ from those of the bulk materials can be generated via plasma polymer deposition. It differs from the other plasma-assisted surface modification in the fact that a thin organic coating is formed over the surface of the original material (Figure 1d). Figure 1 provides an simplified visual representation of the main class of plasma surface modification processes, in which the effect of plasma-wall interaction and particle distribution in the sheath region have not been represented. Important phenomena occurring in this region are still under fervent investigation [15,16]. The figure also does not represent the influence of reactor geometry on the plasma deposition process. The interested reader can refer to an article by Whittle et al. where an international consortium compares coatings produced in 14 different plasma reactors [17].
In this review, we highlight the versatile nature of organic thin films deposited from plasma. We then provide specific examples where carefully designed plasma polymers are used to generate model substrates with controlled surface properties to elucidate fundamental research questions from nanowetting mechanisms to protein adsorption. We illustrate the most recent advances in plasma polymer applications to novel technologies ranging from the development of prosthetic materials, diagnostic devices and even hydrocarbon recovery technologies. Finally, we discuss a new class of plasma polymers that are based on oxazoline precursors pioneered recently by our team. We should stress that this review is not intended to cite all papers published in this exciting field. It is rather intended to summarise recent advances while referring the reader to reviews published by others where a particular aspect of the field is described.

2. Plasma Polymers

Plasma-assisted deposition is a coating technique used to form thin polymer-like films on surfaces. Plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) is one of the most common plasma polymerization techniques. It uses plasmas of volatile organic precursors to create polymeric films at low or atmospheric pressure [18]. While plasma polymerization can be performed by a variety of others means such as magnetron sputtering, liquid-assisted deposition, plasma-assisted thermal evaporation, etc., the focus is here given to low pressure PECVD. One intrinsic advantage of PECVD is that it is a dry technique which only uses a minimal amount of precursors and does not produce liquid organic waste. As such, the method is cost effective and environmentally friendly [19,20,21]. The great advantage of plasma polymer deposition compared to conventional techniques for thin film deposition is the capacity to deposit the same surface chemistry with the same conditions on practically any type of substrate material [22,23,24,25]. This is because after the initial deposition of a few angstroms of material, the film growth becomes substrate independent [22,23]. In contrast, techniques for surface modification such as layer-by-layer (L-b-L) and Self Assembled Monolayers (SAMs) require substrates with highly specific properties, which narrows opportunities for applications [26].
The films generated are commonly referred to as plasma polymers although they do not formally classify as polymers because they do not consist of repeating monomer units. Instead, they are formed of a variety of precursor fragments and recombination products, and are generally highly crosslinked. Historically, such films have been produced with little control over the chemistry of the plasma phase. Despite the use of advanced techniques directly in the plasma phase such as Mass Spectroscopy, Langmuir probes and Optical Emission Spectroscopy, the mechanisms of plasma polymerization remain poorly understood [27,28,29,30]. However, advances in surface characterization techniques and the pull for applications have fueled much progress in this area, and it is now possible to control deposition conditions in many ways so that chemistry and functionality of the resulting coating can be finely tailored to suit specific applications ranging from wearable electronics [31] and solar cells [32] all the way to water treatment [33]. It is also possible to deposit plasma polymers onto micro and nanomaterials as well as powders. This approach has been used to create adsorbents for water treatment purposes. Silica or magnetic nanoparticles can be coated with a hydrophobic plasma polymer layer to remove hydrocarbon residue from waste water [33,34]. Thiophene-coated particles are able to isolate heavy metals [35], and allylamine-coated powders successfully remove dyes from waters which is relevant for the leather, textile, paper, pharmaceuticals, paper and food industries [36]. Plasma polymers coatedmagnetic nanoparticles were even recently used to remove haze proteins from wines [37,38].
The first degree of freedom when designing a plasma polymer is the monomer choice amongst a wealth of precursors [39]. Plasma polymers can be deposited from practically any compound volatile enough to be introduced into the reaction chamber. Table 1 provide examples of organic precursors commonly used to produce thin polymeric films from their plasma phase. This list includes monomers like ethanol which are difficult to polymerise via conventional means but can be deposited into a polymeric film using plasma processes [29,40]. It also includes examples of precursors containing sulfur and fluoro heteroatoms which can provide very interesting reactivity and wetting properties. Another interesting example is that of oxazolines. Following classic organic chemistry routes, oxaolines are polymerized via ring opening polymerization which results in a linear polymer with amide repeating units. Several works have demonstrated that the plasma deposition of oxazolines generates surface chemistries that are not achievable via conventional means, including the formation of isocyanate and nitrile groups but also the retention of the oxazoline ring itself. The presence of intact oxazoline rings provides unique opportunities to conduct binding reactions of biomolecules, nanoparticles and various ligands that carry carboxyl acid groups in their structures [41,42]. Other groups have investigated the plasma deposition of other ring-containing monomers with heteroatoms including pyrrole [43], furfuryl [44], thiophene [45], aniline [46] and even essential oils [47,48,49]. Plasma polymers prepared from non-synthetic monomers are a particularly hot topic because they combine desirable optical and physical properties with biocompatibility and environmental sustainability [50,51]. However, as the complexity of the monomer increases, so does the importance of carefully tuning the plasma deposition condition to tailor the amount of functionality retention to suit any specific application [52,53] and ensure that film reactivity can be maintained for relevant aging time [54].

3. Plasma Polymers in Biomaterial Research

Plasma polymers are a coating of choice for biomedical applications. The topic has been extensively reviewed elsewhere [76,77]. Plasma polymer deposition enables the generation of surfaces where the entire spectrum of surface properties including chemistry, wettability, stiffness and nanotopography can be precisely tailored. The technique is rapid and reproducible; thus, it is possible to create large quantities of model surfaces with well-controlled properties for the investigation of many complex processes, ranging from protein binding, to immune response through to the fundamentals of nano-wetting. They are also underpinning new biosensing platforms [78] and novel cell guidance surfaces. We used a capacitively coupled parallel plate plasma chamber [22] to generate films from a variety of organic precursors including allylamine, octadiene, aldehyde, ethanol, acrylic acid or even perfluorooctane. The resulting coatings present distinctive chemical functions, namely, amines, hydroxyls, carboxylic acids, ketones, etc. These plasma polymers have been used as a utility to investigate the systematic effect of surface chemistry on many biological processes including the biofunctionality of surface-adsorbed proteins [40], the differentiation of embryonic [79], kidney [80], dental pulp [81], mesenchymal [82] and human adipose-derived stem cells [83,84] as well as the deposition of collagen by primary human dermal fibroblasts [85]. Using the reactivity of the chemical groups created, it is also possible to bind ligands and even proteins to create diagnostic tools [40,86,87,88,89]. Fine-tuned chemical functionality facilitated by plasma polymers also allowed binding to surfaces of gold and silver nanoparticles to generate model surface nanotopography to study biological phenomena or solve environmental challenges [25,90,91,92,93], and nanoengineered surfaces with controlled nanofeatures size and density [94]. In this manner, uniform and gradient nanotopography can be generated using electrostatic binding of gold or silver nanoparticles capped with mercapto succinic acid to allylamine plasma polymers or covalent binding to oxazoline-based coatings [95]. A thin layer of plasma polymer can then be deposited on top of the surface nanotopography to control the outermost surface chemistry while preserving nanotopography. This is a unique approach that can be achieved only by plasma polymerization or iCVD. An important application of this approach was to derive understanding of the influence of surface nanotopography and chemistry on inflammatory responses [96,97]. Such knowledge is vital for the utilization of plasma polymers in implantable devices [98,99]. Thanks to the wide range of intrinsic surface chemistry that can be achieved, the films created in this way span a uniquely wide range of wettability, generating water contact angles from 20° to 120° on smooth surfaces. When plasma polymers are combined with nanotexturing, remarkable wetting states such as superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity can be achieved [100,101,102]. We nanoengineered model gradient substrates with intrinsic wettability ranging from hydrophilic to hydrophobic to investigate the mechanisms governing wetting at the nanoscale. While classical theories could not account correctly for the water contact angles measured on nanorough surfaces, we were able to develop an empirical model that effectively captures the experimental data. The model, which is now known as the Vasilev-Ramiasa equation [103], further enables us to predict the water contact angle on the nanorough surfaces, using as the only known parameter the number density and size of the spherical nanofeatures and the contact angle on the smooth substrate itself. A range of other biomedical applications have also been facilitated by plasma polymers including in drug delivery allowing to achieve controlled release rate of synthetic therapeutics or biomolecules [104,105,106].
Another particularly useful application of plasma polymers is in antibacterial technologies [107,108,109]. Coatings able to protect the surface of medical devices from bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation are used to minimize the risk of infection, and especially hospital acquired infections which are one of this century’s biggest health concerns. Infections are a well-studied subject and it is now well-known that the attachment of individual planktonic bacterial cells to the device surface is just the first step, followed by colonization and infection. It is also well understood that once a biofilm is formed, it protects the bacterial cells from the immune system and enormously (up to 1000 times) increases the dose of antibiotics required to clear the infection. This overuse of antibiotics leads, on the one hand, to development of antibiotic resistance by bacteria and, on the other hand, causes systemic toxicity to organs such as the kidneys and liver. For these reasons, the purpose of antibacterial coatings is to disturb the initial stage of bacterial adhesion [110,111]. This can be achieved through one of four distinct mechanisms of action: contact killing, bacterial repellence, killing in solution or stimuli responsive killing [109].
Plasma polymers have been used to generate contact killing surfaces on several occasions [112,113]. We conducted a study in which quaternary ammonium compounds were covalently immobilized to allylamine plasma polymers and found that surface concentration of NR4+ groups equivalent to 5 At% nitrogen and surface potential of +120 mV was necessary to damage bacteria. In another study of surface-bacteria interaction, plasma processes were used to generate silicon nanospikes which we coated with different plasma polymer thin films to tailor the substrate chemistry and wettability [114,115]. We found that for hydrophilic substrates, the presence of nanospikes resulted in bacterial death on contact. Arguably, the most efficient way to limit bacterial colonization is to use coatings that release antimicrobial agents either passively or in response to external stimuli. Our group has explored numerous avenues to produce such platforms using plasma polymers, including the ‘sandwiching’ of antibiotics between two plasma polymer layers [106,116], a sacrificial nano-templating approach to create antibiotic reservoirs whose release could be controlled by a plasma polymer overcoating [105] or encapsulation of antibiotic particulates within plasma polymers. As silver is known as a potent antibacterial agent, much work has also been done revolving around the use of silver nanoparticles for the release of silver ions [91,92,117,118,119,120,121]. The application of silver in antibacterial technology is reviewed in much detail elsewhere [122]. Nitric oxide releasing as well as new TEMPO-based coatings capable of delaying biofilm growth but stimulating mammalian cells growth has also been reported [123,124,125]. The potential of oxazoline-based plasma polymer coatings that we recently developed in antibacterial technologies is discussed later in this review.

4. Plasma Deposited Polyoxazolines—The Importance of Deposition Conditions

For most plasma polymers, chemistry, functionality retention and reactivity are highly dependent on the plasma deposition parameters. For instance, it is well accepted that high powers and low flow rates lead to greater monomer fragmentation and crosslinking. The films deposited using these conditions are typically more stable than those generated at low powers and high flow rates [106,126]. In contrast, low flow rate and high powers allow for the retention of the original precursor functionality which results in films that are relatively more reactive. Carefully balancing the precursor flow rate and power is essential to induce film growth, rather than substrate etching [20]. Several studies investigating the growth and adhesion properties of plasma-deposited polymer films have shown that excellent adhesion can be achieved on a variety of substrates [24]. Furthermore, in the film growth regime, increasing deposition time increases film thickness and it was proven that beyond 5 nm in thickness, the nature of the underlying materials does not affect the properties of the polymer films [22,23,24]. All in all, almost every time a new precursor is used for plasma deposition, optimization is required, even more so when the precursor contains 1 or more heteroatoms.

4.1. PPOx Physico-Chemical Characterization

In the case of plasma-deposited oxazoline films, careful optimization of the deposition parameters is paramount [127].
Our research was motivated by the fact that the conventional polyoxazoline polymer (POx) displayed interesting biomaterial properties such as good biocompatibility, low cytotoxicity and excellent stealth properties with stability rates surpassing those of PEG-modified surfaces. The development of the first generation of plasma deposited x oxazolines conducted by our group revealed that, through the plasma process, we could not only produce films with comparable properties but also films with added reactivity. These results illustrate the importance of carefully controlling deposition conditions to tailor the plasma-coating properties [42]. Our group pioneered the field of plasma-deposited oxazolines (PPOx) using various oxazoline precursors (methy, ethyl and isopropylene) and a range of plasma ignition powers, monomer flow rates and deposition times (Figure 2 and Table 2). The films were deposited in a custom-made inductively coupled glass chamber plasma reactor described in detail elsewhere, in which the brass electrodes are set 10 cm apart [128]. The plasma ignition power was varied from 10 to 50 W. The incoming precursor flow rate, referred to as the chamber working pressure, was adjusted between 0.10 and 0.30 mbar. The deposition time ranged from 1 to 7 min. The plasma phase was characterised using in-situ Mass Spectrometry, and PPOx films were characterised via Ellipsometry, Water Contact Angle measurement, X-ray photoelectron, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. By tuning the deposition conditions, we could produce plasma-deposited polyoxazoline (PPOx) thin films stable under various pH and salt conditions that were biocompatible and chemically reactive [42]. Our results were soon confirmed by other groups who specifically studied films formed from 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline, Figure 2d [129,130].
The films produced by Bhatt et al. have comparable chemistry, but the use of a lower plasma ignition power resulted in significant film loss after water exposure. Our results, shown in Figure 2c, also show that film loss occurred after 1 h immersion in water for the films deposited at the lowest power (10 W). Zanini et al. also used low pressure depositions condition and investigated a wider range of ignition powers, including some comparable to the ones used in our experiment (3.9 sccm, and powers from 5 to 80 W). Table 2 summarizes side by side the reactor specifications and deposition conditions used by these two groups. Comparing our results and those of Zanini et al. for 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline films deposited in two different plasma reactors and using different precursor flow rates, Figure 2d, we found film deposition rates of the same order of magnitude and comparable film wettability, in the range of approximately 60 to 70 depending on the nature of the precursor and deposition conditions, Figure 3a. It is worth noting, however, that the relationship between the film deposition rate and the power input (W/F) is complex and will be influenced by the plasma reactor geometry (e.g., deposition area and electron energy distribution function, ion density) despite the fact that the deposition conditions described in Zanini et al. appear comparable to those used in our study [27,52,131,132]. As such, it is only meaningful here to compare the macroscopic attribute of the films as their intrinsic chemical nature may be quite different.

4.2. PPOx Unique Reactivity

Most importantly, these studies from different research groups demonstrated that under all deposition conditions, the films displayed a rich film chemistry of amine, amide, carbonyl, carboxyl and nitrile functions, as well as intact oxazoline rings [42,130]. Figure 3b presents a typical Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum for oxazoline films deposited from methyl and isopropenyl oxazoline as well as the intact methyl precursor for direct comparison. However, the relative concentration of the surface chemical group, as well as the film wettability and stability, varies with plasma power and the precursor flow rate, as described in details previously [42,127]. Advanced in situ Mass Spectroscopy of the plasma phase correlated with Tof SIMS principal component analysis provided important insights into the physicochemical event occurring in the plasma itself and post deposition [30]. This study revealed that amide groups present in the plasma deposited oxazolines are the result of post deposition reactions in the films while functional groups such as nitrile, isocyanates and oxazoline ring are formed in the plasma process itself and are better retained in the final films when gentle deposition conditions are used. A schematic representing the resulting chemical group present in the PPOx film is shown in Figure 4. Zanini et al. used NMR to estimate the amount of oxazoline ring retention as well as the degree of linear open ring structure in PPOx surfaces. In PEtOX film deposited at 15 W, they achieved 20% ring retention, while the remaining of the surface chemistry resulted from more complex plasma fragmentation and recombination processes, in good agreement with our spectroscopic investigations. The distinctive oxazoline ring functionality of PPOx is a clear advantage over conventional POx because the ring can form covalent bonds with carboxylic acid groups present in biomolecules and in other ligands [42].
This unique reactivity of PPOx with –COOH functionalities, which was also confirmed by Zanini et al., has been used to create surfaces with controlled nanotopography by covalent binding of COOH– functionalised nanoparticles [94]. In a recent study, we created in this way a range of substrates with different nanoparticle sizes and densities to interrogate the effect of nanotopography on protein binding using PPOx as the overlayer [133]. It is well accepted that cell adhesion to biomaterials relies on the initial formation of an adsorbed protein layer [134]. As cells come into contact with the protein film, integrin receptors on the cell membranes recognize favorable binding sites which initiates the adhesion process. It is therefore essential for biomaterials to promote the adsorption of bioactive proteins. Oxygen-rich and nitrogen-rich plasma-derived surfaces have been particularly studied for their application as biomaterials [135]. Oxygen-rich surface chemical functions are known to promote cellular attachment because they contain polar groups such as hydroxyls [136], carboxyls [137,138] and carbonyls [57], which enter ionic interactions with cell adhesion-mediating molecules [139]. Amine-rich plasma polymers, prepared from allylamine [61,62], ethylendiamine [67], propylamine [68], butlyamine [69] and heptylamine [70], also are coatings of choice for biomedical applications [140]. They are positively charged in cell culture conditions and facilitate the electrostatic adsorption of negatively charged proteins. This protein binding ability is thought to confer the amine rich surfaces their biocompatiblity. Plasma-deposited polyoxazolines are both oxygen and nitrogen rich. Surface chemistry analysis indicated that oxygen and nitrogen are, in a PPOx film, engaged in many hydrophilic, H-donor groups which may explain their good ability to support mammalian cell growth, as evidenced in our studies of oxazolines as cell guidance surfaces [41]. We found that mammalian cells such as kidney stem cells and fibroblast do adhere and proliferate on POx coated surfaces just as well as on control tissue culture plate, Figure 4, left. Our work on protein adsorption to nanorough PPOx-coated surfaces demonstrated that the amount of protein bound to the surface is determined by nanotopography-induced geometric effects and surface wettability rather than overall surface area. Protein adsorption was hindered on a densely packed array of 16 and 38 nm gold nanoparticles overcoated with PPOx compared to smooth PPOx substrates, while it increased for 68 nm nanoparticles [94,141].
More recently we conducted a one-year aging study of PPOx films which demonstrated that the reactivity of the films towards COOH-functionalised gold nanoparticles [142] was retained above 90% when the films were kept in dark, vacuum-sealed containers [143]. This extended shelf live is a significant asset for future commercial applications of PPOx. From our detailed investigations, we compiled a matrix of the physico-chemical properties of PPOx as a function of the plasma deposition conditions that we used to design PPOx films tailored for cell guidance surfaces, biosensors and low fouling substrates as explained below, and depicted in Figure 4.

4.3. PPOx in Novel Technology

An enormous advantage of plasma polymers for the industrialization of novel technologies is that they can be deposited on any type of substrate from the four classes of materials (i.e., metals, ceramics, polymers and composites) including those featuring complex shapes and topography. The capacity to preserve valuable bulk properties but to alter the properties at the surface contributes substantial added value to numerous products in fields ranging from medicine to membrane filtration and electronics.
Oxazoline-derived plasma polymer coatings are a promising candidate in antibacterial technologies. Our research demonstrated that, using appropriate deposition conditions, bacteria may attach in small numbers to the PPOx but would not proliferate to form biofilms, Figure 4, right [144]. While the mechanisms underlying these interesting properties are still under investigation, the simplicity of the method has already attracted industrial interest as it provides excellent opportunities for developing medical device-coating technologies. This property of PPOx films is interesting for their use as low fouling coatings for implantable devices. For this reason, we also investigated the response of immune cells to PPOx films. In this investigation, cytokine secretion from bone marrow-derived primary macrophages (BMDM) was measured in vitro. BMDM were selected as model immune cells because their function is to mediate early innate immune inflammatory responses [41,141]. Compared to other nitrogen-rich plasma polymer and tissue culture plates, a marked reduction in the expression of TFN-α and IL-6 cytokine was observed on the PPOx substrates, Figure 4, right. Together, these results indicate that PPOx films could benefit several device types such as prosthetics, catheters, or even wound dressings.
Bladder cancer diagnostic devices: The PPOx capacity to spontaneously form covalent bonds with the carboxylic acid groups present in biomolecules was used to generate immunofunctionalised surfaces for the selective capture of cancer cells from urine [145]. Anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule antibodies were covalently bound to PPOx substrates. Using PPOx to immobilise antibodies for diagnostic purposes is very useful because the strong covalent bond between the substrate and the sensing biomolecule is not disrupted by physiological variations in the composition, pH, and ionic strength of real body fluid such as urine [146]. The biosensors developed in this way were able to detect cancer cells in model urine and also in real patient urine samples. The outcomes of this work are currently being tested in the clinical setting.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

Collectively, this review summarizes the principles at the basis of plasma deposition and highlights recent progress made in understanding the unique chemistry and reactivity of coatings deposited by this method [147]. We then demonstrate how carefully designed plasma polymer films can serve the purpose of fundamental research and biomedical applications. We placed emphasis on relatively recently developed oxazoline precursor-derived plasma polymer coatings which have been demonstrated to offer a number of intriguing and very valuable properties. Some of these properties are unique such as the retention of a population of intact oxazoline rings on the surface of the coatings which opens new opportunities in bio-sensing and medical diagnostics. Other valuable properties such as elimination of biofilm formation and excellent biocompatibility make these coatings good candidates for surface modification of implantable medical devices, tissue engineering constricts, cell and drug delivery vehicles, and many others. However, this is just the beginning of a new era. With more researchers and companies adopting the technology, many new interesting properties will be discovered and new opportunities for commercial applications will be identified.

Funding

This review was supported from funding from ARC DP15104212 and DP180101254, NHMRC Fellowship APP1122825, NHMRC Project grant APP1032738 and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for Fellowship for Experienced Researchers.

Acknowledgments

K.V. thanks ARC for DP15104212 and DP180101254, NHMRC for fellowship APP1122825 and Project grant APP1032738 and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for Fellowship for Experienced Researchers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. d’Agostino, R.; Favia, P.; Oehr, C.; Wertheimer, M.R. Low-temperature plasma processing of materials: Past, present, and future. Plasma Process. Polym. 2005, 2, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chu, P.K.; Chen, J.Y.; Wang, L.P.; Huang, N. Plasma-surface modification of biomaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2002, 36, 143–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chapman, B. Glow Discharge Processes: Sputtering and Plasma Etching; Wiley: Hoboken, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  4. Coburn, J.W.; Winters, H.F. Plasma etching—A discussion of mechanisms. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1979, 16, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Keudell, A.v.; Corbella, C. Review article: Unraveling synergistic effects in plasma-surface processes by means of beam experiments. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2017, 35, 050801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Borghi, F.F.; Rider, A.E.; Kumar, S.; Han, Z.J.; Haylock, D.; Ostrikov, K. Emerging stem cell controls: Nanomaterials and plasma effects. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, S.; Levchenko, I.; Huang, S.Y.; Ostrikov, K. Self-organized vertically aligned single-crystal silicon nanostructures with controlled shape and aspect ratio by reactive plasma etching. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 111505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mariotti, D.; Ostrikov, K. Tailoring microplasma nanofabrication: From nanostructures to nanoarchitectures. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 092002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mariotti, D.; Bose, A.C.; Ostrikov, K. Atmospheric-microplasma-assisted nanofabrication: Metal and metal–oxide nanostructures and nanoarchitectures. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2009, 37, 1027–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wiedemair, J.; Serpe, M.J.; Kim, J.; Masson, J.-F.; Lyon, L.A.; Mizaikoff, B.; Kranz, C. In-situ AFM studies of the phase-transition behavior of single thermoresponsive hydrogel particles. Langmuir 2006, 23, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guimond, S.; Wertheimer, M.R. Surface degradation and hydrophobic recovery of polyolefins treated by air corona and nitrogen atmospheric pressure glow discharge. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 94, 1291–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chatelier, R.C.; Griesser, H.J.; Steele, J.G.; Johnson, G. Cell Growth Substrates. U.S. Patent No. 5,449,383, 12 September 1995. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vandenbossche, M.; Hegemann, D. Recent approaches to reduce aging phenomena in oxygen- and nitrogen-containing plasma polymer films: An overview. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2018, 22, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hegemann, D.; Lorusso, E.; Butron-Garcia, M.-I.; Blanchard, N.E.; Rupper, P.; Favia, P.; Heuberger, M.; Vandenbossche, M. Suppression of hydrophobic recovery by plasma polymer films with vertical chemical gradients. Langmuir 2016, 32, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Saboohi, S.; Coad, B.R.; Griesser, H.J.; Michelmore, A.; Short, R.D. Synthesis of highly functionalised plasma polymer films from protonated precursor ions via the plasma α–γ transition. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 5637–5646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bormashenko, E.; Whyman, G.; Multanen, V.; Shulzinger, E.; Chaniel, G. Physical mechanisms of interaction of cold plasma with polymer surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 448, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Whittle, J.D.; Short, R.D.; Steele, D.A.; Bradley, J.W.; Bryant, P.M.; Jan, F.; Biederman, H.; Serov, A.A.; Choukurov, A.; Hook, A.L. Variability in plasma polymerization processes–an international Round-R obin study. Plasma Process. Polym. 2013, 10, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hegemann, D.; Nisol, B.; Watson, S.; Wertheimer, M.R. Energy conversion efficiency in plasma polymerization—A comparison of low- and atmospheric-pressure processes. Plasma Process. Polym. 2016, 13, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Friedrich, J. Mechanisms of plasma polymerization—Reviewed from a chemical point of view. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 783–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yasuda, H. Plasma Polymerization; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ostrikov, K.; Cvelbar, U.; Murphy, A.B. Plasma nanoscience: Setting directions, tackling grand challenges. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 174001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vasilev, K.; Michelmore, A.; Griesser, H.J.; Short, R.D. Substrate influence on the initial growth phase of plasma-deposited polymer films. Chem. Commun. 2009, 24, 3600–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vasilev, K.; Michelmore, A.; Martinek, P.; Chan, J.; Sah, V.; Griesser, H.J.; Short, R.D. Early stages of growth of plasma polymer coatings deposited from nitrogen- and oxygen-containing monomers. Plasma Process. Polym. 2010, 7, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Michelmore, A.; Martinek, P.; Sah, V.; Short, R.D.; Vasilev, K. Surface morphology in the early stages of plasma polymer film growth from amine-containing monomers. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Goreham, R.V.; Mierczynska, A.; Pierce, M.; Short, R.D.; Taheri, S.; Bachhuka, A.; Cavallaro, A.; Smith, L.; Vasilev, K. A substrate independent approach for generation of surface gradients. Thin Solid Films 2013, 528, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hernandez-Lopez, J.L.; Bauer, R.E.; Chang, W.S.; Glasser, G.; Grebel-Koehler, D.; Klapper, M.; Kreiter, M.; Leclaire, J.; Majoral, J.P.; Mittler, S.; et al. Functional polymers as nanoscopic building blocks. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2003, 23, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Michelmore, A.; Whittle, J.D.; Short, R.D. The importance of ions in low pressure PECVD plasmas. Front. Phys. 2015, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Michelmore, A.; Steele, D.A.; Robinson, D.E.; Whittle, J.D.; Short, R.D. The link between mechanisms of deposition and the physico-chemical properties of plasma polymer films. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 6167–6175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hazrati, H.D.; Whittle, J.D.; Vasilev, K. A mechanistic study of the plasma polymerization of ethanol. Plasma Process. Polym. 2014, 11, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Macgregor, M.N.; Michelmore, A.; Safizadeh Shirazi, H.; Whittle, J.; Vasilev, K. Secrets of plasma-deposited polyoxazoline functionality lie in the plasma phase. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 8047–8051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jacob, M.V.; Olsen, N.S.; Anderson, L.J.; Bazaka, K.; Shanks, R.A. Plasma polymerised thin films for flexible electronic applications. Thin Solid Films 2013, 546, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wong, W.W.H.; Rudd, S.; Ostrikov, K.; Ramiasa-MacGregor, M.; Subbiah, J.; Vasilev, K. Plasma deposition of organic polymer films for solar cell applications. Org. Electron. 2016, 32, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Akhavan, B.; Jarvis, K.; Majewski, P. Hydrophobic plasma polymer coated silica particles for petroleum hydrocarbon removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 8563–8571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wahono, S.K.; Cavallaro, A.; Vasilev, K.; Mierczynska, A. Plasma polymer facilitated magnetic technology for removal of oils from contaminated waters. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Akhavan, B.; Jarvis, K.; Majewski, P. Plasma polymer-functionalized silica particles for heavy metals removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 4265–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jarvis, K.L.; Majewski, P. Removal of acid orange 7 dye from water via plasma-polymerized allylamine-coated quartz particles. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mierczynska-Vasilev, A.; Mierczynski, P.; Maniukiewicz, W.; Visalakshan, R.M.; Vasilev, K.; Smith, P.A. Magnetic separation technology: Functional group efficiency in the removal of haze-forming proteins from wines. Food Chem. 2019, 275, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mierczynska-Vasilev, A.; Boyer, P.; Vasilev, K.; Smith, P.A. A novel technology for the rapid, selective, magnetic removal of pathogenesis-related proteins from wines. Food Chem. 2017, 232, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Macgregor-Ramiasa, M.N.; Vasilev, K. Plasma polymer deposition: A versatile tool for stem cell research. In Advanced Surfaces for Stem Cell Research; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 199–232. [Google Scholar]
  40. Coad, B.R.; Scholz, T.; Vasilev, K.; Hayball, J.D.; Short, R.D.; Griesser, H.J. Functionality of proteins bound to plasma polymer surfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 2455–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ramiasa, M.; Cavallaro, A.; Mierczynska, A.; Christo, S.; Gleadle, J.; Hayball, J.; Vasilev, K. Plasma polymerised polyoxazoline thin films for biomedical applications. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4279–4282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Macgregor-Ramiasa, M.N.; Cavallaro, A.A.; Vasilev, K. Properties and reactivity of polyoxazoline plasma polymer films. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 6327–6337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, D.S.; Yoshida, Y. Dielectric properties of plasma polymerized pyrrole thin film capacitors. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 169, 600–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saboohi, S.; Al-Bataineh, S.A.; Safizadeh Shirazi, H.; Michelmore, A.; Whittle, J.D. Continuous-wave RF plasma polymerization of furfuryl methacrylate: Correlation between plasma and surface chemistry. Plasma Process. Polym. 2016, 14, 1600054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Silverstein, M.; Visoly-Fisher, I. Plasma polymerized thiophene: Molecular structure and electrical properties. Polymer 2002, 43, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Morales, J.; Olayo, M.; Cruz, G.; Castillo-Ortega, M.; Olayo, R. Electronic conductivity of pyrrole and aniline thin films polymerized by plasma. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2000, 38, 3247–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bazaka, K.; Jacob, M.V. Synthesis of radio frequency plasma polymerized non-synthetic terpinen-4-ol thin films. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 1594–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jacob, M.V.; Easton, C.D.; Woods, G.S.; Berndt, C.C. Fabrication of a novel organic polymer thin film. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516, 3884–3887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jacob, M.V.; Easton, C.D.; Anderson, L.J.; Bazaka, K. RF plasma polymerised thin films from natural resources. Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 32, 1460319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bazaka, K.; Jacob, M.V.; Bowden, B.F. Optical and chemical properties of polyterpenol thin films deposited via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. J. Mater. Res. 2011, 26, 1018–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bazaka, K.; Jacob, M.V.; Truong, V.K.; Wang, F.; Pushpamali, W.A.A.; Wang, J.Y.; Ellis, A.V.; Berndt, C.C.; Crawford, R.J.; Ivanova, E.P. Plasma-enhanced synthesis of bioactive polymeric coatings from monoterpene alcohols: A combined experimental and theoretical study. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 2016–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Michelmore, A.; Whittle, J.D.; Bradley, J.W.; Short, R.D. Where physics meets chemistry: Thin film deposition from reactive plasmas. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2016, 10, 441–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bazaka, K.; Jacob, M.V. Nanotribological and nanomechanical properties of plasma-polymerized polyterpenol thin films. J. Mater. Res. 2011, 26, 2952–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bazaka, K.; Jacob, M.V. Post-deposition ageing reactions of plasma derived polyterpenol thin films. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 1123–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Detomaso, L.; Gristina, R.; Senesi, G.S.; d’Agostino, R.; Favia, P. Stable plasma-deposited acrylic acid surfaces for cell culture applications. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 3831–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Daw, R.; Candan, S.; Beck, A.J.; Devlin, A.J.; Brook, I.M.; MacNeil, S.; Dawson, R.A.; Short, R.D. Plasma copolymer surfaces of acrylic acid/1,7 octadiene: Surface characterisation and the attachment of ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials 1998, 19, 1717–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ertel, S.I.; Chilkoti, A.; Horbetti, T.A.; Ratner, B.D. Endothelial cell growth on oxygen-containing films deposited by radio-frequency plasmas: The role of surface carbonyl groups. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 1992, 3, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ameen, A.P.; Short, R.D.; Ward, R. The formation of high surface concentrations of hydroxyl groups in the plasma polymerization of allyl alcohol. Polymer 1994, 35, 4382–4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gancarz, I.; Bryjak, J.; Bryjak, M.; Poźniak, G.; Tylus, W. Plasma modified polymers as a support for enzyme immobilization 1.: Allyl alcohol plasma. Eur. Polym. J. 2003, 39, 1615–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fally, F.; Virlet, I.; Riga, J.; Verbist, J.J. Detailed multitechnique spectroscopic surface and bulk characterization of plasma polymers deposited from 1-propanol, allyl alcohol, and propargyl alcohol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 59, 1569–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shard, A.G.; Whittle, J.D.; Beck, A.J.; Brookes, P.N.; Bullett, N.A.; Talib, R.A.; Mistry, A.; Barton, D.; McArthur, S.L. A nexafs examination of unsaturation in plasma polymers of allylamine and propylamine. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 12472–12480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hook, A.L.; Thissen, H.; Quinton, J.; Voelcker, N.H. Comparison of the binding mode of plasmid DNA to allylamine plasma polymer and poly (ethylene glycol) surfaces. Surf. Sci. 2008, 602, 1883–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Harsch, A.; Calderon, J.; Timmons, R.; Gross, G. Pulsed plasma deposition of allylamine on polysiloxane: A stable surface for neuronal cell adhesion. J. Neurosci. Methods 2000, 98, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, Z.; Wang, J.; Luo, R.; Li, X.; Chen, S.; Sun, H.; Huang, N. Improved hemocompatibility guided by pulsed plasma tailoring the surface amino functionalities of TiO2 coating for covalent immobilization of heparin. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 850–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Thierry, B.; Jasieniak, M.; de Smet, L.C.; Vasilev, K.; Griesser, H.J. Reactive epoxy-functionalized thin films by a pulsed plasma polymerization process. Langmuir 2008, 24, 10187–10195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Harris, L.; Schofield, W.; Badyal, J. Multifunctional molecular scratchcards. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 1546–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Choukourov, A.; Biederman, H.; Kholodkov, I.; Slavinska, D.; Trchova, M.; Hollander, A. Properties of amine-containing coatings prepared by plasma polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 92, 979–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fally, F.; Doneux, C.; Riga, J.; Verbist, J. Quantification of the functional groups present at the surface of plasma polymers deposited from propylamine, allylamine, and propargylamine. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1995, 56, 597–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gancarz, I.; Bryjak, J.; Poźniak, G.; Tylus, W. Plasma modified polymers as a support for enzyme immobilization II. Amines plasma. Eur. Polym. J. 2003, 39, 2217–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gengenbach, T.R.; Chatelier, R.C.; Griesser, H.J. Characterization of the ageing of plasma-deposited polymer films: Global analysis of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data. Surf. Interface Anal. 1996, 24, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Coad, B.R.; Jasieniak, M.; Griesser, S.S.; Griesser, H.J. Controlled covalent surface immobilisation of proteins and peptides using plasma methods. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 233, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Coad, B.R.; Vasilev, K.; Diener, K.R.; Hayball, J.D.; Short, R.D.; Griesser, H.J. Immobilized streptavidin gradients as bioconjugation platforms. Langmuir 2012, 28, 2710–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Christo, S.N.; Sarvestani, G.T.; Griesser, S.S.; Coad, B.R.; Griesser, H.J.; Vasilev, K.; Brown, M.P.; Diener, K.R.; Hayball, J.D. Individual and population quantitative analyses of calcium flux in T-cells activated on functionalized material surfaces. Aust. J. Chem. 2012, 65, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kasparek, E.; Thiry, D.; Tavares, J.R.; Wertheimer, M.R.; Snyders, R.; Girard-Lauriault, P.-L. Growth mechanisms of sulfur-rich plasma polymers: Binary gas mixtures versus single precursor. Plasma Process. Polym. 2018, 15, 1800036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Thiry, D.; Aparicio, F.J.; Britun, N.; Snyders, R. Concomitant effects of the substrate temperature and the plasma chemistry on the chemical properties of propanethiol plasma polymer prepared by ICP discharges. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 241, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Truica-Marasescu, F.; Wertheimer, M.R. Nitrogen-rich plasma-polymer films for biomedical applications. Plasma Process. Polym. 2008, 5, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vasilev, K. Nanoengineered plasma polymer films for biomaterial applications. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2013, 34, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hegemann, D.; Indutnyi, I.; Zajíčková, L.; Makhneva, E.; Farka, Z.; Ushenin, Y.; Vandenbossche, M. Stable, nanometer-thick oxygen-containing plasma polymer films suited for enhanced biosensing. Plasma Process. Polym. 2018, 15, 1800090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Harding, F.J.; Clements, L.R.; Short, R.D.; Thissen, H.; Voelcker, N.H. Assessing embryonic stem cell response to surface chemistry using plasma polymer gradients. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 1739–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Murray, P.; Vasilev, K.; Fuente Mora, C.; Ranghini, E.; Tensaout, H.; Rak-Raszewska, A.; Wilm, B.; Edgar, D.; Short, R.D.; Kenny, S.E. The potential of small chemical functional groups for directing the differentiation of kidney stem cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010, 38, 1062–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bachhuka, A.; Delalat, B.; Ghaemi, S.R.; Gronthos, S.; Voelcker, N.H.; Vasilev, K. Nanotopography mediated osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp derived stem cells. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 14248–14258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. He, W.; Elkhooly, T.A.; Liu, X.; Cavallaro, A.; Taheri, S.; Vasilev, K.; Feng, Q. Silver nanoparticle based coatings enhance adipogenesis compared to osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells through oxidative stress. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 1466–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, X.; Shi, S.; Feng, Q.; Bachhuka, A.; He, W.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, R.; Yang, X.; Vasilev, K. Surface chemical gradient affects the differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells via ERK1/2 signaling pathway. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 18473–18482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Liu, X.; Feng, Q.; Bachhuka, A.; Vasilev, K. Surface modification by allylamine plasma polymerization promotes osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 9733–9741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bachhuka, A.; Hayball, J.; Smith, L.E.; Vasilev, K. Effect of surface chemical functionalities on collagen deposition by primary human dermal fibroblasts. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 23767–23775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Delalat, B.; Mierczynska, A.; Ghaemi, S.R.; Cavallaro, A.; Harding, F.J.; Vasilev, K.; Voelcker, N.H. Materials displaying neural growth factor gradients and applications in neural differentiation of embryoid body cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 2737–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vasilev, K.; Mierczynska, A.; Hook, A.L.; Chan, J.; Voelcker, N.H.; Short, R.D. Creating gradients of two proteins by differential passive adsorption onto a peg-density gradient. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Diener, K.R.; Christo, S.N.; Griesser, S.S.; Sarvestani, G.T.; Vasilev, K.; Griesser, H.J.; Hayball, J.D. Solid-state capture and real-time analysis of individual t cell activation via self-assembly of binding multimeric proteins on functionalized materials surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Christo, S.N.; Diener, K.R.; Nordon, R.E.; Brown, M.P.; Griesser, H.J.; Vasilev, K.; Christo, F.C.; Hayball, J.D. Scrutinizing calcium flux oscillations in T lymphocytes to deduce the strength of stimulus. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 7760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Goreham, R.V.; Short, R.D.; Vasilev, K. Method for the generation of surface-bound nanoparticle density gradients. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 3429–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Khaksar, M.; Jolley, D.F.; Sekine, R.; Vasilev, K.; Johannessen, B.; Donner, E.; Lombi, E. In situ chemical transformations of silver nanoparticles along the water-sediment continuum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sekine, R.; Khaksar, M.; Brunetti, G.; Donner, E.; Scheckel, K.G.; Lombi, E.; Vasilev, K. Surface immobilization of engineered nanomaterials for in situ study of their environmental transformations and fate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 9308–9316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sekine, R.; Brunetti, G.; Donner, E.; Khaksar, M.; Vasilev, K.; Jämting, Å.K.; Scheckel, K.G.; Kappen, P.; Zhang, H.; Lombi, E. Speciation and lability of Ag-, AgCl-, and Ag2S-nanoparticles in soil determined by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and diffusive gradients in thin films. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Visalakshan, R.M.; MacGregor, M.N.; Cavallaro, A.A.; Sasidharan, S.; Bachhuka, A.; Mierczynska-Vasilev, A.M.; Hayball, J.D.; Vasilev, K. Creating nano-engineered biomaterials with well-defined surface descriptors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 2796–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Taheri, S.; Ruiz, J.-C.; Michelmore, A.; MacGregor, M.N.; Foerch, R.; Majewski, P.J.; Vasilev, K. Binding of nanoparticles to aminated plasma polymer surfaces is controlled by primary amine density and solution PH. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 14986–14995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Christo, S.N.; Bachhuka, A.; Diener, K.R.; Mierczynska, A.; Hayball, J.D.; Vasilev, K. The role of surface nanotopography and chemistry on primary neutrophil and macrophage cellular responses. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2016, 5, 956–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Christo, S.; Bachhuka, A.; Diener, K.R.; Vasilev, K.; Hayball, J.D. The contribution of inflammasome components on macrophage response to surface nanotopography and chemistry. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Christo, S.N.; Diener, K.R.; Bachhuka, A.; Vasilev, K.; Hayball, J.D. Innate immunity and biomaterials at the nexus: Friends or foes. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 342304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Chen, Z.; Bachhuka, A.; Wei, F.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Vasilev, K.; Xiao, Y. Nanotopography-based strategy for the precise manipulation of osteoimmunomodulation in bone regeneration. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 18129–18152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Choukourov, A.; Kylián, O.; Petr, M.; Vaidulych, M.; Nikitin, D.; Hanuš, J.; Artemenko, A.; Shelemin, A.; Gordeev, I.; Kolská, Z.; et al. Rms roughness-independent tuning of surface wettability by tailoring silver nanoparticles with a fluorocarbon plasma polymer. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 2616–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kylián, O.; Polonskyi, O.; Kratochvíl, J.; Artemenko, A.; Choukourov, A.; Drábik, M.; Solař, P.; Slavínská, D.; Biederman, H. Control of wettability of plasma polymers by application of ti nano-clusters. Plasma Process. Polym. 2012, 9, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kuzminova, A.; Shelemin, A.; Kylián, O.; Petr, M.; Kratochvíl, J.; Solař, P.; Biederman, H. From super-hydrophilic to super-hydrophobic surfaces using plasma polymerization combined with gas aggregation source of nanoparticles. Vacuum 2014, 110, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ramiasa-MacGregor, M.; Mierczynska, A.; Sedev, R.; Vasilev, K. Tuning and predicting the wetting of nanoengineered material surface. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 4635–4642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Simovic, S.; Diener, K.R.; Bachhuka, A.; Kant, K.; Losic, D.; Hayball, J.D.; Brownc, M.P.; Vasilev, K. Controlled release and bioactivity of the monoclonal antibody rituximab from a porous matrix: A potential in situ therapeutic device. Mater. Lett. 2014, 130, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Simovic, S.; Losic, D.; Vasilev, K. Controlled drug release from porous materials by plasma polymer deposition. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1317–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Vasilev, K.; Poulter, N.; Martinek, P.; Griesser, H.J. Controlled release of levofloxacin sandwiched between two plasma polymerized layers on a solid carrier. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4831–4836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Bazaka, K.; Jacob, M.V.; Crawford, R.J.; Ivanova, E.P. Plasma-assisted surface modification of organic biopolymers to prevent bacterial attachment. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 2015–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bazaka, K.; Jacob, M.; Chrzanowski, W.; Ostrikov, K. Anti-bacterial surfaces: Natural agents, mechanisms of action, and plasma surface modification. Rsc Adv. 2015, 5, 48739–48759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Vasilev, K.; Griesser, S.S.; Griesser, H.J. Antibacterial surfaces and coatings produced by plasma techniques. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 1010–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cavallaro, A.; Taheri, S.; Vasilev, K. Responsive and “smart” antibacterial surfaces: Common approaches and new developments (review). Biointerphases 2014, 9, 029005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Vasilev, K.; Cook, J.; Griesser, H.J. Antibacterial surfaces for biomedical devices. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2009, 6, 553–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Cavallaro, A.; Majewski, P.; Barton, M.; Vasilev, K. Substrate independent approach for immobilisation of quaternary ammonium compounds to surfaces to reduce bio-burden. Mater. Sci. Forum 2014, 783, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Al-Bataineh, S.A.; Jasieniak, M.; Britcher, L.G.; Griesser, H.J. TOF-SIMS and principal component analysis characterization of the multilayer surface grafting of small molecules: Antibacterial furanones. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Ostrikov, K.; Macgregor-Ramiasa, M.; Cavallaro, A.; Ostrikov, K.K.; Vasilev, K. Bactericidal effects of plasma-modified surface chemistry of silicon nanograss. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 304001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Jiann, S.; Srikanth, R.; Fu-Hsiang, K.; Kostya, O. Plasma-made silicon nanograss and related nanostructures. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 174010. [Google Scholar]
  116. Simovic, S.; Losic, D.; Vasilev, K. Controlled release from drug delivery systems based on porous platforms. Pharm. Technol. 2011, 35, 68–71. [Google Scholar]
  117. Taheri, S.; Cavallaro, A.; Christo, S.N.; Majewski, P.; Barton, M.; Hayball, J.D.; Vasilev, K. Antibacterial plasma polymer films conjugated with phospholipid encapsulated silver nanoparticles. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 1, 1278–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Taheri, S.; Cavallaro, A.; Christo, S.N.; Smith, L.E.; Majewski, P.; Barton, M.; Hayball, J.D.; Vasilev, K. Substrate independent silver nanoparticle based antibacterial coatings. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 4601–4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Taheri, S.; Cavallaro, A.; Barton, M.; Whittle, J.; Majewski, P.; Smith, L.; Vasilev, K. Antibacterial efficacy and cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticle based coatings facilitated by a plasma polymer interlayer. Plasma Med. 2014, 4, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Taheri, S.; Baier, G.; Majewski, P.; Barton, M.; Forch, R.; Landfester, K.; Vasilev, K. Synthesis and surface immobilization of antibacterial hybrid silver-poly(l-lactide) nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 305102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Vasilev, K.; Sah, V.R.; Goreham, R.V.; Ndi, C.; Short, R.D.; Griesser, H.J. Antibacterial surfaces by adsorptive binding of polyvinyl-sulphonate-stabilized silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2010, 21, 215102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Vasilev, K.; Ramiasa-Macgregor, M. Nanoengineered plasma polymer films for biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2018, 9, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Michl, T.; Barz, J.; Giles, C.; Haupt, M.; Henze, J.H.; Mayer, J.; Futrega, K.; Doran, M.R.; Oehr, C.; Vasilev, K.; et al. Plasma polymerization of TEMPO yields coatings containing stable nitroxide radicals for controlling interactions with prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 6587–6595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kafshgari, M.H.; Delalat, B.; Harding, F.; Cavallaro, A.; Mäkilä, E.; Salonen, J.; Vasilev, K.; Voelcker, N. Antibacterial properties of nitric oxide-releasing porous silicon nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 2051–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kafshgari, M.H.; Cavallaro, A.; Delalat, B.; Harding, F.J.; McInnes, S.J.; Mäkilä, E.; Salonen, J.; Vasilev, K.; Voelcker, N.H. Nitric oxide-releasing porous silicon nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Vasilev, K.; Britcher, L.; Casanal, A.; Griesser, H.J. Solvent-induced porosity in ultrathin amine plasma polymer coatings. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 10915–10921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. MacGregor-Ramiasa, M.N.; Cavallaro, A.A.; Visalakshan, R.M.; Gonzalez, L.; Vasilev, K. Plasma deposited polyoxazoline coatings, a versatile new class of biomaterials. In CHEMECA 2016: Chemical Engineering—Regeneration, Recovery and Reinvention; Engineers Australia: Adelaide, SA, Australia, 2016; pp. 302–3012. [Google Scholar]
  128. Griesser, H.J. Small scale reactor for plasma processing of moving substrate web. Vacuum 1989, 39, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bhatt, S.; Pulpytel, J.; Mirshahi, M.; Arefi-Khonsari, F. Cell resistant peptidomimetic poly (2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) coatings developed by low pressure inductively excited pulsed plasma polymerization for biomedical purpose. Plasma Process. Polym. 2015, 12, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zanini, S.; Zoia, L.; Dell’Orto, E.C.; Natalello, A.; Villa, A.M.; Pergola, R.D.; Riccardi, C. Plasma polymerized 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline: Chemical characterization and study of the reactivity towards different chemical groups. Mater. Des. 2016, 108, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Dirk, H. Macroscopic investigation of reaction rates yielding plasma polymer deposition. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2013, 46, 205204. [Google Scholar]
  132. Hegemann, D.; Michlíček, M.; Blanchard, N.E.; Schütz, U.; Lohmann, D.; Vandenbossche, M.; Zajíčková, L.; Drábik, M. Deposition of functional plasma polymers influenced by reactor geometry in capacitively coupled discharges. Plasma Process. Polym. 2016, 13, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gonzalez Garcia, L.E.; MacGregor-Ramiasa, M.; Visalakshan, R.M.; Vasilev, K. Protein interactions with nanoengineered polyoxazoline surfaces generated via plasma deposition. Langmuir 2017, 33, 7322–7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ruoslahti, E.; Pierschbacher, M.D. New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science 1987, 238, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ratner, B.D. Plasma deposition for biomedical applications: A brief review. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 1993, 4, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lee, J.H.; Park, J.W.; Lee, H.B. Cell adhesion and growth on polymer surfaces with hydroxyl groups prepared by water vapour plasma treatment. Biomaterials 1991, 12, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Francesch, L.; Garreta, E.; Balcells, M.; Edelman, E.R.; Borrós, S. Fabrication of bioactive surfaces by plasma polymerization techniques using a novel acrylate-derived monomer. Plasma Process. Polym. 2005, 2, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Detomaso, L.; Gristina, R.; d’Agostino, R.; Senesi, G.S.; Favia, P. Plasma deposited acrylic acid coatings: Surface characterization and attachment of 3T3 murine fibroblast cell lines. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005, 200, 1022–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ruiz, J.-C.; Girard-Lauriault, P.-L.; Wertheimer, M.R. Fabrication, characterization, and comparison of oxygen-rich organic films deposited by plasma- and vacuum-ultraviolet (VUV) photo-polymerization. Plasma Process. Polym. 2015, 12, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lerouge, S.; Barrette, J.; Ruiz, J.-C.; Sbai, M.; Savoji, H.; Saoudi, B.; Gauthier, M.; Wertheimer, M.R. Nitrogen-rich plasma polymer coatings for biomedical applications: Stability, mechanical properties and adhesion under dry and wet conditions. Plasma Process. Polym. 2015, 12, 882–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Visalakshan, R.M.; Cavallaro, A.; Smith, L.E.; MacGregor-Ramiasa, M.; Hayball, J.; Vasilev, K. Downstream influences of oxazoline plasma polymerisation conditions on chemical and biological interactions. In Proceeding of CHEMECA 2016: Chemical Engineering—Regeneration, Recovery and Reinvention; Engineers Australia: Adelaide, SA, Australia, 2016; pp. 840–848. [Google Scholar]
  142. Zhu, T.; Vasilev, K.; Kreiter, M.; Mittler, S.; Knoll, W. Surface modification of citrate-reduced colloidal gold nanoparticles with 2-mercaptosuccinic acid. Langmuir 2003, 19, 9518–9525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. MacGregor, M.; Sinha, U.; Visalakshan, R.M.; Cavallaro, A.; Vasilev, K. Preserving the reactivity of coatings plasma deposited from oxazoline precursors—An in depth study. Plasma Process. Polym. 2018, e1800130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Cavallaro, A.A.; Macgregor-Ramiasa, M.N.; Vasilev, K. Antibiofouling properties of plasma-deposited oxazoline-based thin films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 6354–6362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Macgregor-Ramiasa, M.; McNicholas, K.; Ostrikov, K.; Li, J.; Michael, M.; Gleadle, J.M.; Vasilev, K. A platform for selective immuno-capture of cancer cells from urine. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 96, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ostrikov, K.; MacGregor-Ramiasa, M.N.; Vasilev, K. Biomaterial platform for cancer diagnostic from patient urine. In Proceeding of CHEMECA 2016: Chemical Engineering—Regeneration, Recovery and Reinvention; Engineers Australia: Adelaide, SA, Australia, 2016; p. 3405702. [Google Scholar]
  147. Bernard, L.; Rupper, P.; Faccio, G.; Hegemann, D.; Scholder, O.; Heuberger, M.; Maniura-Weber, K.; Vandenbossche, M. Plasma polymer film designs through the eyes of TOF-SIMS. Biointerphases 2018, 13, 03B417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 00191 g001
Figure 1. Plasma-assisted surface modification processes (a) sputtering (b) etching (c) implantation and (d) polymer deposition.
Figure 1. Plasma-assisted surface modification processes (a) sputtering (b) etching (c) implantation and (d) polymer deposition.
Materials 12 00191 g001
Materials 12 00191 g002
Figure 2. PPOx deposition conditions: (a) Effect of monomer chemistry on film thickness, (b) precursor flow rates on nitrogen content, (c) of plasma ignition powers on films stability for MeOx, EtOx and PiPOx. (d) PPEtOX Plasma deposition rate as a function of the Yasunda parameter is defined as the ratio between plasma power and monomer flow rate, in two different plasma reactors.
Figure 2. PPOx deposition conditions: (a) Effect of monomer chemistry on film thickness, (b) precursor flow rates on nitrogen content, (c) of plasma ignition powers on films stability for MeOx, EtOx and PiPOx. (d) PPEtOX Plasma deposition rate as a function of the Yasunda parameter is defined as the ratio between plasma power and monomer flow rate, in two different plasma reactors.
Materials 12 00191 g002
Materials 12 00191 g003
Figure 3. (a) Advancing water contact angle of water in air on plasma-deposited Methyl, Ethyl, and isopropenyl oxazoline deposited at 50 W and 2.3 mbar. (b) FTIR spectra of isopropenyl, and methyl oxazoline deposited under the same conditions as well as a pristine methyl oxazoline precursor.
Figure 3. (a) Advancing water contact angle of water in air on plasma-deposited Methyl, Ethyl, and isopropenyl oxazoline deposited at 50 W and 2.3 mbar. (b) FTIR spectra of isopropenyl, and methyl oxazoline deposited under the same conditions as well as a pristine methyl oxazoline precursor.
Materials 12 00191 g003
Materials 12 00191 g004
Figure 4. Schematic illustrating the PPox deposition process (top) and its applications (bottom) for cell guidance surfaces, diagnostic devices and low fouling properties. The left images illustrate the biocompatible nature of PPOx coating on which multiple cell types including human dermal fibroblast and kidney stem cells proliferate as successfully as on tissue culture plate. The middle schematic illustrates the reaction occurring between PPOx and biomolecule with COOH function and how this biofunctionalisation is used for the selective capture of cancer cells. The right-hand side shows the inhibited proliferation of biofilm on PPOx substrates as well as the decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 secretion, which together makes PPOx a suitable candidate for implant coatings.
Figure 4. Schematic illustrating the PPox deposition process (top) and its applications (bottom) for cell guidance surfaces, diagnostic devices and low fouling properties. The left images illustrate the biocompatible nature of PPOx coating on which multiple cell types including human dermal fibroblast and kidney stem cells proliferate as successfully as on tissue culture plate. The middle schematic illustrates the reaction occurring between PPOx and biomolecule with COOH function and how this biofunctionalisation is used for the selective capture of cancer cells. The right-hand side shows the inhibited proliferation of biofilm on PPOx substrates as well as the decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 secretion, which together makes PPOx a suitable candidate for implant coatings.
Materials 12 00191 g004
Table 1. Examples of common organic precursors used to prepare plasma-deposited film with different surface chemistry.
Table 1. Examples of common organic precursors used to prepare plasma-deposited film with different surface chemistry.
PrecursorChemical FormulaSurface FunctionalityRef.
Acrylic acidMaterials 12 00191 i001carboxyl[55,56,57]
AllylalcoholMaterials 12 00191 i002hydroxyl[58,59,60]
EthanlolMaterials 12 00191 i003
AllylamineMaterials 12 00191 i004Amine, amide[61,62,63,64]
Allylglycidyl etherMaterials 12 00191 i005Epoxy[65,66]
Glycidyl methacrylate Materials 12 00191 i006
AlkyloxazolineMaterials 12 00191 i007Oxazoline, amine, amide[41,42]
Ethylene
diamine		Materials 12 00191 i008Amine, amide[67,68,69,70]
AlkylamineMaterials 12 00191 i009
PropanalMaterials 12 00191 i010Aldehyde[40,71,72,73]
1,7-octadieneMaterials 12 00191 i011Alkyl[56]
perfluoroocataneMaterials 12 00191 i012Fluoro[34]
PropanethiolMaterials 12 00191 i013Thiol[74,75]
Table 2. Plasma reactor specification and depositions condition ranges for the PPOx deposition studies conducted by Zanini et al. and Vasilev et al.
Table 2. Plasma reactor specification and depositions condition ranges for the PPOx deposition studies conducted by Zanini et al. and Vasilev et al.
Reactor and Deposition ParametersZanini et al.Vasilev et al.
Vacuum chamberStainless steelGlass
Chamber Diameter, cm3015
ElectrodeStainless steelBrass
Electrode Diameter, cm1510
Separation Distance, cm410
Monomer inputShowerhead, 2 mm pinholesSingle inlet, 5 mm
Radio frequency, MHz13.5613.56
Base pressure, Pa10−310−1
Working pressure, Pa61–3
Power range, W4–8010–50
Deposition time, min10–301–7

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Macgregor, M.; Vasilev, K. Perspective on Plasma Polymers for Applied Biomaterials Nanoengineering and the Recent Rise of Oxazolines. Materials 2019, 12, 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010191

AMA Style

Macgregor M, Vasilev K. Perspective on Plasma Polymers for Applied Biomaterials Nanoengineering and the Recent Rise of Oxazolines. Materials. 2019; 12(1):191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Macgregor, Melanie, and Krasimir Vasilev. 2019. "Perspective on Plasma Polymers for Applied Biomaterials Nanoengineering and the Recent Rise of Oxazolines" Materials 12, no. 1: 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010191

APA Style

Macgregor, M., & Vasilev, K. (2019). Perspective on Plasma Polymers for Applied Biomaterials Nanoengineering and the Recent Rise of Oxazolines. Materials, 12(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010191

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop