Next Article in Journal
Primary Care Use after Cancer Treatment: An Analysis of Linked Administrative Data
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Health and Budget Impact
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Economic Evaluation of Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer and Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Taxane and Trastuzumab–Based Treatment in Canada

1
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada;
2
Quadrant Health Economics Inc., Cambridge, ON, Canada
3
Hoffmann–La Roche Limited, Mississauga, ON, Canada
4
Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
5
F. Hoffmann–La Roche Limited, Basel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(6), 578-589; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6517
Submission received: 5 September 2020 / Revised: 8 October 2020 / Accepted: 9 November 2020 / Published: 1 December 2020

Abstract

Background: In the katherine trial, adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine [T-DM1, Kadcyla (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.)], compared with trastuzumab, significantly reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 50% (unstratified hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% confidence interval: 0.39 to 0.64; p < 0.0001) in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (ebc) and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment. A cost–utility evaluation, with probabilistic analyses, was conducted to examine the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life–year (qaly) gained associated with T-DM1 relative to trastuzumab, given the higher per-cycle cost of T-DM1. Methods: A Markov model comprising a number of health states was used to examine clinical and economic outcomes over a lifetime horizon from the Canadian public payer perspective. Patients entered the model in the invasive disease-free survival (idfs) state, where they received either T-DM1 or trastuzumab. Transition probabilities between the health states were derived from the katherine trial, Canadian life tables, and published literature from other relevant clinical trials (emilia, cleopatra, and M77001). Resource use, costs, and utilities were derived from katherine, other clinical trials, published literature, provincial fee schedules, and clinical expert opinion. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for key assumptions and model parameters. Results: Compared with trastuzumab, adjuvant T-DM1 was associated with a cost savings of $8,300 per patient and a 2.16 incremental qaly gain; thus T-DM1 dominated trastuzumab. Scenario analyses yielded similar results, with T-DM1 dominating trastuzumab or producing highly favourable incremental cost–utility ratios of less than $10,000 per qaly. Conclusions: Adjuvant T-DM1 monotherapy is a cost-effective strategy compared with trastuzumab alone in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive ebc and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment.
Keywords: early breast cancer; trastuzumab emtansine; cost-utility analyses; economic evaluations; adjuvant HER2-positive therapy early breast cancer; trastuzumab emtansine; cost-utility analyses; economic evaluations; adjuvant HER2-positive therapy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Younis, T.; Lee, A.; Coombes, M.E.; Bouganim, N.; Becker, D.; Revil, C.; Jhuti, G.S. Economic Evaluation of Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer and Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Taxane and Trastuzumab–Based Treatment in Canada. Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27, 578-589. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6517

AMA Style

Younis T, Lee A, Coombes ME, Bouganim N, Becker D, Revil C, Jhuti GS. Economic Evaluation of Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer and Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Taxane and Trastuzumab–Based Treatment in Canada. Current Oncology. 2020; 27(6):578-589. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6517

Chicago/Turabian Style

Younis, T., A. Lee, M. E. Coombes, N. Bouganim, D. Becker, C. Revil, and G. S. Jhuti. 2020. "Economic Evaluation of Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer and Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Taxane and Trastuzumab–Based Treatment in Canada" Current Oncology 27, no. 6: 578-589. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6517

APA Style

Younis, T., Lee, A., Coombes, M. E., Bouganim, N., Becker, D., Revil, C., & Jhuti, G. S. (2020). Economic Evaluation of Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer and Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Taxane and Trastuzumab–Based Treatment in Canada. Current Oncology, 27(6), 578-589. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6517

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop