You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Current Oncology
  • Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
  • Article
  • Open Access

1 August 2020

Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Endometrial Cancer

,
,
,
and
1
Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
2
Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
3
Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in malignancy is associated with poor outcomes. We conducted a retrospective review of VTE in patients with endometrial cancer to characterize the VTE incidence, identify factors that contribute to VTE risk, and compare survival outcomes in patients with and without VTE. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified 422 eligible patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer (1 January 2014 to 31 July 2016). The primary outcome was VTE. Binary logistic regression identified risk factors for VTE; significant risk factors were included in a multivariate analysis. Kaplan–Meier estimates are reported, and log rank tests were used to compare the Kaplan–Meier curves. Risk-adjusted estimates for overall survival based on VTE were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The incidence of VTE was 6.16% overall and 0.7% within 60 days postoperatively. Non-endometrioid histology, stages 3 and 4 disease, laparotomy, and age (p < 0.1) were identified as factors associated with VTE and were included in a multivariate analysis. The overall death rate in patients with VTE was 42% (9% without VTE): hazard ratio, 5.63; 95% confidence interval, 2.86 to 11.08; p < 0.0001. Adjusting for age, stage of disease, and histology, risk of death remained significant for patients with a VTE: hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 4.42; p = 0.0271. Conclusions: A method to identify patients with endometrial cancer who are at high risk for VTE is important, given the implications of VTE for patient outcomes and the frequency of endometrial cancer diagnoses. Factors identified in our study might assist in the recognition of such patients.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.