Next Article in Journal
Impact of Spleen-Preserving Total Gastrectomy on Postoperative Infectious Complications and 5-Year Overall Survival: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Clinical Trials
Previous Article in Journal
Dignity and Its Influencing Factors in Patients with Cancer in North China: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Surgical Attitudes toward Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

by
Som D. Mukherjee
1,*,
N. Hodgson
1,2,
P.J. Lovrics
3,
K. Dhamanaskar
2,
S. Chambers
4 and
J. Sussman
1,4
1
Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
2
Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
3
St. Joseph’s Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
4
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26(2), 194-201; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4227
Submission received: 5 January 2019 / Revised: 2 February 2019 / Accepted: 9 March 2019 / Published: 1 April 2019

Abstract

Background: Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (mri) is commonly requested by surgeons in the initial workup of women with breast cancer; however, its use is controversial. We performed a survey of breast cancer surgeons across Canada to investigate current knowledge about, attitudes to, and self-reported use of preoperative breast mri in a publicly funded health care system in light of the limited evidence to support it. Methods: All identified general surgeons in Canada were mailed a survey instrument designed to probe current practice and knowledge of published trials. Results: Of 403 responding surgeons, 233 (58%) indicated that they performed breast cancer surgery. Of those 233, 218 (94%) had access to breast mri and completed the entire survey. Overall, 54.6% of responding surgeons felt that breast mri was useful in surgical planning, and more than half (58.3%) indicated that their frequency of use was likely to increase over the next 5 years. Surgeons found preoperative mri most useful in detecting mammographically occult disease (71.5% of respondents) and in planning for breast-conserving surgery (57.3%). The main limitations reported were timely access to mri (51%) and false positives (36.7%). Responses suggest a knowledge gap in awareness of published trials in breast mri. Conclusions: Our study found that, in early-stage breast cancer, self-reported use of mri by breast cancer surgeons in Canada varied widely. Reported indications did not align with published data, and significant gaps in self-reported knowledge of the data were evident. Our results would support the development and dissemination of guidelines to optimize use of mri.
Keywords: preoperative assessment; breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging preoperative assessment; breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mukherjee, S.D.; Hodgson, N.; Lovrics, P.J.; Dhamanaskar, K.; Chambers, S.; Sussman, J. Surgical Attitudes toward Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 194-201. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4227

AMA Style

Mukherjee SD, Hodgson N, Lovrics PJ, Dhamanaskar K, Chambers S, Sussman J. Surgical Attitudes toward Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Current Oncology. 2019; 26(2):194-201. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mukherjee, Som D., N. Hodgson, P.J. Lovrics, K. Dhamanaskar, S. Chambers, and J. Sussman. 2019. "Surgical Attitudes toward Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer" Current Oncology 26, no. 2: 194-201. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4227

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop