You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Current Oncology
  • Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
  • Article
  • Open Access

1 August 2018

Adherence to Guidelines in Requesting Oncotype DX in a Publicly Funded Health Care System

,
,
,
and
1
Département d’hémato-oncologie, cisss Montérégie centre/ Hôpital Charles-Lemoyne, centre affilié de l’Université de Sherbrooke, Greenfield Park, QC J4V 2H1, Canada
2
Department of Medical Oncology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
3
Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
4
Département de chirurgie, cisss Montérégie centre/Hôpital Charles-Lemoyne, centre affilié de l’Université de Sherbrooke, Greenfield Park, QC, Canada

Abstract

Background: Oncotype DX [ODX (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA, U.S.A.)] is an approved prognostic tool for women with node-negative, hormone receptor–positive, her2-negative breast cancer. Because of cost, optimal use of this test is crucial, especially in a publicly funded health care system. We evaluated adherence with our provincial guidelines for ODX requests, the management of patients with an intermediate recurrence score (RS), and the cost impact of ODX. Methods: This retrospective study included 201 consecutive patients with an ODX request from two university institutions in Quebec between May 2012 and December 2014. Concordance with provincial guidelines was estimated, with its 95% confidence interval (CI). For patients with an intermediate RS, factors influencing the final treatment decision were assessed. The cost impact of ODX was derived from the proportion of patients for whom chemotherapy was not recommended. Results: In 93.0% of patients (95% CI: 89.5% to 96.6%), ODX was ordered according to guidelines. The concordance was similar in both institutions (92.7%; 95% CI: 88.1% to 97.3%; and 93.6%; 95% CI: 88.2% to 99.0%). In 112 (55.7%), 78 (38.8%), and 9 (4.5%) patients, the RS suggested low, intermediate, and high risk respectively. In the intermediate-risk group, most patients (n = 58, 74.4%) did not receive chemotherapy, mainly because of patient preference and the absence of a clear proven benefit. Savings of CA$100,000 for the study period (2.5 years) were estimated to be associated with ODX use. Conclusions: In our experience, the use of ODX was concordant with published recommendations and had a positive cost impact.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.