You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Current Oncology
  • Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
  • Article
  • Open Access

1 December 2014

Braf Mutation Correlates with Recurrent Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Chinese Patients

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Shanghai Key Laboratory for Endocrine Tumors, Shanghai Clinical Center for Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, and Shanghai e-Institute for Endocrinology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
2
Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
3
Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
4
Laboratory for Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases of Institute of Health Science, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, and Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated correlations of somatic BRAF V600E mutation and RET/PTC1 rearrangement with recurrent disease in Chinese patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Methods: This prospective study included 214 patients with PTC histologically confirmed between November 2009 and May 2011 at a single institute. Results: We found somatic BRAF V600E mutation in 68.7% and RET/PTC1 rearrangement in 25.7% of the patients. Although BRAF mutation was not significantly associated with clinicopathologic features such as patient sex or age, multicentric disease, thyroid capsule invasion, tumour stage, or nodal metastasis, it was significantly associated with recurrent disease. Multivariate analysis revealed that BRAF mutation and tumour size were independent risk factors associated with recurrent disease, with odds ratios of 9.072 and 2.387 respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased 8.3% when BRAF mutation was added to the traditional prognostic factors, but that effect was statistically nonsignificant (0.663 vs. 0.746, p = 0.124). RET/PTC1 rearrangement and nodal metastasis were significantly associated in all patients (p = 0.042), marginally associated in PTC patients (p = 0.051), but not associated in microPTC patients (p = 0.700). RET/PTC1 rearrangement was not significantly associated with recurrent disease. Conclusions: BRAF positivity is an independent predictor of recurrent disease in PTC.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.