A Legal Right to Die: Responding to Slippery Slope and Abuse Arguments
Philosophy Department, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
Curr. Oncol. 2011, 18(5), 206-207; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i5.923
Submission received: 4 August 2011
/
Accepted: 7 September 2011
/
Published: 1 October 2011
Excerpt
Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.
To be forced to continue living a life that one deems intolerable when there are doctors who are willing either to end one’s life or to assist one in ending one’s own life, is an unspeakable violation of an individual’s freedom to live—and to die—as he or she sees fit.[...]
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Benatar, D. A Legal Right to Die: Responding to Slippery Slope and Abuse Arguments. Curr. Oncol. 2011, 18, 206-207. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i5.923
AMA Style
Benatar D. A Legal Right to Die: Responding to Slippery Slope and Abuse Arguments. Current Oncology. 2011; 18(5):206-207. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i5.923
Chicago/Turabian StyleBenatar, D. 2011. "A Legal Right to Die: Responding to Slippery Slope and Abuse Arguments" Current Oncology 18, no. 5: 206-207. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i5.923
