You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Current Oncology
  • Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
  • Review
  • Open Access

1 January 2009

The Role of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as Therapy for Advanced, Metastatic, and Recurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Canadian National Consensus Statement

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Juravinski Canc Ctr, 699 Concess St, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
2
QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Cancer Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
3
BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
4
Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: To provide consensus recommendations on the use of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIS) in patients with advanced or meta-static non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Using a systematic literature search, phase II trials, randomized phase III trials, and meta-analyses were identified for inclusion. Results: A total of forty-six trials were included. Clear evidence is available that EGFR-TKIS should not be administered concurrently with platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic NSCLC . Evidence is currently insufficient to recommend single-agent EGFR-TKIS as first-line therapy either in unselected populations or in populations selected on the basis of molecular or clinical characteristics. Following failure of platinum-based chemotherapy, the evidence suggests that second-line EGFR-TKIS or second-line chemotherapy result in similar survival. Quality of life and symptom improvement for patients treated with an EGFR-TKI appear better than they do for patients treated with second-line docetaxel. Sequence of therapy may not appear to be important, but if survival is the outcome of interest, the goal should be to optimize the number of patients receiving three lines of therapy. Based on available data, molecular markers and clinical characteristics do not appear to be predictive of a differential survival benefit from an EGFR-TKI and therefore those factors should not be used to select patients for EGFR-TKI therapy. Conclusions: The EGFR-TKIS represent an additional therapy in the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC. The results of ongoing clinical trials may define the optimal role for these agents and the effectiveness of combinations of these agents with other targeted agents.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.